Does every program in Java require a class?Is it possible to have a java program with just import statementClass, interface or enum expected (Java)Does every Java .class file contain a public class?Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?Does a finally block always get executed in Java?Java inner class and static nested classFastest way to determine if an integer's square root is an integerHow do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?Comparing Java enum members: == or equals()?What is a JavaBean exactly?Creating a memory leak with JavaStatic Classes In JavaWhy don't Java's +=, -=, *=, /= compound assignment operators require casting?

What makes Ada the language of choice for the ISS's safety-critical systems?

Is using haveibeenpwned to validate password strength rational?

Logarithm of exponential

Would the US government be able to hold control if all electronics were disabled for an indefinite amount of time?

How can this tool find out registered domains from an IP?

Do simulator games use a realistic trajectory to get into orbit?

Universal hash functions with homomorphic XOR property

Why doesn't Adrian Toomes give up Spider-Man's identity?

How to return a security deposit to a tenant

Why was the Sega Genesis marketed as a 16-bit console?

Should an arbiter claim draw at a K+R vs K+R endgame?

What is the `some` keyword in SwiftUI?

Why didn't Voldemort recognize that Dumbledore was affected by his curse?

SOQL Not Recognizing Field?

How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?

Confusion around using "des" in sentences

What can I, as a user, do about offensive reviews in App Store?

How to construct an hbox with negative height?

How come the nude protesters were not arrested?

Winning Strategy for the Magician and his Apprentice

What ways have you found to get edits from non-LaTeX users?

Is counterpoint still used today?

Overlapping String-Blocks

Why would future John risk sending back a T-800 to save his younger self?



Does every program in Java require a class?


Is it possible to have a java program with just import statementClass, interface or enum expected (Java)Does every Java .class file contain a public class?Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?Does a finally block always get executed in Java?Java inner class and static nested classFastest way to determine if an integer's square root is an integerHow do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?Comparing Java enum members: == or equals()?What is a JavaBean exactly?Creating a memory leak with JavaStatic Classes In JavaWhy don't Java's +=, -=, *=, /= compound assignment operators require casting?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








8
















Every Java program requires the
presence of at least one class.




Is the above statement always true ?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Always true, for core and enterprise Java and every other kind as well.

    – duffymo
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






  • 3





    You need Object and String to load before you can load an empty mian(String[]) method, that makes three ;)

    – Peter Lawrey
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:07






  • 1





    @Peter: It's somewhere around 200 classes from the java.* package; see my updated answer.

    – Sanjay T. Sharma
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:20

















8
















Every Java program requires the
presence of at least one class.




Is the above statement always true ?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Always true, for core and enterprise Java and every other kind as well.

    – duffymo
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






  • 3





    You need Object and String to load before you can load an empty mian(String[]) method, that makes three ;)

    – Peter Lawrey
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:07






  • 1





    @Peter: It's somewhere around 200 classes from the java.* package; see my updated answer.

    – Sanjay T. Sharma
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:20













8












8








8


3







Every Java program requires the
presence of at least one class.




Is the above statement always true ?










share|improve this question

















Every Java program requires the
presence of at least one class.




Is the above statement always true ?







java






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 4 '17 at 10:35









Ani Menon

16.7k106187




16.7k106187










asked Mar 5 '11 at 14:27









TonyTony

55751326




55751326







  • 2





    Always true, for core and enterprise Java and every other kind as well.

    – duffymo
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






  • 3





    You need Object and String to load before you can load an empty mian(String[]) method, that makes three ;)

    – Peter Lawrey
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:07






  • 1





    @Peter: It's somewhere around 200 classes from the java.* package; see my updated answer.

    – Sanjay T. Sharma
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:20












  • 2





    Always true, for core and enterprise Java and every other kind as well.

    – duffymo
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






  • 3





    You need Object and String to load before you can load an empty mian(String[]) method, that makes three ;)

    – Peter Lawrey
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:07






  • 1





    @Peter: It's somewhere around 200 classes from the java.* package; see my updated answer.

    – Sanjay T. Sharma
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:20







2




2





Always true, for core and enterprise Java and every other kind as well.

– duffymo
Mar 5 '11 at 14:30





Always true, for core and enterprise Java and every other kind as well.

– duffymo
Mar 5 '11 at 14:30




3




3





You need Object and String to load before you can load an empty mian(String[]) method, that makes three ;)

– Peter Lawrey
Mar 5 '11 at 15:07





You need Object and String to load before you can load an empty mian(String[]) method, that makes three ;)

– Peter Lawrey
Mar 5 '11 at 15:07




1




1





@Peter: It's somewhere around 200 classes from the java.* package; see my updated answer.

– Sanjay T. Sharma
Mar 5 '11 at 15:20





@Peter: It's somewhere around 200 classes from the java.* package; see my updated answer.

– Sanjay T. Sharma
Mar 5 '11 at 15:20












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















21














Yes, you need at least one class to have a program, but no, you do not need any methods (contrary to some other answers).



The reason you need a class is because in Java, all code is inside classes. So to have any code, you need a class. However, code doesn't necessarily need to be in a method. It can also be in initializers. So, here is a complete Java program with no methods:



class LookMaNoMethods 
static
System.out.println("Hello, world!");
System.exit(0);




And that gives...



$ javac LookMaNoMethods.java 
$ java LookMaNoMethods
Hello, world!
$


EDIT : From Java 7 the above code with just static block and no main method does not produce any output. Main method is now compulsory. The code with no main method compiles successfully though.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

    – Matti Virkkunen
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:53






  • 1





    The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

    – Boris
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:05






  • 5





    This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

    – Paŭlo Ebermann
    Mar 5 '11 at 17:21











  • @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

    – rlibby
    Mar 5 '11 at 21:43


















8














From the JVM's point of view; yes. From a programmers view point, it can be a Class or an Enum.



public enum AAA 

AAA;

public static void main(final String[] args)
System.out.println("H");





EDIT: Even if you have a class with empty main method, there are a lot of core classes which work behind the scene to just run the "empty" class of yours. A list of those classes (around 200 from the java.* package) can be viewed by setting the -verbose:class JVM parameter.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Java enums are weird.

    – Matti Virkkunen
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:39






  • 2





    But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

    – duffymo
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:45


















7














A program requires an entry point. An entry point has to be a method. In Java, every method must be contained in a class.



That would imply that every program must have a at least one class.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

    – rlibby
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:48


















3














Yes. In Java you always need one class with the function main to have the JRE run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:29











  • Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

    – Konerak
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






  • 1





    Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

    – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
    Mar 5 '11 at 14:33






  • 1





    @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

    – duffymo
    Mar 5 '11 at 15:46











  • @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 5 '11 at 22:00


















1














yes , you need minimum one class.






share|improve this answer
































    -1














    JAVA required at least one class in a program because at the time of execution of Java programs we needed to provide the name of a class which contains the main () method.

    so, it is compulsory to provide at least one class name to Java programs.
    ex--->`



    class Test 

    public static void main(String [] args)

    System.out.println("Hello World");




    so, javac _____ ("Here we have to give the name of java program in which we save")



    java ______ ("Provide the name of a class which contain the main() method")



    ----->
    according to our program



    javac Hello (here I save the program name by Hello.java)



    java Test (because Test class contains main() method)



    Thank You






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f5204385%2fdoes-every-program-in-java-require-a-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      21














      Yes, you need at least one class to have a program, but no, you do not need any methods (contrary to some other answers).



      The reason you need a class is because in Java, all code is inside classes. So to have any code, you need a class. However, code doesn't necessarily need to be in a method. It can also be in initializers. So, here is a complete Java program with no methods:



      class LookMaNoMethods 
      static
      System.out.println("Hello, world!");
      System.exit(0);




      And that gives...



      $ javac LookMaNoMethods.java 
      $ java LookMaNoMethods
      Hello, world!
      $


      EDIT : From Java 7 the above code with just static block and no main method does not produce any output. Main method is now compulsory. The code with no main method compiles successfully though.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:53






      • 1





        The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

        – Boris
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:05






      • 5





        This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

        – Paŭlo Ebermann
        Mar 5 '11 at 17:21











      • @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 21:43















      21














      Yes, you need at least one class to have a program, but no, you do not need any methods (contrary to some other answers).



      The reason you need a class is because in Java, all code is inside classes. So to have any code, you need a class. However, code doesn't necessarily need to be in a method. It can also be in initializers. So, here is a complete Java program with no methods:



      class LookMaNoMethods 
      static
      System.out.println("Hello, world!");
      System.exit(0);




      And that gives...



      $ javac LookMaNoMethods.java 
      $ java LookMaNoMethods
      Hello, world!
      $


      EDIT : From Java 7 the above code with just static block and no main method does not produce any output. Main method is now compulsory. The code with no main method compiles successfully though.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:53






      • 1





        The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

        – Boris
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:05






      • 5





        This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

        – Paŭlo Ebermann
        Mar 5 '11 at 17:21











      • @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 21:43













      21












      21








      21







      Yes, you need at least one class to have a program, but no, you do not need any methods (contrary to some other answers).



      The reason you need a class is because in Java, all code is inside classes. So to have any code, you need a class. However, code doesn't necessarily need to be in a method. It can also be in initializers. So, here is a complete Java program with no methods:



      class LookMaNoMethods 
      static
      System.out.println("Hello, world!");
      System.exit(0);




      And that gives...



      $ javac LookMaNoMethods.java 
      $ java LookMaNoMethods
      Hello, world!
      $


      EDIT : From Java 7 the above code with just static block and no main method does not produce any output. Main method is now compulsory. The code with no main method compiles successfully though.






      share|improve this answer















      Yes, you need at least one class to have a program, but no, you do not need any methods (contrary to some other answers).



      The reason you need a class is because in Java, all code is inside classes. So to have any code, you need a class. However, code doesn't necessarily need to be in a method. It can also be in initializers. So, here is a complete Java program with no methods:



      class LookMaNoMethods 
      static
      System.out.println("Hello, world!");
      System.exit(0);




      And that gives...



      $ javac LookMaNoMethods.java 
      $ java LookMaNoMethods
      Hello, world!
      $


      EDIT : From Java 7 the above code with just static block and no main method does not produce any output. Main method is now compulsory. The code with no main method compiles successfully though.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Feb 23 '16 at 12:15









      Nirmit Srivastava

      563623




      563623










      answered Mar 5 '11 at 14:41









      rlibbyrlibby

      5,4081524




      5,4081524







      • 1





        Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:53






      • 1





        The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

        – Boris
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:05






      • 5





        This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

        – Paŭlo Ebermann
        Mar 5 '11 at 17:21











      • @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 21:43












      • 1





        Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:53






      • 1





        The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

        – Boris
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:05






      • 5





        This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

        – Paŭlo Ebermann
        Mar 5 '11 at 17:21











      • @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 21:43







      1




      1





      Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

      – Matti Virkkunen
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:53





      Interesting. A class with a static initializer is a valid program, even though there is no main method, which is then again required if there is no static initializer. I wonder what the standard says exactly about the requirement for an entry point.

      – Matti Virkkunen
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:53




      1




      1





      The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

      – Boris
      Mar 5 '11 at 15:05





      The static-block is implemented as special kind of method internally ("<cinit>"). At least AFAIK. But still a good answer, I never was aware that you could start a method without a main(), too... Nice to know.

      – Boris
      Mar 5 '11 at 15:05




      5




      5





      This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

      – Paŭlo Ebermann
      Mar 5 '11 at 17:21





      This program works only because the static initializer invokes System.exit() before the error message about a missing main method can be shown.

      – Paŭlo Ebermann
      Mar 5 '11 at 17:21













      @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

      – rlibby
      Mar 5 '11 at 21:43





      @Paŭlo Ebermann, yes, that's correct, but it is still orderly, not a race. The class is obviously loaded before any attempt to invoke main.

      – rlibby
      Mar 5 '11 at 21:43













      8














      From the JVM's point of view; yes. From a programmers view point, it can be a Class or an Enum.



      public enum AAA 

      AAA;

      public static void main(final String[] args)
      System.out.println("H");





      EDIT: Even if you have a class with empty main method, there are a lot of core classes which work behind the scene to just run the "empty" class of yours. A list of those classes (around 200 from the java.* package) can be viewed by setting the -verbose:class JVM parameter.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        Java enums are weird.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:39






      • 2





        But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:45















      8














      From the JVM's point of view; yes. From a programmers view point, it can be a Class or an Enum.



      public enum AAA 

      AAA;

      public static void main(final String[] args)
      System.out.println("H");





      EDIT: Even if you have a class with empty main method, there are a lot of core classes which work behind the scene to just run the "empty" class of yours. A list of those classes (around 200 from the java.* package) can be viewed by setting the -verbose:class JVM parameter.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        Java enums are weird.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:39






      • 2





        But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:45













      8












      8








      8







      From the JVM's point of view; yes. From a programmers view point, it can be a Class or an Enum.



      public enum AAA 

      AAA;

      public static void main(final String[] args)
      System.out.println("H");





      EDIT: Even if you have a class with empty main method, there are a lot of core classes which work behind the scene to just run the "empty" class of yours. A list of those classes (around 200 from the java.* package) can be viewed by setting the -verbose:class JVM parameter.






      share|improve this answer















      From the JVM's point of view; yes. From a programmers view point, it can be a Class or an Enum.



      public enum AAA 

      AAA;

      public static void main(final String[] args)
      System.out.println("H");





      EDIT: Even if you have a class with empty main method, there are a lot of core classes which work behind the scene to just run the "empty" class of yours. A list of those classes (around 200 from the java.* package) can be viewed by setting the -verbose:class JVM parameter.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 5 '11 at 15:20

























      answered Mar 5 '11 at 14:35









      Sanjay T. SharmaSanjay T. Sharma

      19.9k34765




      19.9k34765







      • 1





        Java enums are weird.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:39






      • 2





        But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:45












      • 1





        Java enums are weird.

        – Matti Virkkunen
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:39






      • 2





        But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:45







      1




      1





      Java enums are weird.

      – Matti Virkkunen
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:39





      Java enums are weird.

      – Matti Virkkunen
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:39




      2




      2





      But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

      – duffymo
      Mar 5 '11 at 15:45





      But an Enum is a class: download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Enum.html. The new keyword is syntactic sugar that hides the class keyword.

      – duffymo
      Mar 5 '11 at 15:45











      7














      A program requires an entry point. An entry point has to be a method. In Java, every method must be contained in a class.



      That would imply that every program must have a at least one class.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:48















      7














      A program requires an entry point. An entry point has to be a method. In Java, every method must be contained in a class.



      That would imply that every program must have a at least one class.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:48













      7












      7








      7







      A program requires an entry point. An entry point has to be a method. In Java, every method must be contained in a class.



      That would imply that every program must have a at least one class.






      share|improve this answer













      A program requires an entry point. An entry point has to be a method. In Java, every method must be contained in a class.



      That would imply that every program must have a at least one class.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 5 '11 at 14:29









      Matti VirkkunenMatti Virkkunen

      53.1k6100138




      53.1k6100138







      • 1





        This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:48












      • 1





        This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

        – rlibby
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:48







      1




      1





      This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

      – rlibby
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:48





      This is a very reasonable answer, but "an entry point has to be a method" is not completely true. See my answer for an entry point that is not a method.

      – rlibby
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:48











      3














      Yes. In Java you always need one class with the function main to have the JRE run it.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 3





        This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:29











      • Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

        – Konerak
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






      • 1





        Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

        – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:33






      • 1





        @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:46











      • @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 22:00















      3














      Yes. In Java you always need one class with the function main to have the JRE run it.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 3





        This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:29











      • Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

        – Konerak
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






      • 1





        Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

        – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:33






      • 1





        @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:46











      • @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 22:00













      3












      3








      3







      Yes. In Java you always need one class with the function main to have the JRE run it.






      share|improve this answer













      Yes. In Java you always need one class with the function main to have the JRE run it.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 5 '11 at 14:28









      KonerakKonerak

      33.4k980109




      33.4k980109







      • 3





        This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:29











      • Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

        – Konerak
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






      • 1





        Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

        – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:33






      • 1





        @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:46











      • @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 22:00












      • 3





        This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:29











      • Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

        – Konerak
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:30






      • 1





        Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

        – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
        Mar 5 '11 at 14:33






      • 1





        @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

        – duffymo
        Mar 5 '11 at 15:46











      • @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

        – Konrad Rudolph
        Mar 5 '11 at 22:00







      3




      3





      This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:29





      This isn’t the reason. Ruby too is object oriented but it doesn’t need any class. The reason is just “because”.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:29













      Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

      – Konerak
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:30





      Hmm I agree the implication is not true. How about 'sun wants it so?'/.

      – Konerak
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:30




      1




      1





      Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

      – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:33





      Groovy (obviously built on top of JVM) does not require any classes to run. But the generated bytecode defines classes behind the scenes.

      – Tomasz Nurkiewicz
      Mar 5 '11 at 14:33




      1




      1





      @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

      – duffymo
      Mar 5 '11 at 15:46





      @Konrad - the statement wasn't that all object-oriented languages require a class, only Java. And other languages that have functions as first-class objects, unlike Java, might appear to allow functions as entry points, but they're still classes underneath.

      – duffymo
      Mar 5 '11 at 15:46













      @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      Mar 5 '11 at 22:00





      @duffymo Well, it was before @Konerak changed the answer. The current answer is correct.

      – Konrad Rudolph
      Mar 5 '11 at 22:00











      1














      yes , you need minimum one class.






      share|improve this answer





























        1














        yes , you need minimum one class.






        share|improve this answer



























          1












          1








          1







          yes , you need minimum one class.






          share|improve this answer















          yes , you need minimum one class.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 14 '12 at 15:23









          Jacob Schoen

          10.2k156997




          10.2k156997










          answered Mar 6 '11 at 5:33









          stinepikestinepike

          44.3k1381103




          44.3k1381103





















              -1














              JAVA required at least one class in a program because at the time of execution of Java programs we needed to provide the name of a class which contains the main () method.

              so, it is compulsory to provide at least one class name to Java programs.
              ex--->`



              class Test 

              public static void main(String [] args)

              System.out.println("Hello World");




              so, javac _____ ("Here we have to give the name of java program in which we save")



              java ______ ("Provide the name of a class which contain the main() method")



              ----->
              according to our program



              javac Hello (here I save the program name by Hello.java)



              java Test (because Test class contains main() method)



              Thank You






              share|improve this answer





























                -1














                JAVA required at least one class in a program because at the time of execution of Java programs we needed to provide the name of a class which contains the main () method.

                so, it is compulsory to provide at least one class name to Java programs.
                ex--->`



                class Test 

                public static void main(String [] args)

                System.out.println("Hello World");




                so, javac _____ ("Here we have to give the name of java program in which we save")



                java ______ ("Provide the name of a class which contain the main() method")



                ----->
                according to our program



                javac Hello (here I save the program name by Hello.java)



                java Test (because Test class contains main() method)



                Thank You






                share|improve this answer



























                  -1












                  -1








                  -1







                  JAVA required at least one class in a program because at the time of execution of Java programs we needed to provide the name of a class which contains the main () method.

                  so, it is compulsory to provide at least one class name to Java programs.
                  ex--->`



                  class Test 

                  public static void main(String [] args)

                  System.out.println("Hello World");




                  so, javac _____ ("Here we have to give the name of java program in which we save")



                  java ______ ("Provide the name of a class which contain the main() method")



                  ----->
                  according to our program



                  javac Hello (here I save the program name by Hello.java)



                  java Test (because Test class contains main() method)



                  Thank You






                  share|improve this answer















                  JAVA required at least one class in a program because at the time of execution of Java programs we needed to provide the name of a class which contains the main () method.

                  so, it is compulsory to provide at least one class name to Java programs.
                  ex--->`



                  class Test 

                  public static void main(String [] args)

                  System.out.println("Hello World");




                  so, javac _____ ("Here we have to give the name of java program in which we save")



                  java ______ ("Provide the name of a class which contain the main() method")



                  ----->
                  according to our program



                  javac Hello (here I save the program name by Hello.java)



                  java Test (because Test class contains main() method)



                  Thank You







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 24 at 17:18

























                  answered Mar 24 at 17:00









                  JATIN BEHUNEJATIN BEHUNE

                  12




                  12



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f5204385%2fdoes-every-program-in-java-require-a-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

                      Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript