How to combine query results?Select columns from result set of stored procedureInsert results of a stored procedure into a temporary tableHow to pass “Null” (a real surname!) to a SOAP web service in ActionScript 3?ColdFusion CFchart and feedback formColdfusion query weird charactersColdFusion <cfselect> binding ErrorSQL query multiple tables, with multiple joins and column field with comma separated listHow to return multiple results from a stored procedure in a CFC?CFMail sending to first recipient of query result onlyHow to combine/merger two separate queries into one?

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

Closed-form expression for certain product

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

How could a planet have erratic days?

Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Does the Location of Line-Dash-Wedge Notations Matter?

What was the exact wording from Ivanhoe of this advice on how to free yourself from slavery?

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?

L1 and Ln cache: when are they written?

What is Cash Advance APR?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Loading commands from file

Not using 's' for he/she/it

How to indicate a cut out for a product window

Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?

Biological Blimps: Propulsion



How to combine query results?


Select columns from result set of stored procedureInsert results of a stored procedure into a temporary tableHow to pass “Null” (a real surname!) to a SOAP web service in ActionScript 3?ColdFusion CFchart and feedback formColdfusion query weird charactersColdFusion <cfselect> binding ErrorSQL query multiple tables, with multiple joins and column field with comma separated listHow to return multiple results from a stored procedure in a CFC?CFMail sending to first recipient of query result onlyHow to combine/merger two separate queries into one?













1















I have three queries that are tied together. The final output requires multiple loops over the queries. This way works just fine but seems very inefficient and too complex in my opinion. Here is what I have:



Query 1:



<cfquery name="qryTypes" datasource="#application.datasource#">
SELECT
t.type_id,
t.category_id,
c.category_name,
s.type_shortcode
FROM type t
INNER JOIN section s
ON s.type_id = t.type_id
INNER JOIN category c
ON c.category_id = t.category_id
WHERE t.rec_id = 45 -- This parameter is passed from form field.
ORDER BY s.type_name,c.category_name
</cfquery>


Query Types will produce this set of results:



4 11 SP PRES
4 12 CH PRES
4 13 MS PRES
4 14 XN PRES


Then loop over query Types and get the records from another query for each record that match:



Query 2:



<cfloop query="qryTypes">
<cfquery name="qryLocation" datasource=#application.datasource#>
SELECT l.location_id, l.spent_amount
FROM locations l
WHERE l.location_type = '#trim(category_name)#'
AND l.nofa_id = 45 -- This is form field
AND l.location_id = '#trim(category_id)##trim(type_id)#'
GROUP BY l.location_id,l.spent_amount
ORDER BY l.location_id ASC
</cfquery>

<cfset spent_total = arraySum(qryLocation['spent_amount']) />
<cfset amount_total = 0 />

<cfloop query="qryLocation">
<cfquery name="qryFunds" datasource=#application.datasource#>
SELECT sum(budget) AS budget
FROM funds f
WHERE f.location_id= '#qryLocation.location_id#'
AND nofa_id = 45
</cfquery>

<cfscript>
if(qryFunds.budgetgt 0)
amount_total = amount_total + qryFunds.budget;

</cfscript>
</cfloop>

<cfset GrandTotal = GrandTotal + spent_total />
<cfset GrandTotalad = GrandTotalad + amount_total />
</cfloop>


After the loops are completed this is result:



CATEGORY NAME SPENT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
SP 970927 89613
CH 4804 8759
MS 9922 21436
XN 39398 4602
Grand Total: 1025051 124410


Is there a good way to merge this together and have only one query instead of three queries and inner loops? I was wondering if this might be a good fit for a stored procedure and then do all data manipulations in there? If anyone have suggestions please let me know.










share|improve this question




























    1















    I have three queries that are tied together. The final output requires multiple loops over the queries. This way works just fine but seems very inefficient and too complex in my opinion. Here is what I have:



    Query 1:



    <cfquery name="qryTypes" datasource="#application.datasource#">
    SELECT
    t.type_id,
    t.category_id,
    c.category_name,
    s.type_shortcode
    FROM type t
    INNER JOIN section s
    ON s.type_id = t.type_id
    INNER JOIN category c
    ON c.category_id = t.category_id
    WHERE t.rec_id = 45 -- This parameter is passed from form field.
    ORDER BY s.type_name,c.category_name
    </cfquery>


    Query Types will produce this set of results:



    4 11 SP PRES
    4 12 CH PRES
    4 13 MS PRES
    4 14 XN PRES


    Then loop over query Types and get the records from another query for each record that match:



    Query 2:



    <cfloop query="qryTypes">
    <cfquery name="qryLocation" datasource=#application.datasource#>
    SELECT l.location_id, l.spent_amount
    FROM locations l
    WHERE l.location_type = '#trim(category_name)#'
    AND l.nofa_id = 45 -- This is form field
    AND l.location_id = '#trim(category_id)##trim(type_id)#'
    GROUP BY l.location_id,l.spent_amount
    ORDER BY l.location_id ASC
    </cfquery>

    <cfset spent_total = arraySum(qryLocation['spent_amount']) />
    <cfset amount_total = 0 />

    <cfloop query="qryLocation">
    <cfquery name="qryFunds" datasource=#application.datasource#>
    SELECT sum(budget) AS budget
    FROM funds f
    WHERE f.location_id= '#qryLocation.location_id#'
    AND nofa_id = 45
    </cfquery>

    <cfscript>
    if(qryFunds.budgetgt 0)
    amount_total = amount_total + qryFunds.budget;

    </cfscript>
    </cfloop>

    <cfset GrandTotal = GrandTotal + spent_total />
    <cfset GrandTotalad = GrandTotalad + amount_total />
    </cfloop>


    After the loops are completed this is result:



    CATEGORY NAME SPENT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
    SP 970927 89613
    CH 4804 8759
    MS 9922 21436
    XN 39398 4602
    Grand Total: 1025051 124410


    Is there a good way to merge this together and have only one query instead of three queries and inner loops? I was wondering if this might be a good fit for a stored procedure and then do all data manipulations in there? If anyone have suggestions please let me know.










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      I have three queries that are tied together. The final output requires multiple loops over the queries. This way works just fine but seems very inefficient and too complex in my opinion. Here is what I have:



      Query 1:



      <cfquery name="qryTypes" datasource="#application.datasource#">
      SELECT
      t.type_id,
      t.category_id,
      c.category_name,
      s.type_shortcode
      FROM type t
      INNER JOIN section s
      ON s.type_id = t.type_id
      INNER JOIN category c
      ON c.category_id = t.category_id
      WHERE t.rec_id = 45 -- This parameter is passed from form field.
      ORDER BY s.type_name,c.category_name
      </cfquery>


      Query Types will produce this set of results:



      4 11 SP PRES
      4 12 CH PRES
      4 13 MS PRES
      4 14 XN PRES


      Then loop over query Types and get the records from another query for each record that match:



      Query 2:



      <cfloop query="qryTypes">
      <cfquery name="qryLocation" datasource=#application.datasource#>
      SELECT l.location_id, l.spent_amount
      FROM locations l
      WHERE l.location_type = '#trim(category_name)#'
      AND l.nofa_id = 45 -- This is form field
      AND l.location_id = '#trim(category_id)##trim(type_id)#'
      GROUP BY l.location_id,l.spent_amount
      ORDER BY l.location_id ASC
      </cfquery>

      <cfset spent_total = arraySum(qryLocation['spent_amount']) />
      <cfset amount_total = 0 />

      <cfloop query="qryLocation">
      <cfquery name="qryFunds" datasource=#application.datasource#>
      SELECT sum(budget) AS budget
      FROM funds f
      WHERE f.location_id= '#qryLocation.location_id#'
      AND nofa_id = 45
      </cfquery>

      <cfscript>
      if(qryFunds.budgetgt 0)
      amount_total = amount_total + qryFunds.budget;

      </cfscript>
      </cfloop>

      <cfset GrandTotal = GrandTotal + spent_total />
      <cfset GrandTotalad = GrandTotalad + amount_total />
      </cfloop>


      After the loops are completed this is result:



      CATEGORY NAME SPENT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
      SP 970927 89613
      CH 4804 8759
      MS 9922 21436
      XN 39398 4602
      Grand Total: 1025051 124410


      Is there a good way to merge this together and have only one query instead of three queries and inner loops? I was wondering if this might be a good fit for a stored procedure and then do all data manipulations in there? If anyone have suggestions please let me know.










      share|improve this question
















      I have three queries that are tied together. The final output requires multiple loops over the queries. This way works just fine but seems very inefficient and too complex in my opinion. Here is what I have:



      Query 1:



      <cfquery name="qryTypes" datasource="#application.datasource#">
      SELECT
      t.type_id,
      t.category_id,
      c.category_name,
      s.type_shortcode
      FROM type t
      INNER JOIN section s
      ON s.type_id = t.type_id
      INNER JOIN category c
      ON c.category_id = t.category_id
      WHERE t.rec_id = 45 -- This parameter is passed from form field.
      ORDER BY s.type_name,c.category_name
      </cfquery>


      Query Types will produce this set of results:



      4 11 SP PRES
      4 12 CH PRES
      4 13 MS PRES
      4 14 XN PRES


      Then loop over query Types and get the records from another query for each record that match:



      Query 2:



      <cfloop query="qryTypes">
      <cfquery name="qryLocation" datasource=#application.datasource#>
      SELECT l.location_id, l.spent_amount
      FROM locations l
      WHERE l.location_type = '#trim(category_name)#'
      AND l.nofa_id = 45 -- This is form field
      AND l.location_id = '#trim(category_id)##trim(type_id)#'
      GROUP BY l.location_id,l.spent_amount
      ORDER BY l.location_id ASC
      </cfquery>

      <cfset spent_total = arraySum(qryLocation['spent_amount']) />
      <cfset amount_total = 0 />

      <cfloop query="qryLocation">
      <cfquery name="qryFunds" datasource=#application.datasource#>
      SELECT sum(budget) AS budget
      FROM funds f
      WHERE f.location_id= '#qryLocation.location_id#'
      AND nofa_id = 45
      </cfquery>

      <cfscript>
      if(qryFunds.budgetgt 0)
      amount_total = amount_total + qryFunds.budget;

      </cfscript>
      </cfloop>

      <cfset GrandTotal = GrandTotal + spent_total />
      <cfset GrandTotalad = GrandTotalad + amount_total />
      </cfloop>


      After the loops are completed this is result:



      CATEGORY NAME SPENT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
      SP 970927 89613
      CH 4804 8759
      MS 9922 21436
      XN 39398 4602
      Grand Total: 1025051 124410


      Is there a good way to merge this together and have only one query instead of three queries and inner loops? I was wondering if this might be a good fit for a stored procedure and then do all data manipulations in there? If anyone have suggestions please let me know.







      stored-procedures coldfusion sybase coldfusion-11






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      RRK

      13k41939




      13k41939










      asked 2 days ago









      espresso_coffeeespresso_coffee

      2,10752050




      2,10752050






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4















          • qryTypes returns X records


          • qryLocation returns Y records

          So far you've run (1 + X) queries.




          • qryFunds returns Z records

          Now you've run (1 + X)(Y) queries.



          The more data each returns, the more queries you'll run. Obviously not good.



          If all you want is the final totals for each category, in a stored procedure, you could create a temp table with the joined data from qryTypes and qryLocation. Then your last qryFunds is just joined against that temp table data.



          SELECT 
          sum(budget) AS budget
          FROM
          funds f
          INNER JOIN
          #TEMP_TABLE t ON t.location_id = f.location_id
          AND
          nofa_id = 45


          You could then get other sums off the temp table if needed. It's possible this could all be worked into a single query, but maybe this helps you get there.



          Also, a stored procedure can return multiple record sets, so you can have one return the aggregated table amount data and a 2nd return the grand total. This would keep all the calculations on the database and no need for CF to be involved.






          share|improve this answer























          • I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

            – Shawn
            yesterday











          • qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

            – Adrian J. Moreno
            yesterday












          • "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

            – Shawn
            20 hours ago










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55281248%2fhow-to-combine-query-results%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4















          • qryTypes returns X records


          • qryLocation returns Y records

          So far you've run (1 + X) queries.




          • qryFunds returns Z records

          Now you've run (1 + X)(Y) queries.



          The more data each returns, the more queries you'll run. Obviously not good.



          If all you want is the final totals for each category, in a stored procedure, you could create a temp table with the joined data from qryTypes and qryLocation. Then your last qryFunds is just joined against that temp table data.



          SELECT 
          sum(budget) AS budget
          FROM
          funds f
          INNER JOIN
          #TEMP_TABLE t ON t.location_id = f.location_id
          AND
          nofa_id = 45


          You could then get other sums off the temp table if needed. It's possible this could all be worked into a single query, but maybe this helps you get there.



          Also, a stored procedure can return multiple record sets, so you can have one return the aggregated table amount data and a 2nd return the grand total. This would keep all the calculations on the database and no need for CF to be involved.






          share|improve this answer























          • I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

            – Shawn
            yesterday











          • qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

            – Adrian J. Moreno
            yesterday












          • "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

            – Shawn
            20 hours ago















          4















          • qryTypes returns X records


          • qryLocation returns Y records

          So far you've run (1 + X) queries.




          • qryFunds returns Z records

          Now you've run (1 + X)(Y) queries.



          The more data each returns, the more queries you'll run. Obviously not good.



          If all you want is the final totals for each category, in a stored procedure, you could create a temp table with the joined data from qryTypes and qryLocation. Then your last qryFunds is just joined against that temp table data.



          SELECT 
          sum(budget) AS budget
          FROM
          funds f
          INNER JOIN
          #TEMP_TABLE t ON t.location_id = f.location_id
          AND
          nofa_id = 45


          You could then get other sums off the temp table if needed. It's possible this could all be worked into a single query, but maybe this helps you get there.



          Also, a stored procedure can return multiple record sets, so you can have one return the aggregated table amount data and a 2nd return the grand total. This would keep all the calculations on the database and no need for CF to be involved.






          share|improve this answer























          • I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

            – Shawn
            yesterday











          • qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

            – Adrian J. Moreno
            yesterday












          • "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

            – Shawn
            20 hours ago













          4












          4








          4








          • qryTypes returns X records


          • qryLocation returns Y records

          So far you've run (1 + X) queries.




          • qryFunds returns Z records

          Now you've run (1 + X)(Y) queries.



          The more data each returns, the more queries you'll run. Obviously not good.



          If all you want is the final totals for each category, in a stored procedure, you could create a temp table with the joined data from qryTypes and qryLocation. Then your last qryFunds is just joined against that temp table data.



          SELECT 
          sum(budget) AS budget
          FROM
          funds f
          INNER JOIN
          #TEMP_TABLE t ON t.location_id = f.location_id
          AND
          nofa_id = 45


          You could then get other sums off the temp table if needed. It's possible this could all be worked into a single query, but maybe this helps you get there.



          Also, a stored procedure can return multiple record sets, so you can have one return the aggregated table amount data and a 2nd return the grand total. This would keep all the calculations on the database and no need for CF to be involved.






          share|improve this answer














          • qryTypes returns X records


          • qryLocation returns Y records

          So far you've run (1 + X) queries.




          • qryFunds returns Z records

          Now you've run (1 + X)(Y) queries.



          The more data each returns, the more queries you'll run. Obviously not good.



          If all you want is the final totals for each category, in a stored procedure, you could create a temp table with the joined data from qryTypes and qryLocation. Then your last qryFunds is just joined against that temp table data.



          SELECT 
          sum(budget) AS budget
          FROM
          funds f
          INNER JOIN
          #TEMP_TABLE t ON t.location_id = f.location_id
          AND
          nofa_id = 45


          You could then get other sums off the temp table if needed. It's possible this could all be worked into a single query, but maybe this helps you get there.



          Also, a stored procedure can return multiple record sets, so you can have one return the aggregated table amount data and a 2nd return the grand total. This would keep all the calculations on the database and no need for CF to be involved.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Adrian J. MorenoAdrian J. Moreno

          10.3k12634




          10.3k12634












          • I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

            – Shawn
            yesterday











          • qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

            – Adrian J. Moreno
            yesterday












          • "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

            – Shawn
            20 hours ago

















          • I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

            – Shawn
            yesterday











          • qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

            – Adrian J. Moreno
            yesterday












          • "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

            – Shawn
            20 hours ago
















          I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

          – Shawn
          yesterday





          I think switch your X and Y..... Actually, I think it might be (X+(X*Y)) and there is a GROUP BY in qryLocation with no aggregation being done in the query. Regardless, it's a serious beating on the database (and network and processor). This is a case of data handling being done in code when it would be much better suited to be done in the SQL itself. You are absolutely right that this bit of code can get out of hand quickly.

          – Shawn
          yesterday













          qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

          – Adrian J. Moreno
          yesterday






          qryTypes is 1 query, which returns X records. Loop over qryLocationX times: (1 + X) queries. The real fun is that qryLocation can have a variable number of returned records. So really this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over.

          – Adrian J. Moreno
          yesterday














          "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

          – Shawn
          20 hours ago





          "this turns into the kind of math problem where I started having dreams of matrices of data and quit being a math major over."- :-)

          – Shawn
          20 hours ago



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55281248%2fhow-to-combine-query-results%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

          155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해