How are C/S RTE ports implemented in AUTOSAR?AUTOSAR equivalent for “Hello World!”?Port Autosar OS to MCUMigration Non Autosar project to AutosarAutosar Software ComponentAUTOSAR Wdg and ISO26262atp splitable feature AUTOSARARXML example of atp.splitkey in AUTOSARWhat is the Goal of Adaptive AutoSARAUTOSAR Acceptance TestPort prototype definition in AUTOSAR
What city and town structures are important in a low fantasy medieval world?
How to use Screen Sharing if I don't know the remote Mac's IP address
How should I mix small caps with digits or symbols?
Parse a C++14 integer literal
Mikrokosmos, BB 105, Vol. 1: No. 17 Contrary Motion (1) - Can't understand the structure
Is there a realtime, uncut video of Saturn V ignition through tower clear?
How do we explain the use of a software on a math paper?
Keeping the dodos out of the field
What was the primary motivation for a historical figure like Xenophon to create an extensive collection of written material?
How do you cope with rejection?
Do most Taxis give Receipts in London?
How can sister protect herself from impulse purchases with a credit card?
Are there historical examples of audiences drawn to a work that was "so bad it's good"?
Warped chessboard
why "American-born", not "America-born"?
Is presenting a play showing Military characters in a bad light a crime in the US?
3D Histogram / bar chart
Why use nominative in Coniugatio periphrastica passiva?
Removing Doubles Destroy Topology
Why is there no current between two capacitors connected in series?
Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"
Is there a way to generate a mapping graph like this?
Department head said that group project may be rejected. How to mitigate?
Why "strap-on" boosters, and how do other people say it?
How are C/S RTE ports implemented in AUTOSAR?
AUTOSAR equivalent for “Hello World!”?Port Autosar OS to MCUMigration Non Autosar project to AutosarAutosar Software ComponentAUTOSAR Wdg and ISO26262atp splitable feature AUTOSARARXML example of atp.splitkey in AUTOSARWhat is the Goal of Adaptive AutoSARAUTOSAR Acceptance TestPort prototype definition in AUTOSAR
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I'm wondering about this because they are vastly different than S/R RTE ports. Data which is sent through the S/R can be observed/recorded. After all RTE is the one who takes the incoming data and copies it to a temporary/direct location. That data is quantifiable. BUT, when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context. Does anybody know how this is implemented?
autosar
add a comment |
I'm wondering about this because they are vastly different than S/R RTE ports. Data which is sent through the S/R can be observed/recorded. After all RTE is the one who takes the incoming data and copies it to a temporary/direct location. That data is quantifiable. BUT, when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context. Does anybody know how this is implemented?
autosar
add a comment |
I'm wondering about this because they are vastly different than S/R RTE ports. Data which is sent through the S/R can be observed/recorded. After all RTE is the one who takes the incoming data and copies it to a temporary/direct location. That data is quantifiable. BUT, when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context. Does anybody know how this is implemented?
autosar
I'm wondering about this because they are vastly different than S/R RTE ports. Data which is sent through the S/R can be observed/recorded. After all RTE is the one who takes the incoming data and copies it to a temporary/direct location. That data is quantifiable. BUT, when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context. Does anybody know how this is implemented?
autosar
autosar
asked Mar 23 at 19:58
Sir DrinksCoffeeALotSir DrinksCoffeeALot
1731517
1731517
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I do not really understand what your question is, because somehow you already answered yourself by writing "when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context.".
So, best case, the client simply invokes a function in the server.
When speaking about Client and Server in different Tasks or even on different uC cores, then events will also be involved and the call is getting more complex.
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55317809%2fhow-are-c-s-rte-ports-implemented-in-autosar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I do not really understand what your question is, because somehow you already answered yourself by writing "when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context.".
So, best case, the client simply invokes a function in the server.
When speaking about Client and Server in different Tasks or even on different uC cores, then events will also be involved and the call is getting more complex.
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
add a comment |
I do not really understand what your question is, because somehow you already answered yourself by writing "when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context.".
So, best case, the client simply invokes a function in the server.
When speaking about Client and Server in different Tasks or even on different uC cores, then events will also be involved and the call is getting more complex.
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
add a comment |
I do not really understand what your question is, because somehow you already answered yourself by writing "when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context.".
So, best case, the client simply invokes a function in the server.
When speaking about Client and Server in different Tasks or even on different uC cores, then events will also be involved and the call is getting more complex.
I do not really understand what your question is, because somehow you already answered yourself by writing "when talking about C/S, client somehow has access to a functions which are offered by a server. Those functions are executed in clients context, not the server context.".
So, best case, the client simply invokes a function in the server.
When speaking about Client and Server in different Tasks or even on different uC cores, then events will also be involved and the call is getting more complex.
answered Mar 24 at 21:39
Oliver ScheidOliver Scheid
11310
11310
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
add a comment |
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
But those functions which are offered by a server, are only classified as server functions when looking at the architecture, but when everything is compiled those function calls are part of the client SWC. So there is no "real" client-server communication. It's not like you're sending an event that will trigger a function call in servers context.
– Sir DrinksCoffeeALot
Mar 26 at 7:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55317809%2fhow-are-c-s-rte-ports-implemented-in-autosar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown