R: 'x' values being identical and lambda values being too redistricted in boxcoxnc functionCounting the number of elements with the values of x in a vectorIs there a built-in function for finding the mode?Grouping functions (tapply, by, aggregate) and the *apply familyRemove rows with all or some NAs (missing values) in data.frameHow do I replace NA values with zeros in an R dataframe?Explicitly calling return in a function or notFunction to clear the console in R and RStudioHow can I view the source code for a function?Function values with normally distributed errorsR: use one list to modify another list efficiently

Why not use a diode instead of a resistor for current sense circuits?

Marrying a second woman behind your wife's back: is it wrong and can Quran/Hadith prove this?

Is it legal for private citizens to "impound" e-scooters?

Unethical behavior : should I report it?

Character is called by their first initial. How do I write it?

How to deal with a player who makes bad characters and kills them?

What's the difference between 2a and 10a charging options?

Send a single HTML email from Thunderbird, overriding the default "plain text" setting

3D Statue Park: U shapes

Basic Questions on Wiener Filtering

Weed in Massachusetts: underground roots, skunky smell when bruised

A planet illuminated by a black hole?

How can I prevent corporations from growing their own workforce?

Is it legal to use cash pulled from a credit card to pay the monthly payment on that credit card?

How do we explain the E major chord in this progression?

How do I run a game when my PCs have different approaches to combat?

Does the Intel 8086 CPU have user mode and kernel mode?

At what rate does the volume (velocity) of a note decay?

Integral of the integral using NIntegrate

How to judge a Ph.D. applicant that arrives "out of thin air"

Examples of simultaneous independent breakthroughs

This message is flooding my syslog, how to find where it comes from?

Are there any examples of technologies have been lost over time?

Can two figures have the same area, perimeter, and same number of segments have different shape?



R: 'x' values being identical and lambda values being too redistricted in boxcoxnc function


Counting the number of elements with the values of x in a vectorIs there a built-in function for finding the mode?Grouping functions (tapply, by, aggregate) and the *apply familyRemove rows with all or some NAs (missing values) in data.frameHow do I replace NA values with zeros in an R dataframe?Explicitly calling return in a function or notFunction to clear the console in R and RStudioHow can I view the source code for a function?Function values with normally distributed errorsR: use one list to modify another list efficiently






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I am trying to use the boxcoxnc function in the AID package to calculate normalized data using the Shapiro-Wilcox W statistic to determine lambda.



I want the boxcoxnc function to run on each column in my data frame in a for loop.



data<-data.frame(data[,2:27])

for (f in 1:length(data))
model<-boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))),
method="sw",lambda = as.numeric(seq(-20,20,0.01)))



The first three columns work fine and when I get to the fourth I get the error:



Error in boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))), method = "sw", : 
Enlarge the range of the lambda


Which I do, enlarge the range of lambda to(-21, -20, 0.01) and then get the following error on the first column.



Error in shapiro.test(store2[[x]]) : all 'x' values are identical


However, the data is not identical. It is only certain columns in my data frame that does this and I do not know why. The fourth column that calls the first error is this:
1.539
1.587
1.558
1.625
1.651
1.659
1.654
1.643
1.53
1.552
1.537
1.522
1.559
1.636
1.57
1.631
1.544
1.625
1.552
1.519
1.556
1.528
1.616
1.554
1.571
1.534
1.574
1.578
1.574
1.533
1.54
1.531
1.561
1.576
1.624
1.593
1.557
1.556
1.559
1.59



The first column is this: 6.301
6.611
6.448
7.049
7.068
7.208
7.215
7.084
6.129
6.471
6.295
5.984
6.34
7.052
6.448
6.885
6.42
6.963
6.169
6.185
6.289
6.05
6.901
6.333
6.458
6.228
6.458
6.477
6.71
6.296
6.147
6.171
6.278
6.667
6.932
6.646
6.369
6.408
6.466
6.688



Any help is really appreciated.










share|improve this question






















  • When you try to make sense of an error message coming from a method/function you need to inspect the values that you are actually passing to the said method. When you see that the values are not indentically are you inspecting the data or the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...))? Assign that expression to a variable and see how it looks like (values, dimensions etc).

    – Valentin Ruano
    Mar 26 at 18:28

















1















I am trying to use the boxcoxnc function in the AID package to calculate normalized data using the Shapiro-Wilcox W statistic to determine lambda.



I want the boxcoxnc function to run on each column in my data frame in a for loop.



data<-data.frame(data[,2:27])

for (f in 1:length(data))
model<-boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))),
method="sw",lambda = as.numeric(seq(-20,20,0.01)))



The first three columns work fine and when I get to the fourth I get the error:



Error in boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))), method = "sw", : 
Enlarge the range of the lambda


Which I do, enlarge the range of lambda to(-21, -20, 0.01) and then get the following error on the first column.



Error in shapiro.test(store2[[x]]) : all 'x' values are identical


However, the data is not identical. It is only certain columns in my data frame that does this and I do not know why. The fourth column that calls the first error is this:
1.539
1.587
1.558
1.625
1.651
1.659
1.654
1.643
1.53
1.552
1.537
1.522
1.559
1.636
1.57
1.631
1.544
1.625
1.552
1.519
1.556
1.528
1.616
1.554
1.571
1.534
1.574
1.578
1.574
1.533
1.54
1.531
1.561
1.576
1.624
1.593
1.557
1.556
1.559
1.59



The first column is this: 6.301
6.611
6.448
7.049
7.068
7.208
7.215
7.084
6.129
6.471
6.295
5.984
6.34
7.052
6.448
6.885
6.42
6.963
6.169
6.185
6.289
6.05
6.901
6.333
6.458
6.228
6.458
6.477
6.71
6.296
6.147
6.171
6.278
6.667
6.932
6.646
6.369
6.408
6.466
6.688



Any help is really appreciated.










share|improve this question






















  • When you try to make sense of an error message coming from a method/function you need to inspect the values that you are actually passing to the said method. When you see that the values are not indentically are you inspecting the data or the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...))? Assign that expression to a variable and see how it looks like (values, dimensions etc).

    – Valentin Ruano
    Mar 26 at 18:28













1












1








1








I am trying to use the boxcoxnc function in the AID package to calculate normalized data using the Shapiro-Wilcox W statistic to determine lambda.



I want the boxcoxnc function to run on each column in my data frame in a for loop.



data<-data.frame(data[,2:27])

for (f in 1:length(data))
model<-boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))),
method="sw",lambda = as.numeric(seq(-20,20,0.01)))



The first three columns work fine and when I get to the fourth I get the error:



Error in boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))), method = "sw", : 
Enlarge the range of the lambda


Which I do, enlarge the range of lambda to(-21, -20, 0.01) and then get the following error on the first column.



Error in shapiro.test(store2[[x]]) : all 'x' values are identical


However, the data is not identical. It is only certain columns in my data frame that does this and I do not know why. The fourth column that calls the first error is this:
1.539
1.587
1.558
1.625
1.651
1.659
1.654
1.643
1.53
1.552
1.537
1.522
1.559
1.636
1.57
1.631
1.544
1.625
1.552
1.519
1.556
1.528
1.616
1.554
1.571
1.534
1.574
1.578
1.574
1.533
1.54
1.531
1.561
1.576
1.624
1.593
1.557
1.556
1.559
1.59



The first column is this: 6.301
6.611
6.448
7.049
7.068
7.208
7.215
7.084
6.129
6.471
6.295
5.984
6.34
7.052
6.448
6.885
6.42
6.963
6.169
6.185
6.289
6.05
6.901
6.333
6.458
6.228
6.458
6.477
6.71
6.296
6.147
6.171
6.278
6.667
6.932
6.646
6.369
6.408
6.466
6.688



Any help is really appreciated.










share|improve this question














I am trying to use the boxcoxnc function in the AID package to calculate normalized data using the Shapiro-Wilcox W statistic to determine lambda.



I want the boxcoxnc function to run on each column in my data frame in a for loop.



data<-data.frame(data[,2:27])

for (f in 1:length(data))
model<-boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))),
method="sw",lambda = as.numeric(seq(-20,20,0.01)))



The first three columns work fine and when I get to the fourth I get the error:



Error in boxcoxnc(as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(data[f]))), method = "sw", : 
Enlarge the range of the lambda


Which I do, enlarge the range of lambda to(-21, -20, 0.01) and then get the following error on the first column.



Error in shapiro.test(store2[[x]]) : all 'x' values are identical


However, the data is not identical. It is only certain columns in my data frame that does this and I do not know why. The fourth column that calls the first error is this:
1.539
1.587
1.558
1.625
1.651
1.659
1.654
1.643
1.53
1.552
1.537
1.522
1.559
1.636
1.57
1.631
1.544
1.625
1.552
1.519
1.556
1.528
1.616
1.554
1.571
1.534
1.574
1.578
1.574
1.533
1.54
1.531
1.561
1.576
1.624
1.593
1.557
1.556
1.559
1.59



The first column is this: 6.301
6.611
6.448
7.049
7.068
7.208
7.215
7.084
6.129
6.471
6.295
5.984
6.34
7.052
6.448
6.885
6.42
6.963
6.169
6.185
6.289
6.05
6.901
6.333
6.458
6.228
6.458
6.477
6.71
6.296
6.147
6.171
6.278
6.667
6.932
6.646
6.369
6.408
6.466
6.688



Any help is really appreciated.







r normal-distribution






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 26 at 17:28









dlsankardlsankar

62 bronze badges




62 bronze badges












  • When you try to make sense of an error message coming from a method/function you need to inspect the values that you are actually passing to the said method. When you see that the values are not indentically are you inspecting the data or the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...))? Assign that expression to a variable and see how it looks like (values, dimensions etc).

    – Valentin Ruano
    Mar 26 at 18:28

















  • When you try to make sense of an error message coming from a method/function you need to inspect the values that you are actually passing to the said method. When you see that the values are not indentically are you inspecting the data or the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...))? Assign that expression to a variable and see how it looks like (values, dimensions etc).

    – Valentin Ruano
    Mar 26 at 18:28
















When you try to make sense of an error message coming from a method/function you need to inspect the values that you are actually passing to the said method. When you see that the values are not indentically are you inspecting the data or the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...))? Assign that expression to a variable and see how it looks like (values, dimensions etc).

– Valentin Ruano
Mar 26 at 18:28





When you try to make sense of an error message coming from a method/function you need to inspect the values that you are actually passing to the said method. When you see that the values are not indentically are you inspecting the data or the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...))? Assign that expression to a variable and see how it looks like (values, dimensions etc).

– Valentin Ruano
Mar 26 at 18:28












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














One thing you must keep always in mind in R is that by design R tends to just to keep going no matter what, coercing and converting the data even when some of the transformation actually do not make sense. This results in values and errors messages down the line that do not make sense and that is what may be happening here. If you inspect the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...)), for every one of those columns I likely that is not what you expect it to be.



Without knowing exactly how boxcoxnc works I suggest the following alternative code to make it more readable and may-be even fix the bug but that is a big maybe:



for (col in 2:27) 
model <- boxcoxnc(data[,col], method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
# what are you trying to do with model here, it is rewritten every time.



Comments:



  1. subsetting the original data is unnecessary since you are iterating through the columns by index.


  2. even when data[col] would work (since a data.frame is in fact a list of columns) is more appropriate to do data[,col]. Also instead of length(data) you should write ncol(data) but that expression is gone anyway.


  3. as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(...))) seems totally unnecessary here and is just a chance to something go wrong in terms of R doing an untended conversion. Perhaps as.numeric is necessary iff boxcoxnc is a bit particular and really cannot accept anything but a numeric vector.


  4. as.numeric(seq(...)) can be just sec(...); it would be surprising if seq would return anything but a numeric vector.


Now, something you should consider is perhaps some of those columns do not contain numeric data. If it say numbers but as strings then yes you need as.numeric. Can you confirm that there is no column that contains anything but numerics and integers typed data? Strings or factors would be problematic and might be the root cause of your issues. What is the result of:



sapply(d, class)


Btw apply methods are preferable to for loops so perhaps you want to go that route perhaps you co do something like this:



models <- sapply(data[,2:27], function(col) 
boxcoxnc(col, method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
)





share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55363029%2fr-x-values-being-identical-and-lambda-values-being-too-redistricted-in-boxcox%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    One thing you must keep always in mind in R is that by design R tends to just to keep going no matter what, coercing and converting the data even when some of the transformation actually do not make sense. This results in values and errors messages down the line that do not make sense and that is what may be happening here. If you inspect the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...)), for every one of those columns I likely that is not what you expect it to be.



    Without knowing exactly how boxcoxnc works I suggest the following alternative code to make it more readable and may-be even fix the bug but that is a big maybe:



    for (col in 2:27) 
    model <- boxcoxnc(data[,col], method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
    # what are you trying to do with model here, it is rewritten every time.



    Comments:



    1. subsetting the original data is unnecessary since you are iterating through the columns by index.


    2. even when data[col] would work (since a data.frame is in fact a list of columns) is more appropriate to do data[,col]. Also instead of length(data) you should write ncol(data) but that expression is gone anyway.


    3. as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(...))) seems totally unnecessary here and is just a chance to something go wrong in terms of R doing an untended conversion. Perhaps as.numeric is necessary iff boxcoxnc is a bit particular and really cannot accept anything but a numeric vector.


    4. as.numeric(seq(...)) can be just sec(...); it would be surprising if seq would return anything but a numeric vector.


    Now, something you should consider is perhaps some of those columns do not contain numeric data. If it say numbers but as strings then yes you need as.numeric. Can you confirm that there is no column that contains anything but numerics and integers typed data? Strings or factors would be problematic and might be the root cause of your issues. What is the result of:



    sapply(d, class)


    Btw apply methods are preferable to for loops so perhaps you want to go that route perhaps you co do something like this:



    models <- sapply(data[,2:27], function(col) 
    boxcoxnc(col, method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
    )





    share|improve this answer





























      0














      One thing you must keep always in mind in R is that by design R tends to just to keep going no matter what, coercing and converting the data even when some of the transformation actually do not make sense. This results in values and errors messages down the line that do not make sense and that is what may be happening here. If you inspect the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...)), for every one of those columns I likely that is not what you expect it to be.



      Without knowing exactly how boxcoxnc works I suggest the following alternative code to make it more readable and may-be even fix the bug but that is a big maybe:



      for (col in 2:27) 
      model <- boxcoxnc(data[,col], method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
      # what are you trying to do with model here, it is rewritten every time.



      Comments:



      1. subsetting the original data is unnecessary since you are iterating through the columns by index.


      2. even when data[col] would work (since a data.frame is in fact a list of columns) is more appropriate to do data[,col]. Also instead of length(data) you should write ncol(data) but that expression is gone anyway.


      3. as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(...))) seems totally unnecessary here and is just a chance to something go wrong in terms of R doing an untended conversion. Perhaps as.numeric is necessary iff boxcoxnc is a bit particular and really cannot accept anything but a numeric vector.


      4. as.numeric(seq(...)) can be just sec(...); it would be surprising if seq would return anything but a numeric vector.


      Now, something you should consider is perhaps some of those columns do not contain numeric data. If it say numbers but as strings then yes you need as.numeric. Can you confirm that there is no column that contains anything but numerics and integers typed data? Strings or factors would be problematic and might be the root cause of your issues. What is the result of:



      sapply(d, class)


      Btw apply methods are preferable to for loops so perhaps you want to go that route perhaps you co do something like this:



      models <- sapply(data[,2:27], function(col) 
      boxcoxnc(col, method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
      )





      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        One thing you must keep always in mind in R is that by design R tends to just to keep going no matter what, coercing and converting the data even when some of the transformation actually do not make sense. This results in values and errors messages down the line that do not make sense and that is what may be happening here. If you inspect the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...)), for every one of those columns I likely that is not what you expect it to be.



        Without knowing exactly how boxcoxnc works I suggest the following alternative code to make it more readable and may-be even fix the bug but that is a big maybe:



        for (col in 2:27) 
        model <- boxcoxnc(data[,col], method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
        # what are you trying to do with model here, it is rewritten every time.



        Comments:



        1. subsetting the original data is unnecessary since you are iterating through the columns by index.


        2. even when data[col] would work (since a data.frame is in fact a list of columns) is more appropriate to do data[,col]. Also instead of length(data) you should write ncol(data) but that expression is gone anyway.


        3. as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(...))) seems totally unnecessary here and is just a chance to something go wrong in terms of R doing an untended conversion. Perhaps as.numeric is necessary iff boxcoxnc is a bit particular and really cannot accept anything but a numeric vector.


        4. as.numeric(seq(...)) can be just sec(...); it would be surprising if seq would return anything but a numeric vector.


        Now, something you should consider is perhaps some of those columns do not contain numeric data. If it say numbers but as strings then yes you need as.numeric. Can you confirm that there is no column that contains anything but numerics and integers typed data? Strings or factors would be problematic and might be the root cause of your issues. What is the result of:



        sapply(d, class)


        Btw apply methods are preferable to for loops so perhaps you want to go that route perhaps you co do something like this:



        models <- sapply(data[,2:27], function(col) 
        boxcoxnc(col, method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
        )





        share|improve this answer















        One thing you must keep always in mind in R is that by design R tends to just to keep going no matter what, coercing and converting the data even when some of the transformation actually do not make sense. This results in values and errors messages down the line that do not make sense and that is what may be happening here. If you inspect the result of as.matrix(as.numeric(...)), for every one of those columns I likely that is not what you expect it to be.



        Without knowing exactly how boxcoxnc works I suggest the following alternative code to make it more readable and may-be even fix the bug but that is a big maybe:



        for (col in 2:27) 
        model <- boxcoxnc(data[,col], method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
        # what are you trying to do with model here, it is rewritten every time.



        Comments:



        1. subsetting the original data is unnecessary since you are iterating through the columns by index.


        2. even when data[col] would work (since a data.frame is in fact a list of columns) is more appropriate to do data[,col]. Also instead of length(data) you should write ncol(data) but that expression is gone anyway.


        3. as.matrix(as.numeric(unlist(...))) seems totally unnecessary here and is just a chance to something go wrong in terms of R doing an untended conversion. Perhaps as.numeric is necessary iff boxcoxnc is a bit particular and really cannot accept anything but a numeric vector.


        4. as.numeric(seq(...)) can be just sec(...); it would be surprising if seq would return anything but a numeric vector.


        Now, something you should consider is perhaps some of those columns do not contain numeric data. If it say numbers but as strings then yes you need as.numeric. Can you confirm that there is no column that contains anything but numerics and integers typed data? Strings or factors would be problematic and might be the root cause of your issues. What is the result of:



        sapply(d, class)


        Btw apply methods are preferable to for loops so perhaps you want to go that route perhaps you co do something like this:



        models <- sapply(data[,2:27], function(col) 
        boxcoxnc(col, method="sw", lambda = seq(-20,20,0.01))
        )






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 26 at 20:31

























        answered Mar 26 at 18:57









        Valentin RuanoValentin Ruano

        2,18711 silver badges26 bronze badges




        2,18711 silver badges26 bronze badges


















            Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.







            Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.



















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55363029%2fr-x-values-being-identical-and-lambda-values-being-too-redistricted-in-boxcox%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현