React Stateful Components without classesConverting react class component to react stateless componentHow to change an element's class with JavaScript?$(document).ready equivalent without jQueryHow do I modify the URL without reloading the page?How can I select an element with multiple classes in jQuery?Loop inside React JSXWhat is the difference between state and props in React?Can you force a React component to rerender without calling setState?Programmatically navigate using react routerWhat is the appropiate way to define a react component class without state?How do react hooks determine the component that they are for?

What was the motivation for the invention of electric pianos?

Why is the T-1000 humanoid?

Why is the Digital 0 not 0V in computer systems?

How major are these paintwork & rust problems?

Some Prime Peerage

What explanation do proponents of a Scotland-NI bridge give for it breaking Brexit impasse?

I was promised a work PC but still awaiting approval 3 months later so using my own laptop - Is it fair to ask employer for laptop insurance?

What's 待ってるから mean?

Can I fix my boots by gluing the soles back on?

What exactly is a marshrutka (маршрутка)?

What jurisdiction do Scottish courts have over the Westminster parliament?

Why is this weapon searching for a new owner?

If the gambler's fallacy is false, how do notions of "expected number" of events work?

Can I tap all my opponent's lands while they're casting a spell to negate it?

Why did they ever make smaller than full-frame sensors?

Is "you will become a subject matter expert" code for "you'll be working on your own 100% of the time"?

Should you only use colons and periods in dialogues?

Were Roman public roads build by private companies?

Finding the number of digits of a given integer.

Planar regular languages

In Germany, how can I maximize the impact of my charitable donations?

Does an oscilloscope subtract voltages as phasors?

Should I leave the first authorship of our paper to the student who did the project whereas I solved it?

How can I discourage sharing internal API keys within a company?



React Stateful Components without classes


Converting react class component to react stateless componentHow to change an element's class with JavaScript?$(document).ready equivalent without jQueryHow do I modify the URL without reloading the page?How can I select an element with multiple classes in jQuery?Loop inside React JSXWhat is the difference between state and props in React?Can you force a React component to rerender without calling setState?Programmatically navigate using react routerWhat is the appropiate way to define a react component class without state?How do react hooks determine the component that they are for?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9















In React, we can write components as pure functions. However, the problem with this is that you can't use it as stateful components because of the lack of lifecycle hooks and state. So, I wonder if is there any way to create stateful components without using classes.



Something that I found is the createClass helper. But, React has moved this helper into their own package in the release 15.5.0, link. Also, they recommend that you migrate them to JavaScript classes because classes are now the preferred way to create components in React. Therefore, I don't think that using this helper could be a good idea.



On the other hand, Facebook recommends the use of High Order Components (HOCs) which is an advanced technique in React for reusing component logic. HOCs are not part of the React API, per se. They are a pattern that emerges from React's compositional nature. But, I couldn't find a way to create common stateful components without classes.



Has anyone gone through this? Is there any way to use React as a some purely functional solution?










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    With monad's.

    – Willem Van Onsem
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:50











  • Do you have experience with any functional programming languages? You can simulate stateful operations using pure functions, you just need to return the new state as one of the return values, and then use that state as one of the parameters to the next time you call the function. The abstraction for this is called the "State monad".

    – 4castle
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:51












  • yes but what about react lifecycle hooks?

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:55







  • 2





    You can use lenses or cursors. This represents a get, set pair of functions that can read and replace some subset of centralized state. One example of a library to help you implement this is omniscientjs.github.io

    – Asad Saeeduddin
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:19











  • Nice, didn't know about that. Btw, that library uses the createClass helper also.

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:29

















9















In React, we can write components as pure functions. However, the problem with this is that you can't use it as stateful components because of the lack of lifecycle hooks and state. So, I wonder if is there any way to create stateful components without using classes.



Something that I found is the createClass helper. But, React has moved this helper into their own package in the release 15.5.0, link. Also, they recommend that you migrate them to JavaScript classes because classes are now the preferred way to create components in React. Therefore, I don't think that using this helper could be a good idea.



On the other hand, Facebook recommends the use of High Order Components (HOCs) which is an advanced technique in React for reusing component logic. HOCs are not part of the React API, per se. They are a pattern that emerges from React's compositional nature. But, I couldn't find a way to create common stateful components without classes.



Has anyone gone through this? Is there any way to use React as a some purely functional solution?










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    With monad's.

    – Willem Van Onsem
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:50











  • Do you have experience with any functional programming languages? You can simulate stateful operations using pure functions, you just need to return the new state as one of the return values, and then use that state as one of the parameters to the next time you call the function. The abstraction for this is called the "State monad".

    – 4castle
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:51












  • yes but what about react lifecycle hooks?

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:55







  • 2





    You can use lenses or cursors. This represents a get, set pair of functions that can read and replace some subset of centralized state. One example of a library to help you implement this is omniscientjs.github.io

    – Asad Saeeduddin
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:19











  • Nice, didn't know about that. Btw, that library uses the createClass helper also.

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:29













9












9








9


0






In React, we can write components as pure functions. However, the problem with this is that you can't use it as stateful components because of the lack of lifecycle hooks and state. So, I wonder if is there any way to create stateful components without using classes.



Something that I found is the createClass helper. But, React has moved this helper into their own package in the release 15.5.0, link. Also, they recommend that you migrate them to JavaScript classes because classes are now the preferred way to create components in React. Therefore, I don't think that using this helper could be a good idea.



On the other hand, Facebook recommends the use of High Order Components (HOCs) which is an advanced technique in React for reusing component logic. HOCs are not part of the React API, per se. They are a pattern that emerges from React's compositional nature. But, I couldn't find a way to create common stateful components without classes.



Has anyone gone through this? Is there any way to use React as a some purely functional solution?










share|improve this question
















In React, we can write components as pure functions. However, the problem with this is that you can't use it as stateful components because of the lack of lifecycle hooks and state. So, I wonder if is there any way to create stateful components without using classes.



Something that I found is the createClass helper. But, React has moved this helper into their own package in the release 15.5.0, link. Also, they recommend that you migrate them to JavaScript classes because classes are now the preferred way to create components in React. Therefore, I don't think that using this helper could be a good idea.



On the other hand, Facebook recommends the use of High Order Components (HOCs) which is an advanced technique in React for reusing component logic. HOCs are not part of the React API, per se. They are a pattern that emerges from React's compositional nature. But, I couldn't find a way to create common stateful components without classes.



Has anyone gone through this? Is there any way to use React as a some purely functional solution?







javascript reactjs functional-programming






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 30 '17 at 21:12







mattias

















asked Jul 30 '17 at 20:48









mattiasmattias

8789 silver badges22 bronze badges




8789 silver badges22 bronze badges










  • 2





    With monad's.

    – Willem Van Onsem
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:50











  • Do you have experience with any functional programming languages? You can simulate stateful operations using pure functions, you just need to return the new state as one of the return values, and then use that state as one of the parameters to the next time you call the function. The abstraction for this is called the "State monad".

    – 4castle
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:51












  • yes but what about react lifecycle hooks?

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:55







  • 2





    You can use lenses or cursors. This represents a get, set pair of functions that can read and replace some subset of centralized state. One example of a library to help you implement this is omniscientjs.github.io

    – Asad Saeeduddin
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:19











  • Nice, didn't know about that. Btw, that library uses the createClass helper also.

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:29












  • 2





    With monad's.

    – Willem Van Onsem
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:50











  • Do you have experience with any functional programming languages? You can simulate stateful operations using pure functions, you just need to return the new state as one of the return values, and then use that state as one of the parameters to the next time you call the function. The abstraction for this is called the "State monad".

    – 4castle
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:51












  • yes but what about react lifecycle hooks?

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 20:55







  • 2





    You can use lenses or cursors. This represents a get, set pair of functions that can read and replace some subset of centralized state. One example of a library to help you implement this is omniscientjs.github.io

    – Asad Saeeduddin
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:19











  • Nice, didn't know about that. Btw, that library uses the createClass helper also.

    – mattias
    Jul 30 '17 at 21:29







2




2





With monad's.

– Willem Van Onsem
Jul 30 '17 at 20:50





With monad's.

– Willem Van Onsem
Jul 30 '17 at 20:50













Do you have experience with any functional programming languages? You can simulate stateful operations using pure functions, you just need to return the new state as one of the return values, and then use that state as one of the parameters to the next time you call the function. The abstraction for this is called the "State monad".

– 4castle
Jul 30 '17 at 20:51






Do you have experience with any functional programming languages? You can simulate stateful operations using pure functions, you just need to return the new state as one of the return values, and then use that state as one of the parameters to the next time you call the function. The abstraction for this is called the "State monad".

– 4castle
Jul 30 '17 at 20:51














yes but what about react lifecycle hooks?

– mattias
Jul 30 '17 at 20:55






yes but what about react lifecycle hooks?

– mattias
Jul 30 '17 at 20:55





2




2





You can use lenses or cursors. This represents a get, set pair of functions that can read and replace some subset of centralized state. One example of a library to help you implement this is omniscientjs.github.io

– Asad Saeeduddin
Jul 30 '17 at 21:19





You can use lenses or cursors. This represents a get, set pair of functions that can read and replace some subset of centralized state. One example of a library to help you implement this is omniscientjs.github.io

– Asad Saeeduddin
Jul 30 '17 at 21:19













Nice, didn't know about that. Btw, that library uses the createClass helper also.

– mattias
Jul 30 '17 at 21:29





Nice, didn't know about that. Btw, that library uses the createClass helper also.

– mattias
Jul 30 '17 at 21:29












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5
















Writing Stateful component without using classes is definitely a choice made by several developers. I recommend to use 'recompose' which has nice and easy implementation to write stateful components without class, yet apply state, both local and from store. Here is an example:



import compose from 'recompose/compose'
import withState from 'recompose/withState'
import withProps from 'recompose/withProps'

Pure.js

function MyComponent(props) (

local: prop1, prop2 ,
setProp1
)

return <div>prop1</div>
}

const defaultState =
prop1: false,
prop2: false


const enhance = compose(
withState('local', 'updateLocal', defaultState),
withProps(( local: prop1, prop2 , updateLocal ) => (
setProp1: (newValue) => updateLocal(state => (...state, prop1: newValue ))
)))

export default enhance(MyComponent)





share|improve this answer

























  • Where has this library been all my life.

    – Asad Saeeduddin
    Jul 31 '17 at 5:36











  • Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

    – mattias
    Aug 1 '17 at 18:59












  • @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

    – Umesh
    Aug 2 '17 at 2:57


















6
















A new feature supports this, called React hooks. From the documentation:




Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.




A simple example:



import useState from 'react';

function Example()
// Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

return (
<div>
<p>You clicked count times</p>
<button onClick=() => setCount(count + 1)>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);



For an example of how to use lifecycles, check out useEffect






share|improve this answer



























  • It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

    – vsync
    Mar 25 at 10:20











  • Thanks for the feedback, updated

    – Karamell
    Mar 25 at 13:09











  • Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

    – vsync
    Mar 25 at 13:40











  • Yes, updated now again :)

    – Karamell
    Mar 28 at 10:26











  • You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

    – vsync
    Mar 28 at 13:07


















0
















Maybe react-instance can become handy. Take a look at examples below.



Save state in local variable:



import React from "react"
import instance from "react-instance"

const App = instance(( forceUpdate ) =>
let time = 0

const timer = setInterval(() =>
time++
forceUpdate()
, 100)

return
render()
return time
,
unmount()
clearInterval(timer)
,

)


Save state in component state:



import React from "react"
import instance from "react-instance"

const App = instance(instance =>
instance.state = time: 0

const timer = setInterval(() =>
instance.setState( time: instance.state.time + 1 )
, 100)

return
render()
return instance.state.time
,
unmount()
clearInterval(timer)
,

)





share|improve this answer
































    0
















    I tried to create a simple stateful component named Comp without the usage of es6 classes.



    Here is the code



    Basically I'm linking the prototype of the Comp function (our stateful component) to the prototype object of React.Component and I pass down to it Comp's props to initialize it properly. After that you can use every function of the React.Component object on the Comp.prototype. I used some just an example. I don't know if this is the best way in the "most javascript" way to use react






    share|improve this answer



























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f45404546%2freact-stateful-components-without-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5
















      Writing Stateful component without using classes is definitely a choice made by several developers. I recommend to use 'recompose' which has nice and easy implementation to write stateful components without class, yet apply state, both local and from store. Here is an example:



      import compose from 'recompose/compose'
      import withState from 'recompose/withState'
      import withProps from 'recompose/withProps'

      Pure.js

      function MyComponent(props) (

      local: prop1, prop2 ,
      setProp1
      )

      return <div>prop1</div>
      }

      const defaultState =
      prop1: false,
      prop2: false


      const enhance = compose(
      withState('local', 'updateLocal', defaultState),
      withProps(( local: prop1, prop2 , updateLocal ) => (
      setProp1: (newValue) => updateLocal(state => (...state, prop1: newValue ))
      )))

      export default enhance(MyComponent)





      share|improve this answer

























      • Where has this library been all my life.

        – Asad Saeeduddin
        Jul 31 '17 at 5:36











      • Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

        – mattias
        Aug 1 '17 at 18:59












      • @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

        – Umesh
        Aug 2 '17 at 2:57















      5
















      Writing Stateful component without using classes is definitely a choice made by several developers. I recommend to use 'recompose' which has nice and easy implementation to write stateful components without class, yet apply state, both local and from store. Here is an example:



      import compose from 'recompose/compose'
      import withState from 'recompose/withState'
      import withProps from 'recompose/withProps'

      Pure.js

      function MyComponent(props) (

      local: prop1, prop2 ,
      setProp1
      )

      return <div>prop1</div>
      }

      const defaultState =
      prop1: false,
      prop2: false


      const enhance = compose(
      withState('local', 'updateLocal', defaultState),
      withProps(( local: prop1, prop2 , updateLocal ) => (
      setProp1: (newValue) => updateLocal(state => (...state, prop1: newValue ))
      )))

      export default enhance(MyComponent)





      share|improve this answer

























      • Where has this library been all my life.

        – Asad Saeeduddin
        Jul 31 '17 at 5:36











      • Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

        – mattias
        Aug 1 '17 at 18:59












      • @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

        – Umesh
        Aug 2 '17 at 2:57













      5














      5










      5









      Writing Stateful component without using classes is definitely a choice made by several developers. I recommend to use 'recompose' which has nice and easy implementation to write stateful components without class, yet apply state, both local and from store. Here is an example:



      import compose from 'recompose/compose'
      import withState from 'recompose/withState'
      import withProps from 'recompose/withProps'

      Pure.js

      function MyComponent(props) (

      local: prop1, prop2 ,
      setProp1
      )

      return <div>prop1</div>
      }

      const defaultState =
      prop1: false,
      prop2: false


      const enhance = compose(
      withState('local', 'updateLocal', defaultState),
      withProps(( local: prop1, prop2 , updateLocal ) => (
      setProp1: (newValue) => updateLocal(state => (...state, prop1: newValue ))
      )))

      export default enhance(MyComponent)





      share|improve this answer













      Writing Stateful component without using classes is definitely a choice made by several developers. I recommend to use 'recompose' which has nice and easy implementation to write stateful components without class, yet apply state, both local and from store. Here is an example:



      import compose from 'recompose/compose'
      import withState from 'recompose/withState'
      import withProps from 'recompose/withProps'

      Pure.js

      function MyComponent(props) (

      local: prop1, prop2 ,
      setProp1
      )

      return <div>prop1</div>
      }

      const defaultState =
      prop1: false,
      prop2: false


      const enhance = compose(
      withState('local', 'updateLocal', defaultState),
      withProps(( local: prop1, prop2 , updateLocal ) => (
      setProp1: (newValue) => updateLocal(state => (...state, prop1: newValue ))
      )))

      export default enhance(MyComponent)






      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Jul 31 '17 at 3:09









      UmeshUmesh

      2,13714 silver badges19 bronze badges




      2,13714 silver badges19 bronze badges















      • Where has this library been all my life.

        – Asad Saeeduddin
        Jul 31 '17 at 5:36











      • Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

        – mattias
        Aug 1 '17 at 18:59












      • @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

        – Umesh
        Aug 2 '17 at 2:57

















      • Where has this library been all my life.

        – Asad Saeeduddin
        Jul 31 '17 at 5:36











      • Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

        – mattias
        Aug 1 '17 at 18:59












      • @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

        – Umesh
        Aug 2 '17 at 2:57
















      Where has this library been all my life.

      – Asad Saeeduddin
      Jul 31 '17 at 5:36





      Where has this library been all my life.

      – Asad Saeeduddin
      Jul 31 '17 at 5:36













      Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

      – mattias
      Aug 1 '17 at 18:59






      Thanks! what about react lifecycle hooks? Can you use it?

      – mattias
      Aug 1 '17 at 18:59














      @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

      – Umesh
      Aug 2 '17 at 2:57





      @mattias, I am not sure that lifecycle events can be attached too. So far I haven't seen that implemented. You might want to visit recompose library for more details.

      – Umesh
      Aug 2 '17 at 2:57













      6
















      A new feature supports this, called React hooks. From the documentation:




      Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.




      A simple example:



      import useState from 'react';

      function Example()
      // Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"
      const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

      return (
      <div>
      <p>You clicked count times</p>
      <button onClick=() => setCount(count + 1)>
      Click me
      </button>
      </div>
      );



      For an example of how to use lifecycles, check out useEffect






      share|improve this answer



























      • It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 10:20











      • Thanks for the feedback, updated

        – Karamell
        Mar 25 at 13:09











      • Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 13:40











      • Yes, updated now again :)

        – Karamell
        Mar 28 at 10:26











      • You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

        – vsync
        Mar 28 at 13:07















      6
















      A new feature supports this, called React hooks. From the documentation:




      Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.




      A simple example:



      import useState from 'react';

      function Example()
      // Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"
      const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

      return (
      <div>
      <p>You clicked count times</p>
      <button onClick=() => setCount(count + 1)>
      Click me
      </button>
      </div>
      );



      For an example of how to use lifecycles, check out useEffect






      share|improve this answer



























      • It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 10:20











      • Thanks for the feedback, updated

        – Karamell
        Mar 25 at 13:09











      • Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 13:40











      • Yes, updated now again :)

        – Karamell
        Mar 28 at 10:26











      • You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

        – vsync
        Mar 28 at 13:07













      6














      6










      6









      A new feature supports this, called React hooks. From the documentation:




      Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.




      A simple example:



      import useState from 'react';

      function Example()
      // Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"
      const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

      return (
      <div>
      <p>You clicked count times</p>
      <button onClick=() => setCount(count + 1)>
      Click me
      </button>
      </div>
      );



      For an example of how to use lifecycles, check out useEffect






      share|improve this answer















      A new feature supports this, called React hooks. From the documentation:




      Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.




      A simple example:



      import useState from 'react';

      function Example()
      // Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"
      const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

      return (
      <div>
      <p>You clicked count times</p>
      <button onClick=() => setCount(count + 1)>
      Click me
      </button>
      </div>
      );



      For an example of how to use lifecycles, check out useEffect







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 28 at 10:26

























      answered Nov 4 '18 at 8:06









      KaramellKaramell

      6604 silver badges17 bronze badges




      6604 silver badges17 bronze badges















      • It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 10:20











      • Thanks for the feedback, updated

        – Karamell
        Mar 25 at 13:09











      • Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 13:40











      • Yes, updated now again :)

        – Karamell
        Mar 28 at 10:26











      • You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

        – vsync
        Mar 28 at 13:07

















      • It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 10:20











      • Thanks for the feedback, updated

        – Karamell
        Mar 25 at 13:09











      • Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

        – vsync
        Mar 25 at 13:40











      • Yes, updated now again :)

        – Karamell
        Mar 28 at 10:26











      • You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

        – vsync
        Mar 28 at 13:07
















      It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

      – vsync
      Mar 25 at 10:20





      It's not experimental anymore so you might want to update your answer

      – vsync
      Mar 25 at 10:20













      Thanks for the feedback, updated

      – Karamell
      Mar 25 at 13:09





      Thanks for the feedback, updated

      – Karamell
      Mar 25 at 13:09













      Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

      – vsync
      Mar 25 at 13:40





      Note that React 16.8 is out and has hooks support

      – vsync
      Mar 25 at 13:40













      Yes, updated now again :)

      – Karamell
      Mar 28 at 10:26





      Yes, updated now again :)

      – Karamell
      Mar 28 at 10:26













      You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

      – vsync
      Mar 28 at 13:07





      You'll have to update it again in a year, removing the word "new" ;)

      – vsync
      Mar 28 at 13:07











      0
















      Maybe react-instance can become handy. Take a look at examples below.



      Save state in local variable:



      import React from "react"
      import instance from "react-instance"

      const App = instance(( forceUpdate ) =>
      let time = 0

      const timer = setInterval(() =>
      time++
      forceUpdate()
      , 100)

      return
      render()
      return time
      ,
      unmount()
      clearInterval(timer)
      ,

      )


      Save state in component state:



      import React from "react"
      import instance from "react-instance"

      const App = instance(instance =>
      instance.state = time: 0

      const timer = setInterval(() =>
      instance.setState( time: instance.state.time + 1 )
      , 100)

      return
      render()
      return instance.state.time
      ,
      unmount()
      clearInterval(timer)
      ,

      )





      share|improve this answer





























        0
















        Maybe react-instance can become handy. Take a look at examples below.



        Save state in local variable:



        import React from "react"
        import instance from "react-instance"

        const App = instance(( forceUpdate ) =>
        let time = 0

        const timer = setInterval(() =>
        time++
        forceUpdate()
        , 100)

        return
        render()
        return time
        ,
        unmount()
        clearInterval(timer)
        ,

        )


        Save state in component state:



        import React from "react"
        import instance from "react-instance"

        const App = instance(instance =>
        instance.state = time: 0

        const timer = setInterval(() =>
        instance.setState( time: instance.state.time + 1 )
        , 100)

        return
        render()
        return instance.state.time
        ,
        unmount()
        clearInterval(timer)
        ,

        )





        share|improve this answer



























          0














          0










          0









          Maybe react-instance can become handy. Take a look at examples below.



          Save state in local variable:



          import React from "react"
          import instance from "react-instance"

          const App = instance(( forceUpdate ) =>
          let time = 0

          const timer = setInterval(() =>
          time++
          forceUpdate()
          , 100)

          return
          render()
          return time
          ,
          unmount()
          clearInterval(timer)
          ,

          )


          Save state in component state:



          import React from "react"
          import instance from "react-instance"

          const App = instance(instance =>
          instance.state = time: 0

          const timer = setInterval(() =>
          instance.setState( time: instance.state.time + 1 )
          , 100)

          return
          render()
          return instance.state.time
          ,
          unmount()
          clearInterval(timer)
          ,

          )





          share|improve this answer













          Maybe react-instance can become handy. Take a look at examples below.



          Save state in local variable:



          import React from "react"
          import instance from "react-instance"

          const App = instance(( forceUpdate ) =>
          let time = 0

          const timer = setInterval(() =>
          time++
          forceUpdate()
          , 100)

          return
          render()
          return time
          ,
          unmount()
          clearInterval(timer)
          ,

          )


          Save state in component state:



          import React from "react"
          import instance from "react-instance"

          const App = instance(instance =>
          instance.state = time: 0

          const timer = setInterval(() =>
          instance.setState( time: instance.state.time + 1 )
          , 100)

          return
          render()
          return instance.state.time
          ,
          unmount()
          clearInterval(timer)
          ,

          )






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 20 '18 at 18:47









          pravdomilpravdomil

          2,10615 silver badges32 bronze badges




          2,10615 silver badges32 bronze badges
























              0
















              I tried to create a simple stateful component named Comp without the usage of es6 classes.



              Here is the code



              Basically I'm linking the prototype of the Comp function (our stateful component) to the prototype object of React.Component and I pass down to it Comp's props to initialize it properly. After that you can use every function of the React.Component object on the Comp.prototype. I used some just an example. I don't know if this is the best way in the "most javascript" way to use react






              share|improve this answer





























                0
















                I tried to create a simple stateful component named Comp without the usage of es6 classes.



                Here is the code



                Basically I'm linking the prototype of the Comp function (our stateful component) to the prototype object of React.Component and I pass down to it Comp's props to initialize it properly. After that you can use every function of the React.Component object on the Comp.prototype. I used some just an example. I don't know if this is the best way in the "most javascript" way to use react






                share|improve this answer



























                  0














                  0










                  0









                  I tried to create a simple stateful component named Comp without the usage of es6 classes.



                  Here is the code



                  Basically I'm linking the prototype of the Comp function (our stateful component) to the prototype object of React.Component and I pass down to it Comp's props to initialize it properly. After that you can use every function of the React.Component object on the Comp.prototype. I used some just an example. I don't know if this is the best way in the "most javascript" way to use react






                  share|improve this answer













                  I tried to create a simple stateful component named Comp without the usage of es6 classes.



                  Here is the code



                  Basically I'm linking the prototype of the Comp function (our stateful component) to the prototype object of React.Component and I pass down to it Comp's props to initialize it properly. After that you can use every function of the React.Component object on the Comp.prototype. I used some just an example. I don't know if this is the best way in the "most javascript" way to use react







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:53









                  Alpe89Alpe89

                  1831 silver badge9 bronze badges




                  1831 silver badge9 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f45404546%2freact-stateful-components-without-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현