Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?JavaScript closure inside loops – simple practical exampleHttpClient.GetAsync(…) never returns when using await/asyncHow and when to use ‘async’ and ‘await’When correctly use Task.Run and when just async-awaitWhy is my variable unaltered after I modify it inside of a function? - Asynchronous code referenceCombination of async function + await + setTimeoutCall async/await functions in parallelUsing async/await with a forEach loopECMAScript7 async/await inconsistent behavior depending on whether using brackets in arrow function or notcode inside async function executes before the code that follows itasync / await not working?
Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?
Can a 2nd-level sorcerer use sorcery points to create a 2nd-level spell slot?
What's the correct term describing the action of sending a brand-new ship out into its first seafaring trip?
Word for a small burst of laughter that can't be held back
C SIGINT signal in Linux
X-shaped crossword
Pronoun introduced before its antecedent
Do manufacturers try make their components as close to ideal ones as possible?
What is the purpose of building foundations?
How to make a setting relevant?
Function to extract float from different price patterns
Why is c4 bad when playing the London against a King's Indian?
Avoiding cliches when writing gods
Smooth switching between 12v batteries, with toggle switch
How is TD(0) method helpful? What good does it do?
Java guess the number
Does the growth of home value benefit from compound interest?
Is there any word or phrase for negative bearing?
Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?
Short story written from alien perspective with this line: "It's too bright to look at, so they don't"
Who operates delivery flights for commercial airlines?
Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?
Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access
Why is the relationship between frequency and pitch exponential?
Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?
JavaScript closure inside loops – simple practical exampleHttpClient.GetAsync(…) never returns when using await/asyncHow and when to use ‘async’ and ‘await’When correctly use Task.Run and when just async-awaitWhy is my variable unaltered after I modify it inside of a function? - Asynchronous code referenceCombination of async function + await + setTimeoutCall async/await functions in parallelUsing async/await with a forEach loopECMAScript7 async/await inconsistent behavior depending on whether using brackets in arrow function or notcode inside async function executes before the code that follows itasync / await not working?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have three snippets that loop three times while await
ing on a promise
.
In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i
is decremented with each await
.
let i = 3;
(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Output:
3
2
1
In the second one, the value of i
is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the await
s are executed.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;
Output:
0
0
0
Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
error and doesn't print any values.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.
javascript async-await es6-promise
add a comment |
I have three snippets that loop three times while await
ing on a promise
.
In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i
is decremented with each await
.
let i = 3;
(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Output:
3
2
1
In the second one, the value of i
is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the await
s are executed.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;
Output:
0
0
0
Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
error and doesn't print any values.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.
javascript async-await es6-promise
9
Do you know howasync function
s desugar to promises?
– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00
@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the.then()
and.catch()
methods. Am I right ?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39
Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written withthen()
?
– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41
For the second snippet, it would be:while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25
Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs0
three times.
– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44
add a comment |
I have three snippets that loop three times while await
ing on a promise
.
In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i
is decremented with each await
.
let i = 3;
(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Output:
3
2
1
In the second one, the value of i
is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the await
s are executed.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;
Output:
0
0
0
Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
error and doesn't print any values.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.
javascript async-await es6-promise
I have three snippets that loop three times while await
ing on a promise
.
In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i
is decremented with each await
.
let i = 3;
(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Output:
3
2
1
In the second one, the value of i
is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the await
s are executed.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;
Output:
0
0
0
Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
error and doesn't print any values.
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.
javascript async-await es6-promise
javascript async-await es6-promise
edited Mar 24 at 12:41
Ahmed Karaman
asked Mar 24 at 12:11
Ahmed KaramanAhmed Karaman
35119
35119
9
Do you know howasync function
s desugar to promises?
– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00
@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the.then()
and.catch()
methods. Am I right ?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39
Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written withthen()
?
– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41
For the second snippet, it would be:while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25
Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs0
three times.
– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44
add a comment |
9
Do you know howasync function
s desugar to promises?
– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00
@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the.then()
and.catch()
methods. Am I right ?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39
Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written withthen()
?
– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41
For the second snippet, it would be:while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25
Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs0
three times.
– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44
9
9
Do you know how
async function
s desugar to promises?– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00
Do you know how
async function
s desugar to promises?– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00
@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the
.then()
and .catch()
methods. Am I right ?– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39
@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the
.then()
and .catch()
methods. Am I right ?– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39
Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with
then()
?– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41
Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with
then()
?– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41
For the second snippet, it would be:
while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25
For the second snippet, it would be:
while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25
Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs
0
three times.– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44
Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs
0
three times.– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Concerning your second snippet:
Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:
await (async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
it will loop in order.
Concerning your third snippet:
You never decrement i
in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i
if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.
let i = 3;
while(i > 0)
doStuff();
add a comment |
Focusing primarily on the last example:
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:
let callbacks = [];
let i = 0;
while (i > 0)
callbacks.push(() =>
console.log(i);
i--;
);
callbacks.forEach(cb =>
cb();
);
As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.
add a comment |
Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0
In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full
add a comment |
In your particular example it decrements the i
and then runs the async
code like:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// >---------------------------
Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i
value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// out from the (async() => )() <-------------------------
Not really, If you would remove theawait Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.
– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have anasync
function without anawait
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
2
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but thei
would be equal to zero eventually.
– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
1
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.
– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55323666%2fwhy-does-async-await-work-properly-when-the-loop-is-inside-the-async-function-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Concerning your second snippet:
Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:
await (async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
it will loop in order.
Concerning your third snippet:
You never decrement i
in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i
if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.
let i = 3;
while(i > 0)
doStuff();
add a comment |
Concerning your second snippet:
Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:
await (async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
it will loop in order.
Concerning your third snippet:
You never decrement i
in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i
if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.
let i = 3;
while(i > 0)
doStuff();
add a comment |
Concerning your second snippet:
Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:
await (async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
it will loop in order.
Concerning your third snippet:
You never decrement i
in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i
if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.
let i = 3;
while(i > 0)
doStuff();
Concerning your second snippet:
Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:
await (async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
it will loop in order.
Concerning your third snippet:
You never decrement i
in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i
if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.
let i = 3;
while(i > 0)
doStuff();
edited Mar 25 at 11:43
answered Mar 24 at 12:14
Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms
71.8k63864
71.8k63864
add a comment |
add a comment |
Focusing primarily on the last example:
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:
let callbacks = [];
let i = 0;
while (i > 0)
callbacks.push(() =>
console.log(i);
i--;
);
callbacks.forEach(cb =>
cb();
);
As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.
add a comment |
Focusing primarily on the last example:
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:
let callbacks = [];
let i = 0;
while (i > 0)
callbacks.push(() =>
console.log(i);
i--;
);
callbacks.forEach(cb =>
cb();
);
As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.
add a comment |
Focusing primarily on the last example:
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:
let callbacks = [];
let i = 0;
while (i > 0)
callbacks.push(() =>
console.log(i);
i--;
);
callbacks.forEach(cb =>
cb();
);
As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.
Focusing primarily on the last example:
let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();
It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:
let callbacks = [];
let i = 0;
while (i > 0)
callbacks.push(() =>
console.log(i);
i--;
);
callbacks.forEach(cb =>
cb();
);
As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.
answered Mar 24 at 12:59
Joel CornettJoel Cornett
18.1k44471
18.1k44471
add a comment |
add a comment |
Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0
In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full
add a comment |
Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0
In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full
add a comment |
Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0
In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full
Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0
In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full
edited Mar 24 at 12:45
answered Mar 24 at 12:19
Nikita UmnovNikita Umnov
867
867
add a comment |
add a comment |
In your particular example it decrements the i
and then runs the async
code like:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// >---------------------------
Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i
value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// out from the (async() => )() <-------------------------
Not really, If you would remove theawait Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.
– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have anasync
function without anawait
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
2
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but thei
would be equal to zero eventually.
– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
1
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.
– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
|
show 4 more comments
In your particular example it decrements the i
and then runs the async
code like:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// >---------------------------
Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i
value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// out from the (async() => )() <-------------------------
Not really, If you would remove theawait Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.
– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have anasync
function without anawait
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
2
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but thei
would be equal to zero eventually.
– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
1
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.
– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
|
show 4 more comments
In your particular example it decrements the i
and then runs the async
code like:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// >---------------------------
Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i
value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// out from the (async() => )() <-------------------------
In your particular example it decrements the i
and then runs the async
code like:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// >---------------------------
Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i
value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:
let i = 3;
while (i)
// out from the (async() => )() <-------------------------
edited Mar 24 at 15:23
answered Mar 24 at 12:14
Bhojendra RauniyarBhojendra Rauniyar
54.1k2285140
54.1k2285140
Not really, If you would remove theawait Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.
– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have anasync
function without anawait
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
2
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but thei
would be equal to zero eventually.
– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
1
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.
– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
|
show 4 more comments
Not really, If you would remove theawait Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.
– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have anasync
function without anawait
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
2
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but thei
would be equal to zero eventually.
– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
1
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.
– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
Not really, If you would remove the
await Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
Not really, If you would remove the
await Promise.resolve
it would log correctly.– Jonas Wilms
Mar 24 at 12:16
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 12:37
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an
async
function without an await
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
@JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an
async
function without an await
in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 24 at 13:35
2
2
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i
would be equal to zero eventually.– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
the asynchronous code runs in background
this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i
would be equal to zero eventually.– meze
Mar 24 at 14:28
1
1
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.
await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
@BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread.
await
is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.– Joel Cornett
Mar 24 at 15:14
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55323666%2fwhy-does-async-await-work-properly-when-the-loop-is-inside-the-async-function-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
9
Do you know how
async function
s desugar to promises?– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00
@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the
.then()
and.catch()
methods. Am I right ?– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39
Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with
then()
?– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41
For the second snippet, it would be:
while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;
– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25
Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs
0
three times.– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44