Using wildcards for -group or -user with find commandFind a file where name starts with a capital letterFind files that end with numberPrint file name extension using -exec in findBatch Renaming ScriptFind files with group permissions more restrictive than owner permissionsCommand find and tar in scriptRegex not matching file using `find` despite being validFind and Replace with Sed, not a regular fileFind command - file path with white spaceBash array with folder paths and wildcards

How many days for hunting?

Why didn't Thatcher give Hong Kong to Taiwan?

Planet that’s 90% water or more?

Generate points for smooth movement between two given points

If I have an accident, should I file a claim with my car insurance company?

Unknown,AppDomain 66 (master.sys[runtime].65) is Marked for Unload Due to Memory Pressure

Is Levitate supposed to basically disable a melee based enemy?

To which airspace does the border of two adjacent airspaces belong to?

How does speed affect lift?

Why do old games use flashing as means of showing damage?

Do I need to get a noble in order to win Splendor?

When is it legal to castle moving the rook first?

How could a planet have one hemisphere way warmer than the other without the planet being tidally locked?

Go for an isolated pawn

Question about derivation of kinematics equations

Is there any reason to change the ISO manually?

My boss says "This will help us better view the utilization of your services." Does this mean my job is ending in this organisation?

Is mathematics truth?

Does this bike use hydraulic brakes?

Why did the VIC-II and SID use 6 µm technology in the era of 3 µm and 1.5 µm?

slowest crash on the Moon?

Why did the Joi advertisement trigger K?

Were the women of Travancore, India, taxed for covering their breasts by breast size?

Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .NET Core?



Using wildcards for -group or -user with find command


Find a file where name starts with a capital letterFind files that end with numberPrint file name extension using -exec in findBatch Renaming ScriptFind files with group permissions more restrictive than owner permissionsCommand find and tar in scriptRegex not matching file using `find` despite being validFind and Replace with Sed, not a regular fileFind command - file path with white spaceBash array with folder paths and wildcards






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I'm trying to find owners of files on the system that all start with a specific name, for example



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls
17295583 0 drwxrwxr-x 2 unu unu 74 Mar 28 03:14 .
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295586 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test33
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11
17295588 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test22


I need find to only get files owned by users whose name starts with "br_".



So what I tried was



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -user "br_*" -ls
find: ‘br_*’ is not the name of a known user


Now a method I found that works is using awk, but I have certain problems with this method and it's not really usable for what I'm trying:



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls|awk 'if ($5 ~ "br_"'
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11


Is there a way to add wildcards to the -user or -group options of find?










share|improve this question
















migrated from stackoverflow.com Mar 28 at 3:29


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.



















  • With getent passwd get a list of users which match br_.* and build a list like: --user br_asd1 --user br_asd2 --user br_bfg1 for find command.

    – Cyrus
    Mar 28 at 3:33












  • GNU find does not have options to pass wildcards for -user and -group fields. One way would be to use GNU coreutils stat and use the %U quantifier to get the owner name. Do something like for file in *; do [ -f "$file" ] || continue; owner=$(stat -c '%U' "$file"); if [[ "$owner" =~ ^br.* ]]; then echo "$file"; fi; done

    – Inian
    Mar 28 at 3:52

















1















I'm trying to find owners of files on the system that all start with a specific name, for example



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls
17295583 0 drwxrwxr-x 2 unu unu 74 Mar 28 03:14 .
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295586 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test33
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11
17295588 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test22


I need find to only get files owned by users whose name starts with "br_".



So what I tried was



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -user "br_*" -ls
find: ‘br_*’ is not the name of a known user


Now a method I found that works is using awk, but I have certain problems with this method and it's not really usable for what I'm trying:



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls|awk 'if ($5 ~ "br_"'
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11


Is there a way to add wildcards to the -user or -group options of find?










share|improve this question
















migrated from stackoverflow.com Mar 28 at 3:29


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.



















  • With getent passwd get a list of users which match br_.* and build a list like: --user br_asd1 --user br_asd2 --user br_bfg1 for find command.

    – Cyrus
    Mar 28 at 3:33












  • GNU find does not have options to pass wildcards for -user and -group fields. One way would be to use GNU coreutils stat and use the %U quantifier to get the owner name. Do something like for file in *; do [ -f "$file" ] || continue; owner=$(stat -c '%U' "$file"); if [[ "$owner" =~ ^br.* ]]; then echo "$file"; fi; done

    – Inian
    Mar 28 at 3:52













1












1








1








I'm trying to find owners of files on the system that all start with a specific name, for example



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls
17295583 0 drwxrwxr-x 2 unu unu 74 Mar 28 03:14 .
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295586 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test33
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11
17295588 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test22


I need find to only get files owned by users whose name starts with "br_".



So what I tried was



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -user "br_*" -ls
find: ‘br_*’ is not the name of a known user


Now a method I found that works is using awk, but I have certain problems with this method and it's not really usable for what I'm trying:



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls|awk 'if ($5 ~ "br_"'
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11


Is there a way to add wildcards to the -user or -group options of find?










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to find owners of files on the system that all start with a specific name, for example



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls
17295583 0 drwxrwxr-x 2 unu unu 74 Mar 28 03:14 .
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295586 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test33
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11
17295588 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 unu unu 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test22


I need find to only get files owned by users whose name starts with "br_".



So what I tried was



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -user "br_*" -ls
find: ‘br_*’ is not the name of a known user


Now a method I found that works is using awk, but I have certain problems with this method and it's not really usable for what I'm trying:



[unu@here findtest]$ find . -ls|awk 'if ($5 ~ "br_"'
17295584 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd1 br_asd1 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test1
17295585 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_asd2 br_asd2 0 Mar 28 03:13 ./test2
17295587 0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 br_bfg1 br_bfg1 0 Mar 28 03:14 ./test11


Is there a way to add wildcards to the -user or -group options of find?







bash find wildcards






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 4:07









Prvt_Yadv

3,9113 gold badges17 silver badges34 bronze badges




3,9113 gold badges17 silver badges34 bronze badges










asked Mar 28 at 3:21







Lhakryma DL












migrated from stackoverflow.com Mar 28 at 3:29


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.











migrated from stackoverflow.com Mar 28 at 3:29


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.









migrated from stackoverflow.com Mar 28 at 3:29


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.














  • With getent passwd get a list of users which match br_.* and build a list like: --user br_asd1 --user br_asd2 --user br_bfg1 for find command.

    – Cyrus
    Mar 28 at 3:33












  • GNU find does not have options to pass wildcards for -user and -group fields. One way would be to use GNU coreutils stat and use the %U quantifier to get the owner name. Do something like for file in *; do [ -f "$file" ] || continue; owner=$(stat -c '%U' "$file"); if [[ "$owner" =~ ^br.* ]]; then echo "$file"; fi; done

    – Inian
    Mar 28 at 3:52

















  • With getent passwd get a list of users which match br_.* and build a list like: --user br_asd1 --user br_asd2 --user br_bfg1 for find command.

    – Cyrus
    Mar 28 at 3:33












  • GNU find does not have options to pass wildcards for -user and -group fields. One way would be to use GNU coreutils stat and use the %U quantifier to get the owner name. Do something like for file in *; do [ -f "$file" ] || continue; owner=$(stat -c '%U' "$file"); if [[ "$owner" =~ ^br.* ]]; then echo "$file"; fi; done

    – Inian
    Mar 28 at 3:52
















With getent passwd get a list of users which match br_.* and build a list like: --user br_asd1 --user br_asd2 --user br_bfg1 for find command.

– Cyrus
Mar 28 at 3:33






With getent passwd get a list of users which match br_.* and build a list like: --user br_asd1 --user br_asd2 --user br_bfg1 for find command.

– Cyrus
Mar 28 at 3:33














GNU find does not have options to pass wildcards for -user and -group fields. One way would be to use GNU coreutils stat and use the %U quantifier to get the owner name. Do something like for file in *; do [ -f "$file" ] || continue; owner=$(stat -c '%U' "$file"); if [[ "$owner" =~ ^br.* ]]; then echo "$file"; fi; done

– Inian
Mar 28 at 3:52





GNU find does not have options to pass wildcards for -user and -group fields. One way would be to use GNU coreutils stat and use the %U quantifier to get the owner name. Do something like for file in *; do [ -f "$file" ] || continue; owner=$(stat -c '%U' "$file"); if [[ "$owner" =~ ^br.* ]]; then echo "$file"; fi; done

– Inian
Mar 28 at 3:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1
















If you're writing for bash you can use an array to hold the set of users and another array to generate the corresponding syntax for find to match those users:



#!/bin/bash

# The beginning of the userids we need to match
match=br

# Find the matching set of users
users=($(
getent passwd |
awk -F: -vm="$match" 'BEGIN re = "^" m $1 ~ re print $1'
))

# Build the list of users ("find ( -user XX -o -user YY -o user ZZ ) ...")
finds=()
for user in "$users[@]"
do
finds+=('-o' '-user' "$user")
done
[[ $#finds[@] -gt 0 ]] && finds=('(' "$finds[@]:1" ')')

# Execute the find command with the set of users
find . "$finds[@]" -ls


As ever, you can prefix the find command with something like echo to see what would be executed. (Or you could run with bash -x to enable line-by-line debug reporting.)






share|improve this answer



























  • Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 28 at 8:46


















0
















If all you need is just a listing, I would go for a good old grep over find’s output. It would be slower, but much less typing.



At the very basic you might try this, for your example case:



find -printf '%u %pn' | egrep '^br_'


This gives you the list of files owned by users br_*, shown with username and filename on each line.



You might then expand the output by fiddling the -printf format string.



For instance, to make it resemble more an ls output:



find -printf '%-8.8u %-8.8g %M %8s %t %pn' | egrep '^br_'


The important thing to keep the command line as short as possible is to place the username at the very beginning, so that the egrep’s part can be kept short like that.



To see all that you can specify in the format string, go here, then search for -printf format.



Be careful though that if your files have newlines in their names then this solution might have problems in showing them.






share|improve this answer



























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509121%2fusing-wildcards-for-group-or-user-with-find-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1
















    If you're writing for bash you can use an array to hold the set of users and another array to generate the corresponding syntax for find to match those users:



    #!/bin/bash

    # The beginning of the userids we need to match
    match=br

    # Find the matching set of users
    users=($(
    getent passwd |
    awk -F: -vm="$match" 'BEGIN re = "^" m $1 ~ re print $1'
    ))

    # Build the list of users ("find ( -user XX -o -user YY -o user ZZ ) ...")
    finds=()
    for user in "$users[@]"
    do
    finds+=('-o' '-user' "$user")
    done
    [[ $#finds[@] -gt 0 ]] && finds=('(' "$finds[@]:1" ')')

    # Execute the find command with the set of users
    find . "$finds[@]" -ls


    As ever, you can prefix the find command with something like echo to see what would be executed. (Or you could run with bash -x to enable line-by-line debug reporting.)






    share|improve this answer



























    • Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

      – Kusalananda
      Mar 28 at 8:46















    1
















    If you're writing for bash you can use an array to hold the set of users and another array to generate the corresponding syntax for find to match those users:



    #!/bin/bash

    # The beginning of the userids we need to match
    match=br

    # Find the matching set of users
    users=($(
    getent passwd |
    awk -F: -vm="$match" 'BEGIN re = "^" m $1 ~ re print $1'
    ))

    # Build the list of users ("find ( -user XX -o -user YY -o user ZZ ) ...")
    finds=()
    for user in "$users[@]"
    do
    finds+=('-o' '-user' "$user")
    done
    [[ $#finds[@] -gt 0 ]] && finds=('(' "$finds[@]:1" ')')

    # Execute the find command with the set of users
    find . "$finds[@]" -ls


    As ever, you can prefix the find command with something like echo to see what would be executed. (Or you could run with bash -x to enable line-by-line debug reporting.)






    share|improve this answer



























    • Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

      – Kusalananda
      Mar 28 at 8:46













    1














    1










    1









    If you're writing for bash you can use an array to hold the set of users and another array to generate the corresponding syntax for find to match those users:



    #!/bin/bash

    # The beginning of the userids we need to match
    match=br

    # Find the matching set of users
    users=($(
    getent passwd |
    awk -F: -vm="$match" 'BEGIN re = "^" m $1 ~ re print $1'
    ))

    # Build the list of users ("find ( -user XX -o -user YY -o user ZZ ) ...")
    finds=()
    for user in "$users[@]"
    do
    finds+=('-o' '-user' "$user")
    done
    [[ $#finds[@] -gt 0 ]] && finds=('(' "$finds[@]:1" ')')

    # Execute the find command with the set of users
    find . "$finds[@]" -ls


    As ever, you can prefix the find command with something like echo to see what would be executed. (Or you could run with bash -x to enable line-by-line debug reporting.)






    share|improve this answer















    If you're writing for bash you can use an array to hold the set of users and another array to generate the corresponding syntax for find to match those users:



    #!/bin/bash

    # The beginning of the userids we need to match
    match=br

    # Find the matching set of users
    users=($(
    getent passwd |
    awk -F: -vm="$match" 'BEGIN re = "^" m $1 ~ re print $1'
    ))

    # Build the list of users ("find ( -user XX -o -user YY -o user ZZ ) ...")
    finds=()
    for user in "$users[@]"
    do
    finds+=('-o' '-user' "$user")
    done
    [[ $#finds[@] -gt 0 ]] && finds=('(' "$finds[@]:1" ')')

    # Execute the find command with the set of users
    find . "$finds[@]" -ls


    As ever, you can prefix the find command with something like echo to see what would be executed. (Or you could run with bash -x to enable line-by-line debug reporting.)







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 28 at 9:03

























    answered Mar 28 at 8:29









    roaimaroaima

    49.4k7 gold badges66 silver badges133 bronze badges




    49.4k7 gold badges66 silver badges133 bronze badges















    • Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

      – Kusalananda
      Mar 28 at 8:46

















    • Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

      – Kusalananda
      Mar 28 at 8:46
















    Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 28 at 8:46





    Instead of the test in each iteration of that loop, you could just use "$finds[@]:1" when calling find to ignore that first -o in the list.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 28 at 8:46













    0
















    If all you need is just a listing, I would go for a good old grep over find’s output. It would be slower, but much less typing.



    At the very basic you might try this, for your example case:



    find -printf '%u %pn' | egrep '^br_'


    This gives you the list of files owned by users br_*, shown with username and filename on each line.



    You might then expand the output by fiddling the -printf format string.



    For instance, to make it resemble more an ls output:



    find -printf '%-8.8u %-8.8g %M %8s %t %pn' | egrep '^br_'


    The important thing to keep the command line as short as possible is to place the username at the very beginning, so that the egrep’s part can be kept short like that.



    To see all that you can specify in the format string, go here, then search for -printf format.



    Be careful though that if your files have newlines in their names then this solution might have problems in showing them.






    share|improve this answer





























      0
















      If all you need is just a listing, I would go for a good old grep over find’s output. It would be slower, but much less typing.



      At the very basic you might try this, for your example case:



      find -printf '%u %pn' | egrep '^br_'


      This gives you the list of files owned by users br_*, shown with username and filename on each line.



      You might then expand the output by fiddling the -printf format string.



      For instance, to make it resemble more an ls output:



      find -printf '%-8.8u %-8.8g %M %8s %t %pn' | egrep '^br_'


      The important thing to keep the command line as short as possible is to place the username at the very beginning, so that the egrep’s part can be kept short like that.



      To see all that you can specify in the format string, go here, then search for -printf format.



      Be careful though that if your files have newlines in their names then this solution might have problems in showing them.






      share|improve this answer



























        0














        0










        0









        If all you need is just a listing, I would go for a good old grep over find’s output. It would be slower, but much less typing.



        At the very basic you might try this, for your example case:



        find -printf '%u %pn' | egrep '^br_'


        This gives you the list of files owned by users br_*, shown with username and filename on each line.



        You might then expand the output by fiddling the -printf format string.



        For instance, to make it resemble more an ls output:



        find -printf '%-8.8u %-8.8g %M %8s %t %pn' | egrep '^br_'


        The important thing to keep the command line as short as possible is to place the username at the very beginning, so that the egrep’s part can be kept short like that.



        To see all that you can specify in the format string, go here, then search for -printf format.



        Be careful though that if your files have newlines in their names then this solution might have problems in showing them.






        share|improve this answer













        If all you need is just a listing, I would go for a good old grep over find’s output. It would be slower, but much less typing.



        At the very basic you might try this, for your example case:



        find -printf '%u %pn' | egrep '^br_'


        This gives you the list of files owned by users br_*, shown with username and filename on each line.



        You might then expand the output by fiddling the -printf format string.



        For instance, to make it resemble more an ls output:



        find -printf '%-8.8u %-8.8g %M %8s %t %pn' | egrep '^br_'


        The important thing to keep the command line as short as possible is to place the username at the very beginning, so that the egrep’s part can be kept short like that.



        To see all that you can specify in the format string, go here, then search for -printf format.



        Be careful though that if your files have newlines in their names then this solution might have problems in showing them.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 29 at 0:13









        LL3LL3

        2,1772 silver badges14 bronze badges




        2,1772 silver badges14 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509121%2fusing-wildcards-for-group-or-user-with-find-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

            Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript