Longest repeating sequence using linq onlyLINQ query on a DataTableDynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>LINQ equivalent of foreach for IEnumerable<T>Multiple “order by” in LINQUsing LINQ to remove elements from a List<T>When to use .First and when to use .FirstOrDefault with LINQ?What is the Java equivalent for LINQ?LEFT OUTER JOIN in LINQLINQ Aggregate algorithm explainedGroup by in LINQ

Why do wings prefer laminar flow if cd is lower for turbulent flows?

Run "cd" command as superuser in Linux

Why did Grima shed a tear?

Why is macOS limited to 1064 processes?

Hypothesis testing- with normal approximation

Can a planet's magnetic field be generated by non-ferromagnetic metals?

Why are my plastic credit card and activation code sent separately?

Transforming the first Bell state into the other Bell states

Is exploit free code, software possible?

What is a GPU year?

Why is Ancient Greek "δέ" translated by Gothic "þan" /then/?

land of light bulbs

Why does Bane's stock exchange robbery actually work to bankrupt Bruce Wayne?

where does black come from in CMYK color mode?

Command which removes data left side of ";" (semicolon) on each row

What are the Advantages of having a Double-pane Space Helmet?

How does a manufacturer determine the warranty for the battery?

In Cura, can I make my top and bottom layer be all perimiters?

Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?

How to write pdf object directly in PDF and get number of this object via LaTeX or expl3?

How does a twisted piece of string/yarn wind back on itself? What kinds of forces are responsible for this?

Decay of spin-1/2 particle into two spin-1/2 particles

What is more proper notation in piano sheet music to denote that the left hand should be louder?

What could a technologically advanced but outnumbered alien race do to destroy humanity?



Longest repeating sequence using linq only


LINQ query on a DataTableDynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>LINQ equivalent of foreach for IEnumerable<T>Multiple “order by” in LINQUsing LINQ to remove elements from a List<T>When to use .First and when to use .FirstOrDefault with LINQ?What is the Java equivalent for LINQ?LEFT OUTER JOIN in LINQLINQ Aggregate algorithm explainedGroup by in LINQ






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









-3

















As the title says i have a task to find the longest repeating sequence in a string and it has to be done with linq only - no ifs, no loop, no try, assignment is only allowed on initialization of variables, recursion is allowed. I've found the solution online and i understand what is happening but i can't transform it to linq -I'm not that familiar with it. I would greatly appreciate if someone could help me. Here is a link to what ive found -https://www.javatpoint.com/program-to-find-longest-repeating-sequence-in-a-string.



List<int> a = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2;
List<List<int>> aa = new List<List<int>>();
outerLoop(a);

var max = aa.Max(x => x.Count);
var m = from v in aa
where v.Count == max
select v;
m.Dump();

void outerLoop(List<int> list)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(list.Skip(list.Count-1).Take(list.Count).ToList());
innerLoop(list, list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList());

f.ForEach(k => outerLoop(list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList()));



void innerLoop(List<int> l, List<int> subList)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(subList.Skip(subList.Count-1).Take(subList.Count).ToList());
var tt = l.TakeWhile((ch, i) => i < subList.Count && subList[i] == ch).ToList();

aa.Add(tt);
f.ForEach(k => innerLoop(l, subList.Skip(1).Take(subList.Count).ToList()));



so i came up with this "beauty", i don't think it's good code but i think it works. If anyone is interested and wants to make suggestions how to make it better, they are more than welcome to :)



if input is int[] x= 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2
result should be 1212










share|improve this question




























  • You may create linq function?

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 21:43






  • 3





    @Daniel welcome to SO, unfortunately SO is not a code writing service, if you post your existing code, ie what you have tried, then others might be able to help you better.

    – mxmissile
    Mar 28 at 21:46











  • @mxmissile updated, and you know you could have just pointed me to an useful tutorial or something and not get passive aggressive immediately considering ive admitted to not knowing a lot in this subject. Thanks for the tips tho

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:14












  • @isaeid i believe so

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:15











  • Linq has set functions too, like union.

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 22:26

















-3

















As the title says i have a task to find the longest repeating sequence in a string and it has to be done with linq only - no ifs, no loop, no try, assignment is only allowed on initialization of variables, recursion is allowed. I've found the solution online and i understand what is happening but i can't transform it to linq -I'm not that familiar with it. I would greatly appreciate if someone could help me. Here is a link to what ive found -https://www.javatpoint.com/program-to-find-longest-repeating-sequence-in-a-string.



List<int> a = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2;
List<List<int>> aa = new List<List<int>>();
outerLoop(a);

var max = aa.Max(x => x.Count);
var m = from v in aa
where v.Count == max
select v;
m.Dump();

void outerLoop(List<int> list)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(list.Skip(list.Count-1).Take(list.Count).ToList());
innerLoop(list, list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList());

f.ForEach(k => outerLoop(list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList()));



void innerLoop(List<int> l, List<int> subList)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(subList.Skip(subList.Count-1).Take(subList.Count).ToList());
var tt = l.TakeWhile((ch, i) => i < subList.Count && subList[i] == ch).ToList();

aa.Add(tt);
f.ForEach(k => innerLoop(l, subList.Skip(1).Take(subList.Count).ToList()));



so i came up with this "beauty", i don't think it's good code but i think it works. If anyone is interested and wants to make suggestions how to make it better, they are more than welcome to :)



if input is int[] x= 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2
result should be 1212










share|improve this question




























  • You may create linq function?

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 21:43






  • 3





    @Daniel welcome to SO, unfortunately SO is not a code writing service, if you post your existing code, ie what you have tried, then others might be able to help you better.

    – mxmissile
    Mar 28 at 21:46











  • @mxmissile updated, and you know you could have just pointed me to an useful tutorial or something and not get passive aggressive immediately considering ive admitted to not knowing a lot in this subject. Thanks for the tips tho

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:14












  • @isaeid i believe so

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:15











  • Linq has set functions too, like union.

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 22:26













-3












-3








-3








As the title says i have a task to find the longest repeating sequence in a string and it has to be done with linq only - no ifs, no loop, no try, assignment is only allowed on initialization of variables, recursion is allowed. I've found the solution online and i understand what is happening but i can't transform it to linq -I'm not that familiar with it. I would greatly appreciate if someone could help me. Here is a link to what ive found -https://www.javatpoint.com/program-to-find-longest-repeating-sequence-in-a-string.



List<int> a = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2;
List<List<int>> aa = new List<List<int>>();
outerLoop(a);

var max = aa.Max(x => x.Count);
var m = from v in aa
where v.Count == max
select v;
m.Dump();

void outerLoop(List<int> list)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(list.Skip(list.Count-1).Take(list.Count).ToList());
innerLoop(list, list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList());

f.ForEach(k => outerLoop(list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList()));



void innerLoop(List<int> l, List<int> subList)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(subList.Skip(subList.Count-1).Take(subList.Count).ToList());
var tt = l.TakeWhile((ch, i) => i < subList.Count && subList[i] == ch).ToList();

aa.Add(tt);
f.ForEach(k => innerLoop(l, subList.Skip(1).Take(subList.Count).ToList()));



so i came up with this "beauty", i don't think it's good code but i think it works. If anyone is interested and wants to make suggestions how to make it better, they are more than welcome to :)



if input is int[] x= 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2
result should be 1212










share|improve this question

















As the title says i have a task to find the longest repeating sequence in a string and it has to be done with linq only - no ifs, no loop, no try, assignment is only allowed on initialization of variables, recursion is allowed. I've found the solution online and i understand what is happening but i can't transform it to linq -I'm not that familiar with it. I would greatly appreciate if someone could help me. Here is a link to what ive found -https://www.javatpoint.com/program-to-find-longest-repeating-sequence-in-a-string.



List<int> a = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2;
List<List<int>> aa = new List<List<int>>();
outerLoop(a);

var max = aa.Max(x => x.Count);
var m = from v in aa
where v.Count == max
select v;
m.Dump();

void outerLoop(List<int> list)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(list.Skip(list.Count-1).Take(list.Count).ToList());
innerLoop(list, list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList());

f.ForEach(k => outerLoop(list.Skip(1).Take(list.Count).ToList()));



void innerLoop(List<int> l, List<int> subList)

List<int> f = new List<int>();
f.AddRange(subList.Skip(subList.Count-1).Take(subList.Count).ToList());
var tt = l.TakeWhile((ch, i) => i < subList.Count && subList[i] == ch).ToList();

aa.Add(tt);
f.ForEach(k => innerLoop(l, subList.Skip(1).Take(subList.Count).ToList()));



so i came up with this "beauty", i don't think it's good code but i think it works. If anyone is interested and wants to make suggestions how to make it better, they are more than welcome to :)



if input is int[] x= 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2
result should be 1212







c# linq lcs lrs






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 10:30







Daniel

















asked Mar 28 at 21:36









Daniel Daniel

11 bronze badge




11 bronze badge















  • You may create linq function?

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 21:43






  • 3





    @Daniel welcome to SO, unfortunately SO is not a code writing service, if you post your existing code, ie what you have tried, then others might be able to help you better.

    – mxmissile
    Mar 28 at 21:46











  • @mxmissile updated, and you know you could have just pointed me to an useful tutorial or something and not get passive aggressive immediately considering ive admitted to not knowing a lot in this subject. Thanks for the tips tho

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:14












  • @isaeid i believe so

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:15











  • Linq has set functions too, like union.

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 22:26

















  • You may create linq function?

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 21:43






  • 3





    @Daniel welcome to SO, unfortunately SO is not a code writing service, if you post your existing code, ie what you have tried, then others might be able to help you better.

    – mxmissile
    Mar 28 at 21:46











  • @mxmissile updated, and you know you could have just pointed me to an useful tutorial or something and not get passive aggressive immediately considering ive admitted to not knowing a lot in this subject. Thanks for the tips tho

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:14












  • @isaeid i believe so

    – Daniel
    Mar 28 at 22:15











  • Linq has set functions too, like union.

    – isaeid
    Mar 28 at 22:26
















You may create linq function?

– isaeid
Mar 28 at 21:43





You may create linq function?

– isaeid
Mar 28 at 21:43




3




3





@Daniel welcome to SO, unfortunately SO is not a code writing service, if you post your existing code, ie what you have tried, then others might be able to help you better.

– mxmissile
Mar 28 at 21:46





@Daniel welcome to SO, unfortunately SO is not a code writing service, if you post your existing code, ie what you have tried, then others might be able to help you better.

– mxmissile
Mar 28 at 21:46













@mxmissile updated, and you know you could have just pointed me to an useful tutorial or something and not get passive aggressive immediately considering ive admitted to not knowing a lot in this subject. Thanks for the tips tho

– Daniel
Mar 28 at 22:14






@mxmissile updated, and you know you could have just pointed me to an useful tutorial or something and not get passive aggressive immediately considering ive admitted to not knowing a lot in this subject. Thanks for the tips tho

– Daniel
Mar 28 at 22:14














@isaeid i believe so

– Daniel
Mar 28 at 22:15





@isaeid i believe so

– Daniel
Mar 28 at 22:15













Linq has set functions too, like union.

– isaeid
Mar 28 at 22:26





Linq has set functions too, like union.

– isaeid
Mar 28 at 22:26












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0


















Give this a go:



List<int> words = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 ;

string result =
words
.Select((c, i) => i)
.SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, words.Count - i).Select(j => words.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
.GroupBy(x => String.Join(",", x.w), x => x.i)
.Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
.Select(x => x.Key)
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
.First();


That gives me 1,2,1,2.



If you want one that actually works with strings, try this:



var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

string result =
word
.Select((c, i) => i)
.SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i).Select(j => word.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
.GroupBy(x => new string(x.w.ToArray()), x => x.i)
.Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
.Select(x => x.Key)
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
.First();


That gives me ali.




Here's a slightly more understandable version:



var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

string result =
(
from i in Enumerable.Range(0, word.Length)
from j in Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i)
group i by word.Substring(i, j) into gis
where gis.Skip(1).Any()
orderby gis.Key.Length descending
select gis.Key
).First();





share|improve this answer




























  • I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

    – Daniel
    Mar 29 at 10:36











  • @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

    – Enigmativity
    Mar 29 at 11:21











  • Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

    – NetMage
    Mar 29 at 17:20



















0


















Here is my version. It isn't a single LINQ expression, but does use only LINQ. It does return all same length subsequences if there are multiple answers. It should work any type of sequence. It was written to only use standard LINQ methods.



It uses GroupBy with a string key to implement a sequence Distinct. (Because of this trick, lists that contain items with commas might not work right.) In production code, I would use a Distinct with an IEqualityComparer for sequences based on SequenceEqual. It also has a separate step for finding the maximum repeated sequence length and then finding all the matching sequences, in production code I would use a MaxBy extension.



Update: Since I was using GroupBy for DistinctBy, I realized I could just use that to count the subsequence repeats directly rather than search for them.



var repeaters = Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count) // starting positions
.SelectMany(n => Enumerable.Range(1, (words.Count - n) / 2).Select(l => words.Skip(n).Take(l).ToList())) // subseqs from each starting position
.GroupBy(s => String.Join(",", s), (k, sg) => new seq = sg.First(), Repeats = sg.Count() ) // count each sequence
.Where(sr => sr.Repeats > 1) // only keep repeated sequences
.Select(sr => sr.seq); // no longer need counts
var maxRepeaterLen = repeaters.Select(ss => ss.Count()).Max(); // find longest repeated sequence's length
var maxLenRepeaters = repeaters.Where(ss => ss.Count() == maxRepeaterLen); // return all sequences matching longest length





share|improve this answer





























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55407210%2flongest-repeating-sequence-using-linq-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0


















    Give this a go:



    List<int> words = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 ;

    string result =
    words
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, words.Count - i).Select(j => words.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => String.Join(",", x.w), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me 1,2,1,2.



    If you want one that actually works with strings, try this:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    word
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i).Select(j => word.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => new string(x.w.ToArray()), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me ali.




    Here's a slightly more understandable version:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    (
    from i in Enumerable.Range(0, word.Length)
    from j in Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i)
    group i by word.Substring(i, j) into gis
    where gis.Skip(1).Any()
    orderby gis.Key.Length descending
    select gis.Key
    ).First();





    share|improve this answer




























    • I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

      – Daniel
      Mar 29 at 10:36











    • @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

      – Enigmativity
      Mar 29 at 11:21











    • Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

      – NetMage
      Mar 29 at 17:20
















    0


















    Give this a go:



    List<int> words = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 ;

    string result =
    words
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, words.Count - i).Select(j => words.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => String.Join(",", x.w), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me 1,2,1,2.



    If you want one that actually works with strings, try this:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    word
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i).Select(j => word.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => new string(x.w.ToArray()), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me ali.




    Here's a slightly more understandable version:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    (
    from i in Enumerable.Range(0, word.Length)
    from j in Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i)
    group i by word.Substring(i, j) into gis
    where gis.Skip(1).Any()
    orderby gis.Key.Length descending
    select gis.Key
    ).First();





    share|improve this answer




























    • I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

      – Daniel
      Mar 29 at 10:36











    • @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

      – Enigmativity
      Mar 29 at 11:21











    • Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

      – NetMage
      Mar 29 at 17:20














    0














    0










    0









    Give this a go:



    List<int> words = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 ;

    string result =
    words
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, words.Count - i).Select(j => words.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => String.Join(",", x.w), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me 1,2,1,2.



    If you want one that actually works with strings, try this:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    word
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i).Select(j => word.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => new string(x.w.ToArray()), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me ali.




    Here's a slightly more understandable version:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    (
    from i in Enumerable.Range(0, word.Length)
    from j in Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i)
    group i by word.Substring(i, j) into gis
    where gis.Skip(1).Any()
    orderby gis.Key.Length descending
    select gis.Key
    ).First();





    share|improve this answer
















    Give this a go:



    List<int> words = new List<int> 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 ;

    string result =
    words
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, words.Count - i).Select(j => words.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => String.Join(",", x.w), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me 1,2,1,2.



    If you want one that actually works with strings, try this:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    word
    .Select((c, i) => i)
    .SelectMany(i => Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i).Select(j => word.Skip(i).Take(j)), (i, w) => new i, w )
    .GroupBy(x => new string(x.w.ToArray()), x => x.i)
    .Where(x => x.Skip(1).Any())
    .Select(x => x.Key)
    .OrderByDescending(x => x.Length)
    .First();


    That gives me ali.




    Here's a slightly more understandable version:



    var word = "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious";

    string result =
    (
    from i in Enumerable.Range(0, word.Length)
    from j in Enumerable.Range(1, word.Length - i)
    group i by word.Substring(i, j) into gis
    where gis.Skip(1).Any()
    orderby gis.Key.Length descending
    select gis.Key
    ).First();






    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 29 at 11:21

























    answered Mar 29 at 0:06









    EnigmativityEnigmativity

    82.2k9 gold badges68 silver badges138 bronze badges




    82.2k9 gold badges68 silver badges138 bronze badges















    • I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

      – Daniel
      Mar 29 at 10:36











    • @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

      – Enigmativity
      Mar 29 at 11:21











    • Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

      – NetMage
      Mar 29 at 17:20


















    • I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

      – Daniel
      Mar 29 at 10:36











    • @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

      – Enigmativity
      Mar 29 at 11:21











    • Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

      – NetMage
      Mar 29 at 17:20

















    I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

    – Daniel
    Mar 29 at 10:36





    I believe this is working (its getting the correct result when i test it), but i don't understand it well enough to test all cases (code is a bit complicated for me right now, and i find it a bit hard to follow)

    – Daniel
    Mar 29 at 10:36













    @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

    – Enigmativity
    Mar 29 at 11:21





    @Daniel - I've added a slightly more understandable version. Let me know if that's better.

    – Enigmativity
    Mar 29 at 11:21













    Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

    – NetMage
    Mar 29 at 17:20






    Interesting trick with .Skip(1).Any() for .Count() > 1 but since Grouping implements Count() efficiently, it may not be better. Also, while trickier, I prefer handling the case of two equal length sequences being returned when they both repeat. Also suggest Select((c,i) => i) is a tricky way to say Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count-1) though one reference to words is nice.

    – NetMage
    Mar 29 at 17:20














    0


















    Here is my version. It isn't a single LINQ expression, but does use only LINQ. It does return all same length subsequences if there are multiple answers. It should work any type of sequence. It was written to only use standard LINQ methods.



    It uses GroupBy with a string key to implement a sequence Distinct. (Because of this trick, lists that contain items with commas might not work right.) In production code, I would use a Distinct with an IEqualityComparer for sequences based on SequenceEqual. It also has a separate step for finding the maximum repeated sequence length and then finding all the matching sequences, in production code I would use a MaxBy extension.



    Update: Since I was using GroupBy for DistinctBy, I realized I could just use that to count the subsequence repeats directly rather than search for them.



    var repeaters = Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count) // starting positions
    .SelectMany(n => Enumerable.Range(1, (words.Count - n) / 2).Select(l => words.Skip(n).Take(l).ToList())) // subseqs from each starting position
    .GroupBy(s => String.Join(",", s), (k, sg) => new seq = sg.First(), Repeats = sg.Count() ) // count each sequence
    .Where(sr => sr.Repeats > 1) // only keep repeated sequences
    .Select(sr => sr.seq); // no longer need counts
    var maxRepeaterLen = repeaters.Select(ss => ss.Count()).Max(); // find longest repeated sequence's length
    var maxLenRepeaters = repeaters.Where(ss => ss.Count() == maxRepeaterLen); // return all sequences matching longest length





    share|improve this answer
































      0


















      Here is my version. It isn't a single LINQ expression, but does use only LINQ. It does return all same length subsequences if there are multiple answers. It should work any type of sequence. It was written to only use standard LINQ methods.



      It uses GroupBy with a string key to implement a sequence Distinct. (Because of this trick, lists that contain items with commas might not work right.) In production code, I would use a Distinct with an IEqualityComparer for sequences based on SequenceEqual. It also has a separate step for finding the maximum repeated sequence length and then finding all the matching sequences, in production code I would use a MaxBy extension.



      Update: Since I was using GroupBy for DistinctBy, I realized I could just use that to count the subsequence repeats directly rather than search for them.



      var repeaters = Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count) // starting positions
      .SelectMany(n => Enumerable.Range(1, (words.Count - n) / 2).Select(l => words.Skip(n).Take(l).ToList())) // subseqs from each starting position
      .GroupBy(s => String.Join(",", s), (k, sg) => new seq = sg.First(), Repeats = sg.Count() ) // count each sequence
      .Where(sr => sr.Repeats > 1) // only keep repeated sequences
      .Select(sr => sr.seq); // no longer need counts
      var maxRepeaterLen = repeaters.Select(ss => ss.Count()).Max(); // find longest repeated sequence's length
      var maxLenRepeaters = repeaters.Where(ss => ss.Count() == maxRepeaterLen); // return all sequences matching longest length





      share|improve this answer






























        0














        0










        0









        Here is my version. It isn't a single LINQ expression, but does use only LINQ. It does return all same length subsequences if there are multiple answers. It should work any type of sequence. It was written to only use standard LINQ methods.



        It uses GroupBy with a string key to implement a sequence Distinct. (Because of this trick, lists that contain items with commas might not work right.) In production code, I would use a Distinct with an IEqualityComparer for sequences based on SequenceEqual. It also has a separate step for finding the maximum repeated sequence length and then finding all the matching sequences, in production code I would use a MaxBy extension.



        Update: Since I was using GroupBy for DistinctBy, I realized I could just use that to count the subsequence repeats directly rather than search for them.



        var repeaters = Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count) // starting positions
        .SelectMany(n => Enumerable.Range(1, (words.Count - n) / 2).Select(l => words.Skip(n).Take(l).ToList())) // subseqs from each starting position
        .GroupBy(s => String.Join(",", s), (k, sg) => new seq = sg.First(), Repeats = sg.Count() ) // count each sequence
        .Where(sr => sr.Repeats > 1) // only keep repeated sequences
        .Select(sr => sr.seq); // no longer need counts
        var maxRepeaterLen = repeaters.Select(ss => ss.Count()).Max(); // find longest repeated sequence's length
        var maxLenRepeaters = repeaters.Where(ss => ss.Count() == maxRepeaterLen); // return all sequences matching longest length





        share|improve this answer
















        Here is my version. It isn't a single LINQ expression, but does use only LINQ. It does return all same length subsequences if there are multiple answers. It should work any type of sequence. It was written to only use standard LINQ methods.



        It uses GroupBy with a string key to implement a sequence Distinct. (Because of this trick, lists that contain items with commas might not work right.) In production code, I would use a Distinct with an IEqualityComparer for sequences based on SequenceEqual. It also has a separate step for finding the maximum repeated sequence length and then finding all the matching sequences, in production code I would use a MaxBy extension.



        Update: Since I was using GroupBy for DistinctBy, I realized I could just use that to count the subsequence repeats directly rather than search for them.



        var repeaters = Enumerable.Range(0, words.Count) // starting positions
        .SelectMany(n => Enumerable.Range(1, (words.Count - n) / 2).Select(l => words.Skip(n).Take(l).ToList())) // subseqs from each starting position
        .GroupBy(s => String.Join(",", s), (k, sg) => new seq = sg.First(), Repeats = sg.Count() ) // count each sequence
        .Where(sr => sr.Repeats > 1) // only keep repeated sequences
        .Select(sr => sr.seq); // no longer need counts
        var maxRepeaterLen = repeaters.Select(ss => ss.Count()).Max(); // find longest repeated sequence's length
        var maxLenRepeaters = repeaters.Where(ss => ss.Count() == maxRepeaterLen); // return all sequences matching longest length






        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 29 at 19:33

























        answered Mar 29 at 18:51









        NetMageNetMage

        16.8k1 gold badge22 silver badges37 bronze badges




        16.8k1 gold badge22 silver badges37 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55407210%2flongest-repeating-sequence-using-linq-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현