IF Statement with multiple conditions always saying true (nested in while loop)data.table vs dplyr: can one do something well the other can't or does poorly?Issues with nested while loop in for loop for RIfelse statment across multiple rowsIf value is in another dataframe, replace multiple columns with NAElegant way to do nested if else statements for multiple groupsifelse inside for loop w/ 2 conditionsIncrease efficiency of for loop with conditional logicMy if..else code is failingUpdating a vector outside a For Loop based on dataframe column conditionDataframe change names of factors if frequency of the factor is lower than some number

Square spiral in Mathematica

Why is vowel phonology represented in a trapezoid instead of a square?

refer string as a field API name

Why is Drogon so much better in battle than Rhaegal and Viserion?

Is it standard to have the first week's pay indefinitely withheld?

How can we delete item permanently without storing in Recycle Bin?

Physically unpleasant work environment

Why use a retrograde orbit?

A latin word for "area of interest"

How could it be that 80% of townspeople were farmers during the Edo period in Japan?

Cycling to work - 30mile return

How was the blinking terminal cursor invented?

Holding rent money for my friend which amounts to over $10k?

Does a non-singular matrix have a large minor with disjoint rows and columns and full rank?

Polynomial division: Is this trick obvious?

What dog breeds survive the apocalypse for generations?

Why do academics prefer Mac/Linux?

Why can't I share a one use code with anyone else?

Failing students when it might cause them economic ruin

Usage of the relative pronoun "dont"

How does the Heat Metal spell interact with a follow-up Frostbite spell?

What do astronauts do with their trash on the ISS?

How can I make dummy text (like lipsum) grey?

How does this piece of code determine array size without using sizeof( )?



IF Statement with multiple conditions always saying true (nested in while loop)


data.table vs dplyr: can one do something well the other can't or does poorly?Issues with nested while loop in for loop for RIfelse statment across multiple rowsIf value is in another dataframe, replace multiple columns with NAElegant way to do nested if else statements for multiple groupsifelse inside for loop w/ 2 conditionsIncrease efficiency of for loop with conditional logicMy if..else code is failingUpdating a vector outside a For Loop based on dataframe column conditionDataframe change names of factors if frequency of the factor is lower than some number






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















Please see my code below.



I have a data frame where each race a person identifies with is in a column (ex. AWHITE, ABLACK, etc.) and if they identify with this race then the entry is 1 (if not the entry is 2). Respondents can identify with more than one race.



I'm trying to identify when a respondent has stated they belong to more than one race. If they do, I want one column (ARACE) to update to 91 and another column (AOTHRACE) to become 2.



The if statement (in the code below) is always evaluating to TRUE. Even though this is not correct. There are respondents who identify as only one race (i.e. white). I've looked this over multiple times, but I can't find where I've messed up.



I plan to use more if statements (if, else if) for the other races/columns as well (i.e. a respondent identifies as black AND at least one other race), but I can't even get the first one to work, so I haven't implemented that.



(I don't actually want the else to be 0, I just used that to confirm the code wasn't working as expected. When I ran the summary function on ARACE the minimum was 91, so I know this statement was never evaluated.)



i <- 0
while (i <= nrow(nhes05v2))
if ((nhes05v2$AWHITE == 1) && (any(nhes05v2$ABLACK==1, nhes05v2$AAMIND==1, nhes05v2$AASIAN==1, nhes05v2$APACI==1)))
nhes05v2$ARACE = 91
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 2
else nhes05v2$ARACE = 0
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 0
i <- i+1


Here's an example of the values:



> nhes05v2$AWHITE[1:20]
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> nhes05v2$ABLACK[1:20]
[1] 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AASIAN[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AAMIND[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$APACI[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2


I would like the output to be something like (this would be with more than just my one if statement above, there'd be more if, else if, but since I'm stuck on the first I haven't gone past that)



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Currently the output is



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2









share|improve this question
























  • Are your race variables (AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND , etc.) coded as numeric or factor levels?

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • Your code is not reproducible and testable. Please share a reproducible example of your data frame and the expected output. It is likely that we don't need any for-loop or while-loop to achieve your task.

    – www
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • @NM_ they are currently numeric

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:32











  • @www I've edited to add some context. Thank you both for your feedback!

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:33











  • In order to belong to more than one race, is it possible for some one to be of two non-white races (for example, Asian and Black)? This is because your current if statement considers that a person is more than one race if they are white + at least one more race (i.e. in order to be mixed, that have to be white + some other race).

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:48


















1















Please see my code below.



I have a data frame where each race a person identifies with is in a column (ex. AWHITE, ABLACK, etc.) and if they identify with this race then the entry is 1 (if not the entry is 2). Respondents can identify with more than one race.



I'm trying to identify when a respondent has stated they belong to more than one race. If they do, I want one column (ARACE) to update to 91 and another column (AOTHRACE) to become 2.



The if statement (in the code below) is always evaluating to TRUE. Even though this is not correct. There are respondents who identify as only one race (i.e. white). I've looked this over multiple times, but I can't find where I've messed up.



I plan to use more if statements (if, else if) for the other races/columns as well (i.e. a respondent identifies as black AND at least one other race), but I can't even get the first one to work, so I haven't implemented that.



(I don't actually want the else to be 0, I just used that to confirm the code wasn't working as expected. When I ran the summary function on ARACE the minimum was 91, so I know this statement was never evaluated.)



i <- 0
while (i <= nrow(nhes05v2))
if ((nhes05v2$AWHITE == 1) && (any(nhes05v2$ABLACK==1, nhes05v2$AAMIND==1, nhes05v2$AASIAN==1, nhes05v2$APACI==1)))
nhes05v2$ARACE = 91
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 2
else nhes05v2$ARACE = 0
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 0
i <- i+1


Here's an example of the values:



> nhes05v2$AWHITE[1:20]
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> nhes05v2$ABLACK[1:20]
[1] 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AASIAN[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AAMIND[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$APACI[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2


I would like the output to be something like (this would be with more than just my one if statement above, there'd be more if, else if, but since I'm stuck on the first I haven't gone past that)



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Currently the output is



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2









share|improve this question
























  • Are your race variables (AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND , etc.) coded as numeric or factor levels?

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • Your code is not reproducible and testable. Please share a reproducible example of your data frame and the expected output. It is likely that we don't need any for-loop or while-loop to achieve your task.

    – www
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • @NM_ they are currently numeric

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:32











  • @www I've edited to add some context. Thank you both for your feedback!

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:33











  • In order to belong to more than one race, is it possible for some one to be of two non-white races (for example, Asian and Black)? This is because your current if statement considers that a person is more than one race if they are white + at least one more race (i.e. in order to be mixed, that have to be white + some other race).

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:48














1












1








1








Please see my code below.



I have a data frame where each race a person identifies with is in a column (ex. AWHITE, ABLACK, etc.) and if they identify with this race then the entry is 1 (if not the entry is 2). Respondents can identify with more than one race.



I'm trying to identify when a respondent has stated they belong to more than one race. If they do, I want one column (ARACE) to update to 91 and another column (AOTHRACE) to become 2.



The if statement (in the code below) is always evaluating to TRUE. Even though this is not correct. There are respondents who identify as only one race (i.e. white). I've looked this over multiple times, but I can't find where I've messed up.



I plan to use more if statements (if, else if) for the other races/columns as well (i.e. a respondent identifies as black AND at least one other race), but I can't even get the first one to work, so I haven't implemented that.



(I don't actually want the else to be 0, I just used that to confirm the code wasn't working as expected. When I ran the summary function on ARACE the minimum was 91, so I know this statement was never evaluated.)



i <- 0
while (i <= nrow(nhes05v2))
if ((nhes05v2$AWHITE == 1) && (any(nhes05v2$ABLACK==1, nhes05v2$AAMIND==1, nhes05v2$AASIAN==1, nhes05v2$APACI==1)))
nhes05v2$ARACE = 91
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 2
else nhes05v2$ARACE = 0
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 0
i <- i+1


Here's an example of the values:



> nhes05v2$AWHITE[1:20]
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> nhes05v2$ABLACK[1:20]
[1] 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AASIAN[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AAMIND[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$APACI[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2


I would like the output to be something like (this would be with more than just my one if statement above, there'd be more if, else if, but since I'm stuck on the first I haven't gone past that)



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Currently the output is



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2









share|improve this question
















Please see my code below.



I have a data frame where each race a person identifies with is in a column (ex. AWHITE, ABLACK, etc.) and if they identify with this race then the entry is 1 (if not the entry is 2). Respondents can identify with more than one race.



I'm trying to identify when a respondent has stated they belong to more than one race. If they do, I want one column (ARACE) to update to 91 and another column (AOTHRACE) to become 2.



The if statement (in the code below) is always evaluating to TRUE. Even though this is not correct. There are respondents who identify as only one race (i.e. white). I've looked this over multiple times, but I can't find where I've messed up.



I plan to use more if statements (if, else if) for the other races/columns as well (i.e. a respondent identifies as black AND at least one other race), but I can't even get the first one to work, so I haven't implemented that.



(I don't actually want the else to be 0, I just used that to confirm the code wasn't working as expected. When I ran the summary function on ARACE the minimum was 91, so I know this statement was never evaluated.)



i <- 0
while (i <= nrow(nhes05v2))
if ((nhes05v2$AWHITE == 1) && (any(nhes05v2$ABLACK==1, nhes05v2$AAMIND==1, nhes05v2$AASIAN==1, nhes05v2$APACI==1)))
nhes05v2$ARACE = 91
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 2
else nhes05v2$ARACE = 0
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = 0
i <- i+1


Here's an example of the values:



> nhes05v2$AWHITE[1:20]
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> nhes05v2$ABLACK[1:20]
[1] 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AASIAN[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$AAMIND[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
> nhes05v2$APACI[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2


I would like the output to be something like (this would be with more than just my one if statement above, there'd be more if, else if, but since I'm stuck on the first I haven't gone past that)



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Currently the output is



> nhes05v2$ARACE[1:20]
[1] 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
> nhes05v2$AOTHRACE[1:20]
[1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2






r






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 23 at 16:57







jazlaw

















asked Mar 23 at 16:13









jazlawjazlaw

84




84












  • Are your race variables (AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND , etc.) coded as numeric or factor levels?

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • Your code is not reproducible and testable. Please share a reproducible example of your data frame and the expected output. It is likely that we don't need any for-loop or while-loop to achieve your task.

    – www
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • @NM_ they are currently numeric

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:32











  • @www I've edited to add some context. Thank you both for your feedback!

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:33











  • In order to belong to more than one race, is it possible for some one to be of two non-white races (for example, Asian and Black)? This is because your current if statement considers that a person is more than one race if they are white + at least one more race (i.e. in order to be mixed, that have to be white + some other race).

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:48


















  • Are your race variables (AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND , etc.) coded as numeric or factor levels?

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • Your code is not reproducible and testable. Please share a reproducible example of your data frame and the expected output. It is likely that we don't need any for-loop or while-loop to achieve your task.

    – www
    Mar 23 at 16:18











  • @NM_ they are currently numeric

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:32











  • @www I've edited to add some context. Thank you both for your feedback!

    – jazlaw
    Mar 23 at 16:33











  • In order to belong to more than one race, is it possible for some one to be of two non-white races (for example, Asian and Black)? This is because your current if statement considers that a person is more than one race if they are white + at least one more race (i.e. in order to be mixed, that have to be white + some other race).

    – NM_
    Mar 23 at 16:48

















Are your race variables (AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND , etc.) coded as numeric or factor levels?

– NM_
Mar 23 at 16:18





Are your race variables (AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND , etc.) coded as numeric or factor levels?

– NM_
Mar 23 at 16:18













Your code is not reproducible and testable. Please share a reproducible example of your data frame and the expected output. It is likely that we don't need any for-loop or while-loop to achieve your task.

– www
Mar 23 at 16:18





Your code is not reproducible and testable. Please share a reproducible example of your data frame and the expected output. It is likely that we don't need any for-loop or while-loop to achieve your task.

– www
Mar 23 at 16:18













@NM_ they are currently numeric

– jazlaw
Mar 23 at 16:32





@NM_ they are currently numeric

– jazlaw
Mar 23 at 16:32













@www I've edited to add some context. Thank you both for your feedback!

– jazlaw
Mar 23 at 16:33





@www I've edited to add some context. Thank you both for your feedback!

– jazlaw
Mar 23 at 16:33













In order to belong to more than one race, is it possible for some one to be of two non-white races (for example, Asian and Black)? This is because your current if statement considers that a person is more than one race if they are white + at least one more race (i.e. in order to be mixed, that have to be white + some other race).

– NM_
Mar 23 at 16:48






In order to belong to more than one race, is it possible for some one to be of two non-white races (for example, Asian and Black)? This is because your current if statement considers that a person is more than one race if they are white + at least one more race (i.e. in order to be mixed, that have to be white + some other race).

– NM_
Mar 23 at 16:48













2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














We can achieve this by recoding the 2 to 0 (i.e, 0 = "No") and using the following code with 2 functions used to determine whether a record satisfies criteria.



Please note that the code assumes that the race variables are numeric.



# Replicate your example
AWHITE = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", " ")))
ABLACK = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
AASIAN = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
AAMIND = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
APACI = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))

nhes05v2 = data.frame(AWHITE, ABLACK, AASIAN, AAMIND, APACI)
> nhes05v2 # Partial output given
AWHITE ABLACK AASIAN AAMIND APACI
1 1 2 2 2 2
2 1 1 2 2 2
3 1 2 2 2 2
...
18 1 2 2 2 2
19 1 2 2 2 2
20 1 2 2 2 2


Recode the variables



# Recode variables. Change all 2's to 0's (New coding is 1 = Yes, 0 = No).
nhes05v2[nhes05v2 == 2] = 0


Create 2 functions to satisfy criteria for ARACE and AORACE



# A person is mixed race it they answer 1 to more than one race
# Therefore a person whose row sum is greater than 1 is mixed race

determine.arace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 91, 0)


determine.aothrace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 2, 0)



Apply these functions to your data



ARACE = mapply(determine.arace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
> ARACE
[1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0

AOTHRACE = mapply(determine.aothrace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
> AOTHRACE
[1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0


To add them to your data frame



nhes05v2$ARACE = ARACE
nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = AOTHRACE





share|improve this answer

























  • Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

    – jazlaw
    Mar 24 at 9:23











  • @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

    – NM_
    Mar 24 at 19:28


















0














Using the dplyr and magrittr packages, my best version of this looks like:



nhes05v2 %>%
mutate(ARACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 91, 0),
AOTHRACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 2, 0))


The && conditional in R only checks against the first row, which is why you got the results you did here - here's a post from other people who have been flummoxed by that behavior.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55315756%2fif-statement-with-multiple-conditions-always-saying-true-nested-in-while-loop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    We can achieve this by recoding the 2 to 0 (i.e, 0 = "No") and using the following code with 2 functions used to determine whether a record satisfies criteria.



    Please note that the code assumes that the race variables are numeric.



    # Replicate your example
    AWHITE = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", " ")))
    ABLACK = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AASIAN = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AAMIND = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    APACI = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))

    nhes05v2 = data.frame(AWHITE, ABLACK, AASIAN, AAMIND, APACI)
    > nhes05v2 # Partial output given
    AWHITE ABLACK AASIAN AAMIND APACI
    1 1 2 2 2 2
    2 1 1 2 2 2
    3 1 2 2 2 2
    ...
    18 1 2 2 2 2
    19 1 2 2 2 2
    20 1 2 2 2 2


    Recode the variables



    # Recode variables. Change all 2's to 0's (New coding is 1 = Yes, 0 = No).
    nhes05v2[nhes05v2 == 2] = 0


    Create 2 functions to satisfy criteria for ARACE and AORACE



    # A person is mixed race it they answer 1 to more than one race
    # Therefore a person whose row sum is greater than 1 is mixed race

    determine.arace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 91, 0)


    determine.aothrace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 2, 0)



    Apply these functions to your data



    ARACE = mapply(determine.arace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > ARACE
    [1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0

    AOTHRACE = mapply(determine.aothrace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > AOTHRACE
    [1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0


    To add them to your data frame



    nhes05v2$ARACE = ARACE
    nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = AOTHRACE





    share|improve this answer

























    • Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

      – jazlaw
      Mar 24 at 9:23











    • @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

      – NM_
      Mar 24 at 19:28















    0














    We can achieve this by recoding the 2 to 0 (i.e, 0 = "No") and using the following code with 2 functions used to determine whether a record satisfies criteria.



    Please note that the code assumes that the race variables are numeric.



    # Replicate your example
    AWHITE = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", " ")))
    ABLACK = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AASIAN = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AAMIND = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    APACI = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))

    nhes05v2 = data.frame(AWHITE, ABLACK, AASIAN, AAMIND, APACI)
    > nhes05v2 # Partial output given
    AWHITE ABLACK AASIAN AAMIND APACI
    1 1 2 2 2 2
    2 1 1 2 2 2
    3 1 2 2 2 2
    ...
    18 1 2 2 2 2
    19 1 2 2 2 2
    20 1 2 2 2 2


    Recode the variables



    # Recode variables. Change all 2's to 0's (New coding is 1 = Yes, 0 = No).
    nhes05v2[nhes05v2 == 2] = 0


    Create 2 functions to satisfy criteria for ARACE and AORACE



    # A person is mixed race it they answer 1 to more than one race
    # Therefore a person whose row sum is greater than 1 is mixed race

    determine.arace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 91, 0)


    determine.aothrace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 2, 0)



    Apply these functions to your data



    ARACE = mapply(determine.arace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > ARACE
    [1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0

    AOTHRACE = mapply(determine.aothrace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > AOTHRACE
    [1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0


    To add them to your data frame



    nhes05v2$ARACE = ARACE
    nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = AOTHRACE





    share|improve this answer

























    • Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

      – jazlaw
      Mar 24 at 9:23











    • @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

      – NM_
      Mar 24 at 19:28













    0












    0








    0







    We can achieve this by recoding the 2 to 0 (i.e, 0 = "No") and using the following code with 2 functions used to determine whether a record satisfies criteria.



    Please note that the code assumes that the race variables are numeric.



    # Replicate your example
    AWHITE = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", " ")))
    ABLACK = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AASIAN = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AAMIND = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    APACI = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))

    nhes05v2 = data.frame(AWHITE, ABLACK, AASIAN, AAMIND, APACI)
    > nhes05v2 # Partial output given
    AWHITE ABLACK AASIAN AAMIND APACI
    1 1 2 2 2 2
    2 1 1 2 2 2
    3 1 2 2 2 2
    ...
    18 1 2 2 2 2
    19 1 2 2 2 2
    20 1 2 2 2 2


    Recode the variables



    # Recode variables. Change all 2's to 0's (New coding is 1 = Yes, 0 = No).
    nhes05v2[nhes05v2 == 2] = 0


    Create 2 functions to satisfy criteria for ARACE and AORACE



    # A person is mixed race it they answer 1 to more than one race
    # Therefore a person whose row sum is greater than 1 is mixed race

    determine.arace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 91, 0)


    determine.aothrace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 2, 0)



    Apply these functions to your data



    ARACE = mapply(determine.arace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > ARACE
    [1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0

    AOTHRACE = mapply(determine.aothrace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > AOTHRACE
    [1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0


    To add them to your data frame



    nhes05v2$ARACE = ARACE
    nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = AOTHRACE





    share|improve this answer















    We can achieve this by recoding the 2 to 0 (i.e, 0 = "No") and using the following code with 2 functions used to determine whether a record satisfies criteria.



    Please note that the code assumes that the race variables are numeric.



    # Replicate your example
    AWHITE = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1", " ")))
    ABLACK = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AASIAN = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    AAMIND = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))
    APACI = as.numeric(unlist(strsplit("2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2", " ")))

    nhes05v2 = data.frame(AWHITE, ABLACK, AASIAN, AAMIND, APACI)
    > nhes05v2 # Partial output given
    AWHITE ABLACK AASIAN AAMIND APACI
    1 1 2 2 2 2
    2 1 1 2 2 2
    3 1 2 2 2 2
    ...
    18 1 2 2 2 2
    19 1 2 2 2 2
    20 1 2 2 2 2


    Recode the variables



    # Recode variables. Change all 2's to 0's (New coding is 1 = Yes, 0 = No).
    nhes05v2[nhes05v2 == 2] = 0


    Create 2 functions to satisfy criteria for ARACE and AORACE



    # A person is mixed race it they answer 1 to more than one race
    # Therefore a person whose row sum is greater than 1 is mixed race

    determine.arace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 91, 0)


    determine.aothrace = function(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI)
    ifelse( sum(AWHITE, ABLACK, AAMIND, AASIAN, APACI ) > 1 , 2, 0)



    Apply these functions to your data



    ARACE = mapply(determine.arace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > ARACE
    [1] 0 91 0 91 0 91 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0

    AOTHRACE = mapply(determine.aothrace, nhes05v2$AWHITE, nhes05v2$ABLACK, nhes05v2$AAMIND, nhes05v2$AASIAN, nhes05v2$APACI)
    > AOTHRACE
    [1] 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0


    To add them to your data frame



    nhes05v2$ARACE = ARACE
    nhes05v2$AOTHRACE = AOTHRACE






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 24 at 18:21

























    answered Mar 23 at 17:08









    NM_NM_

    1,164320




    1,164320












    • Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

      – jazlaw
      Mar 24 at 9:23











    • @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

      – NM_
      Mar 24 at 19:28

















    • Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

      – jazlaw
      Mar 24 at 9:23











    • @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

      – NM_
      Mar 24 at 19:28
















    Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

    – jazlaw
    Mar 24 at 9:23





    Thank you so much! This easily gets me to what I need for all that extra code! And thank you for your comments to help clarify my question.

    – jazlaw
    Mar 24 at 9:23













    @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

    – NM_
    Mar 24 at 19:28





    @jazlaw, glad to hear this! Good luck with your research :)

    – NM_
    Mar 24 at 19:28













    0














    Using the dplyr and magrittr packages, my best version of this looks like:



    nhes05v2 %>%
    mutate(ARACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 91, 0),
    AOTHRACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 2, 0))


    The && conditional in R only checks against the first row, which is why you got the results you did here - here's a post from other people who have been flummoxed by that behavior.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      Using the dplyr and magrittr packages, my best version of this looks like:



      nhes05v2 %>%
      mutate(ARACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 91, 0),
      AOTHRACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 2, 0))


      The && conditional in R only checks against the first row, which is why you got the results you did here - here's a post from other people who have been flummoxed by that behavior.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        Using the dplyr and magrittr packages, my best version of this looks like:



        nhes05v2 %>%
        mutate(ARACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 91, 0),
        AOTHRACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 2, 0))


        The && conditional in R only checks against the first row, which is why you got the results you did here - here's a post from other people who have been flummoxed by that behavior.






        share|improve this answer













        Using the dplyr and magrittr packages, my best version of this looks like:



        nhes05v2 %>%
        mutate(ARACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 91, 0),
        AOTHRACE = ifelse(AWHITE == 1 & (ABLACK == 1 | AAMIND ==1 | AASIAN == 1 | APACI == 1), 2, 0))


        The && conditional in R only checks against the first row, which is why you got the results you did here - here's a post from other people who have been flummoxed by that behavior.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 23 at 17:08









        Michael MahoneyMichael Mahoney

        1111




        1111



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55315756%2fif-statement-with-multiple-conditions-always-saying-true-nested-in-while-loop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현