Is there a bijective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?Example of continuous but not absolutely continuous strictly increasing functionCan you build metric space theory without the real numbers?Proof by induction: prove that if $x_0>3$ then the following sequence is strictly increasing…A continuous function $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ is injective if and only if it is strictly increasing or strictly decreasingIs there a “jagged” real-valued function that is “smooth” in cardinalities greater than the reals?examples of first strictly concave then convex function?Inverse of any strictly monotonic increasing function defined over a fixed domain and range.Continuity of $argmax$ of a strictly concave functionstrictly increasing function from reals to reals which is never an algebraic numberAt which value (over $mathbbR^+$) is the gamma function strictly increasing?
Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?
Can a planet still function with a damaged moon?
How long can fsck take on a 30 TB volume?
How come mathematicians published in Annals of Eugenics?
What's an appropriate age to involve kids in life changing decisions?
How to avoid making self and former employee look bad when reporting on fixing former employee's work?
if i accidentally leaked my schools ip address and someone d doses my school am i at fault
Can the president of the United States be guilty of insider trading?
Why use steam instead of just hot air?
What can cause an unfrozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?
Not taking the bishop by the knight, why?
Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?
Do Monks gain the 9th level Unarmored Movement benefit when wearing armor or using a shield?
Is every story set in the future "science fiction"?
Best species to breed to intelligence
Pre-1993 comic in which Wolverine's claws were turned to rubber?
Compactness in normed vector spaces.
How to handle DM constantly stealing everything from sleeping characters?
A Latin text with dependency tree
My perfect evil overlord plan... or is it?
Renting a house to a graduate student in my department
Does Thread.yield() do anything if we have enough processors to service all threads?
Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?
Was the Highlands Ranch shooting the 115th mass shooting in the US in 2019
Is there a bijective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?
Example of continuous but not absolutely continuous strictly increasing functionCan you build metric space theory without the real numbers?Proof by induction: prove that if $x_0>3$ then the following sequence is strictly increasing…A continuous function $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ is injective if and only if it is strictly increasing or strictly decreasingIs there a “jagged” real-valued function that is “smooth” in cardinalities greater than the reals?examples of first strictly concave then convex function?Inverse of any strictly monotonic increasing function defined over a fixed domain and range.Continuity of $argmax$ of a strictly concave functionstrictly increasing function from reals to reals which is never an algebraic numberAt which value (over $mathbbR^+$) is the gamma function strictly increasing?
$begingroup$
I can't come up with a single one.
The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^-x$ only maps to half of the real line.
Any ideas?
real-analysis functions recreational-mathematics real-numbers
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I can't come up with a single one.
The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^-x$ only maps to half of the real line.
Any ideas?
real-analysis functions recreational-mathematics real-numbers
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^-x$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Mar 22 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Mar 22 at 17:59
1
$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
Mar 22 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 22 at 20:03
2
$begingroup$
A better title is "is there a bijective convex function from the reals to reals?" (I prefer convex since "convex" is simpler and more popular than "concave")
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:58
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I can't come up with a single one.
The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^-x$ only maps to half of the real line.
Any ideas?
real-analysis functions recreational-mathematics real-numbers
$endgroup$
I can't come up with a single one.
The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^-x$ only maps to half of the real line.
Any ideas?
real-analysis functions recreational-mathematics real-numbers
real-analysis functions recreational-mathematics real-numbers
edited Mar 23 at 8:30
Jack M
19.1k33983
19.1k33983
asked Mar 22 at 17:52
cammilcammil
1436
1436
6
$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^-x$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Mar 22 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Mar 22 at 17:59
1
$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
Mar 22 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 22 at 20:03
2
$begingroup$
A better title is "is there a bijective convex function from the reals to reals?" (I prefer convex since "convex" is simpler and more popular than "concave")
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:58
|
show 2 more comments
6
$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^-x$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Mar 22 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Mar 22 at 17:59
1
$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
Mar 22 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 22 at 20:03
2
$begingroup$
A better title is "is there a bijective convex function from the reals to reals?" (I prefer convex since "convex" is simpler and more popular than "concave")
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:58
6
6
$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^-x$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Mar 22 at 17:58
$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^-x$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Mar 22 at 17:58
1
1
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Mar 22 at 17:59
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Mar 22 at 17:59
1
1
$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
Mar 22 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
Mar 22 at 18:19
1
1
$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 22 at 20:03
$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 22 at 20:03
2
2
$begingroup$
A better title is "is there a bijective convex function from the reals to reals?" (I prefer convex since "convex" is simpler and more popular than "concave")
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:58
$begingroup$
A better title is "is there a bijective convex function from the reals to reals?" (I prefer convex since "convex" is simpler and more popular than "concave")
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:58
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = x-e^-x
$$
is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^-x$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.
Even better,
$$
f(x) = 2x -sqrt1+3x^2
$$
has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^-3/2 < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^-1(x) = 2x+sqrt1+3x^2$, clearly defined for all $x$.
EDIT: Since it was requested in the comments, here is a plot of this function and its inverse:
Note that even though the growth rate for positive $x$ is slow, the function is asymptotically linear (with slope $2-sqrt3approx 0.268$) and thus unbounded.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
1
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about
$f(x)=left{beginarraycc ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^-x& &x<0endarrayright.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158452%2fis-there-a-bijective-monotonically-increasing-strictly-concave-function-from-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = x-e^-x
$$
is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^-x$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.
Even better,
$$
f(x) = 2x -sqrt1+3x^2
$$
has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^-3/2 < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^-1(x) = 2x+sqrt1+3x^2$, clearly defined for all $x$.
EDIT: Since it was requested in the comments, here is a plot of this function and its inverse:
Note that even though the growth rate for positive $x$ is slow, the function is asymptotically linear (with slope $2-sqrt3approx 0.268$) and thus unbounded.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
1
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = x-e^-x
$$
is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^-x$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.
Even better,
$$
f(x) = 2x -sqrt1+3x^2
$$
has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^-3/2 < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^-1(x) = 2x+sqrt1+3x^2$, clearly defined for all $x$.
EDIT: Since it was requested in the comments, here is a plot of this function and its inverse:
Note that even though the growth rate for positive $x$ is slow, the function is asymptotically linear (with slope $2-sqrt3approx 0.268$) and thus unbounded.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
1
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
f(x) = x-e^-x
$$
is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^-x$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.
Even better,
$$
f(x) = 2x -sqrt1+3x^2
$$
has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^-3/2 < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^-1(x) = 2x+sqrt1+3x^2$, clearly defined for all $x$.
EDIT: Since it was requested in the comments, here is a plot of this function and its inverse:
Note that even though the growth rate for positive $x$ is slow, the function is asymptotically linear (with slope $2-sqrt3approx 0.268$) and thus unbounded.
$endgroup$
$$
f(x) = x-e^-x
$$
is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^-x$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.
Even better,
$$
f(x) = 2x -sqrt1+3x^2
$$
has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^-3/2 < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^-1(x) = 2x+sqrt1+3x^2$, clearly defined for all $x$.
EDIT: Since it was requested in the comments, here is a plot of this function and its inverse:
Note that even though the growth rate for positive $x$ is slow, the function is asymptotically linear (with slope $2-sqrt3approx 0.268$) and thus unbounded.
edited Mar 23 at 16:30
answered Mar 22 at 18:38


eyeballfrogeyeballfrog
7,642634
7,642634
1
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
1
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
1
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
1
1
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
$begingroup$
+1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 22 at 19:44
1
1
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley The idea of "linear function + concave function" was fairly straightforward. I figured an algebraic function would have a closed-form inverse (unlike the transcendental $x-e^-x$), then fiddled with the parameters until both the function and its inverse came out looking nice.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Mar 22 at 22:22
1
1
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
@eyeballfrog Upvoted. It would be great if you can add a graph or two. Human loves graph!
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:51
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
I could’ve never come up with this.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Mar 22 at 23:55
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
$begingroup$
As in Ross Millikan's comment, $f$ is the lower branch of a hyperbola. Neatly, $f^-1$ is the upper branch. The lower branch passes through the points $(1,0)$, $(0,-1)$, $(4,1)$, $(-1,-4)$, $(15,4)$, $(-4,-15)$. (So the upper branch passes through the reflections of these six points in the line $x=y$.) This makes the hyperbola easy to plot (in GeoGebra, for instance). Its equation is $x^2-4xy+y^2=1$. The equation of its asymptotes is $x^2-4xy+y^2=0$.
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
Mar 23 at 19:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about
$f(x)=left{beginarraycc ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^-x& &x<0endarrayright.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about
$f(x)=left{beginarraycc ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^-x& &x<0endarrayright.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How about
$f(x)=left{beginarraycc ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^-x& &x<0endarrayright.$
$endgroup$
How about
$f(x)=left{beginarraycc ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^-x& &x<0endarrayright.$
answered Mar 22 at 18:33
paw88789paw88789
29.6k12451
29.6k12451
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$f(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.
$endgroup$
$f(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.
edited Mar 23 at 23:29
answered Mar 22 at 18:57


zhw.zhw.
75.6k43376
75.6k43376
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
$begingroup$
I would have preferred to incorporate the $pi x$ term into the integral, by adding a constant to the integrand. And using $pi$ is maybe not the most obvious choice of a number larger than$~fracpi2$; the essential point is having the primitive of an everywhere decreasing function of $t$ that moreover is positively bounded away from $0$ (i.e., remains $>c$ for some constant $c>0$).
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Mar 25 at 17:57
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158452%2fis-there-a-bijective-monotonically-increasing-strictly-concave-function-from-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^-x$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Mar 22 at 17:58
1
$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Mar 22 at 17:59
1
$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
Mar 22 at 18:19
1
$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Mar 22 at 20:03
2
$begingroup$
A better title is "is there a bijective convex function from the reals to reals?" (I prefer convex since "convex" is simpler and more popular than "concave")
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 22 at 22:58