@ConditionalOnExpression if property is presentSort ArrayList of custom Objects by propertyCreate the perfect JPA entityDealing with “Xerces hell” in Java/Maven?Spring Boot @ConditionalOnProperty behaviorZuul router with Spring application.yml routes won't work as expectedHow can I get the keys from application.properties within other properties files served by Spring Boot Config Server?Prefix for nested configuration properties in springSpring boot read array from YAML (properties) fileConfigurationProperties binding a property name with a number in from a yaml file@GetMapping with array parameters by application.yml
Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship
How many times to repeat an event with known probability before it has occurred a number of times
Background for black and white chart
My players want to use called-shots on Strahd
How many possible starting positions are uniquely solvable for a nonogram puzzle?
For Saintsbury, which English novelists constituted the "great quartet of the mid-eighteenth century"?
What is the difference between state-based effects and effects on the stack?
Interview was just a one hour panel. Got an offer the next day; do I accept or is this a red flag?
Are athletes' college degrees discounted by employers and graduate school admissions?
Will users know a CardView is clickable
How to make a villain when your PCs are villains?
Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?
Why is gun control associated with the socially liberal Democratic party?
How would Japanese people react to someone refusing to say “itadakimasu” for religious reasons?
Bullying by school - Submitted PhD thesis but not allowed to proceed to viva until change to new supervisor
SQL Server has encountered occurences of I/O requests taking longer than 15 seconds
Digital signature that is only verifiable by one specific person
How can Caller ID be faked?
Does an African-American baby born in Youngstown, Ohio have a higher infant mortality rate than a baby born in Iran?
Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it
Does anyone recognize these rockets, and their location?
Sakkāya-Ditthi and Self-View
How to test soql with For Update statement
Does PC weight have a mechanical effect?
@ConditionalOnExpression if property is present
Sort ArrayList of custom Objects by propertyCreate the perfect JPA entityDealing with “Xerces hell” in Java/Maven?Spring Boot @ConditionalOnProperty behaviorZuul router with Spring application.yml routes won't work as expectedHow can I get the keys from application.properties within other properties files served by Spring Boot Config Server?Prefix for nested configuration properties in springSpring boot read array from YAML (properties) fileConfigurationProperties binding a property name with a number in from a yaml file@GetMapping with array parameters by application.yml
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have application.yml that has a property and it takes an array/list like this
tokens:
token:
- name: one
site: chicago
token:
- name: two
site: 'st. louis'
How do I use @ConditionalOnExpression
such that just the presence of tokens in application.yml suffice?
I have tried @ConditionalOnProperty("tokens")
and @CondtionalOnProperty(prefix="tokens", value= "token"
. It does not work. Even the official doc suggests that with lists/arrays it won't work great.
java spring spring-boot
add a comment |
I have application.yml that has a property and it takes an array/list like this
tokens:
token:
- name: one
site: chicago
token:
- name: two
site: 'st. louis'
How do I use @ConditionalOnExpression
such that just the presence of tokens in application.yml suffice?
I have tried @ConditionalOnProperty("tokens")
and @CondtionalOnProperty(prefix="tokens", value= "token"
. It does not work. Even the official doc suggests that with lists/arrays it won't work great.
java spring spring-boot
Why would you want to do that? It will be hard to maintain a property which is either present or absent. Programmer will have to go through the code to figure out what property to add for enabling. It would be better to have a second boolean propertytokenPresent
.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:28
This is a very good advise. The trouble is, I am developing an application that will be added as a dependency in other projects. I don't want them to add unnecessary properties. You know what I mean?
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 3:32
Yeah. I did something like this few months back. Will add an answer now.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:36
add a comment |
I have application.yml that has a property and it takes an array/list like this
tokens:
token:
- name: one
site: chicago
token:
- name: two
site: 'st. louis'
How do I use @ConditionalOnExpression
such that just the presence of tokens in application.yml suffice?
I have tried @ConditionalOnProperty("tokens")
and @CondtionalOnProperty(prefix="tokens", value= "token"
. It does not work. Even the official doc suggests that with lists/arrays it won't work great.
java spring spring-boot
I have application.yml that has a property and it takes an array/list like this
tokens:
token:
- name: one
site: chicago
token:
- name: two
site: 'st. louis'
How do I use @ConditionalOnExpression
such that just the presence of tokens in application.yml suffice?
I have tried @ConditionalOnProperty("tokens")
and @CondtionalOnProperty(prefix="tokens", value= "token"
. It does not work. Even the official doc suggests that with lists/arrays it won't work great.
java spring spring-boot
java spring spring-boot
edited Apr 7 at 3:54
Aditya Gupta
1,02721322
1,02721322
asked Mar 25 at 2:46
Faraz DurraniFaraz Durrani
2,93421137
2,93421137
Why would you want to do that? It will be hard to maintain a property which is either present or absent. Programmer will have to go through the code to figure out what property to add for enabling. It would be better to have a second boolean propertytokenPresent
.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:28
This is a very good advise. The trouble is, I am developing an application that will be added as a dependency in other projects. I don't want them to add unnecessary properties. You know what I mean?
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 3:32
Yeah. I did something like this few months back. Will add an answer now.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:36
add a comment |
Why would you want to do that? It will be hard to maintain a property which is either present or absent. Programmer will have to go through the code to figure out what property to add for enabling. It would be better to have a second boolean propertytokenPresent
.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:28
This is a very good advise. The trouble is, I am developing an application that will be added as a dependency in other projects. I don't want them to add unnecessary properties. You know what I mean?
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 3:32
Yeah. I did something like this few months back. Will add an answer now.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:36
Why would you want to do that? It will be hard to maintain a property which is either present or absent. Programmer will have to go through the code to figure out what property to add for enabling. It would be better to have a second boolean property
tokenPresent
.– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:28
Why would you want to do that? It will be hard to maintain a property which is either present or absent. Programmer will have to go through the code to figure out what property to add for enabling. It would be better to have a second boolean property
tokenPresent
.– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:28
This is a very good advise. The trouble is, I am developing an application that will be added as a dependency in other projects. I don't want them to add unnecessary properties. You know what I mean?
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 3:32
This is a very good advise. The trouble is, I am developing an application that will be added as a dependency in other projects. I don't want them to add unnecessary properties. You know what I mean?
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 3:32
Yeah. I did something like this few months back. Will add an answer now.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:36
Yeah. I did something like this few months back. Will add an answer now.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:36
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can use @Conditional(YourCondition.class)
Quoating from docs:
A single condition that must be matched in order for a component to be
registered. Conditions are checked immediately before the
bean-definition is due to be registered and are free to veto
registration based on any criteria that can be determined at that
point.
Illustration:
@Conditional(MyCondition.class)
@Controller
public class Box
...
public class MyCondition implements Condition
@Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata)
Environment env = context.getEnvironment();
return null == env.getProperty("tokens.token[0].name");
Here, en.getProperty
will return null in case of missing property.
In theory,ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.
– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
Yeah, but here you can write your logic insideMyCondition
class.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask forenv.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
add a comment |
@Faraz Durrani try this concept you will get...
@Component
@EnableConfigurationProperties
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "tokens")
public class ServiceClass
private String token;
...
1
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55330646%2fconditionalonexpression-if-property-is-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use @Conditional(YourCondition.class)
Quoating from docs:
A single condition that must be matched in order for a component to be
registered. Conditions are checked immediately before the
bean-definition is due to be registered and are free to veto
registration based on any criteria that can be determined at that
point.
Illustration:
@Conditional(MyCondition.class)
@Controller
public class Box
...
public class MyCondition implements Condition
@Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata)
Environment env = context.getEnvironment();
return null == env.getProperty("tokens.token[0].name");
Here, en.getProperty
will return null in case of missing property.
In theory,ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.
– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
Yeah, but here you can write your logic insideMyCondition
class.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask forenv.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
add a comment |
You can use @Conditional(YourCondition.class)
Quoating from docs:
A single condition that must be matched in order for a component to be
registered. Conditions are checked immediately before the
bean-definition is due to be registered and are free to veto
registration based on any criteria that can be determined at that
point.
Illustration:
@Conditional(MyCondition.class)
@Controller
public class Box
...
public class MyCondition implements Condition
@Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata)
Environment env = context.getEnvironment();
return null == env.getProperty("tokens.token[0].name");
Here, en.getProperty
will return null in case of missing property.
In theory,ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.
– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
Yeah, but here you can write your logic insideMyCondition
class.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask forenv.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
add a comment |
You can use @Conditional(YourCondition.class)
Quoating from docs:
A single condition that must be matched in order for a component to be
registered. Conditions are checked immediately before the
bean-definition is due to be registered and are free to veto
registration based on any criteria that can be determined at that
point.
Illustration:
@Conditional(MyCondition.class)
@Controller
public class Box
...
public class MyCondition implements Condition
@Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata)
Environment env = context.getEnvironment();
return null == env.getProperty("tokens.token[0].name");
Here, en.getProperty
will return null in case of missing property.
You can use @Conditional(YourCondition.class)
Quoating from docs:
A single condition that must be matched in order for a component to be
registered. Conditions are checked immediately before the
bean-definition is due to be registered and are free to veto
registration based on any criteria that can be determined at that
point.
Illustration:
@Conditional(MyCondition.class)
@Controller
public class Box
...
public class MyCondition implements Condition
@Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata)
Environment env = context.getEnvironment();
return null == env.getProperty("tokens.token[0].name");
Here, en.getProperty
will return null in case of missing property.
edited Mar 25 at 5:58
Faraz Durrani
2,93421137
2,93421137
answered Mar 25 at 4:12
Aditya GuptaAditya Gupta
1,02721322
1,02721322
In theory,ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.
– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
Yeah, but here you can write your logic insideMyCondition
class.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask forenv.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
add a comment |
In theory,ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.
– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
Yeah, but here you can write your logic insideMyCondition
class.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask forenv.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
In theory,
ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
In theory,
ConditionalOnProperty
would accomplish this.– Makoto
Mar 25 at 4:18
Yeah, but here you can write your logic inside
MyCondition
class.– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
Yeah, but here you can write your logic inside
MyCondition
class.– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 5:02
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask for
env.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
@AdityaGupta ty. i edited you answer a bit. If I ask for
env.getProperty("tokens")
, it always returns null. I have to give full property only then it actually returns a value instead of null.– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 5:57
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
Looks good. Thanks for updating.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 17:42
add a comment |
@Faraz Durrani try this concept you will get...
@Component
@EnableConfigurationProperties
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "tokens")
public class ServiceClass
private String token;
...
1
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
add a comment |
@Faraz Durrani try this concept you will get...
@Component
@EnableConfigurationProperties
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "tokens")
public class ServiceClass
private String token;
...
1
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
add a comment |
@Faraz Durrani try this concept you will get...
@Component
@EnableConfigurationProperties
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "tokens")
public class ServiceClass
private String token;
...
@Faraz Durrani try this concept you will get...
@Component
@EnableConfigurationProperties
@ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "tokens")
public class ServiceClass
private String token;
...
answered Mar 25 at 4:26
kumarkumar
274110
274110
1
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
add a comment |
1
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
1
1
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
No Kumar this is totally off. Sorry.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 6:00
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
i done a sample on this and it's working for me ...better to try this....
– kumar
Mar 25 at 9:27
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
yes I understand kumar. But my question is different. I think you misunderstood the question.
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 26 at 2:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55330646%2fconditionalonexpression-if-property-is-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why would you want to do that? It will be hard to maintain a property which is either present or absent. Programmer will have to go through the code to figure out what property to add for enabling. It would be better to have a second boolean property
tokenPresent
.– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:28
This is a very good advise. The trouble is, I am developing an application that will be added as a dependency in other projects. I don't want them to add unnecessary properties. You know what I mean?
– Faraz Durrani
Mar 25 at 3:32
Yeah. I did something like this few months back. Will add an answer now.
– Aditya Gupta
Mar 25 at 3:36