Bash method for viewing beginning and end of fileCommand to display first few and last few lines of a fileRace Condition for Shell Blocks in Bash?Add character to beginning and end of columnusing awk to create a LaTex table from my data in a text fileAppend columns in a text file to after the final rowRemove spaces and headers from a dumped database tableCount the maximum character length for all the data fields in a simplified csv file and output to txtOpening multiple tabs in gnome-terminal, having them automatically password-lessly ssh to servers and do so using alias from my bashrc fileWriting a program for editing .txt data - Python or Unix?Merging two Unix filesProblem with ffmpeg in bash loophow to evaluate number between a range of numbers using different variables in bash

Was Donald Trump at ground zero helping out on 9-11?

What Marvel character has this 'W' symbol?

Why don't short runways use ramps for takeoff?

Can I attune a Circlet of Human Perfection to my animated skeletons to allow them to blend in and speak?

"DDoouubbllee ssppeeaakk!!"

Why did I lose on time with 3 pawns vs Knight. Shouldn't it be a draw?

Why are subdominants unstable?

Why doesn't the Gottesman-Knill theorem render quantum computing almost useless?

What were the first chips with hardware support for SPI?

What language is Raven using for her attack in the new 52?

Can Papyrus be folded?

Why would anyone ever invest in a cash-only etf?

How can Paypal know my card is being used in another account?

How to efficiently shred a lot of cabbage?

How would a lunar colony attack Earth?

Security measures that could plausibly last 150+ years?

Coworker mumbles to herself when working, how to ask her to stop?

Complaints from (junior) developers against solution architects: how can we show the benefits of our work and improve relationships?

Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?

Why did some Apollo missions carry a grenade launcher?

Why does the Rust compiler not optimize code assuming that two mutable references cannot alias?

Did Vladimir Lenin have a cat?

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

A variant of the Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem



Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file


Command to display first few and last few lines of a fileRace Condition for Shell Blocks in Bash?Add character to beginning and end of columnusing awk to create a LaTex table from my data in a text fileAppend columns in a text file to after the final rowRemove spaces and headers from a dumped database tableCount the maximum character length for all the data fields in a simplified csv file and output to txtOpening multiple tabs in gnome-terminal, having them automatically password-lessly ssh to servers and do so using alias from my bashrc fileWriting a program for editing .txt data - Python or Unix?Merging two Unix filesProblem with ffmpeg in bash loophow to evaluate number between a range of numbers using different variables in bash






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question


























  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:59







  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:16







  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:24


















8















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question


























  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:59







  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:16







  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:24














8












8








8








On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question
















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?







bash text-processing






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 19:11









Rui F Ribeiro

41k16 gold badges92 silver badges152 bronze badges




41k16 gold badges92 silver badges152 bronze badges










asked Mar 26 at 19:05









MadisonCooperMadisonCooper

464 bronze badges




464 bronze badges















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:59







  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:16







  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:24


















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:59







  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:16







  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:24

















Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

– MadisonCooper
Mar 26 at 19:59






Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

– MadisonCooper
Mar 26 at 19:59





2




2





Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

– Stéphane Chazelas
Mar 26 at 20:16






Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

– Stéphane Chazelas
Mar 26 at 20:16





2




2





I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

– Stéphane Chazelas
Mar 26 at 20:24






I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

– Stéphane Chazelas
Mar 26 at 20:24











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















14














Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:18











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:22






  • 4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 19:22







  • 2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:27







  • 3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:04


















2














Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






share|improve this answer



























  • +1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

    – Joe
    Apr 9 at 10:31


















2














awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






share|improve this answer



























  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:31











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 20:42



















0














You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


After update its not simple anymore though,






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:32











  • yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 26 at 19:43











  • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:39











  • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 27 at 7:22













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508818%2fbash-method-for-viewing-beginning-and-end-of-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









14














Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:18











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:22






  • 4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 19:22







  • 2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:27







  • 3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:04















14














Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)





share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:18











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:22






  • 4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 19:22







  • 2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:27







  • 3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:04













14












14








14







Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)





share|improve this answer













Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 26 at 19:16









Timothy PulliamTimothy Pulliam

1,5051 gold badge11 silver badges25 bronze badges




1,5051 gold badge11 silver badges25 bronze badges










  • 6





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:18











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:22






  • 4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 19:22







  • 2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:27







  • 3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:04












  • 6





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:18











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:22






  • 4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 19:22







  • 2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    Mar 26 at 19:27







  • 3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 26 at 20:04







6




6





Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

– Kusalananda
Mar 26 at 19:18





Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

– Kusalananda
Mar 26 at 19:18













Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

– MadisonCooper
Mar 26 at 19:22





Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

– MadisonCooper
Mar 26 at 19:22




4




4





@Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

– ilkkachu
Mar 26 at 19:22






@Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

– ilkkachu
Mar 26 at 19:22





2




2





@ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

– MadisonCooper
Mar 26 at 19:27






@ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

– MadisonCooper
Mar 26 at 19:27





3




3





@Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

– Stéphane Chazelas
Mar 26 at 20:04





@Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

– Stéphane Chazelas
Mar 26 at 20:04













2














Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






share|improve this answer



























  • +1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

    – Joe
    Apr 9 at 10:31















2














Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






share|improve this answer



























  • +1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

    – Joe
    Apr 9 at 10:31













2












2








2







Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






share|improve this answer















Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 19:46

























answered Mar 26 at 19:30









KusalanandaKusalananda

157k18 gold badges311 silver badges496 bronze badges




157k18 gold badges311 silver badges496 bronze badges















  • +1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

    – Joe
    Apr 9 at 10:31

















  • +1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

    – Joe
    Apr 9 at 10:31
















+1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

– Joe
Apr 9 at 10:31





+1 I was thinking of the same solution with the slight variation of using tee to let the output go straight into head and only using the saved output for tail.

– Joe
Apr 9 at 10:31











2














awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






share|improve this answer



























  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:31











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 20:42
















2














awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






share|improve this answer



























  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:31











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 20:42














2












2








2







awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






share|improve this answer















awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; 
END print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; '
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 20:37

























answered Mar 26 at 19:33









ilkkachuilkkachu

66.5k10 gold badges111 silver badges193 bronze badges




66.5k10 gold badges111 silver badges193 bronze badges















  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:31











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 20:42


















  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:31











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    Mar 26 at 20:42

















If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

– mosvy
Mar 26 at 20:31





If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

– mosvy
Mar 26 at 20:31













@mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

– ilkkachu
Mar 26 at 20:42






@mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

– ilkkachu
Mar 26 at 20:42












0














You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


After update its not simple anymore though,






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:32











  • yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 26 at 19:43











  • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:39











  • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 27 at 7:22















0














You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


After update its not simple anymore though,






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:32











  • yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 26 at 19:43











  • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:39











  • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 27 at 7:22













0












0








0







You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


After update its not simple anymore though,






share|improve this answer















You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



awk 'NR<=n print $0 A[NR%n]=$0 END for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] ' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


After update its not simple anymore though,







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 27 at 7:22

























answered Mar 26 at 19:25









AbdurrahimAbdurrahim

1012 bronze badges




1012 bronze badges










  • 1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:32











  • yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 26 at 19:43











  • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:39











  • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 27 at 7:22












  • 1





    This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 26 at 19:32











  • yes let me update

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 26 at 19:43











  • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

    – mosvy
    Mar 26 at 20:39











  • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

    – Abdurrahim
    Mar 27 at 7:22







1




1





This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

– Kusalananda
Mar 26 at 19:32





This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

– Kusalananda
Mar 26 at 19:32













yes let me update

– Abdurrahim
Mar 26 at 19:43





yes let me update

– Abdurrahim
Mar 26 at 19:43













This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

– mosvy
Mar 26 at 20:39





This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

– mosvy
Mar 26 at 20:39













:) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

– Abdurrahim
Mar 27 at 7:22





:) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

– Abdurrahim
Mar 27 at 7:22

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508818%2fbash-method-for-viewing-beginning-and-end-of-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해