Execution Plan missing Actual Partitions AccessedExecution Plan on Table PartitioningWhat do Clustered and Non clustered index actually mean?partitioning big tables - indexes Azure Export from localDb fails to make indexSQL Server: Strange execution planNeed help understanding and improving query plan (Estimated Number of Rows is very different from Actual Number of Rows)SSMS - SQL Azure v12 preview - unknown property IsNativelyCompiledExtrememly High Estimated Number of Rows in Execution PlanQuery execution plan of same queriesWhat is causing the Execution plan difference between Azure SQL and SQL Server?Simple query with different execution plan when executed from SQL Job agent

Was Donald Trump at ground zero helping out on 9-11?

Just how much information should you share with a former client?

Why did I lose on time with 3 pawns vs Knight. Shouldn't it be a draw?

Unknown indication below upper stave

Coworker mumbles to herself when working, how to ask her to stop?

What are the closest international airports in different countries?

How did astronauts using rovers tell direction without compasses on the Moon?

Exploiting the delay when a festival ticket is scanned

What Marvel character has this 'W' symbol?

How can flights operated by the same company have such different prices when marketed by another?

Why would an invisible personal shield be necessary?

Efficiently finding furthest two nodes in a graph

"DDoouubbllee ssppeeaakk!!"

How should I quote American English speakers in a British English essay?

Prepare a user to perform an action before proceeding to the next step

Should I put my name first, or last in the team members list

Did Vladimir Lenin have a cat?

My employer is refusing to give me the pay that was advertised after an internal job move

How to find the three closest (nearest) values within a vector?

On what tickets or flights are Flying Blue XP earned?

Can machine learning learn a function like finding maximum from a list?

How to efficiently shred a lot of cabbage?

Why does one get the wrong value when printing counters together?

Microgravity indicators



Execution Plan missing Actual Partitions Accessed


Execution Plan on Table PartitioningWhat do Clustered and Non clustered index actually mean?partitioning big tables - indexes Azure Export from localDb fails to make indexSQL Server: Strange execution planNeed help understanding and improving query plan (Estimated Number of Rows is very different from Actual Number of Rows)SSMS - SQL Azure v12 preview - unknown property IsNativelyCompiledExtrememly High Estimated Number of Rows in Execution PlanQuery execution plan of same queriesWhat is causing the Execution plan difference between Azure SQL and SQL Server?Simple query with different execution plan when executed from SQL Job agent






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















Using Azure Sql Database, SQL Server Management Studio V. 18.0 Preview 6 (though this problem existed when I was using v 17).
When viewing the execution plan against a partitioned table, the only partition related info I get when I view the properties of a partitioned clustered index seek is "Partitioned | True" (nothing in the XML version either). Nowhere do I see "Actual Partitions Accessed" as is pictured in this post (as example).

Why is it missing?










share|improve this question





















  • 1





    are you looking at the actual execution plan? Not the estimated or cached one?

    – Martin Smith
    Mar 28 at 4:06


















0















Using Azure Sql Database, SQL Server Management Studio V. 18.0 Preview 6 (though this problem existed when I was using v 17).
When viewing the execution plan against a partitioned table, the only partition related info I get when I view the properties of a partitioned clustered index seek is "Partitioned | True" (nothing in the XML version either). Nowhere do I see "Actual Partitions Accessed" as is pictured in this post (as example).

Why is it missing?










share|improve this question





















  • 1





    are you looking at the actual execution plan? Not the estimated or cached one?

    – Martin Smith
    Mar 28 at 4:06














0












0








0








Using Azure Sql Database, SQL Server Management Studio V. 18.0 Preview 6 (though this problem existed when I was using v 17).
When viewing the execution plan against a partitioned table, the only partition related info I get when I view the properties of a partitioned clustered index seek is "Partitioned | True" (nothing in the XML version either). Nowhere do I see "Actual Partitions Accessed" as is pictured in this post (as example).

Why is it missing?










share|improve this question
















Using Azure Sql Database, SQL Server Management Studio V. 18.0 Preview 6 (though this problem existed when I was using v 17).
When viewing the execution plan against a partitioned table, the only partition related info I get when I view the properties of a partitioned clustered index seek is "Partitioned | True" (nothing in the XML version either). Nowhere do I see "Actual Partitions Accessed" as is pictured in this post (as example).

Why is it missing?







sql-server azure-sql-database ssms






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 12:35







dudeNumber4

















asked Mar 26 at 21:24









dudeNumber4dudeNumber4

1,4761 gold badge22 silver badges43 bronze badges




1,4761 gold badge22 silver badges43 bronze badges










  • 1





    are you looking at the actual execution plan? Not the estimated or cached one?

    – Martin Smith
    Mar 28 at 4:06













  • 1





    are you looking at the actual execution plan? Not the estimated or cached one?

    – Martin Smith
    Mar 28 at 4:06








1




1





are you looking at the actual execution plan? Not the estimated or cached one?

– Martin Smith
Mar 28 at 4:06






are you looking at the actual execution plan? Not the estimated or cached one?

– Martin Smith
Mar 28 at 4:06













2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














This is strange, I’m using SSMS 18 Preview 7 and I get those properties on Azure and SQL 2019 (just as a quick test).



Azure:



Azure



SQL 2019:



SQL 2019



Example I used:



CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION pf_test(INT) 
AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (0)

CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ps_test
AS PARTITION pf_test ALL TO ([PRIMARY])

CREATE TABLE Foo
(
WorkItem INT NOT NULL
, Payload CHAR(300) NOT NULL DEFAULT REPLICATE ('X', 300)
) ON ps_test(WorkItem)

INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)
INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)

SELECT * FROM Foo
WHERE WorkItem > -1





share|improve this answer



























  • Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

    – dudeNumber4
    Mar 28 at 14:08


















0














The answer was exceedingly simple; @MartinSmith comment (why can't I at mention here?) - include actual execution plan.






share|improve this answer



























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55366420%2fexecution-plan-missing-actual-partitions-accessed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    This is strange, I’m using SSMS 18 Preview 7 and I get those properties on Azure and SQL 2019 (just as a quick test).



    Azure:



    Azure



    SQL 2019:



    SQL 2019



    Example I used:



    CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION pf_test(INT) 
    AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (0)

    CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ps_test
    AS PARTITION pf_test ALL TO ([PRIMARY])

    CREATE TABLE Foo
    (
    WorkItem INT NOT NULL
    , Payload CHAR(300) NOT NULL DEFAULT REPLICATE ('X', 300)
    ) ON ps_test(WorkItem)

    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)

    SELECT * FROM Foo
    WHERE WorkItem > -1





    share|improve this answer



























    • Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

      – dudeNumber4
      Mar 28 at 14:08















    1














    This is strange, I’m using SSMS 18 Preview 7 and I get those properties on Azure and SQL 2019 (just as a quick test).



    Azure:



    Azure



    SQL 2019:



    SQL 2019



    Example I used:



    CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION pf_test(INT) 
    AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (0)

    CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ps_test
    AS PARTITION pf_test ALL TO ([PRIMARY])

    CREATE TABLE Foo
    (
    WorkItem INT NOT NULL
    , Payload CHAR(300) NOT NULL DEFAULT REPLICATE ('X', 300)
    ) ON ps_test(WorkItem)

    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)

    SELECT * FROM Foo
    WHERE WorkItem > -1





    share|improve this answer



























    • Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

      – dudeNumber4
      Mar 28 at 14:08













    1












    1








    1







    This is strange, I’m using SSMS 18 Preview 7 and I get those properties on Azure and SQL 2019 (just as a quick test).



    Azure:



    Azure



    SQL 2019:



    SQL 2019



    Example I used:



    CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION pf_test(INT) 
    AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (0)

    CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ps_test
    AS PARTITION pf_test ALL TO ([PRIMARY])

    CREATE TABLE Foo
    (
    WorkItem INT NOT NULL
    , Payload CHAR(300) NOT NULL DEFAULT REPLICATE ('X', 300)
    ) ON ps_test(WorkItem)

    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)

    SELECT * FROM Foo
    WHERE WorkItem > -1





    share|improve this answer















    This is strange, I’m using SSMS 18 Preview 7 and I get those properties on Azure and SQL 2019 (just as a quick test).



    Azure:



    Azure



    SQL 2019:



    SQL 2019



    Example I used:



    CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION pf_test(INT) 
    AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (0)

    CREATE PARTITION SCHEME ps_test
    AS PARTITION pf_test ALL TO ([PRIMARY])

    CREATE TABLE Foo
    (
    WorkItem INT NOT NULL
    , Payload CHAR(300) NOT NULL DEFAULT REPLICATE ('X', 300)
    ) ON ps_test(WorkItem)

    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (-1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (1)
    INSERT INTO Foo (WorkItem) VALUES (2)

    SELECT * FROM Foo
    WHERE WorkItem > -1






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 28 at 3:58









    CR241

    1,0448 silver badges20 bronze badges




    1,0448 silver badges20 bronze badges










    answered Mar 27 at 22:23









    Pedro LopesPedro Lopes

    362 bronze badges




    362 bronze badges















    • Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

      – dudeNumber4
      Mar 28 at 14:08

















    • Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

      – dudeNumber4
      Mar 28 at 14:08
















    Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

    – dudeNumber4
    Mar 28 at 14:08





    Thanks for the script; I probably should've included that myself :/

    – dudeNumber4
    Mar 28 at 14:08













    0














    The answer was exceedingly simple; @MartinSmith comment (why can't I at mention here?) - include actual execution plan.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      The answer was exceedingly simple; @MartinSmith comment (why can't I at mention here?) - include actual execution plan.






      share|improve this answer



























        0












        0








        0







        The answer was exceedingly simple; @MartinSmith comment (why can't I at mention here?) - include actual execution plan.






        share|improve this answer













        The answer was exceedingly simple; @MartinSmith comment (why can't I at mention here?) - include actual execution plan.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 28 at 14:09









        dudeNumber4dudeNumber4

        1,4761 gold badge22 silver badges43 bronze badges




        1,4761 gold badge22 silver badges43 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55366420%2fexecution-plan-missing-actual-partitions-accessed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현