Is “balancing” noun or verb in the given context?What does “it brings me back in a big way” mean?Meaning of “highlighted” in the given contextSynonym of “scrap” in the given econtextWhat does the word “foliage” mean here?What does the phrase “wistful settings” mean here?What does the phrase “connected to the idea of using” mean here?What does the word “veer” mean here?What does the word “trinkets” mean here?What does the phrase “ride every wall” mean here?What does the phrase “soar off ramps” mean here?

How should I interpret a promising preprint that was never published in a peer-reviewed journal?

What's the largest an Earth-like planet can be and support Earth's biosphere?

Should I have shared a document with a former employee?

How to not confuse readers with simultaneous events?

Why is carrying a heavy object more taxing on the body than pushing the same object on wheels?

Why does a tetrahedral molecule like methane have a dipole moment of zero?

Counting multiples of 3 up to a given number

How important are the Author's mood and feelings for writing a story?

Function over a list that depends on the index

Discontinuous Tube visualization

Are there foods that astronauts are explicitly never allowed to eat?

Do higher dimensions have axes?

To what extent does asymmetric cryptography secure bitcoin transactions?

Does a hash function have a Upper bound on input length?

Do Australia and New Zealand have a travel ban on Somalis (like Wikipedia says)?

Why teach C using scanf without talking about command line arguments?

What is a Kravchuk transform and how is it related to Fourier transforms?

Why should fork() have been designed to return a file descriptor?

When we are talking about black hole evaporation - what exactly happens?

Legendre Polynomial Integral over half space

The most secure way to handle someone forgetting to verify their account?

I have found a mistake on someone's code published online: what is the protocol?

Formating slide

What are my hardware upgrade optoins for a late 2009 iMac?



Is “balancing” noun or verb in the given context?


What does “it brings me back in a big way” mean?Meaning of “highlighted” in the given contextSynonym of “scrap” in the given econtextWhat does the word “foliage” mean here?What does the phrase “wistful settings” mean here?What does the phrase “connected to the idea of using” mean here?What does the word “veer” mean here?What does the word “trinkets” mean here?What does the phrase “ride every wall” mean here?What does the phrase “soar off ramps” mean here?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















Here is a sentence from the description of a battle game.




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, balancing
armour, speed, and your cannon.




In the sentence, I am not sure if the word "balancing" is a verb or noun here. I am confused by the word "improve." It is not clear whether the player has the option to improve all the four things or simply "tracks".










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    You've identified a problem with the sentence, not your understanding.

    – chrylis
    Mar 26 at 11:29











  • Can you link to the source (if it's online)? More information about the specific game may resolve the ambiguity. "Balancing armour" isn't exactly a known phrase, but it's possible that it's a phrase specific to the game, and acts as a compound noun.

    – Anthony Grist
    Mar 26 at 14:30

















4















Here is a sentence from the description of a battle game.




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, balancing
armour, speed, and your cannon.




In the sentence, I am not sure if the word "balancing" is a verb or noun here. I am confused by the word "improve." It is not clear whether the player has the option to improve all the four things or simply "tracks".










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    You've identified a problem with the sentence, not your understanding.

    – chrylis
    Mar 26 at 11:29











  • Can you link to the source (if it's online)? More information about the specific game may resolve the ambiguity. "Balancing armour" isn't exactly a known phrase, but it's possible that it's a phrase specific to the game, and acts as a compound noun.

    – Anthony Grist
    Mar 26 at 14:30













4












4








4


1






Here is a sentence from the description of a battle game.




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, balancing
armour, speed, and your cannon.




In the sentence, I am not sure if the word "balancing" is a verb or noun here. I am confused by the word "improve." It is not clear whether the player has the option to improve all the four things or simply "tracks".










share|improve this question














Here is a sentence from the description of a battle game.




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, balancing
armour, speed, and your cannon.




In the sentence, I am not sure if the word "balancing" is a verb or noun here. I am confused by the word "improve." It is not clear whether the player has the option to improve all the four things or simply "tracks".







meaning-in-context






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 26 at 7:08









curiouscurious

5141 gold badge3 silver badges12 bronze badges




5141 gold badge3 silver badges12 bronze badges







  • 2





    You've identified a problem with the sentence, not your understanding.

    – chrylis
    Mar 26 at 11:29











  • Can you link to the source (if it's online)? More information about the specific game may resolve the ambiguity. "Balancing armour" isn't exactly a known phrase, but it's possible that it's a phrase specific to the game, and acts as a compound noun.

    – Anthony Grist
    Mar 26 at 14:30












  • 2





    You've identified a problem with the sentence, not your understanding.

    – chrylis
    Mar 26 at 11:29











  • Can you link to the source (if it's online)? More information about the specific game may resolve the ambiguity. "Balancing armour" isn't exactly a known phrase, but it's possible that it's a phrase specific to the game, and acts as a compound noun.

    – Anthony Grist
    Mar 26 at 14:30







2




2





You've identified a problem with the sentence, not your understanding.

– chrylis
Mar 26 at 11:29





You've identified a problem with the sentence, not your understanding.

– chrylis
Mar 26 at 11:29













Can you link to the source (if it's online)? More information about the specific game may resolve the ambiguity. "Balancing armour" isn't exactly a known phrase, but it's possible that it's a phrase specific to the game, and acts as a compound noun.

– Anthony Grist
Mar 26 at 14:30





Can you link to the source (if it's online)? More information about the specific game may resolve the ambiguity. "Balancing armour" isn't exactly a known phrase, but it's possible that it's a phrase specific to the game, and acts as a compound noun.

– Anthony Grist
Mar 26 at 14:30










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














I don't think this is a very well written or clear sentence. In the context I would understand it as




You can improve your "tracks"...




Tracks must be a jargon term in the game.




..., which has the effect of balancing three things:...




Balancing is a gerund here, the noun form of a verb.




... armour, speed and cannon.




I suppose in the game stronger armour means less speed or a weaker cannon. But better "tracks" means that you can carry more armour and a bigger cannon without slowing down.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5





    Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

    – Andrew Tobilko
    Mar 26 at 11:06







  • 1





    @AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:56












  • @Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

    – hobbs
    Mar 26 at 14:34











  • @hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 14:41


















1














It makes sense to improve:



  • tracks;

  • speed;

  • cannon.

It does not make much sense to improve:



  • balancing armor.

Actually, what is that, a "balancing armor"?



But it can make sense if you use an additional comma: "improve ... balancing, armor ...", because you can apply improve to:



  • balancing;

  • armor.

I do not know what "balancing" would mean in the game, but I hope it makes sense.




Another way to make a sense out of this question is to use "by":




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, by balancing armour, speed, and your cannon.




with the meaning: You can improve your tracks according to the way you find a balance between armor, speed and cannon.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    "balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:58











  • Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

    – virolino
    Mar 26 at 12:01













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202422%2fis-balancing-noun-or-verb-in-the-given-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














I don't think this is a very well written or clear sentence. In the context I would understand it as




You can improve your "tracks"...




Tracks must be a jargon term in the game.




..., which has the effect of balancing three things:...




Balancing is a gerund here, the noun form of a verb.




... armour, speed and cannon.




I suppose in the game stronger armour means less speed or a weaker cannon. But better "tracks" means that you can carry more armour and a bigger cannon without slowing down.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5





    Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

    – Andrew Tobilko
    Mar 26 at 11:06







  • 1





    @AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:56












  • @Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

    – hobbs
    Mar 26 at 14:34











  • @hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 14:41















5














I don't think this is a very well written or clear sentence. In the context I would understand it as




You can improve your "tracks"...




Tracks must be a jargon term in the game.




..., which has the effect of balancing three things:...




Balancing is a gerund here, the noun form of a verb.




... armour, speed and cannon.




I suppose in the game stronger armour means less speed or a weaker cannon. But better "tracks" means that you can carry more armour and a bigger cannon without slowing down.






share|improve this answer


















  • 5





    Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

    – Andrew Tobilko
    Mar 26 at 11:06







  • 1





    @AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:56












  • @Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

    – hobbs
    Mar 26 at 14:34











  • @hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 14:41













5












5








5







I don't think this is a very well written or clear sentence. In the context I would understand it as




You can improve your "tracks"...




Tracks must be a jargon term in the game.




..., which has the effect of balancing three things:...




Balancing is a gerund here, the noun form of a verb.




... armour, speed and cannon.




I suppose in the game stronger armour means less speed or a weaker cannon. But better "tracks" means that you can carry more armour and a bigger cannon without slowing down.






share|improve this answer













I don't think this is a very well written or clear sentence. In the context I would understand it as




You can improve your "tracks"...




Tracks must be a jargon term in the game.




..., which has the effect of balancing three things:...




Balancing is a gerund here, the noun form of a verb.




... armour, speed and cannon.




I suppose in the game stronger armour means less speed or a weaker cannon. But better "tracks" means that you can carry more armour and a bigger cannon without slowing down.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 26 at 9:28









James KJames K

49.9k1 gold badge52 silver badges122 bronze badges




49.9k1 gold badge52 silver badges122 bronze badges







  • 5





    Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

    – Andrew Tobilko
    Mar 26 at 11:06







  • 1





    @AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:56












  • @Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

    – hobbs
    Mar 26 at 14:34











  • @hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 14:41












  • 5





    Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

    – Andrew Tobilko
    Mar 26 at 11:06







  • 1





    @AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:56












  • @Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

    – hobbs
    Mar 26 at 14:34











  • @hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 14:41







5




5





Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

– Andrew Tobilko
Mar 26 at 11:06






Would it be clearer if there was by: the option to improve your tracks by balancing armour, speed, and cannon?

– Andrew Tobilko
Mar 26 at 11:06





1




1





@AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

– Flater
Mar 26 at 11:56






@AndrewTobilko: Your versions suggests that balancing leads to track improvement, but this answer seems to infer that track improvement leads to balancing. If the intended meaning is the latter, then it should be "to": "improve your tracks to balance your armor, speed, and cannon"

– Flater
Mar 26 at 11:56














@Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

– hobbs
Mar 26 at 14:34





@Flater the "by" interpretation is the one that makes sense.

– hobbs
Mar 26 at 14:34













@hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

– Flater
Mar 26 at 14:41





@hobbs: If balancing leads to track improvement, I agree.

– Flater
Mar 26 at 14:41













1














It makes sense to improve:



  • tracks;

  • speed;

  • cannon.

It does not make much sense to improve:



  • balancing armor.

Actually, what is that, a "balancing armor"?



But it can make sense if you use an additional comma: "improve ... balancing, armor ...", because you can apply improve to:



  • balancing;

  • armor.

I do not know what "balancing" would mean in the game, but I hope it makes sense.




Another way to make a sense out of this question is to use "by":




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, by balancing armour, speed, and your cannon.




with the meaning: You can improve your tracks according to the way you find a balance between armor, speed and cannon.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    "balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:58











  • Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

    – virolino
    Mar 26 at 12:01















1














It makes sense to improve:



  • tracks;

  • speed;

  • cannon.

It does not make much sense to improve:



  • balancing armor.

Actually, what is that, a "balancing armor"?



But it can make sense if you use an additional comma: "improve ... balancing, armor ...", because you can apply improve to:



  • balancing;

  • armor.

I do not know what "balancing" would mean in the game, but I hope it makes sense.




Another way to make a sense out of this question is to use "by":




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, by balancing armour, speed, and your cannon.




with the meaning: You can improve your tracks according to the way you find a balance between armor, speed and cannon.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    "balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:58











  • Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

    – virolino
    Mar 26 at 12:01













1












1








1







It makes sense to improve:



  • tracks;

  • speed;

  • cannon.

It does not make much sense to improve:



  • balancing armor.

Actually, what is that, a "balancing armor"?



But it can make sense if you use an additional comma: "improve ... balancing, armor ...", because you can apply improve to:



  • balancing;

  • armor.

I do not know what "balancing" would mean in the game, but I hope it makes sense.




Another way to make a sense out of this question is to use "by":




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, by balancing armour, speed, and your cannon.




with the meaning: You can improve your tracks according to the way you find a balance between armor, speed and cannon.






share|improve this answer















It makes sense to improve:



  • tracks;

  • speed;

  • cannon.

It does not make much sense to improve:



  • balancing armor.

Actually, what is that, a "balancing armor"?



But it can make sense if you use an additional comma: "improve ... balancing, armor ...", because you can apply improve to:



  • balancing;

  • armor.

I do not know what "balancing" would mean in the game, but I hope it makes sense.




Another way to make a sense out of this question is to use "by":




In the game, you have the option to improve your tracks, by balancing armour, speed, and your cannon.




with the meaning: You can improve your tracks according to the way you find a balance between armor, speed and cannon.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 12:05

























answered Mar 26 at 9:07









virolinovirolino

6,9281 gold badge10 silver badges38 bronze badges




6,9281 gold badge10 silver badges38 bronze badges







  • 2





    "balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:58











  • Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

    – virolino
    Mar 26 at 12:01












  • 2





    "balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

    – Flater
    Mar 26 at 11:58











  • Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

    – virolino
    Mar 26 at 12:01







2




2





"balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

– Flater
Mar 26 at 11:58





"balancing armour" doesn't make sense, but "balancing armour, speed, and your cannon" does: you are balancing three things (armour, speed and cannon). I'm not saying the phrasing isn't flawed, but I think you're looking at it too narrowly by only focusing on "balancing armour".

– Flater
Mar 26 at 11:58













Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

– virolino
Mar 26 at 12:01





Yes, I am aware of this meaning, after reading the other answer. Thank you, though, for pointing it out.

– virolino
Mar 26 at 12:01

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202422%2fis-balancing-noun-or-verb-in-the-given-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript