Optimized integer logarithm base2 for BigIntWhat is JavaScript's highest integer value that a number can go to without losing precision?Plot logarithmic axes with matplotlib in pythonLogarithmic sliderHow to sort an array of integers correctlyConvert a string to an integer in JavaScript?How do I check that a number is float or integer?Integer division with remainder in JavaScript?How can I get Google's Closure Compiler to eliminate attributesbigInt to base2How to obtain the amount of bits of a BigInt?
BritRail England Passes compared to return ticket for travel in England
Why didn't Doctor Strange restore Tony Stark after he used the Stones?
How long were the Apollo astronauts allowed to breathe 100% oxygen at 1 atmosphere continuously?
literal `0` beeing a valid candidate for int and const string& overloads causes ambiguous call
What is a Romeo Word™?
In this iconic lunar orbit rendezvous photo of John Houbolt, why do arrows #5 and #6 point the "wrong" way?
Pauli exclusion principle - black holes
What could make large expeditions ineffective for exploring territory full of dangers and valuable resources?
Is it legal for a supermarket to refuse to sell an adult beer if an adult with them doesn’t have their ID?
Why can't I hear fret buzz through the amp?
Proof that every field is perfect???
How important are the Author's mood and feelings for writing a story?
Is it possible to have a career in SciComp without contributing to arms research?
When designing an adventure, how can I ensure a continuous player experience in a setting that's likely to favor TPKs?
How can I automate this tensor computation?
Why are there few or no black super GMs?
Which GPUs to get for Mathematical Optimization (if any)?
Why did my "seldom" get corrected?
Do Australia and New Zealand have a travel ban on Somalis (like Wikipedia says)?
Should I have one hand on the throttle during engine ignition?
Could a US citizen born through "birth tourism" become President?
Changing iteration variable in Do loop
How to tell if JDK is available from within running JVM?
Should I have shared a document with a former employee?
Optimized integer logarithm base2 for BigInt
What is JavaScript's highest integer value that a number can go to without losing precision?Plot logarithmic axes with matplotlib in pythonLogarithmic sliderHow to sort an array of integers correctlyConvert a string to an integer in JavaScript?How do I check that a number is float or integer?Integer division with remainder in JavaScript?How can I get Google's Closure Compiler to eliminate attributesbigInt to base2How to obtain the amount of bits of a BigInt?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
This is the naive algorithm that calculates integer log2(n),
function ilog2(n) // n is a positive non-zero BigInt
const C1 = BigInt(1)
const C2 = BigInt(2)
for(var count=0; n>C1; count++) n = n/C2
return count
// example ilog2(16n)==4
I am testing optimizations (see example below) but they are not "for log2", as commented here.
There are something better using WebAssembly?
PS: if it is not possible a generic solution, to solve my problem I can use functions like ilog2_64bits(n)
, with WebAssembly truncating or ignoring some bits of input BigInt.
non-WebAssembly
Example of not so optimized in pure Javascript (ideal is WebAssembly!)... Trying adaptation of integerLogarithm() of BigInteger.js:
function ilog2_pe(value, base=2n)
// example: ilog2_pe(255n) returns p: 128n, e: 7n
if (base <= value)
let i = ilog2_pe(value, base**2n);
let t = i.p*base
return (t <= value)
? p: t, e: i.e*2n + 1n
: p: i.p, e: i.e*2n
return p: 1n, e: 0n ;
function ilog2_str(n) // 2*faster!
return n.toString(2).length - 1
PS: it is running in modern browsers and last versions of NodeJS.
About performance... ilog2_pe(x64bits)
is 4 times faster tham the naive ilog2()
, ilog2_pe(x1024bits)
is ~9 times faster... Was expected... But:
Any non-WebAssembly solution has so ugly performance, even for 512, 1024, 2048 bits... counting string digits with ilog_str()
is 2 times faster!
For less tham 64 bits is 3 or more times faster.
javascript logarithm
add a comment |
This is the naive algorithm that calculates integer log2(n),
function ilog2(n) // n is a positive non-zero BigInt
const C1 = BigInt(1)
const C2 = BigInt(2)
for(var count=0; n>C1; count++) n = n/C2
return count
// example ilog2(16n)==4
I am testing optimizations (see example below) but they are not "for log2", as commented here.
There are something better using WebAssembly?
PS: if it is not possible a generic solution, to solve my problem I can use functions like ilog2_64bits(n)
, with WebAssembly truncating or ignoring some bits of input BigInt.
non-WebAssembly
Example of not so optimized in pure Javascript (ideal is WebAssembly!)... Trying adaptation of integerLogarithm() of BigInteger.js:
function ilog2_pe(value, base=2n)
// example: ilog2_pe(255n) returns p: 128n, e: 7n
if (base <= value)
let i = ilog2_pe(value, base**2n);
let t = i.p*base
return (t <= value)
? p: t, e: i.e*2n + 1n
: p: i.p, e: i.e*2n
return p: 1n, e: 0n ;
function ilog2_str(n) // 2*faster!
return n.toString(2).length - 1
PS: it is running in modern browsers and last versions of NodeJS.
About performance... ilog2_pe(x64bits)
is 4 times faster tham the naive ilog2()
, ilog2_pe(x1024bits)
is ~9 times faster... Was expected... But:
Any non-WebAssembly solution has so ugly performance, even for 512, 1024, 2048 bits... counting string digits with ilog_str()
is 2 times faster!
For less tham 64 bits is 3 or more times faster.
javascript logarithm
add a comment |
This is the naive algorithm that calculates integer log2(n),
function ilog2(n) // n is a positive non-zero BigInt
const C1 = BigInt(1)
const C2 = BigInt(2)
for(var count=0; n>C1; count++) n = n/C2
return count
// example ilog2(16n)==4
I am testing optimizations (see example below) but they are not "for log2", as commented here.
There are something better using WebAssembly?
PS: if it is not possible a generic solution, to solve my problem I can use functions like ilog2_64bits(n)
, with WebAssembly truncating or ignoring some bits of input BigInt.
non-WebAssembly
Example of not so optimized in pure Javascript (ideal is WebAssembly!)... Trying adaptation of integerLogarithm() of BigInteger.js:
function ilog2_pe(value, base=2n)
// example: ilog2_pe(255n) returns p: 128n, e: 7n
if (base <= value)
let i = ilog2_pe(value, base**2n);
let t = i.p*base
return (t <= value)
? p: t, e: i.e*2n + 1n
: p: i.p, e: i.e*2n
return p: 1n, e: 0n ;
function ilog2_str(n) // 2*faster!
return n.toString(2).length - 1
PS: it is running in modern browsers and last versions of NodeJS.
About performance... ilog2_pe(x64bits)
is 4 times faster tham the naive ilog2()
, ilog2_pe(x1024bits)
is ~9 times faster... Was expected... But:
Any non-WebAssembly solution has so ugly performance, even for 512, 1024, 2048 bits... counting string digits with ilog_str()
is 2 times faster!
For less tham 64 bits is 3 or more times faster.
javascript logarithm
This is the naive algorithm that calculates integer log2(n),
function ilog2(n) // n is a positive non-zero BigInt
const C1 = BigInt(1)
const C2 = BigInt(2)
for(var count=0; n>C1; count++) n = n/C2
return count
// example ilog2(16n)==4
I am testing optimizations (see example below) but they are not "for log2", as commented here.
There are something better using WebAssembly?
PS: if it is not possible a generic solution, to solve my problem I can use functions like ilog2_64bits(n)
, with WebAssembly truncating or ignoring some bits of input BigInt.
non-WebAssembly
Example of not so optimized in pure Javascript (ideal is WebAssembly!)... Trying adaptation of integerLogarithm() of BigInteger.js:
function ilog2_pe(value, base=2n)
// example: ilog2_pe(255n) returns p: 128n, e: 7n
if (base <= value)
let i = ilog2_pe(value, base**2n);
let t = i.p*base
return (t <= value)
? p: t, e: i.e*2n + 1n
: p: i.p, e: i.e*2n
return p: 1n, e: 0n ;
function ilog2_str(n) // 2*faster!
return n.toString(2).length - 1
PS: it is running in modern browsers and last versions of NodeJS.
About performance... ilog2_pe(x64bits)
is 4 times faster tham the naive ilog2()
, ilog2_pe(x1024bits)
is ~9 times faster... Was expected... But:
Any non-WebAssembly solution has so ugly performance, even for 512, 1024, 2048 bits... counting string digits with ilog_str()
is 2 times faster!
For less tham 64 bits is 3 or more times faster.
javascript logarithm
javascript logarithm
edited Mar 26 at 23:01
Peter Krauss
asked Mar 26 at 10:43
Peter KraussPeter Krauss
5,88611 gold badges88 silver badges191 bronze badges
5,88611 gold badges88 silver badges191 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55355184%2foptimized-integer-logarithm-base2-for-bigint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.
Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55355184%2foptimized-integer-logarithm-base2-for-bigint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown