What Brexit proposals are on the table in the indicative votes on the 27th of March 2019?Will the British Parliament prevent “Brexit”?Why is the British government waiting until March 29th to officially Brexit?Do Opposition amendments to the Queen's Speech amount to no-confidence motions?What would be the subject of a second Brexit Referendum?What would a delayed Brexit mean for the 2019 European Parliament election?What will happen if Parliament votes “no” on each of the Brexit-related votes to be held on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March?How has the division of power worked, between govt and parliament, in modern Britain?Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?What exactly did the Brexit Party gain in the 2019 EU parliament election?
Does Dovescape counter Enchantment Creatures?
Journal published a paper, ignoring my objections as a referee
What checks exist against overuse of presidential pardons in the USA?
Coupling two 15 Amp circuit breaker for 20 Amp
Don't look at what I did there
What does "-1" represent in the value range for unsigned int and signed int?
Group riding etiquette
How could a self contained organic body propel itself in space
Necessity of tenure for lifetime academic research
Did the Apollo Guidance Computer really use 60% of the world's ICs in 1963?
What is the purpose of Strength, Intelligence and Dexterity in Path of Exile?
How can I fix cracks between the bathtub and the wall surround?
What is the following VRP?
What is the sound/audio equivalent of "unsightly"?
What ways are there to "PEEK" memory sections in (different) BASIC(s)
Is the Amazon rainforest the "world's lungs"?
Generic Extension Method To Count Descendants
Why is there not a willingness from the world to step in between Pakistan and India?
SVO airport, how to avoid scam taxis without pre-booking?
Is there a way to tell what frequency I need a PWM to be?
Cutting numbers into a specific decimals
Is belaying with a hip belay unsafe?
Count the number of triangles
Why did Starhopper's exhaust plume become brighter just before landing?
What Brexit proposals are on the table in the indicative votes on the 27th of March 2019?
Will the British Parliament prevent “Brexit”?Why is the British government waiting until March 29th to officially Brexit?Do Opposition amendments to the Queen's Speech amount to no-confidence motions?What would be the subject of a second Brexit Referendum?What would a delayed Brexit mean for the 2019 European Parliament election?What will happen if Parliament votes “no” on each of the Brexit-related votes to be held on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March?How has the division of power worked, between govt and parliament, in modern Britain?Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?What exactly did the Brexit Party gain in the 2019 EU parliament election?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
|
show 2 more comments
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:03
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:04
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:13
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:15
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:22
|
show 2 more comments
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
On the 27th of March, the UK parliament has taken control of its own agenda in an attempt to break the so-called Brexit deadlock.
How many proposals are there and what are they?
united-kingdom brexit parliament
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked Mar 27 at 18:56
JJJJJJ
11.8k4 gold badges38 silver badges78 bronze badges
11.8k4 gold badges38 silver badges78 bronze badges
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:03
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:04
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:13
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:15
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:22
|
show 2 more comments
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:03
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:04
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:13
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:15
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:22
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:03
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:03
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:04
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:04
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:13
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:13
1
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:15
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:15
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:22
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:22
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:

The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.

6
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
5
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39908%2fwhat-brexit-proposals-are-on-the-table-in-the-indicative-votes-on-the-27th-of-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:

The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.

6
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
5
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
add a comment |
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:

The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.

6
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
5
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
add a comment |
Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:

The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.

Dutch bank ING has an informative overview of the 16 options put forward by MPs:

The first column, motion, indicates the 'number' by which the motions are referred to by many MPs in the debate in the House of Commons. The description column also indicates if motions are (likely to be) unacceptable to the EU.
As explained by Origimbo in a comment below, the speaker has selected only options B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O. Meaning 8 options are actually on the table.

edited Mar 27 at 20:30
divibisan
3,21913 silver badges35 bronze badges
3,21913 silver badges35 bronze badges
answered Mar 27 at 18:56
JJJJJJ
11.8k4 gold badges38 silver badges78 bronze badges
11.8k4 gold badges38 silver badges78 bronze badges
6
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
5
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
add a comment |
6
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
5
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
6
6
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
Note that only B, D, H, J, K, L, M and O have been selected by the speaker to actually be voted on. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47704794
– origimbo
Mar 27 at 19:05
2
2
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
@origimbo thanks, I edited it in. :)
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 19:15
5
5
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
None of the 8 votes produced a majority. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47728333
– alephzero
Mar 27 at 22:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39908%2fwhat-brexit-proposals-are-on-the-table-in-the-indicative-votes-on-the-27th-of-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@DenisdeBernardy please elaborate which of the criteria of good-faith as laid out on meta my question (or answer) does not satisfy. I posted the question because it was missing on Politics Se and I thought it was good to share my answer. In fact, I did not know at the time the speaker had selected amendments and as such at least one person (me) learnt something. Isn't that what SE is about?
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:03
Per my comment: "Or at the very least, the lack of research is too great". Speaker usually lets MPs know what's up for voting in the late afternoon UK time. theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/mar/27/… -- it's been all over the news and Twitter since.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:04
@DenisdeBernardy I don't think lack of research is a closing reason on this SE. It is a reason for down voting (try hovering over the down vote button), so feel free to do that.
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:13
1
I did that already. But just to clarify why, your question came 3 hours after the amendments got picked. Your question would have been great if you had put the actual answer to that directly. I'd have even upvoted both the question and your answer had you done that. Instead, you asked the question, and contributed an answer without having even Googled what the answer might be. And it was so wrong someone prompted you to edit it to correct what's getting voted on. Anyway, let's just leave it at that. Your other contributions to the site are great.
– Denis de Bernardy
Mar 27 at 21:15
@DenisdeBernardy thanks for the compliment but I really don't see what you are getting upset about. Even without my answer, the question stands regardless of when the options for voting would be picked. This site is not just for questions that are relevant in some very small time window, it also serves as a reference framework and aims to be a repository of knowledge (in this case on politics). With Brexit being an important issue, this is a relevant question now (to follow current affairs) or in the future (e.g. to support someone analysing the Brexit process).
– JJJ
Mar 27 at 21:22