Aggregate a tibble based on a consecutive values in a boolean column Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Using dplyr::mutate between two dataframes to create column based on date rangeFrequency of multiple boolean or non-boolean columns in Rcumsum by day with hourly observations with dplyrcombining rows with dplyr when number of columns is unknowntransform() to add rows with dplyr()Substract value from tibble column based on another tibbleHow to update the row value with sequentially updated result of previous row of same column in RAggregate a tibble based on date windowsNested `if_else()` and `is.na()` logic inconsistency?row wise test if multiple (not all) columns are equal
Illegal assignment from sObject to Id
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?
Would the Life Transference spell be unbalanced if it ignored resistance and immunity?
How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?
Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?
What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?
Sum letters are not two different
What is a fractional matching?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?
Can the Great Weapon Master feat's damage bonus and accuracy penalty apply to attacks from the Spiritual Weapon spell?
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
Did Krishna say in Bhagavad Gita "I am in every living being"
How to write the following sign?
Time to Settle Down!
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?
Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
Is there any word for a place full of confusion?
What was the first language to use conditional keywords?
Aggregate a tibble based on a consecutive values in a boolean column
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Using dplyr::mutate between two dataframes to create column based on date rangeFrequency of multiple boolean or non-boolean columns in Rcumsum by day with hourly observations with dplyrcombining rows with dplyr when number of columns is unknowntransform() to add rows with dplyr()Substract value from tibble column based on another tibbleHow to update the row value with sequentially updated result of previous row of same column in RAggregate a tibble based on date windowsNested `if_else()` and `is.na()` logic inconsistency?row wise test if multiple (not all) columns are equal
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I've got a fairly straight-forward problem, but I'm struggling to find a solution that doesn't require a wall of code and complicated loops.
I've got a summary table, df
, for an hourly timeseries dataset where each observations belongs to a group.
I want to merge some of those groups, based on a boolean column in the summary table.
The boolean column, merge_with_next
indicates whether a given group should be merged with the next group (one row down).
The merging effectively occurs by updating the end
, value and removing rows:
library(dplyr)
# Demo data
df <- tibble(
group = 1:12,
start = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 00:00"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 00:00"), by = "1 day"),
end = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 23:59"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 23:59"), by = "1 day"),
merge_with_next = rep(c(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE), 4)
)
df
#> # A tibble: 12 x 4
#> group start end merge_with_next
#> <int> <dttm> <dttm> <lgl>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-01 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 2 2 2019-01-02 00:00:00 2019-01-02 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 3 3 2019-01-03 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 4 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-04 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 5 5 2019-01-05 00:00:00 2019-01-05 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 6 6 2019-01-06 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 7 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-07 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 8 8 2019-01-08 00:00:00 2019-01-08 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 9 9 2019-01-09 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 10 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-10 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 11 11 2019-01-11 00:00:00 2019-01-11 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 12 12 2019-01-12 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00 FALSE
# Desired result
desired <- tibble(
group = c(1, 4, 7, 9),
start = c("2019-01-01 00:00", "2019-01-04 00:00", "2019-01-07 00:00", "2019-01-10 00:00"),
end = c("2019-01-03 23:59", "2019-01-06 23:59", "2019-01-09 23:59", "2019-01-12 23:59")
)
desired
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#> group start end
#> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00 2019-01-03 23:59
#> 2 4 2019-01-04 00:00 2019-01-06 23:59
#> 3 7 2019-01-07 00:00 2019-01-09 23:59
#> 4 9 2019-01-10 00:00 2019-01-12 23:59
Created on 2019-03-22 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
I'm looking for a short and clear solution that doesn't involve a myriad of helper tables and loops. The final value in the group
column is not significant, I only care about the start
and end
columns from the result.
r dplyr tibble
add a comment |
I've got a fairly straight-forward problem, but I'm struggling to find a solution that doesn't require a wall of code and complicated loops.
I've got a summary table, df
, for an hourly timeseries dataset where each observations belongs to a group.
I want to merge some of those groups, based on a boolean column in the summary table.
The boolean column, merge_with_next
indicates whether a given group should be merged with the next group (one row down).
The merging effectively occurs by updating the end
, value and removing rows:
library(dplyr)
# Demo data
df <- tibble(
group = 1:12,
start = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 00:00"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 00:00"), by = "1 day"),
end = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 23:59"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 23:59"), by = "1 day"),
merge_with_next = rep(c(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE), 4)
)
df
#> # A tibble: 12 x 4
#> group start end merge_with_next
#> <int> <dttm> <dttm> <lgl>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-01 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 2 2 2019-01-02 00:00:00 2019-01-02 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 3 3 2019-01-03 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 4 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-04 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 5 5 2019-01-05 00:00:00 2019-01-05 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 6 6 2019-01-06 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 7 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-07 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 8 8 2019-01-08 00:00:00 2019-01-08 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 9 9 2019-01-09 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 10 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-10 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 11 11 2019-01-11 00:00:00 2019-01-11 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 12 12 2019-01-12 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00 FALSE
# Desired result
desired <- tibble(
group = c(1, 4, 7, 9),
start = c("2019-01-01 00:00", "2019-01-04 00:00", "2019-01-07 00:00", "2019-01-10 00:00"),
end = c("2019-01-03 23:59", "2019-01-06 23:59", "2019-01-09 23:59", "2019-01-12 23:59")
)
desired
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#> group start end
#> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00 2019-01-03 23:59
#> 2 4 2019-01-04 00:00 2019-01-06 23:59
#> 3 7 2019-01-07 00:00 2019-01-09 23:59
#> 4 9 2019-01-10 00:00 2019-01-12 23:59
Created on 2019-03-22 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
I'm looking for a short and clear solution that doesn't involve a myriad of helper tables and loops. The final value in the group
column is not significant, I only care about the start
and end
columns from the result.
r dplyr tibble
add a comment |
I've got a fairly straight-forward problem, but I'm struggling to find a solution that doesn't require a wall of code and complicated loops.
I've got a summary table, df
, for an hourly timeseries dataset where each observations belongs to a group.
I want to merge some of those groups, based on a boolean column in the summary table.
The boolean column, merge_with_next
indicates whether a given group should be merged with the next group (one row down).
The merging effectively occurs by updating the end
, value and removing rows:
library(dplyr)
# Demo data
df <- tibble(
group = 1:12,
start = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 00:00"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 00:00"), by = "1 day"),
end = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 23:59"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 23:59"), by = "1 day"),
merge_with_next = rep(c(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE), 4)
)
df
#> # A tibble: 12 x 4
#> group start end merge_with_next
#> <int> <dttm> <dttm> <lgl>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-01 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 2 2 2019-01-02 00:00:00 2019-01-02 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 3 3 2019-01-03 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 4 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-04 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 5 5 2019-01-05 00:00:00 2019-01-05 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 6 6 2019-01-06 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 7 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-07 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 8 8 2019-01-08 00:00:00 2019-01-08 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 9 9 2019-01-09 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 10 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-10 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 11 11 2019-01-11 00:00:00 2019-01-11 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 12 12 2019-01-12 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00 FALSE
# Desired result
desired <- tibble(
group = c(1, 4, 7, 9),
start = c("2019-01-01 00:00", "2019-01-04 00:00", "2019-01-07 00:00", "2019-01-10 00:00"),
end = c("2019-01-03 23:59", "2019-01-06 23:59", "2019-01-09 23:59", "2019-01-12 23:59")
)
desired
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#> group start end
#> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00 2019-01-03 23:59
#> 2 4 2019-01-04 00:00 2019-01-06 23:59
#> 3 7 2019-01-07 00:00 2019-01-09 23:59
#> 4 9 2019-01-10 00:00 2019-01-12 23:59
Created on 2019-03-22 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
I'm looking for a short and clear solution that doesn't involve a myriad of helper tables and loops. The final value in the group
column is not significant, I only care about the start
and end
columns from the result.
r dplyr tibble
I've got a fairly straight-forward problem, but I'm struggling to find a solution that doesn't require a wall of code and complicated loops.
I've got a summary table, df
, for an hourly timeseries dataset where each observations belongs to a group.
I want to merge some of those groups, based on a boolean column in the summary table.
The boolean column, merge_with_next
indicates whether a given group should be merged with the next group (one row down).
The merging effectively occurs by updating the end
, value and removing rows:
library(dplyr)
# Demo data
df <- tibble(
group = 1:12,
start = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 00:00"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 00:00"), by = "1 day"),
end = seq.POSIXt(as.POSIXct("2019-01-01 23:59"), as.POSIXct("2019-01-12 23:59"), by = "1 day"),
merge_with_next = rep(c(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE), 4)
)
df
#> # A tibble: 12 x 4
#> group start end merge_with_next
#> <int> <dttm> <dttm> <lgl>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-01 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 2 2 2019-01-02 00:00:00 2019-01-02 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 3 3 2019-01-03 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 4 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-04 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 5 5 2019-01-05 00:00:00 2019-01-05 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 6 6 2019-01-06 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 7 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-07 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 8 8 2019-01-08 00:00:00 2019-01-08 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 9 9 2019-01-09 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00 FALSE
#> 10 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-10 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 11 11 2019-01-11 00:00:00 2019-01-11 23:59:00 TRUE
#> 12 12 2019-01-12 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00 FALSE
# Desired result
desired <- tibble(
group = c(1, 4, 7, 9),
start = c("2019-01-01 00:00", "2019-01-04 00:00", "2019-01-07 00:00", "2019-01-10 00:00"),
end = c("2019-01-03 23:59", "2019-01-06 23:59", "2019-01-09 23:59", "2019-01-12 23:59")
)
desired
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#> group start end
#> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 2019-01-01 00:00 2019-01-03 23:59
#> 2 4 2019-01-04 00:00 2019-01-06 23:59
#> 3 7 2019-01-07 00:00 2019-01-09 23:59
#> 4 9 2019-01-10 00:00 2019-01-12 23:59
Created on 2019-03-22 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
I'm looking for a short and clear solution that doesn't involve a myriad of helper tables and loops. The final value in the group
column is not significant, I only care about the start
and end
columns from the result.
r dplyr tibble
r dplyr tibble
edited Mar 22 at 10:39
markus
15.8k11336
15.8k11336
asked Mar 22 at 10:12
djfinnoydjfinnoy
319110
319110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
We can use dplyr
and create groups based on every time TRUE
value occurs in merge_with_next
column and select first
value from start
and last
value from end
column for each group.
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(temp = cumsum(!lag(merge_with_next, default = TRUE))) %>%
summarise(group = first(group),
start = first(start),
end = last(end)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
select(-temp)
# group start end
# <int> <dttm> <dttm>
#1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00
#2 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00
#3 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00
#4 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55297317%2faggregate-a-tibble-based-on-a-consecutive-values-in-a-boolean-column%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We can use dplyr
and create groups based on every time TRUE
value occurs in merge_with_next
column and select first
value from start
and last
value from end
column for each group.
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(temp = cumsum(!lag(merge_with_next, default = TRUE))) %>%
summarise(group = first(group),
start = first(start),
end = last(end)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
select(-temp)
# group start end
# <int> <dttm> <dttm>
#1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00
#2 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00
#3 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00
#4 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
add a comment |
We can use dplyr
and create groups based on every time TRUE
value occurs in merge_with_next
column and select first
value from start
and last
value from end
column for each group.
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(temp = cumsum(!lag(merge_with_next, default = TRUE))) %>%
summarise(group = first(group),
start = first(start),
end = last(end)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
select(-temp)
# group start end
# <int> <dttm> <dttm>
#1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00
#2 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00
#3 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00
#4 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
add a comment |
We can use dplyr
and create groups based on every time TRUE
value occurs in merge_with_next
column and select first
value from start
and last
value from end
column for each group.
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(temp = cumsum(!lag(merge_with_next, default = TRUE))) %>%
summarise(group = first(group),
start = first(start),
end = last(end)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
select(-temp)
# group start end
# <int> <dttm> <dttm>
#1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00
#2 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00
#3 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00
#4 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00
We can use dplyr
and create groups based on every time TRUE
value occurs in merge_with_next
column and select first
value from start
and last
value from end
column for each group.
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(temp = cumsum(!lag(merge_with_next, default = TRUE))) %>%
summarise(group = first(group),
start = first(start),
end = last(end)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
select(-temp)
# group start end
# <int> <dttm> <dttm>
#1 1 2019-01-01 00:00:00 2019-01-03 23:59:00
#2 4 2019-01-04 00:00:00 2019-01-06 23:59:00
#3 7 2019-01-07 00:00:00 2019-01-09 23:59:00
#4 10 2019-01-10 00:00:00 2019-01-12 23:59:00
answered Mar 22 at 10:20
Ronak ShahRonak Shah
48.2k104369
48.2k104369
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
add a comment |
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
Perfect! Thank you very much.
– djfinnoy
Mar 22 at 10:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55297317%2faggregate-a-tibble-based-on-a-consecutive-values-in-a-boolean-column%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown