Imgur.com blocked, what are my options? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow do I show a picture on Stack Overflow instead of just an icon or caption `enter image description here`?Source code on GitHub (failed review)Red popup appeared when I tried to flag a question or an answerHow should I review answers with screenshots of code in Low Quality Posts?What stops the >! notation from working as a spoiler?Allow posting images even for new users, when the question would benefit from itIs it possible to add markup tags to a block quote?Opening image links redirects from postHow to flag duplicate questions of another which has no marked answer?More rigorous rules for including image samples in the questionenter image description here… please?Should we display a warning when users include images?Raise the amount of reputation needed to stop seeing the warning on the image upload dialogHow can I post a question with sample output?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

How to translate "being like"?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

How come people say “Would of”?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?

"as much details as you can remember"

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Can an undergraduate be advised by a professor who is very far away?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

$EDITOR environment variable won't set

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?



Imgur.com blocked, what are my options?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow do I show a picture on Stack Overflow instead of just an icon or caption `enter image description here`?Source code on GitHub (failed review)Red popup appeared when I tried to flag a question or an answerHow should I review answers with screenshots of code in Low Quality Posts?What stops the >! notation from working as a spoiler?Allow posting images even for new users, when the question would benefit from itIs it possible to add markup tags to a block quote?Opening image links redirects from postHow to flag duplicate questions of another which has no marked answer?More rigorous rules for including image samples in the questionenter image description here… please?Should we display a warning when users include images?Raise the amount of reputation needed to stop seeing the warning on the image upload dialogHow can I post a question with sample output?










73















My organization's proxy blocks http://i.stack.imgur.com/, and they refuse to lift that block.



Is there any way for me to work around that to see screenshots and images users post in questions? While most questions don't include images, the entire meaning of other questions is based on those images.









share



















  • 24





    That's a real shame. i.stack.imgur.com is probably one of the safest image domains there is, unless their real motivation is that they don't believe you need it for work-related reasons, or that they simply lack motivation altogether.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:48







  • 27





    Open a Google Drive document, add an image from a url. It's bad, but it's what I do.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:49






  • 6





    @gunr2171: Not much help for images that are already posted by other users.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:50






  • 1





    I'm curious why they have that block in place o.O

    – Cerbrus
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:53






  • 4





    @RobertHarvey, as long as the post has an image url (not a link to a page with an image on it), this will work, no matter who posted it. You just have to view the source of the post to get the url.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:54






  • 4





    @gunr2171: I think you're missing the point. Most people don't post images that way.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:56







  • 6





    @Cerbrus: It's probably a block for the entire imgur.com domain.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:58






  • 2





    @RobertHarvey, ok (as much as I don't want to argue), the normal way people post images is with the "image" editor button, which puts markdown in the post and a url (for i.stack.imgur) at the bottom. So I notice there is a screenshot missing, open up the post for edit, and get the url from the bottom.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:00











  • @gunr2171: The url will contain an i.stack.imgur.com link, 99 percent of the time. What?

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:01







  • 21





    @RobertHarvey, and that's fine. Adding an image by url (even an i.stack.imgur.com link) in google docs will go around a proxy.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:03






  • 30





    Have you considered seeking employment elsewhere...sounds like you're working for tyrants...!

    – JRG-Developer
    Jun 24 '14 at 23:47






  • 5





    @gunr2171 how about posting that as an answer, it sounds like the best solution (simplest, safest, most likely to work, least likely to end in a disciplinary tribunal...). Make it clear that it works by Google's server downloading the image from imgur, then you accessing the image from Google's servers, which are (hopefully!) not blocked.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:02












  • What about changing the DNS for that domain on the local machine if allowed?

    – JeromeJ
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:03











  • It's probably safe to assume that if imgur.com is blocked, the user doesn't have any admin rights beyond the bare essentials.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:05






  • 5





    Stack Overflow needs to employ these blocks so people can see why link-only answers are so highly frowned upon.

    – BoltClock
    Jun 25 '14 at 16:46















73















My organization's proxy blocks http://i.stack.imgur.com/, and they refuse to lift that block.



Is there any way for me to work around that to see screenshots and images users post in questions? While most questions don't include images, the entire meaning of other questions is based on those images.









share



















  • 24





    That's a real shame. i.stack.imgur.com is probably one of the safest image domains there is, unless their real motivation is that they don't believe you need it for work-related reasons, or that they simply lack motivation altogether.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:48







  • 27





    Open a Google Drive document, add an image from a url. It's bad, but it's what I do.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:49






  • 6





    @gunr2171: Not much help for images that are already posted by other users.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:50






  • 1





    I'm curious why they have that block in place o.O

    – Cerbrus
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:53






  • 4





    @RobertHarvey, as long as the post has an image url (not a link to a page with an image on it), this will work, no matter who posted it. You just have to view the source of the post to get the url.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:54






  • 4





    @gunr2171: I think you're missing the point. Most people don't post images that way.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:56







  • 6





    @Cerbrus: It's probably a block for the entire imgur.com domain.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:58






  • 2





    @RobertHarvey, ok (as much as I don't want to argue), the normal way people post images is with the "image" editor button, which puts markdown in the post and a url (for i.stack.imgur) at the bottom. So I notice there is a screenshot missing, open up the post for edit, and get the url from the bottom.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:00











  • @gunr2171: The url will contain an i.stack.imgur.com link, 99 percent of the time. What?

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:01







  • 21





    @RobertHarvey, and that's fine. Adding an image by url (even an i.stack.imgur.com link) in google docs will go around a proxy.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:03






  • 30





    Have you considered seeking employment elsewhere...sounds like you're working for tyrants...!

    – JRG-Developer
    Jun 24 '14 at 23:47






  • 5





    @gunr2171 how about posting that as an answer, it sounds like the best solution (simplest, safest, most likely to work, least likely to end in a disciplinary tribunal...). Make it clear that it works by Google's server downloading the image from imgur, then you accessing the image from Google's servers, which are (hopefully!) not blocked.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:02












  • What about changing the DNS for that domain on the local machine if allowed?

    – JeromeJ
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:03











  • It's probably safe to assume that if imgur.com is blocked, the user doesn't have any admin rights beyond the bare essentials.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:05






  • 5





    Stack Overflow needs to employ these blocks so people can see why link-only answers are so highly frowned upon.

    – BoltClock
    Jun 25 '14 at 16:46













73












73








73


14






My organization's proxy blocks http://i.stack.imgur.com/, and they refuse to lift that block.



Is there any way for me to work around that to see screenshots and images users post in questions? While most questions don't include images, the entire meaning of other questions is based on those images.









share
















My organization's proxy blocks http://i.stack.imgur.com/, and they refuse to lift that block.



Is there any way for me to work around that to see screenshots and images users post in questions? While most questions don't include images, the entire meaning of other questions is based on those images.







support images





share














share












share



share








edited Jun 25 '14 at 0:06









Hans Passant

797k2377103




797k2377103










asked Jun 24 '14 at 19:47







user1454117














  • 24





    That's a real shame. i.stack.imgur.com is probably one of the safest image domains there is, unless their real motivation is that they don't believe you need it for work-related reasons, or that they simply lack motivation altogether.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:48







  • 27





    Open a Google Drive document, add an image from a url. It's bad, but it's what I do.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:49






  • 6





    @gunr2171: Not much help for images that are already posted by other users.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:50






  • 1





    I'm curious why they have that block in place o.O

    – Cerbrus
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:53






  • 4





    @RobertHarvey, as long as the post has an image url (not a link to a page with an image on it), this will work, no matter who posted it. You just have to view the source of the post to get the url.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:54






  • 4





    @gunr2171: I think you're missing the point. Most people don't post images that way.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:56







  • 6





    @Cerbrus: It's probably a block for the entire imgur.com domain.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:58






  • 2





    @RobertHarvey, ok (as much as I don't want to argue), the normal way people post images is with the "image" editor button, which puts markdown in the post and a url (for i.stack.imgur) at the bottom. So I notice there is a screenshot missing, open up the post for edit, and get the url from the bottom.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:00











  • @gunr2171: The url will contain an i.stack.imgur.com link, 99 percent of the time. What?

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:01







  • 21





    @RobertHarvey, and that's fine. Adding an image by url (even an i.stack.imgur.com link) in google docs will go around a proxy.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:03






  • 30





    Have you considered seeking employment elsewhere...sounds like you're working for tyrants...!

    – JRG-Developer
    Jun 24 '14 at 23:47






  • 5





    @gunr2171 how about posting that as an answer, it sounds like the best solution (simplest, safest, most likely to work, least likely to end in a disciplinary tribunal...). Make it clear that it works by Google's server downloading the image from imgur, then you accessing the image from Google's servers, which are (hopefully!) not blocked.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:02












  • What about changing the DNS for that domain on the local machine if allowed?

    – JeromeJ
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:03











  • It's probably safe to assume that if imgur.com is blocked, the user doesn't have any admin rights beyond the bare essentials.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:05






  • 5





    Stack Overflow needs to employ these blocks so people can see why link-only answers are so highly frowned upon.

    – BoltClock
    Jun 25 '14 at 16:46












  • 24





    That's a real shame. i.stack.imgur.com is probably one of the safest image domains there is, unless their real motivation is that they don't believe you need it for work-related reasons, or that they simply lack motivation altogether.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:48







  • 27





    Open a Google Drive document, add an image from a url. It's bad, but it's what I do.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:49






  • 6





    @gunr2171: Not much help for images that are already posted by other users.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:50






  • 1





    I'm curious why they have that block in place o.O

    – Cerbrus
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:53






  • 4





    @RobertHarvey, as long as the post has an image url (not a link to a page with an image on it), this will work, no matter who posted it. You just have to view the source of the post to get the url.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:54






  • 4





    @gunr2171: I think you're missing the point. Most people don't post images that way.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:56







  • 6





    @Cerbrus: It's probably a block for the entire imgur.com domain.

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 19:58






  • 2





    @RobertHarvey, ok (as much as I don't want to argue), the normal way people post images is with the "image" editor button, which puts markdown in the post and a url (for i.stack.imgur) at the bottom. So I notice there is a screenshot missing, open up the post for edit, and get the url from the bottom.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:00











  • @gunr2171: The url will contain an i.stack.imgur.com link, 99 percent of the time. What?

    – Robert Harvey
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:01







  • 21





    @RobertHarvey, and that's fine. Adding an image by url (even an i.stack.imgur.com link) in google docs will go around a proxy.

    – gunr2171
    Jun 24 '14 at 20:03






  • 30





    Have you considered seeking employment elsewhere...sounds like you're working for tyrants...!

    – JRG-Developer
    Jun 24 '14 at 23:47






  • 5





    @gunr2171 how about posting that as an answer, it sounds like the best solution (simplest, safest, most likely to work, least likely to end in a disciplinary tribunal...). Make it clear that it works by Google's server downloading the image from imgur, then you accessing the image from Google's servers, which are (hopefully!) not blocked.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:02












  • What about changing the DNS for that domain on the local machine if allowed?

    – JeromeJ
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:03











  • It's probably safe to assume that if imgur.com is blocked, the user doesn't have any admin rights beyond the bare essentials.

    – user568458
    Jun 25 '14 at 14:05






  • 5





    Stack Overflow needs to employ these blocks so people can see why link-only answers are so highly frowned upon.

    – BoltClock
    Jun 25 '14 at 16:46







24




24





That's a real shame. i.stack.imgur.com is probably one of the safest image domains there is, unless their real motivation is that they don't believe you need it for work-related reasons, or that they simply lack motivation altogether.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:48






That's a real shame. i.stack.imgur.com is probably one of the safest image domains there is, unless their real motivation is that they don't believe you need it for work-related reasons, or that they simply lack motivation altogether.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:48





27




27





Open a Google Drive document, add an image from a url. It's bad, but it's what I do.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 19:49





Open a Google Drive document, add an image from a url. It's bad, but it's what I do.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 19:49




6




6





@gunr2171: Not much help for images that are already posted by other users.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:50





@gunr2171: Not much help for images that are already posted by other users.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:50




1




1





I'm curious why they have that block in place o.O

– Cerbrus
Jun 24 '14 at 19:53





I'm curious why they have that block in place o.O

– Cerbrus
Jun 24 '14 at 19:53




4




4





@RobertHarvey, as long as the post has an image url (not a link to a page with an image on it), this will work, no matter who posted it. You just have to view the source of the post to get the url.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 19:54





@RobertHarvey, as long as the post has an image url (not a link to a page with an image on it), this will work, no matter who posted it. You just have to view the source of the post to get the url.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 19:54




4




4





@gunr2171: I think you're missing the point. Most people don't post images that way.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:56






@gunr2171: I think you're missing the point. Most people don't post images that way.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:56





6




6





@Cerbrus: It's probably a block for the entire imgur.com domain.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:58





@Cerbrus: It's probably a block for the entire imgur.com domain.

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 19:58




2




2





@RobertHarvey, ok (as much as I don't want to argue), the normal way people post images is with the "image" editor button, which puts markdown in the post and a url (for i.stack.imgur) at the bottom. So I notice there is a screenshot missing, open up the post for edit, and get the url from the bottom.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 20:00





@RobertHarvey, ok (as much as I don't want to argue), the normal way people post images is with the "image" editor button, which puts markdown in the post and a url (for i.stack.imgur) at the bottom. So I notice there is a screenshot missing, open up the post for edit, and get the url from the bottom.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 20:00













@gunr2171: The url will contain an i.stack.imgur.com link, 99 percent of the time. What?

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 20:01






@gunr2171: The url will contain an i.stack.imgur.com link, 99 percent of the time. What?

– Robert Harvey
Jun 24 '14 at 20:01





21




21





@RobertHarvey, and that's fine. Adding an image by url (even an i.stack.imgur.com link) in google docs will go around a proxy.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 20:03





@RobertHarvey, and that's fine. Adding an image by url (even an i.stack.imgur.com link) in google docs will go around a proxy.

– gunr2171
Jun 24 '14 at 20:03




30




30





Have you considered seeking employment elsewhere...sounds like you're working for tyrants...!

– JRG-Developer
Jun 24 '14 at 23:47





Have you considered seeking employment elsewhere...sounds like you're working for tyrants...!

– JRG-Developer
Jun 24 '14 at 23:47




5




5





@gunr2171 how about posting that as an answer, it sounds like the best solution (simplest, safest, most likely to work, least likely to end in a disciplinary tribunal...). Make it clear that it works by Google's server downloading the image from imgur, then you accessing the image from Google's servers, which are (hopefully!) not blocked.

– user568458
Jun 25 '14 at 14:02






@gunr2171 how about posting that as an answer, it sounds like the best solution (simplest, safest, most likely to work, least likely to end in a disciplinary tribunal...). Make it clear that it works by Google's server downloading the image from imgur, then you accessing the image from Google's servers, which are (hopefully!) not blocked.

– user568458
Jun 25 '14 at 14:02














What about changing the DNS for that domain on the local machine if allowed?

– JeromeJ
Jun 25 '14 at 14:03





What about changing the DNS for that domain on the local machine if allowed?

– JeromeJ
Jun 25 '14 at 14:03













It's probably safe to assume that if imgur.com is blocked, the user doesn't have any admin rights beyond the bare essentials.

– user568458
Jun 25 '14 at 14:05





It's probably safe to assume that if imgur.com is blocked, the user doesn't have any admin rights beyond the bare essentials.

– user568458
Jun 25 '14 at 14:05




5




5





Stack Overflow needs to employ these blocks so people can see why link-only answers are so highly frowned upon.

– BoltClock
Jun 25 '14 at 16:46





Stack Overflow needs to employ these blocks so people can see why link-only answers are so highly frowned upon.

– BoltClock
Jun 25 '14 at 16:46










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















16














You can quickly see image thumbnails for all images on a page using the Google Image Search thumbnails, which come from Google's gstatic.com server. Hopefully your employer hasn't blocked Google!



  • Copy the URL of the question page

  • Prepend site: and paste it into Google Image Search. You might need to tinker with or shorten the URL, removing the SEO stuff like the question title keywords.

    • For example, to see the images on this page, search Google Images for site:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/


  • You'll get thumbnails of all the images on that page, served from Google's gstatic.com server, or as base64 JPG/PNG data written into the source of the (Google-origin) page.

  • Then, if there's an image you need to see in more detail, you may be able to do the Google Docs trick in gunr2171's answer on this page to see the full thing.

This is ideal if you can't muck about with proxies, DNS routing, etc due to company policies or privilege restrictions (which is very likely if imgur's blocked).



The downsides are, it only works for questions old enough to have been indexed by google, so it might not work for questions or updates less than, say, an hour old, and it only gives a smallish thumbnail. So, fine for research if you don't need fine detail, but not so good for answering new questions.



For example using a graphic design question with several images (I realise this image won't help the asker until this page is indexed...):



enter image description here



...the images are coming from Google, not from the original (blocked) source.





share

























  • The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

    – RobH
    Jun 15 '16 at 17:12











  • "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

    – Aaron Franke
    Nov 16 '16 at 14:26






  • 2





    @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

    – user568458
    Nov 16 '16 at 14:35


















20














The trick I use is loading the image in Google Docs. It's time consuming, but it works. Here are the steps to use:



  1. Edit the post so you can see the source. Grab the image url (either inline or at the bottom of the post.

  2. Open a Google Document, preferably a Word Document.

  3. In the "Insert" menu, choose "Image".
    enter image description here

  4. On the left menu, choose "By Url", then paste the url in the box. If all goes well, you will see the image. You can insert it into the document to see it larger.
    enter image description here

Bewarned about links that don't go to i.stack.imgur. If the link goes to a page that contains the image, then this trick won't work. Then you just have to wait until you get home.



The reason why this works is because it's Google's servers that are downloading the picture, which can get to the sites that are blocked for you.





share


















  • 2





    Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

    – pixelmeow
    Jun 25 '14 at 19:33






  • 4





    drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

    – David Crowell
    Jun 25 '14 at 20:33











  • Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

    – Stefan Steiger
    Jun 26 '14 at 15:08







  • 10





    It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

    – Dmytro Shevchenko
    Sep 24 '14 at 11:27







  • 1





    @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

    – gunr2171
    Sep 24 '14 at 12:21











  • @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

    – Dmytro Shevchenko
    Sep 24 '14 at 16:05











  • @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

    – gunr2171
    Sep 24 '14 at 16:21











  • @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

    – Dmytro Shevchenko
    Sep 24 '14 at 20:09






  • 2





    I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

    – TheByeByeMan
    May 25 '16 at 10:47











  • You saved my Time :)

    – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
    Feb 1 '18 at 4:12


















15














Another proxy is using duckduckgo image results page,



The img link: https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg



Becomes like this: https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg





share

























  • @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

    – Arda
    Aug 19 '16 at 16:50












  • That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

    – Paul Stenne
    Aug 20 '16 at 13:19






  • 1





    @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

    – Arda
    Aug 21 '16 at 12:21











  • Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

    – Paul Stenne
    Aug 22 '16 at 15:57






  • 2





    @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

    – Arda
    Aug 22 '16 at 20:30












  • Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

    – Paul Stenne
    Aug 22 '16 at 20:56



















9














So inspired by James' answer about using Greasemonkey, I wondered how tough it'd be to hack up a quick JavaScript snippet that'd swap out image sources.



The below code will swap out all images whose sources start with i.stack.imgur with their counterparts from archive.org. To be clear, this puts the images on the page you're viewing, which is ideal, I think.



$("img").each(function(ignore, e) 
var $e = $(e);
if ($e.attr("src").startsWith("http://i.stack.imgur"))
$e.attr("src", "http://web.archive.org/web/" + $e.attr("src"));

);


To run this easily, you'll need to access a developer console for your browser of choice (often brought up with F12 if on Windows). I'm using Firebug, but I bet Firefox's normal, built-in tools work too.



(You could also use Greasemonkey, though this is easy enough I'm not going to bother. It looks like recent versions of Greasemonkey have some trouble, and it's not a big deal to bring up dev tools. Still, Greasemonkey 2.3.1 seems stable, and it'd be easier to use than having this code in a txt file somewhere to paste over and over.)



Note: Originally I was going to try some way of using http://images.google.com, but that's blocked for me right now too! Archive.org is not, though my guess would be that fewer images are stored there than images.google, and I wonder how quickly answers are indexed. You'll still miss some images, especially recent ones, using this technique.



This did work for the image-intensive answer I'm currently viewing. Wish I'd done this months ago. Stupid. ;^) Guess I should go contribute now.





share
































    6














    If you're running a browser that supports Greasemonkey and you're able to get to an open proxy service, you should be able to write a page script that munges all the imgur URLs.



    I found someone on reddit with a similar problem that posted a script that might work.





    share


















    • 12





      If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

      – Ian Goldby
      Jun 25 '14 at 11:57












    • It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Jun 25 '14 at 12:33






    • 5





      It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

      – Chris
      Jun 25 '14 at 13:47






    • 1





      @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

      – Stefan Steiger
      Jun 26 '14 at 15:06


















    6














    You can use FoxyProxy (also exists for Chrome) and do a SSH port forwarding to your machine at home ;)



    To create the tunnel:



    ssh -D 8080 you@yourserver.com


    Then you use FoxyProxy to connect FireFox/Chrome to your local port 8080 (if you have no admin rights, use a Port > 10'000).



    If port 22 (SSH) is blocked, you can set the SSH daemon at home to listen at the SSL port, that almost always works, at least for me ;)



    You can also tell Firefox to use the proxy for DNS-resolution already ;)



    For Windows, you need PUTTY for the SSH tunnel:
    http://www.hostdime.com/resources/browsing-internet-ssh-tunnel-windows/
    or you can use the ssh in git-bash in git-scm. Works fantastic.
    With SSL-Port: ssh -D 10001 username@yourserver.com -p 443

    With git-scm, you can even use RSA private-public keys, especially when you don't have admin rights, and going through putty-gui is just too slow.



    To generate a RSA-key (4096 bit) for the ssh-daemon, execute



    ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096
    cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys


    you need to generate the key on the client, then take the id_rsa.pub in the ~/.ssh folder and echo the text in id_rsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on the server for the user you want to use.



    That's much safer than using a PUBLIC proxy that can't be trusted (those cursed moments when you forget to switch the proxy off), and you can switch it on/off in an instant.



    Also, if you connect to the SSH server, use the IP instead of the servername, that way DNS-blocking will not be able to stop you.


    If you have no admin rights, use PortableApps (for both Firefox and PuTTY, Chrome doesn't need admin rights for installation).



    All the network admin will see is a SSL connection to your home server IP.

    That's much safer anyway.

    No more monitoring of your browsing activity, no more blocked sites, no more traces.

    Everything is encrypted.





    share




















    • 36





      Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

      – Ian Goldby
      Jun 25 '14 at 11:58











    • +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

      – Sreenath S
      Jun 25 '14 at 12:00






    • 1





      @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

      – Stefan Steiger
      Jun 25 '14 at 12:02







    • 8





      I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

      – Ian Goldby
      Jun 25 '14 at 12:13






    • 8





      Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Jun 25 '14 at 12:34












    • @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

      – indivisible
      Jun 25 '14 at 13:39


















    2














    NOTE: This is somewhat outdated. It still works fine as of 5/1/2018, but I've written another userscript that seems to work a bit better.




    I've created a new tampermonkey script specifically for this purpose called Image Proxier.



    This will replace all links from ["https://i.stack.imgur.com/", "https://i.imgur.com/"] with links from http://web.archive.org/web/ (by default, this can be changed relatively easy).



    This userscript works for images both in questions/answers, and also comments. In comments it will convert links to images into a thumbnail and collate them all together at the top of the comment. Here is an example of comments with 1 or 2 images:



    enter image description here



    You can then click on the image to see a bigger version of it:



    enter image description here



    On images inside questions, it will similarly collate all of the images together, but only ones near eachother in paragraphs. If multiple images exist in a paragraph, they will all be collated together right above where they originally had been.



    enter image description here



    NOTE: Images posted may not immediately be picked up by archive.org, they may take some time to actually display the picture.





    share

























    • It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

      – Yılmaz Durmaz
      Apr 29 '18 at 14:22











    • @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

      – GrumpyCrouton
      Apr 30 '18 at 12:46











    • nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

      – Yılmaz Durmaz
      Apr 30 '18 at 15:34











    • @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

      – GrumpyCrouton
      Apr 30 '18 at 15:40











    • I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

      – Yılmaz Durmaz
      Apr 30 '18 at 16:08











    • @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

      – GrumpyCrouton
      Apr 30 '18 at 16:11











    • OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

      – Yılmaz Durmaz
      Apr 30 '18 at 16:38











    • @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

      – GrumpyCrouton
      May 1 '18 at 18:32











    • I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

      – Yılmaz Durmaz
      May 2 '18 at 22:00


















    2














    I've created another Userscript that accomplishes this, and I believe it does a better job than my other answer because it avoids the issue of newer images not loading by actually sending the picture to a proxy service which returns a working image.



    I've made a userscript that I call Image Wizard. Image Wizard will take links and images from given domains with a real proxied version of the image (currently from bypass123.com, but this is easily changeable.)



    This will make all images (from imgur.com and facebook.com by default) inside content posts on Stack Overflow look like this:



    enter image description here



    And links in comments will be changed to [Image Wizard]:



    enter image description here




    Any link/image that is converted by Image Wizard when clicked will open in a new tab.



    The project is hosted on GitHub.



    Image Wizard can be installed through GreasyFork.




    Update 5/2/18 - Added an automated method of detecting when images are added to DOM instead of running the function every x seconds. Method - new version v1.5.





    share
































      -2














      If you have a home computer, it wouldn't be too hard to whip up a node.js program that'd let you run a proxy.



      In fact...



      req.pipe(request(siteURL)).pipe(resp)


      ...that's a one line proxy right there. You could simply bounce the url through to the server with a command line, or maybe write a simple webpage that'd go ahead and display the image for you.





      share























      • The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

        – Nathan Tuggy
        Jun 15 '16 at 22:50











      • @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

        – Renan
        Aug 15 '16 at 17:43

















      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes








      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      16














      You can quickly see image thumbnails for all images on a page using the Google Image Search thumbnails, which come from Google's gstatic.com server. Hopefully your employer hasn't blocked Google!



      • Copy the URL of the question page

      • Prepend site: and paste it into Google Image Search. You might need to tinker with or shorten the URL, removing the SEO stuff like the question title keywords.

        • For example, to see the images on this page, search Google Images for site:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/


      • You'll get thumbnails of all the images on that page, served from Google's gstatic.com server, or as base64 JPG/PNG data written into the source of the (Google-origin) page.

      • Then, if there's an image you need to see in more detail, you may be able to do the Google Docs trick in gunr2171's answer on this page to see the full thing.

      This is ideal if you can't muck about with proxies, DNS routing, etc due to company policies or privilege restrictions (which is very likely if imgur's blocked).



      The downsides are, it only works for questions old enough to have been indexed by google, so it might not work for questions or updates less than, say, an hour old, and it only gives a smallish thumbnail. So, fine for research if you don't need fine detail, but not so good for answering new questions.



      For example using a graphic design question with several images (I realise this image won't help the asker until this page is indexed...):



      enter image description here



      ...the images are coming from Google, not from the original (blocked) source.





      share

























      • The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

        – RobH
        Jun 15 '16 at 17:12











      • "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

        – Aaron Franke
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:26






      • 2





        @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

        – user568458
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:35















      16














      You can quickly see image thumbnails for all images on a page using the Google Image Search thumbnails, which come from Google's gstatic.com server. Hopefully your employer hasn't blocked Google!



      • Copy the URL of the question page

      • Prepend site: and paste it into Google Image Search. You might need to tinker with or shorten the URL, removing the SEO stuff like the question title keywords.

        • For example, to see the images on this page, search Google Images for site:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/


      • You'll get thumbnails of all the images on that page, served from Google's gstatic.com server, or as base64 JPG/PNG data written into the source of the (Google-origin) page.

      • Then, if there's an image you need to see in more detail, you may be able to do the Google Docs trick in gunr2171's answer on this page to see the full thing.

      This is ideal if you can't muck about with proxies, DNS routing, etc due to company policies or privilege restrictions (which is very likely if imgur's blocked).



      The downsides are, it only works for questions old enough to have been indexed by google, so it might not work for questions or updates less than, say, an hour old, and it only gives a smallish thumbnail. So, fine for research if you don't need fine detail, but not so good for answering new questions.



      For example using a graphic design question with several images (I realise this image won't help the asker until this page is indexed...):



      enter image description here



      ...the images are coming from Google, not from the original (blocked) source.





      share

























      • The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

        – RobH
        Jun 15 '16 at 17:12











      • "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

        – Aaron Franke
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:26






      • 2





        @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

        – user568458
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:35













      16












      16








      16







      You can quickly see image thumbnails for all images on a page using the Google Image Search thumbnails, which come from Google's gstatic.com server. Hopefully your employer hasn't blocked Google!



      • Copy the URL of the question page

      • Prepend site: and paste it into Google Image Search. You might need to tinker with or shorten the URL, removing the SEO stuff like the question title keywords.

        • For example, to see the images on this page, search Google Images for site:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/


      • You'll get thumbnails of all the images on that page, served from Google's gstatic.com server, or as base64 JPG/PNG data written into the source of the (Google-origin) page.

      • Then, if there's an image you need to see in more detail, you may be able to do the Google Docs trick in gunr2171's answer on this page to see the full thing.

      This is ideal if you can't muck about with proxies, DNS routing, etc due to company policies or privilege restrictions (which is very likely if imgur's blocked).



      The downsides are, it only works for questions old enough to have been indexed by google, so it might not work for questions or updates less than, say, an hour old, and it only gives a smallish thumbnail. So, fine for research if you don't need fine detail, but not so good for answering new questions.



      For example using a graphic design question with several images (I realise this image won't help the asker until this page is indexed...):



      enter image description here



      ...the images are coming from Google, not from the original (blocked) source.





      share















      You can quickly see image thumbnails for all images on a page using the Google Image Search thumbnails, which come from Google's gstatic.com server. Hopefully your employer hasn't blocked Google!



      • Copy the URL of the question page

      • Prepend site: and paste it into Google Image Search. You might need to tinker with or shorten the URL, removing the SEO stuff like the question title keywords.

        • For example, to see the images on this page, search Google Images for site:https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/


      • You'll get thumbnails of all the images on that page, served from Google's gstatic.com server, or as base64 JPG/PNG data written into the source of the (Google-origin) page.

      • Then, if there's an image you need to see in more detail, you may be able to do the Google Docs trick in gunr2171's answer on this page to see the full thing.

      This is ideal if you can't muck about with proxies, DNS routing, etc due to company policies or privilege restrictions (which is very likely if imgur's blocked).



      The downsides are, it only works for questions old enough to have been indexed by google, so it might not work for questions or updates less than, say, an hour old, and it only gives a smallish thumbnail. So, fine for research if you don't need fine detail, but not so good for answering new questions.



      For example using a graphic design question with several images (I realise this image won't help the asker until this page is indexed...):



      enter image description here



      ...the images are coming from Google, not from the original (blocked) source.






      share













      share


      share








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:46









      Community

      1




      1










      answered Jun 25 '14 at 14:22









      user568458user568458

      16.7k89




      16.7k89












      • The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

        – RobH
        Jun 15 '16 at 17:12











      • "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

        – Aaron Franke
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:26






      • 2





        @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

        – user568458
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:35

















      • The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

        – RobH
        Jun 15 '16 at 17:12











      • "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

        – Aaron Franke
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:26






      • 2





        @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

        – user568458
        Nov 16 '16 at 14:35
















      The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

      – RobH
      Jun 15 '16 at 17:12





      The company I work for blocks imgur.com, and until I convinced them otherwise, this also included i.stack.imgur.com. If you ask them nicely and tell them that without permission to view images on i.stack.imgur.com, many answers on the SE network depend on images that hare hosted there and don't make any sense without them, they may make i.stack.imgur.com an exception to their imgur.com ban like my organization did. Good luck!

      – RobH
      Jun 15 '16 at 17:12













      "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

      – Aaron Franke
      Nov 16 '16 at 14:26





      "Your search - site:i.imgur.com/y4U4kME.png - did not match any image results." What am I doing wrong?

      – Aaron Franke
      Nov 16 '16 at 14:26




      2




      2





      @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

      – user568458
      Nov 16 '16 at 14:35





      @Aaron You should search on the url of the question page, not the image. So for example to see thumbnails of the images on this page, search on site:http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/261455/ (removing the SEO gumpf from the URL to give the shortest URL that's specific to this page)

      – user568458
      Nov 16 '16 at 14:35











      20














      The trick I use is loading the image in Google Docs. It's time consuming, but it works. Here are the steps to use:



      1. Edit the post so you can see the source. Grab the image url (either inline or at the bottom of the post.

      2. Open a Google Document, preferably a Word Document.

      3. In the "Insert" menu, choose "Image".
        enter image description here

      4. On the left menu, choose "By Url", then paste the url in the box. If all goes well, you will see the image. You can insert it into the document to see it larger.
        enter image description here

      Bewarned about links that don't go to i.stack.imgur. If the link goes to a page that contains the image, then this trick won't work. Then you just have to wait until you get home.



      The reason why this works is because it's Google's servers that are downloading the picture, which can get to the sites that are blocked for you.





      share


















      • 2





        Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

        – pixelmeow
        Jun 25 '14 at 19:33






      • 4





        drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

        – David Crowell
        Jun 25 '14 at 20:33











      • Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

        – Stefan Steiger
        Jun 26 '14 at 15:08







      • 10





        It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 11:27







      • 1





        @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 12:21











      • @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:05











      • @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:21











      • @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 20:09






      • 2





        I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

        – TheByeByeMan
        May 25 '16 at 10:47











      • You saved my Time :)

        – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
        Feb 1 '18 at 4:12















      20














      The trick I use is loading the image in Google Docs. It's time consuming, but it works. Here are the steps to use:



      1. Edit the post so you can see the source. Grab the image url (either inline or at the bottom of the post.

      2. Open a Google Document, preferably a Word Document.

      3. In the "Insert" menu, choose "Image".
        enter image description here

      4. On the left menu, choose "By Url", then paste the url in the box. If all goes well, you will see the image. You can insert it into the document to see it larger.
        enter image description here

      Bewarned about links that don't go to i.stack.imgur. If the link goes to a page that contains the image, then this trick won't work. Then you just have to wait until you get home.



      The reason why this works is because it's Google's servers that are downloading the picture, which can get to the sites that are blocked for you.





      share


















      • 2





        Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

        – pixelmeow
        Jun 25 '14 at 19:33






      • 4





        drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

        – David Crowell
        Jun 25 '14 at 20:33











      • Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

        – Stefan Steiger
        Jun 26 '14 at 15:08







      • 10





        It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 11:27







      • 1





        @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 12:21











      • @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:05











      • @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:21











      • @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 20:09






      • 2





        I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

        – TheByeByeMan
        May 25 '16 at 10:47











      • You saved my Time :)

        – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
        Feb 1 '18 at 4:12













      20












      20








      20







      The trick I use is loading the image in Google Docs. It's time consuming, but it works. Here are the steps to use:



      1. Edit the post so you can see the source. Grab the image url (either inline or at the bottom of the post.

      2. Open a Google Document, preferably a Word Document.

      3. In the "Insert" menu, choose "Image".
        enter image description here

      4. On the left menu, choose "By Url", then paste the url in the box. If all goes well, you will see the image. You can insert it into the document to see it larger.
        enter image description here

      Bewarned about links that don't go to i.stack.imgur. If the link goes to a page that contains the image, then this trick won't work. Then you just have to wait until you get home.



      The reason why this works is because it's Google's servers that are downloading the picture, which can get to the sites that are blocked for you.





      share













      The trick I use is loading the image in Google Docs. It's time consuming, but it works. Here are the steps to use:



      1. Edit the post so you can see the source. Grab the image url (either inline or at the bottom of the post.

      2. Open a Google Document, preferably a Word Document.

      3. In the "Insert" menu, choose "Image".
        enter image description here

      4. On the left menu, choose "By Url", then paste the url in the box. If all goes well, you will see the image. You can insert it into the document to see it larger.
        enter image description here

      Bewarned about links that don't go to i.stack.imgur. If the link goes to a page that contains the image, then this trick won't work. Then you just have to wait until you get home.



      The reason why this works is because it's Google's servers that are downloading the picture, which can get to the sites that are blocked for you.






      share











      share


      share










      answered Jun 25 '14 at 15:38









      gunr2171gunr2171

      7,70934453




      7,70934453







      • 2





        Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

        – pixelmeow
        Jun 25 '14 at 19:33






      • 4





        drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

        – David Crowell
        Jun 25 '14 at 20:33











      • Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

        – Stefan Steiger
        Jun 26 '14 at 15:08







      • 10





        It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 11:27







      • 1





        @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 12:21











      • @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:05











      • @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:21











      • @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 20:09






      • 2





        I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

        – TheByeByeMan
        May 25 '16 at 10:47











      • You saved my Time :)

        – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
        Feb 1 '18 at 4:12












      • 2





        Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

        – pixelmeow
        Jun 25 '14 at 19:33






      • 4





        drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

        – David Crowell
        Jun 25 '14 at 20:33











      • Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

        – Stefan Steiger
        Jun 26 '14 at 15:08







      • 10





        It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 11:27







      • 1





        @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 12:21











      • @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:05











      • @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

        – gunr2171
        Sep 24 '14 at 16:21











      • @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

        – Dmytro Shevchenko
        Sep 24 '14 at 20:09






      • 2





        I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

        – TheByeByeMan
        May 25 '16 at 10:47











      • You saved my Time :)

        – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
        Feb 1 '18 at 4:12







      2




      2





      Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

      – pixelmeow
      Jun 25 '14 at 19:33





      Thanks for posting this. I had no idea there was a way to see the images while I'm at work, this is really nice.

      – pixelmeow
      Jun 25 '14 at 19:33




      4




      4





      drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

      – David Crowell
      Jun 25 '14 at 20:33





      drive.google.com is blocked for me too, so this won't work.

      – David Crowell
      Jun 25 '14 at 20:33













      Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

      – Stefan Steiger
      Jun 26 '14 at 15:08






      Haha, good one. Now about that HTML pages [...] ;)

      – Stefan Steiger
      Jun 26 '14 at 15:08





      10




      10





      It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

      – Dmytro Shevchenko
      Sep 24 '14 at 11:27






      It is kind of ironical that your steps include pictures hosted at imgur.

      – Dmytro Shevchenko
      Sep 24 '14 at 11:27





      1




      1





      @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

      – gunr2171
      Sep 24 '14 at 12:21





      @Shedal, yo dawg, I herd you like unblocking photos, so I put some photos in my post about unblocking photos so you can practice while you learn! Also, stack's imgur is the best place to put images, as they don't 404 after a while.

      – gunr2171
      Sep 24 '14 at 12:21













      @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

      – Dmytro Shevchenko
      Sep 24 '14 at 16:05





      @gunr2171 it's just that these images are part of your instructions for seeing imgur images. People who would follow these instructions don't yet see the images. So having them there doesn't make much sense.

      – Dmytro Shevchenko
      Sep 24 '14 at 16:05













      @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

      – gunr2171
      Sep 24 '14 at 16:21





      @Shedal, agreed that it's sort of backwards, but the text instructions should be enough. The images are just reinforcing the written steps. If you want to add more text to make it more clear, go for it!

      – gunr2171
      Sep 24 '14 at 16:21













      @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

      – Dmytro Shevchenko
      Sep 24 '14 at 20:09





      @gunr2171 I simply pointed out the irony.

      – Dmytro Shevchenko
      Sep 24 '14 at 20:09




      2




      2





      I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

      – TheByeByeMan
      May 25 '16 at 10:47





      I stop at step 2, then I copy + past the content to google document.

      – TheByeByeMan
      May 25 '16 at 10:47













      You saved my Time :)

      – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
      Feb 1 '18 at 4:12





      You saved my Time :)

      – RAJESH KUMAR ARUMUGAM
      Feb 1 '18 at 4:12











      15














      Another proxy is using duckduckgo image results page,



      The img link: https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg



      Becomes like this: https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg





      share

























      • @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

        – Arda
        Aug 19 '16 at 16:50












      • That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 20 '16 at 13:19






      • 1





        @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

        – Arda
        Aug 21 '16 at 12:21











      • Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 15:57






      • 2





        @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

        – Arda
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:30












      • Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:56
















      15














      Another proxy is using duckduckgo image results page,



      The img link: https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg



      Becomes like this: https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg





      share

























      • @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

        – Arda
        Aug 19 '16 at 16:50












      • That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 20 '16 at 13:19






      • 1





        @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

        – Arda
        Aug 21 '16 at 12:21











      • Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 15:57






      • 2





        @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

        – Arda
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:30












      • Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:56














      15












      15








      15







      Another proxy is using duckduckgo image results page,



      The img link: https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg



      Becomes like this: https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg





      share















      Another proxy is using duckduckgo image results page,



      The img link: https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg



      Becomes like this: https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://i.imgur.com/f01Ert6.jpg






      share













      share


      share








      edited Dec 17 '18 at 14:47

























      answered Aug 15 '16 at 17:30









      ArdaArda

      3,93194




      3,93194












      • @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

        – Arda
        Aug 19 '16 at 16:50












      • That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 20 '16 at 13:19






      • 1





        @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

        – Arda
        Aug 21 '16 at 12:21











      • Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 15:57






      • 2





        @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

        – Arda
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:30












      • Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:56


















      • @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

        – Arda
        Aug 19 '16 at 16:50












      • That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 20 '16 at 13:19






      • 1





        @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

        – Arda
        Aug 21 '16 at 12:21











      • Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 15:57






      • 2





        @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

        – Arda
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:30












      • Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

        – Paul Stenne
        Aug 22 '16 at 20:56

















      @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

      – Arda
      Aug 19 '16 at 16:50






      @Kyll Weird, I can see it, curl and wget it just fine from my local machine and headless server.

      – Arda
      Aug 19 '16 at 16:50














      That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

      – Paul Stenne
      Aug 20 '16 at 13:19





      That is strange, works fine in Chromium but 403s in FF Dev Edition. Oh well.

      – Paul Stenne
      Aug 20 '16 at 13:19




      1




      1





      @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

      – Arda
      Aug 21 '16 at 12:21





      @Kyll Uhm.. Works for me on FF, but not dev edition installed: i.imgur.com/DiTyRdo.png

      – Arda
      Aug 21 '16 at 12:21













      Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

      – Paul Stenne
      Aug 22 '16 at 15:57





      Maybe it has something to do with localization? I'm in France.

      – Paul Stenne
      Aug 22 '16 at 15:57




      2




      2





      @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

      – Arda
      Aug 22 '16 at 20:30






      @Kyll Hmm weird, it's now 403 on Chrome for me as well, but if I add gibberish salting to url such as &hodor=hodor1 it works nice.

      – Arda
      Aug 22 '16 at 20:30














      Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

      – Paul Stenne
      Aug 22 '16 at 20:56






      Woah, this is weird. Reproduce and confirmed Hodor fix. Maybe get in touch with DDG about this?

      – Paul Stenne
      Aug 22 '16 at 20:56












      9














      So inspired by James' answer about using Greasemonkey, I wondered how tough it'd be to hack up a quick JavaScript snippet that'd swap out image sources.



      The below code will swap out all images whose sources start with i.stack.imgur with their counterparts from archive.org. To be clear, this puts the images on the page you're viewing, which is ideal, I think.



      $("img").each(function(ignore, e) 
      var $e = $(e);
      if ($e.attr("src").startsWith("http://i.stack.imgur"))
      $e.attr("src", "http://web.archive.org/web/" + $e.attr("src"));

      );


      To run this easily, you'll need to access a developer console for your browser of choice (often brought up with F12 if on Windows). I'm using Firebug, but I bet Firefox's normal, built-in tools work too.



      (You could also use Greasemonkey, though this is easy enough I'm not going to bother. It looks like recent versions of Greasemonkey have some trouble, and it's not a big deal to bring up dev tools. Still, Greasemonkey 2.3.1 seems stable, and it'd be easier to use than having this code in a txt file somewhere to paste over and over.)



      Note: Originally I was going to try some way of using http://images.google.com, but that's blocked for me right now too! Archive.org is not, though my guess would be that fewer images are stored there than images.google, and I wonder how quickly answers are indexed. You'll still miss some images, especially recent ones, using this technique.



      This did work for the image-intensive answer I'm currently viewing. Wish I'd done this months ago. Stupid. ;^) Guess I should go contribute now.





      share





























        9














        So inspired by James' answer about using Greasemonkey, I wondered how tough it'd be to hack up a quick JavaScript snippet that'd swap out image sources.



        The below code will swap out all images whose sources start with i.stack.imgur with their counterparts from archive.org. To be clear, this puts the images on the page you're viewing, which is ideal, I think.



        $("img").each(function(ignore, e) 
        var $e = $(e);
        if ($e.attr("src").startsWith("http://i.stack.imgur"))
        $e.attr("src", "http://web.archive.org/web/" + $e.attr("src"));

        );


        To run this easily, you'll need to access a developer console for your browser of choice (often brought up with F12 if on Windows). I'm using Firebug, but I bet Firefox's normal, built-in tools work too.



        (You could also use Greasemonkey, though this is easy enough I'm not going to bother. It looks like recent versions of Greasemonkey have some trouble, and it's not a big deal to bring up dev tools. Still, Greasemonkey 2.3.1 seems stable, and it'd be easier to use than having this code in a txt file somewhere to paste over and over.)



        Note: Originally I was going to try some way of using http://images.google.com, but that's blocked for me right now too! Archive.org is not, though my guess would be that fewer images are stored there than images.google, and I wonder how quickly answers are indexed. You'll still miss some images, especially recent ones, using this technique.



        This did work for the image-intensive answer I'm currently viewing. Wish I'd done this months ago. Stupid. ;^) Guess I should go contribute now.





        share



























          9












          9








          9







          So inspired by James' answer about using Greasemonkey, I wondered how tough it'd be to hack up a quick JavaScript snippet that'd swap out image sources.



          The below code will swap out all images whose sources start with i.stack.imgur with their counterparts from archive.org. To be clear, this puts the images on the page you're viewing, which is ideal, I think.



          $("img").each(function(ignore, e) 
          var $e = $(e);
          if ($e.attr("src").startsWith("http://i.stack.imgur"))
          $e.attr("src", "http://web.archive.org/web/" + $e.attr("src"));

          );


          To run this easily, you'll need to access a developer console for your browser of choice (often brought up with F12 if on Windows). I'm using Firebug, but I bet Firefox's normal, built-in tools work too.



          (You could also use Greasemonkey, though this is easy enough I'm not going to bother. It looks like recent versions of Greasemonkey have some trouble, and it's not a big deal to bring up dev tools. Still, Greasemonkey 2.3.1 seems stable, and it'd be easier to use than having this code in a txt file somewhere to paste over and over.)



          Note: Originally I was going to try some way of using http://images.google.com, but that's blocked for me right now too! Archive.org is not, though my guess would be that fewer images are stored there than images.google, and I wonder how quickly answers are indexed. You'll still miss some images, especially recent ones, using this technique.



          This did work for the image-intensive answer I'm currently viewing. Wish I'd done this months ago. Stupid. ;^) Guess I should go contribute now.





          share















          So inspired by James' answer about using Greasemonkey, I wondered how tough it'd be to hack up a quick JavaScript snippet that'd swap out image sources.



          The below code will swap out all images whose sources start with i.stack.imgur with their counterparts from archive.org. To be clear, this puts the images on the page you're viewing, which is ideal, I think.



          $("img").each(function(ignore, e) 
          var $e = $(e);
          if ($e.attr("src").startsWith("http://i.stack.imgur"))
          $e.attr("src", "http://web.archive.org/web/" + $e.attr("src"));

          );


          To run this easily, you'll need to access a developer console for your browser of choice (often brought up with F12 if on Windows). I'm using Firebug, but I bet Firefox's normal, built-in tools work too.



          (You could also use Greasemonkey, though this is easy enough I'm not going to bother. It looks like recent versions of Greasemonkey have some trouble, and it's not a big deal to bring up dev tools. Still, Greasemonkey 2.3.1 seems stable, and it'd be easier to use than having this code in a txt file somewhere to paste over and over.)



          Note: Originally I was going to try some way of using http://images.google.com, but that's blocked for me right now too! Archive.org is not, though my guess would be that fewer images are stored there than images.google, and I wonder how quickly answers are indexed. You'll still miss some images, especially recent ones, using this technique.



          This did work for the image-intensive answer I'm currently viewing. Wish I'd done this months ago. Stupid. ;^) Guess I should go contribute now.






          share













          share


          share








          edited May 23 '17 at 12:37









          Community

          1




          1










          answered Jul 2 '15 at 15:26









          ruffinruffin

          9,35587




          9,35587





















              6














              If you're running a browser that supports Greasemonkey and you're able to get to an open proxy service, you should be able to write a page script that munges all the imgur URLs.



              I found someone on reddit with a similar problem that posted a script that might work.





              share


















              • 12





                If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:57












              • It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:33






              • 5





                It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

                – Chris
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 26 '14 at 15:06















              6














              If you're running a browser that supports Greasemonkey and you're able to get to an open proxy service, you should be able to write a page script that munges all the imgur URLs.



              I found someone on reddit with a similar problem that posted a script that might work.





              share


















              • 12





                If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:57












              • It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:33






              • 5





                It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

                – Chris
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 26 '14 at 15:06













              6












              6








              6







              If you're running a browser that supports Greasemonkey and you're able to get to an open proxy service, you should be able to write a page script that munges all the imgur URLs.



              I found someone on reddit with a similar problem that posted a script that might work.





              share













              If you're running a browser that supports Greasemonkey and you're able to get to an open proxy service, you should be able to write a page script that munges all the imgur URLs.



              I found someone on reddit with a similar problem that posted a script that might work.






              share











              share


              share










              answered Jun 24 '14 at 23:57









              James MasonJames Mason

              3,72883




              3,72883







              • 12





                If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:57












              • It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:33






              • 5





                It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

                – Chris
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 26 '14 at 15:06












              • 12





                If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:57












              • It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:33






              • 5





                It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

                – Chris
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 26 '14 at 15:06







              12




              12





              If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

              – Ian Goldby
              Jun 25 '14 at 11:57






              If a company is blocking certain websites, they will certainly be aggressively blocking all external proxy services. It is also probably strictly against company policy to try to use an external proxy.

              – Ian Goldby
              Jun 25 '14 at 11:57














              It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:33





              It's also probably not just a request URL filter.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:33




              5




              5





              It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

              – Chris
              Jun 25 '14 at 13:47





              It's probably also against company policy to try to circumvent restrictions like this.

              – Chris
              Jun 25 '14 at 13:47




              1




              1





              @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

              – Stefan Steiger
              Jun 26 '14 at 15:06





              @Ian Goldby: It's also possible it's just a standard setting of the browser content filter, and the network admin does not know what he does or that this setting blocks SO.

              – Stefan Steiger
              Jun 26 '14 at 15:06











              6














              You can use FoxyProxy (also exists for Chrome) and do a SSH port forwarding to your machine at home ;)



              To create the tunnel:



              ssh -D 8080 you@yourserver.com


              Then you use FoxyProxy to connect FireFox/Chrome to your local port 8080 (if you have no admin rights, use a Port > 10'000).



              If port 22 (SSH) is blocked, you can set the SSH daemon at home to listen at the SSL port, that almost always works, at least for me ;)



              You can also tell Firefox to use the proxy for DNS-resolution already ;)



              For Windows, you need PUTTY for the SSH tunnel:
              http://www.hostdime.com/resources/browsing-internet-ssh-tunnel-windows/
              or you can use the ssh in git-bash in git-scm. Works fantastic.
              With SSL-Port: ssh -D 10001 username@yourserver.com -p 443

              With git-scm, you can even use RSA private-public keys, especially when you don't have admin rights, and going through putty-gui is just too slow.



              To generate a RSA-key (4096 bit) for the ssh-daemon, execute



              ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096
              cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys


              you need to generate the key on the client, then take the id_rsa.pub in the ~/.ssh folder and echo the text in id_rsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on the server for the user you want to use.



              That's much safer than using a PUBLIC proxy that can't be trusted (those cursed moments when you forget to switch the proxy off), and you can switch it on/off in an instant.



              Also, if you connect to the SSH server, use the IP instead of the servername, that way DNS-blocking will not be able to stop you.


              If you have no admin rights, use PortableApps (for both Firefox and PuTTY, Chrome doesn't need admin rights for installation).



              All the network admin will see is a SSL connection to your home server IP.

              That's much safer anyway.

              No more monitoring of your browsing activity, no more blocked sites, no more traces.

              Everything is encrypted.





              share




















              • 36





                Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:58











              • +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

                – Sreenath S
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:00






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:02







              • 8





                I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:13






              • 8





                Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:34












              • @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

                – indivisible
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:39















              6














              You can use FoxyProxy (also exists for Chrome) and do a SSH port forwarding to your machine at home ;)



              To create the tunnel:



              ssh -D 8080 you@yourserver.com


              Then you use FoxyProxy to connect FireFox/Chrome to your local port 8080 (if you have no admin rights, use a Port > 10'000).



              If port 22 (SSH) is blocked, you can set the SSH daemon at home to listen at the SSL port, that almost always works, at least for me ;)



              You can also tell Firefox to use the proxy for DNS-resolution already ;)



              For Windows, you need PUTTY for the SSH tunnel:
              http://www.hostdime.com/resources/browsing-internet-ssh-tunnel-windows/
              or you can use the ssh in git-bash in git-scm. Works fantastic.
              With SSL-Port: ssh -D 10001 username@yourserver.com -p 443

              With git-scm, you can even use RSA private-public keys, especially when you don't have admin rights, and going through putty-gui is just too slow.



              To generate a RSA-key (4096 bit) for the ssh-daemon, execute



              ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096
              cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys


              you need to generate the key on the client, then take the id_rsa.pub in the ~/.ssh folder and echo the text in id_rsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on the server for the user you want to use.



              That's much safer than using a PUBLIC proxy that can't be trusted (those cursed moments when you forget to switch the proxy off), and you can switch it on/off in an instant.



              Also, if you connect to the SSH server, use the IP instead of the servername, that way DNS-blocking will not be able to stop you.


              If you have no admin rights, use PortableApps (for both Firefox and PuTTY, Chrome doesn't need admin rights for installation).



              All the network admin will see is a SSL connection to your home server IP.

              That's much safer anyway.

              No more monitoring of your browsing activity, no more blocked sites, no more traces.

              Everything is encrypted.





              share




















              • 36





                Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:58











              • +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

                – Sreenath S
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:00






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:02







              • 8





                I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:13






              • 8





                Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:34












              • @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

                – indivisible
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:39













              6












              6








              6







              You can use FoxyProxy (also exists for Chrome) and do a SSH port forwarding to your machine at home ;)



              To create the tunnel:



              ssh -D 8080 you@yourserver.com


              Then you use FoxyProxy to connect FireFox/Chrome to your local port 8080 (if you have no admin rights, use a Port > 10'000).



              If port 22 (SSH) is blocked, you can set the SSH daemon at home to listen at the SSL port, that almost always works, at least for me ;)



              You can also tell Firefox to use the proxy for DNS-resolution already ;)



              For Windows, you need PUTTY for the SSH tunnel:
              http://www.hostdime.com/resources/browsing-internet-ssh-tunnel-windows/
              or you can use the ssh in git-bash in git-scm. Works fantastic.
              With SSL-Port: ssh -D 10001 username@yourserver.com -p 443

              With git-scm, you can even use RSA private-public keys, especially when you don't have admin rights, and going through putty-gui is just too slow.



              To generate a RSA-key (4096 bit) for the ssh-daemon, execute



              ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096
              cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys


              you need to generate the key on the client, then take the id_rsa.pub in the ~/.ssh folder and echo the text in id_rsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on the server for the user you want to use.



              That's much safer than using a PUBLIC proxy that can't be trusted (those cursed moments when you forget to switch the proxy off), and you can switch it on/off in an instant.



              Also, if you connect to the SSH server, use the IP instead of the servername, that way DNS-blocking will not be able to stop you.


              If you have no admin rights, use PortableApps (for both Firefox and PuTTY, Chrome doesn't need admin rights for installation).



              All the network admin will see is a SSL connection to your home server IP.

              That's much safer anyway.

              No more monitoring of your browsing activity, no more blocked sites, no more traces.

              Everything is encrypted.





              share















              You can use FoxyProxy (also exists for Chrome) and do a SSH port forwarding to your machine at home ;)



              To create the tunnel:



              ssh -D 8080 you@yourserver.com


              Then you use FoxyProxy to connect FireFox/Chrome to your local port 8080 (if you have no admin rights, use a Port > 10'000).



              If port 22 (SSH) is blocked, you can set the SSH daemon at home to listen at the SSL port, that almost always works, at least for me ;)



              You can also tell Firefox to use the proxy for DNS-resolution already ;)



              For Windows, you need PUTTY for the SSH tunnel:
              http://www.hostdime.com/resources/browsing-internet-ssh-tunnel-windows/
              or you can use the ssh in git-bash in git-scm. Works fantastic.
              With SSL-Port: ssh -D 10001 username@yourserver.com -p 443

              With git-scm, you can even use RSA private-public keys, especially when you don't have admin rights, and going through putty-gui is just too slow.



              To generate a RSA-key (4096 bit) for the ssh-daemon, execute



              ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096
              cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys


              you need to generate the key on the client, then take the id_rsa.pub in the ~/.ssh folder and echo the text in id_rsa.pub in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on the server for the user you want to use.



              That's much safer than using a PUBLIC proxy that can't be trusted (those cursed moments when you forget to switch the proxy off), and you can switch it on/off in an instant.



              Also, if you connect to the SSH server, use the IP instead of the servername, that way DNS-blocking will not be able to stop you.


              If you have no admin rights, use PortableApps (for both Firefox and PuTTY, Chrome doesn't need admin rights for installation).



              All the network admin will see is a SSL connection to your home server IP.

              That's much safer anyway.

              No more monitoring of your browsing activity, no more blocked sites, no more traces.

              Everything is encrypted.






              share













              share


              share








              edited Feb 17 '17 at 9:45

























              answered Jun 25 '14 at 11:43









              Stefan SteigerStefan Steiger

              46.1k1111




              46.1k1111







              • 36





                Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:58











              • +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

                – Sreenath S
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:00






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:02







              • 8





                I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:13






              • 8





                Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:34












              • @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

                – indivisible
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:39












              • 36





                Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 11:58











              • +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

                – Sreenath S
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:00






              • 1





                @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

                – Stefan Steiger
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:02







              • 8





                I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

                – Ian Goldby
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:13






              • 8





                Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

                – Lightness Races in Orbit
                Jun 25 '14 at 12:34












              • @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

                – indivisible
                Jun 25 '14 at 13:39







              36




              36





              Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

              – Ian Goldby
              Jun 25 '14 at 11:58





              Beware - trying to use an external proxy will probably be against your company policy, and might be a disciplinary offence.

              – Ian Goldby
              Jun 25 '14 at 11:58













              +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

              – Sreenath S
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:00





              +1 for mentioning ssh tunneling.

              – Sreenath S
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:00




              1




              1





              @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

              – Stefan Steiger
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:02






              @Ian Goldby: Yep, for risks and side effects, read the package leaflet and ask your doctor or pharmacist (or lawyer). Though I very much doubt any company other than a big bank/multinational with illegal activities does actually have such a policy.

              – Stefan Steiger
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:02





              8




              8





              I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

              – Ian Goldby
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:13





              I work in a large multinational energy company that has such a policy. I believe it is pretty standard practice in large companies and has nothing to do with trying to hide illegal activity. I suspect the usual reason is to prevent drive-by browser exploits and time-wasting. (eBay is completely blocked where I work. I suspect people have been caught in the past trying to run an eBay business during work hours.)

              – Ian Goldby
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:13




              8




              8





              Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:34






              Tunnelling out through a firewall is an obvious security risk and will be prohibited by all but the most hippy IT departments.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Jun 25 '14 at 12:34














              @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

              – indivisible
              Jun 25 '14 at 13:39





              @IanGoldby, yeah, part of the boilerplate techo-babble T&Cs. I'd say a lot of companies have it even if they don't realise it or enforce it.

              – indivisible
              Jun 25 '14 at 13:39











              2














              NOTE: This is somewhat outdated. It still works fine as of 5/1/2018, but I've written another userscript that seems to work a bit better.




              I've created a new tampermonkey script specifically for this purpose called Image Proxier.



              This will replace all links from ["https://i.stack.imgur.com/", "https://i.imgur.com/"] with links from http://web.archive.org/web/ (by default, this can be changed relatively easy).



              This userscript works for images both in questions/answers, and also comments. In comments it will convert links to images into a thumbnail and collate them all together at the top of the comment. Here is an example of comments with 1 or 2 images:



              enter image description here



              You can then click on the image to see a bigger version of it:



              enter image description here



              On images inside questions, it will similarly collate all of the images together, but only ones near eachother in paragraphs. If multiple images exist in a paragraph, they will all be collated together right above where they originally had been.



              enter image description here



              NOTE: Images posted may not immediately be picked up by archive.org, they may take some time to actually display the picture.





              share

























              • It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 29 '18 at 14:22











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 12:46











              • nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:34











              • @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:40











              • I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:08











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:11











              • OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:38











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

                – GrumpyCrouton
                May 1 '18 at 18:32











              • I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                May 2 '18 at 22:00















              2














              NOTE: This is somewhat outdated. It still works fine as of 5/1/2018, but I've written another userscript that seems to work a bit better.




              I've created a new tampermonkey script specifically for this purpose called Image Proxier.



              This will replace all links from ["https://i.stack.imgur.com/", "https://i.imgur.com/"] with links from http://web.archive.org/web/ (by default, this can be changed relatively easy).



              This userscript works for images both in questions/answers, and also comments. In comments it will convert links to images into a thumbnail and collate them all together at the top of the comment. Here is an example of comments with 1 or 2 images:



              enter image description here



              You can then click on the image to see a bigger version of it:



              enter image description here



              On images inside questions, it will similarly collate all of the images together, but only ones near eachother in paragraphs. If multiple images exist in a paragraph, they will all be collated together right above where they originally had been.



              enter image description here



              NOTE: Images posted may not immediately be picked up by archive.org, they may take some time to actually display the picture.





              share

























              • It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 29 '18 at 14:22











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 12:46











              • nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:34











              • @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:40











              • I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:08











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:11











              • OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:38











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

                – GrumpyCrouton
                May 1 '18 at 18:32











              • I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                May 2 '18 at 22:00













              2












              2








              2







              NOTE: This is somewhat outdated. It still works fine as of 5/1/2018, but I've written another userscript that seems to work a bit better.




              I've created a new tampermonkey script specifically for this purpose called Image Proxier.



              This will replace all links from ["https://i.stack.imgur.com/", "https://i.imgur.com/"] with links from http://web.archive.org/web/ (by default, this can be changed relatively easy).



              This userscript works for images both in questions/answers, and also comments. In comments it will convert links to images into a thumbnail and collate them all together at the top of the comment. Here is an example of comments with 1 or 2 images:



              enter image description here



              You can then click on the image to see a bigger version of it:



              enter image description here



              On images inside questions, it will similarly collate all of the images together, but only ones near eachother in paragraphs. If multiple images exist in a paragraph, they will all be collated together right above where they originally had been.



              enter image description here



              NOTE: Images posted may not immediately be picked up by archive.org, they may take some time to actually display the picture.





              share















              NOTE: This is somewhat outdated. It still works fine as of 5/1/2018, but I've written another userscript that seems to work a bit better.




              I've created a new tampermonkey script specifically for this purpose called Image Proxier.



              This will replace all links from ["https://i.stack.imgur.com/", "https://i.imgur.com/"] with links from http://web.archive.org/web/ (by default, this can be changed relatively easy).



              This userscript works for images both in questions/answers, and also comments. In comments it will convert links to images into a thumbnail and collate them all together at the top of the comment. Here is an example of comments with 1 or 2 images:



              enter image description here



              You can then click on the image to see a bigger version of it:



              enter image description here



              On images inside questions, it will similarly collate all of the images together, but only ones near eachother in paragraphs. If multiple images exist in a paragraph, they will all be collated together right above where they originally had been.



              enter image description here



              NOTE: Images posted may not immediately be picked up by archive.org, they may take some time to actually display the picture.






              share













              share


              share








              edited May 1 '18 at 19:51

























              answered Feb 13 '18 at 21:09









              GrumpyCroutonGrumpyCrouton

              4,412411




              4,412411












              • It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 29 '18 at 14:22











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 12:46











              • nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:34











              • @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:40











              • I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:08











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:11











              • OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:38











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

                – GrumpyCrouton
                May 1 '18 at 18:32











              • I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                May 2 '18 at 22:00

















              • It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 29 '18 at 14:22











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 12:46











              • nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:34











              • @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 15:40











              • I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:08











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

                – GrumpyCrouton
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:11











              • OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                Apr 30 '18 at 16:38











              • @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

                – GrumpyCrouton
                May 1 '18 at 18:32











              • I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

                – Yılmaz Durmaz
                May 2 '18 at 22:00
















              It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 29 '18 at 14:22





              It is a nice interface for a chrome user like me. ı may promote to my friends. Though it has a layout bug since at least 1 image here is placed before the div content (In the answer given by Arda).

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 29 '18 at 14:22













              @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

              – GrumpyCrouton
              Apr 30 '18 at 12:46





              @YılmazDurmaz I'm not sure what you mean by the layout bug, but thanks for your comment!

              – GrumpyCrouton
              Apr 30 '18 at 12:46













              nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 30 '18 at 15:34





              nice question, I can't remember what I have seen and don't see a layout problem in the mentioned post now. It might be possible the page had another problem at the time. By the way, using your script I modified it to use a free proxy page as archive.org won't have freshly added images. you may modify yours as well to use a proxy if image not found preferred source.

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 30 '18 at 15:34













              @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

              – GrumpyCrouton
              Apr 30 '18 at 15:40





              @YılmazDurmaz What proxy did you use? Could you somehow show me how you accomplished that?

              – GrumpyCrouton
              Apr 30 '18 at 15:40













              I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 30 '18 at 16:08





              I dont want to advertise such site here. I used GM.xmlHttpRequest to use its proxy POST form, and it returns a new link for the images. I think you can find info on how to use GM.xmlHttpRequest and "finalUrl" property of its response. I use my modified version for myself only, but if we share you need to add my name in the scripts writer list :))

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 30 '18 at 16:08













              @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

              – GrumpyCrouton
              Apr 30 '18 at 16:11





              @YılmazDurmaz I'm fine with adding your name to the writer list if you want to contribute some code. I use this proxier daily because the network I am usually on has imgur blocked, if I could make it work better then great! Feel free to contribute through the github project

              – GrumpyCrouton
              Apr 30 '18 at 16:11













              OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 30 '18 at 16:38





              OK, check it on this temporary gist. I will delete it in a few hours. you can add me as a Collaborator on your project: "yilmazdurmaz".

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              Apr 30 '18 at 16:38













              @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

              – GrumpyCrouton
              May 1 '18 at 18:32





              @YılmazDurmaz I'm working on a complete rewrite of this script right now to be released as "Image Wizard" instead

              – GrumpyCrouton
              May 1 '18 at 18:32













              I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              May 2 '18 at 22:00





              I am new to git and yet learning how to use forks and pulls. depending on how busy I am, days or weeks later I may propose my changes :)

              – Yılmaz Durmaz
              May 2 '18 at 22:00











              2














              I've created another Userscript that accomplishes this, and I believe it does a better job than my other answer because it avoids the issue of newer images not loading by actually sending the picture to a proxy service which returns a working image.



              I've made a userscript that I call Image Wizard. Image Wizard will take links and images from given domains with a real proxied version of the image (currently from bypass123.com, but this is easily changeable.)



              This will make all images (from imgur.com and facebook.com by default) inside content posts on Stack Overflow look like this:



              enter image description here



              And links in comments will be changed to [Image Wizard]:



              enter image description here




              Any link/image that is converted by Image Wizard when clicked will open in a new tab.



              The project is hosted on GitHub.



              Image Wizard can be installed through GreasyFork.




              Update 5/2/18 - Added an automated method of detecting when images are added to DOM instead of running the function every x seconds. Method - new version v1.5.





              share





























                2














                I've created another Userscript that accomplishes this, and I believe it does a better job than my other answer because it avoids the issue of newer images not loading by actually sending the picture to a proxy service which returns a working image.



                I've made a userscript that I call Image Wizard. Image Wizard will take links and images from given domains with a real proxied version of the image (currently from bypass123.com, but this is easily changeable.)



                This will make all images (from imgur.com and facebook.com by default) inside content posts on Stack Overflow look like this:



                enter image description here



                And links in comments will be changed to [Image Wizard]:



                enter image description here




                Any link/image that is converted by Image Wizard when clicked will open in a new tab.



                The project is hosted on GitHub.



                Image Wizard can be installed through GreasyFork.




                Update 5/2/18 - Added an automated method of detecting when images are added to DOM instead of running the function every x seconds. Method - new version v1.5.





                share



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  I've created another Userscript that accomplishes this, and I believe it does a better job than my other answer because it avoids the issue of newer images not loading by actually sending the picture to a proxy service which returns a working image.



                  I've made a userscript that I call Image Wizard. Image Wizard will take links and images from given domains with a real proxied version of the image (currently from bypass123.com, but this is easily changeable.)



                  This will make all images (from imgur.com and facebook.com by default) inside content posts on Stack Overflow look like this:



                  enter image description here



                  And links in comments will be changed to [Image Wizard]:



                  enter image description here




                  Any link/image that is converted by Image Wizard when clicked will open in a new tab.



                  The project is hosted on GitHub.



                  Image Wizard can be installed through GreasyFork.




                  Update 5/2/18 - Added an automated method of detecting when images are added to DOM instead of running the function every x seconds. Method - new version v1.5.





                  share















                  I've created another Userscript that accomplishes this, and I believe it does a better job than my other answer because it avoids the issue of newer images not loading by actually sending the picture to a proxy service which returns a working image.



                  I've made a userscript that I call Image Wizard. Image Wizard will take links and images from given domains with a real proxied version of the image (currently from bypass123.com, but this is easily changeable.)



                  This will make all images (from imgur.com and facebook.com by default) inside content posts on Stack Overflow look like this:



                  enter image description here



                  And links in comments will be changed to [Image Wizard]:



                  enter image description here




                  Any link/image that is converted by Image Wizard when clicked will open in a new tab.



                  The project is hosted on GitHub.



                  Image Wizard can be installed through GreasyFork.




                  Update 5/2/18 - Added an automated method of detecting when images are added to DOM instead of running the function every x seconds. Method - new version v1.5.






                  share













                  share


                  share








                  edited May 2 '18 at 12:58

























                  answered May 1 '18 at 19:50









                  GrumpyCroutonGrumpyCrouton

                  4,412411




                  4,412411





















                      -2














                      If you have a home computer, it wouldn't be too hard to whip up a node.js program that'd let you run a proxy.



                      In fact...



                      req.pipe(request(siteURL)).pipe(resp)


                      ...that's a one line proxy right there. You could simply bounce the url through to the server with a command line, or maybe write a simple webpage that'd go ahead and display the image for you.





                      share























                      • The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

                        – Nathan Tuggy
                        Jun 15 '16 at 22:50











                      • @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

                        – Renan
                        Aug 15 '16 at 17:43















                      -2














                      If you have a home computer, it wouldn't be too hard to whip up a node.js program that'd let you run a proxy.



                      In fact...



                      req.pipe(request(siteURL)).pipe(resp)


                      ...that's a one line proxy right there. You could simply bounce the url through to the server with a command line, or maybe write a simple webpage that'd go ahead and display the image for you.





                      share























                      • The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

                        – Nathan Tuggy
                        Jun 15 '16 at 22:50











                      • @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

                        – Renan
                        Aug 15 '16 at 17:43













                      -2












                      -2








                      -2







                      If you have a home computer, it wouldn't be too hard to whip up a node.js program that'd let you run a proxy.



                      In fact...



                      req.pipe(request(siteURL)).pipe(resp)


                      ...that's a one line proxy right there. You could simply bounce the url through to the server with a command line, or maybe write a simple webpage that'd go ahead and display the image for you.





                      share













                      If you have a home computer, it wouldn't be too hard to whip up a node.js program that'd let you run a proxy.



                      In fact...



                      req.pipe(request(siteURL)).pipe(resp)


                      ...that's a one line proxy right there. You could simply bounce the url through to the server with a command line, or maybe write a simple webpage that'd go ahead and display the image for you.






                      share











                      share


                      share










                      answered Jun 15 '16 at 14:46









                      orlando marinellaorlando marinella

                      1642




                      1642












                      • The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

                        – Nathan Tuggy
                        Jun 15 '16 at 22:50











                      • @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

                        – Renan
                        Aug 15 '16 at 17:43

















                      • The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

                        – Nathan Tuggy
                        Jun 15 '16 at 22:50











                      • @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

                        – Renan
                        Aug 15 '16 at 17:43
















                      The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

                      – Nathan Tuggy
                      Jun 15 '16 at 22:50





                      The proxy solution was already mentioned, but it has problems, given that any sane IT department will look very poorly on open external proxies like this, because they allow circumventing all policies and oversight.

                      – Nathan Tuggy
                      Jun 15 '16 at 22:50













                      @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

                      – Renan
                      Aug 15 '16 at 17:43





                      @NathanTuggy a sane IT department wouldn't go about blocking imgur in the first place.

                      – Renan
                      Aug 15 '16 at 17:43



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

                      155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해