Trying to get a HashCode for a simple list of custom POCO'sHow to get first N elements of a list in C#?Implementing `hashCode()` for very simple classesHow to get the list of properties of a class?How to get the unique ID of an object which overrides hashCode()?How to get a list of properties with a given attribute?HashCode, trying to get the last couple letters of a word or numberUse LINQ to get items in one List<>, that are not in another List<>How likely is it to get a HashCode collision with this hashcode function?Getting a list item by indexGenerating hashCode() for a custom class

Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?

If quadruped mammals evolve to become bipedal will their breast or nipple change position?

What is the Ancient One's mistake?

How to increase speed on my hybrid bike with flat handlebars and 700X35C tyres?

Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy

What calendar would the Saturn nation use?

Select list elements based on other list

How do I minimise waste on a flight?

Why always 4...dxc6 and not 4...bxc6 in the Ruy Lopez Exchange?

Can a player choose to add detail and flavor to their character's spells and abilities?

Translation of "invincible independence"

Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?

Bash prompt takes only the first word of a hostname before the dot

Does this website provide consistent translation into Wookiee?

What does the copyright in a dissertation protect exactly?

A♭ major 9th chord in Bach is unexpectedly dissonant/jazzy

Are modes in jazz primarily a melody thing?

Did any early RISC OS precursor run on the BBC Micro?

What's weird about Proto-Indo-European Stops?

Why did Gendry call himself Gendry Rivers?

Do the Zhentarim fire members for killing fellow members?

In a series of books, what happens after the coming of age?

How to get the decimal part of a number in apex

What's the difference between "ricochet" and "bounce"?



Trying to get a HashCode for a simple list of custom POCO's


How to get first N elements of a list in C#?Implementing `hashCode()` for very simple classesHow to get the list of properties of a class?How to get the unique ID of an object which overrides hashCode()?How to get a list of properties with a given attribute?HashCode, trying to get the last couple letters of a word or numberUse LINQ to get items in one List<>, that are not in another List<>How likely is it to get a HashCode collision with this hashcode function?Getting a list item by indexGenerating hashCode() for a custom class






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I'm trying to create a simple HashCode of a list of weather results (custom POCO's) and would like to know if what I'm doing is ok/fine.



I have a time based process that checks the weather results for a 5 locations. I store each weather result in a List:




"results": [

"Id": 1,
"Location": "New York City",
"Temp": "21.7",
"Metric": "Celsius"
,

"Id": 2,
"Location": "San Francisco",
"Temp": "18.1",
"Metric": "Celsius"
,
....

"Id": 5,
"Location": "Melbourne",
"Temp": "33.1",
"Metric": "Celsius"

]



So I wish to get a HashCode / unique fingerprint .. store this in a db. Later on, I'll grab the latest weather results again ... and this time compare this most recent result against the previous result (in the db).



To do this, I'm doing the following:



private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

byte[] hash;

// MD5 or SHA256?
using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));


return Encoding.UTF8.GetString(hash);



  1. So i'm using MD5 because I don't care about security (eg. this isn't passwords we're storing) and would like this to be fast.

  2. I'm converting the list to JSON as an easy way to get a standard text representation of my weather list. (simple serialization)

When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results ... here's a snapshot:



enter image description here



So the code seems to generate some textual representation of my lists. I can store this text into the db.



So it feels like, what I'm doing is ok -> I would just like someone to confirm if the steps I'm doing are fine.










share|improve this question




























    0















    I'm trying to create a simple HashCode of a list of weather results (custom POCO's) and would like to know if what I'm doing is ok/fine.



    I have a time based process that checks the weather results for a 5 locations. I store each weather result in a List:




    "results": [

    "Id": 1,
    "Location": "New York City",
    "Temp": "21.7",
    "Metric": "Celsius"
    ,

    "Id": 2,
    "Location": "San Francisco",
    "Temp": "18.1",
    "Metric": "Celsius"
    ,
    ....

    "Id": 5,
    "Location": "Melbourne",
    "Temp": "33.1",
    "Metric": "Celsius"

    ]



    So I wish to get a HashCode / unique fingerprint .. store this in a db. Later on, I'll grab the latest weather results again ... and this time compare this most recent result against the previous result (in the db).



    To do this, I'm doing the following:



    private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

    byte[] hash;

    // MD5 or SHA256?
    using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

    var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
    hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));


    return Encoding.UTF8.GetString(hash);



    1. So i'm using MD5 because I don't care about security (eg. this isn't passwords we're storing) and would like this to be fast.

    2. I'm converting the list to JSON as an easy way to get a standard text representation of my weather list. (simple serialization)

    When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results ... here's a snapshot:



    enter image description here



    So the code seems to generate some textual representation of my lists. I can store this text into the db.



    So it feels like, what I'm doing is ok -> I would just like someone to confirm if the steps I'm doing are fine.










    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0








      I'm trying to create a simple HashCode of a list of weather results (custom POCO's) and would like to know if what I'm doing is ok/fine.



      I have a time based process that checks the weather results for a 5 locations. I store each weather result in a List:




      "results": [

      "Id": 1,
      "Location": "New York City",
      "Temp": "21.7",
      "Metric": "Celsius"
      ,

      "Id": 2,
      "Location": "San Francisco",
      "Temp": "18.1",
      "Metric": "Celsius"
      ,
      ....

      "Id": 5,
      "Location": "Melbourne",
      "Temp": "33.1",
      "Metric": "Celsius"

      ]



      So I wish to get a HashCode / unique fingerprint .. store this in a db. Later on, I'll grab the latest weather results again ... and this time compare this most recent result against the previous result (in the db).



      To do this, I'm doing the following:



      private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

      byte[] hash;

      // MD5 or SHA256?
      using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

      var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
      hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));


      return Encoding.UTF8.GetString(hash);



      1. So i'm using MD5 because I don't care about security (eg. this isn't passwords we're storing) and would like this to be fast.

      2. I'm converting the list to JSON as an easy way to get a standard text representation of my weather list. (simple serialization)

      When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results ... here's a snapshot:



      enter image description here



      So the code seems to generate some textual representation of my lists. I can store this text into the db.



      So it feels like, what I'm doing is ok -> I would just like someone to confirm if the steps I'm doing are fine.










      share|improve this question














      I'm trying to create a simple HashCode of a list of weather results (custom POCO's) and would like to know if what I'm doing is ok/fine.



      I have a time based process that checks the weather results for a 5 locations. I store each weather result in a List:




      "results": [

      "Id": 1,
      "Location": "New York City",
      "Temp": "21.7",
      "Metric": "Celsius"
      ,

      "Id": 2,
      "Location": "San Francisco",
      "Temp": "18.1",
      "Metric": "Celsius"
      ,
      ....

      "Id": 5,
      "Location": "Melbourne",
      "Temp": "33.1",
      "Metric": "Celsius"

      ]



      So I wish to get a HashCode / unique fingerprint .. store this in a db. Later on, I'll grab the latest weather results again ... and this time compare this most recent result against the previous result (in the db).



      To do this, I'm doing the following:



      private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

      byte[] hash;

      // MD5 or SHA256?
      using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

      var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
      hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));


      return Encoding.UTF8.GetString(hash);



      1. So i'm using MD5 because I don't care about security (eg. this isn't passwords we're storing) and would like this to be fast.

      2. I'm converting the list to JSON as an easy way to get a standard text representation of my weather list. (simple serialization)

      When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results ... here's a snapshot:



      enter image description here



      So the code seems to generate some textual representation of my lists. I can store this text into the db.



      So it feels like, what I'm doing is ok -> I would just like someone to confirm if the steps I'm doing are fine.







      c# .net hashcode






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 23 at 6:15









      Pure.KromePure.Krome

      45.6k92324532




      45.6k92324532






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results




          That's because you're treating arbitrary binary data (a cryptographic hash) as if it's UTF-8-encoded text data. It's like trying to open a JPG file in Notepad - you'll see garbage, because a JPG file isn't a text file.



          If you want printable text, you should convert to hex or base64. Base64 is probably the simplest:



          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);


          Note that if you put the return statement inside the using statement you don't even need the extra local variable:



          private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

          using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

          var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
          var hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));
          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);




          This personally feels somewhat brittle though - it's relying on the precise JSON representation of the POCO. In particular, if you were to change some aspect of serialization, e.g. changing the field names in the JSON, then the hash would change even if the data didn't, which may not be what you want. As another example, suppose you add an int field to your POCO - the JSON representation of all your existing data would change to include that value even if it's 0, so all the hashes would change.



          (It's also quite an inefficient way of hashing data, but that may well not be important.)



          This may all be fine for you, but you need to consider your requirements as your data type evolves.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 7:15











          • @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

            – Jon Skeet
            Mar 23 at 7:57











          • Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 10:38











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55311143%2ftrying-to-get-a-hashcode-for-a-simple-list-of-custom-pocos%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results




          That's because you're treating arbitrary binary data (a cryptographic hash) as if it's UTF-8-encoded text data. It's like trying to open a JPG file in Notepad - you'll see garbage, because a JPG file isn't a text file.



          If you want printable text, you should convert to hex or base64. Base64 is probably the simplest:



          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);


          Note that if you put the return statement inside the using statement you don't even need the extra local variable:



          private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

          using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

          var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
          var hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));
          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);




          This personally feels somewhat brittle though - it's relying on the precise JSON representation of the POCO. In particular, if you were to change some aspect of serialization, e.g. changing the field names in the JSON, then the hash would change even if the data didn't, which may not be what you want. As another example, suppose you add an int field to your POCO - the JSON representation of all your existing data would change to include that value even if it's 0, so all the hashes would change.



          (It's also quite an inefficient way of hashing data, but that may well not be important.)



          This may all be fine for you, but you need to consider your requirements as your data type evolves.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 7:15











          • @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

            – Jon Skeet
            Mar 23 at 7:57











          • Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 10:38















          3















          When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results




          That's because you're treating arbitrary binary data (a cryptographic hash) as if it's UTF-8-encoded text data. It's like trying to open a JPG file in Notepad - you'll see garbage, because a JPG file isn't a text file.



          If you want printable text, you should convert to hex or base64. Base64 is probably the simplest:



          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);


          Note that if you put the return statement inside the using statement you don't even need the extra local variable:



          private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

          using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

          var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
          var hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));
          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);




          This personally feels somewhat brittle though - it's relying on the precise JSON representation of the POCO. In particular, if you were to change some aspect of serialization, e.g. changing the field names in the JSON, then the hash would change even if the data didn't, which may not be what you want. As another example, suppose you add an int field to your POCO - the JSON representation of all your existing data would change to include that value even if it's 0, so all the hashes would change.



          (It's also quite an inefficient way of hashing data, but that may well not be important.)



          This may all be fine for you, but you need to consider your requirements as your data type evolves.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 7:15











          • @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

            – Jon Skeet
            Mar 23 at 7:57











          • Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 10:38













          3












          3








          3








          When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results




          That's because you're treating arbitrary binary data (a cryptographic hash) as if it's UTF-8-encoded text data. It's like trying to open a JPG file in Notepad - you'll see garbage, because a JPG file isn't a text file.



          If you want printable text, you should convert to hex or base64. Base64 is probably the simplest:



          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);


          Note that if you put the return statement inside the using statement you don't even need the extra local variable:



          private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

          using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

          var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
          var hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));
          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);




          This personally feels somewhat brittle though - it's relying on the precise JSON representation of the POCO. In particular, if you were to change some aspect of serialization, e.g. changing the field names in the JSON, then the hash would change even if the data didn't, which may not be what you want. As another example, suppose you add an int field to your POCO - the JSON representation of all your existing data would change to include that value even if it's 0, so all the hashes would change.



          (It's also quite an inefficient way of hashing data, but that may well not be important.)



          This may all be fine for you, but you need to consider your requirements as your data type evolves.






          share|improve this answer














          When I do the code (above) I get some weird text results




          That's because you're treating arbitrary binary data (a cryptographic hash) as if it's UTF-8-encoded text data. It's like trying to open a JPG file in Notepad - you'll see garbage, because a JPG file isn't a text file.



          If you want printable text, you should convert to hex or base64. Base64 is probably the simplest:



          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);


          Note that if you put the return statement inside the using statement you don't even need the extra local variable:



          private static string ToHash(IEnumerable<Weather> weatherResults)

          using (var algorithm = MD5.Create())

          var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherResults);
          var hash = algorithm.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(json));
          return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);




          This personally feels somewhat brittle though - it's relying on the precise JSON representation of the POCO. In particular, if you were to change some aspect of serialization, e.g. changing the field names in the JSON, then the hash would change even if the data didn't, which may not be what you want. As another example, suppose you add an int field to your POCO - the JSON representation of all your existing data would change to include that value even if it's 0, so all the hashes would change.



          (It's also quite an inefficient way of hashing data, but that may well not be important.)



          This may all be fine for you, but you need to consider your requirements as your data type evolves.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 23 at 6:46









          Jon SkeetJon Skeet

          1104k70380338498




          1104k70380338498












          • Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 7:15











          • @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

            – Jon Skeet
            Mar 23 at 7:57











          • Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 10:38

















          • Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 7:15











          • @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

            – Jon Skeet
            Mar 23 at 7:57











          • Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

            – Pure.Krome
            Mar 23 at 10:38
















          Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

          – Pure.Krome
          Mar 23 at 7:15





          Thank you Jon for your thoughts and suggestions. Given the warnings, I'm not sure what other options I should consider? For example, serializing as JSON is brittle (fields change, serialization format changes, etc) ... so instead of JSON ... what else could I use? Secondly, you said that this is an inefficient way of hashing. What other suggestions would you suggest for a more efficient way. Security is not an issue (it's not a password). Again - thank you again for you help!

          – Pure.Krome
          Mar 23 at 7:15













          @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

          – Jon Skeet
          Mar 23 at 7:57





          @Pure.Krome: I can't really offer an answer without knowing more requirements - that's the thing you need to think about. How do you expect the data model to evolve, and how does that affect how you use the hashes? (For example, if you're happy to rehash the data if the model changes, that may be fine.) How important is performance? Lots of questions to think about - and I'm not inviting answers in comments here; once you've thought about this carefully, it may be worth asking a new question with all the details.

          – Jon Skeet
          Mar 23 at 7:57













          Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

          – Pure.Krome
          Mar 23 at 10:38





          Thanks @jonskeet - really appreciated the feedback - cheers!

          – Pure.Krome
          Mar 23 at 10:38



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55311143%2ftrying-to-get-a-hashcode-for-a-simple-list-of-custom-pocos%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현