Greco-Roman egalitarianismA cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableGuess a common 5-letter word!Solution or Origin of logic puzzle
Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)
Why am I getting a strange double quote (“) in Open Office instead of the ordinary one (")?
Do people with slow metabolism tend to gain weight (fat) if they stop exercising?
How can one's career as a reviewer be ended?
Can the removal of a duty-free sales trolley result in a measurable reduction in emissions?
Was Self-modifying-code possible just using BASIC?
How can I make 12 tone and atonal melodies sound interesting?
Grep Match and extract
A word that means "blending into a community too much"
What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?
How creative should the DM let an artificer be in terms of what they can build?
Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?
Getting UPS Power from One Room to Another
How to befriend someone who doesn't like to talk?
How to publish items after pipeline is finished?
60s or 70s novel about Empire of Man making 1st contact with 1st discovered alien race
What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)
CircuiTikZ: How to draw contactor coil?
Does the Nuka-Cola bottler actually generate nuka cola?
Electricity free spaceship
Do ailerons on opposite wings move together?
How to write a convincing religious myth?
Why can my keyboard only digest 6 keypresses at a time?
Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?
Greco-Roman egalitarianism
A cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableGuess a common 5-letter word!Solution or Origin of logic puzzle
$begingroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.
lateral-thinking
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.
lateral-thinking
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.
lateral-thinking
$endgroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.
lateral-thinking
lateral-thinking
edited Mar 24 at 20:00
humn
asked Mar 24 at 19:52
humnhumn
14.9k442134
14.9k442134
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
edited Mar 24 at 20:52
answered Mar 24 at 20:01
noednenoedne
10.6k12977
10.6k12977
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
2
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08
2
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39
1
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52