Greco-Roman egalitarianismA cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableGuess a common 5-letter word!Solution or Origin of logic puzzle

Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)

Why am I getting a strange double quote (“) in Open Office instead of the ordinary one (")?

Do people with slow metabolism tend to gain weight (fat) if they stop exercising?

How can one's career as a reviewer be ended?

Can the removal of a duty-free sales trolley result in a measurable reduction in emissions?

Was Self-modifying-code possible just using BASIC?

How can I make 12 tone and atonal melodies sound interesting?

Grep Match and extract

A word that means "blending into a community too much"

What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?

How creative should the DM let an artificer be in terms of what they can build?

Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?

Getting UPS Power from One Room to Another

How to befriend someone who doesn't like to talk?

How to publish items after pipeline is finished?

60s or 70s novel about Empire of Man making 1st contact with 1st discovered alien race

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)

CircuiTikZ: How to draw contactor coil?

Does the Nuka-Cola bottler actually generate nuka cola?

Electricity free spaceship

Do ailerons on opposite wings move together?

How to write a convincing religious myth?

Why can my keyboard only digest 6 keypresses at a time?

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?



Greco-Roman egalitarianism


A cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableGuess a common 5-letter word!Solution or Origin of logic puzzle













10












$begingroup$


Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 19:52















10












$begingroup$


Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 19:52













10












10








10


1



$begingroup$


Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.







lateral-thinking






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 20:00







humn

















asked Mar 24 at 19:52









humnhumn

14.9k442134




14.9k442134











  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 19:52
















  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 19:52















$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52




$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 19:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 20:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 24 at 23:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 23:45











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 20:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 24 at 23:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 23:45















7












$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 20:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 24 at 23:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 23:45













7












7








7





$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 24 at 20:52

























answered Mar 24 at 20:01









noednenoedne

10.6k12977




10.6k12977







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 20:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 24 at 23:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 23:45












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    Mar 24 at 20:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 24 at 23:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Mar 24 at 23:45







2




2




$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04




$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 20:04












$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08





$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
Mar 24 at 20:08





2




2




$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39




$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 24 at 23:39




1




1




$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45




$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
Mar 24 at 23:45

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해