Subring of a UFD [duplicate]Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.How do I prove whether something is a Euclidean domain?Subring of $mathbb Z[x]$ is UFD or not?GCD in a subring is GCD in a bigger ring?Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.Is a polynomial ring over a UFD in countably many variables a UFD?Is a subring a UFD?True/False regarding PIDs and UFDsIdeals generated by irreducible elements in a UFD.Which of the following statements about UFDs and PIDs are true?Determining whether a subring with a certain property is a UFDQuotient of UFD

How bad would a partial hash leak be, realistically?

Can a user sell my software (MIT license) without modification?

What can plausibly explain many of my very long and low-tech bridges?

What is the advantage of carrying a tripod and ND-filters when you could use image stacking instead?

How to make a setting relevant?

Complex sentence - words lacking?

SF novella separating the dumb majority from the intelligent part of mankind

Strange symbol for two functions

Why is the past conditionel used here?

When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision

Why does the Schrödinger equation work so well for the Hydrogen atom despite the relativistic boundary at the nucleus?

How can drunken, homicidal elves successfully conduct a wild hunt?

Cause of continuous spectral lines

How can you travel on a trans-Siberian train when it is fully booked?

Did the first version of Linux developed by Linus Torvalds have a GUI?

Required to check-in in person at international layover airport

Pushout commutative diagram

How do I write "Show, Don't Tell" as a person with Asperger Syndrome?

How to generate random points without duplication?

Is it recommended against to open-source the code of a webapp?

Subtables with equal width?

PL/SQL function to receive a number and return its binary format

How to translate “Me doing X” like in online posts?

siunitx error: Invalid numerical input



Subring of a UFD [duplicate]


Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.How do I prove whether something is a Euclidean domain?Subring of $mathbb Z[x]$ is UFD or not?GCD in a subring is GCD in a bigger ring?Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.Is a polynomial ring over a UFD in countably many variables a UFD?Is a subring a UFD?True/False regarding PIDs and UFDsIdeals generated by irreducible elements in a UFD.Which of the following statements about UFDs and PIDs are true?Determining whether a subring with a certain property is a UFDQuotient of UFD













1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.

    5 answers



Let $R$ be a UFD with $1$, are the following two statements true?



  • If $S$ is a subring of $R$, then $S$ is also a UFD;


  • if $S$ is a subring of $R$, and $1in S$, then $S$ is UFD.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Cameron Buie, Eric Wofsey abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 24 at 15:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

















  • $begingroup$
    Doesn’t subring automatically have $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 24 at 14:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner: It depends on the text. Some don't require rings to have a unit, so (for example) $2n:ninBbb Z$ is a ring with the usual integer operations.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Mar 24 at 14:54















1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.

    5 answers



Let $R$ be a UFD with $1$, are the following two statements true?



  • If $S$ is a subring of $R$, then $S$ is also a UFD;


  • if $S$ is a subring of $R$, and $1in S$, then $S$ is UFD.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Cameron Buie, Eric Wofsey abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 24 at 15:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

















  • $begingroup$
    Doesn’t subring automatically have $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 24 at 14:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner: It depends on the text. Some don't require rings to have a unit, so (for example) $2n:ninBbb Z$ is a ring with the usual integer operations.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Mar 24 at 14:54













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.

    5 answers



Let $R$ be a UFD with $1$, are the following two statements true?



  • If $S$ is a subring of $R$, then $S$ is also a UFD;


  • if $S$ is a subring of $R$, and $1in S$, then $S$ is UFD.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:



  • Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.

    5 answers



Let $R$ be a UFD with $1$, are the following two statements true?



  • If $S$ is a subring of $R$, then $S$ is also a UFD;


  • if $S$ is a subring of $R$, and $1in S$, then $S$ is UFD.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Give an example of a UFD having a subring which is not a UFD.

    5 answers







abstract-algebra ring-theory unique-factorization-domains






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 24 at 14:29









qinrqinr

767




767




marked as duplicate by Cameron Buie, Eric Wofsey abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 24 at 15:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Cameron Buie, Eric Wofsey abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 24 at 15:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • $begingroup$
    Doesn’t subring automatically have $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 24 at 14:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner: It depends on the text. Some don't require rings to have a unit, so (for example) $2n:ninBbb Z$ is a ring with the usual integer operations.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Mar 24 at 14:54
















  • $begingroup$
    Doesn’t subring automatically have $1$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 24 at 14:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner: It depends on the text. Some don't require rings to have a unit, so (for example) $2n:ninBbb Z$ is a ring with the usual integer operations.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Mar 24 at 14:54















$begingroup$
Doesn’t subring automatically have $1$?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 14:42




$begingroup$
Doesn’t subring automatically have $1$?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 14:42




1




1




$begingroup$
@J.W.Tanner: It depends on the text. Some don't require rings to have a unit, so (for example) $2n:ninBbb Z$ is a ring with the usual integer operations.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Mar 24 at 14:54




$begingroup$
@J.W.Tanner: It depends on the text. Some don't require rings to have a unit, so (for example) $2n:ninBbb Z$ is a ring with the usual integer operations.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Mar 24 at 14:54










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Not in general. For example, note that $R=Bbb C$ is a field, so trivially a UFD. However, consider $S=Bbb Z[2i]:=x+2iy:x,yinBbb Z.$ One can show fairly easily that $S$ is a subring of $R$ with unity. However, while $2$ is irreducible in $S,$ it is not prime in $S$. Hence, while $S$ is an integral domain (as a subring with unity of an integral domain), it is not a UFD. See here for more information on how we might go about proving this (and feel free to ask me questions if you're stuck).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Generalizing the examples given by Bill Dubuque and Cameron Buie, we can use the fact that a UFD is normal (that is, it is integrally closed in its field of fractions) to give us a strategy for finding counterexamples.



    Namely, take some UFD $R$, consider its field of fractions $K$, and then find a (unital) subring $Ssubseteq R$ such that the field of fractions of $S$ is still $K$, and $S$ is not integrally closed, i.e., there is $omegain Ksetminus S$ which satisfies a monic polynomial over $S$.



    This gives us the counterexamples from both of the other examples. Cameron Buie's has $R=BbbZ[i]$, $S=BbbZ[2i]$, $omega=i$. Bill Dubuque's has $R=BbbZ[sqrtn]$, $S=BbbZ[2sqrtn]$, and $omega = sqrtn$.



    Both of these examples are of rings of integers, however, we can also find a subring of a polynomial ring that is not a UFD via this strategy. Consider $R=k[t]$, $S=k[t^2,t^3]$, $omega = t$. We have $omega^2-t^2=0$, so $omega$ is integral over $S$. Note that $t$ is in the fraction field of $S$, since $t=fract^3t^2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      Mar 24 at 15:30











    • $begingroup$
      @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
      $endgroup$
      – jgon
      Mar 24 at 15:38










    • $begingroup$
      No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      Mar 24 at 15:41



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Pick any quadratic number ring UFD $,R = Bbb Z[sqrt n],$ and let $,S = Bbb Z[2sqrt n]subset R.,$ Notice that $,w = (2sqrtn)/2 = sqrtn,$ is a fraction over $S$ and $,wnotin S,$ but $w$ is a root of the monic polynomial $,x^2 - n, ,$ contra the Rational Root Test (which is valid in any UFD). So $S$ is not a UFD.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
      $endgroup$
      – J. W. Tanner
      Mar 24 at 15:23






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      Mar 24 at 15:26

















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Not in general. For example, note that $R=Bbb C$ is a field, so trivially a UFD. However, consider $S=Bbb Z[2i]:=x+2iy:x,yinBbb Z.$ One can show fairly easily that $S$ is a subring of $R$ with unity. However, while $2$ is irreducible in $S,$ it is not prime in $S$. Hence, while $S$ is an integral domain (as a subring with unity of an integral domain), it is not a UFD. See here for more information on how we might go about proving this (and feel free to ask me questions if you're stuck).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Not in general. For example, note that $R=Bbb C$ is a field, so trivially a UFD. However, consider $S=Bbb Z[2i]:=x+2iy:x,yinBbb Z.$ One can show fairly easily that $S$ is a subring of $R$ with unity. However, while $2$ is irreducible in $S,$ it is not prime in $S$. Hence, while $S$ is an integral domain (as a subring with unity of an integral domain), it is not a UFD. See here for more information on how we might go about proving this (and feel free to ask me questions if you're stuck).






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Not in general. For example, note that $R=Bbb C$ is a field, so trivially a UFD. However, consider $S=Bbb Z[2i]:=x+2iy:x,yinBbb Z.$ One can show fairly easily that $S$ is a subring of $R$ with unity. However, while $2$ is irreducible in $S,$ it is not prime in $S$. Hence, while $S$ is an integral domain (as a subring with unity of an integral domain), it is not a UFD. See here for more information on how we might go about proving this (and feel free to ask me questions if you're stuck).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Not in general. For example, note that $R=Bbb C$ is a field, so trivially a UFD. However, consider $S=Bbb Z[2i]:=x+2iy:x,yinBbb Z.$ One can show fairly easily that $S$ is a subring of $R$ with unity. However, while $2$ is irreducible in $S,$ it is not prime in $S$. Hence, while $S$ is an integral domain (as a subring with unity of an integral domain), it is not a UFD. See here for more information on how we might go about proving this (and feel free to ask me questions if you're stuck).







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 24 at 14:53

























        answered Mar 24 at 14:41









        Cameron BuieCameron Buie

        88.8k773163




        88.8k773163





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Generalizing the examples given by Bill Dubuque and Cameron Buie, we can use the fact that a UFD is normal (that is, it is integrally closed in its field of fractions) to give us a strategy for finding counterexamples.



            Namely, take some UFD $R$, consider its field of fractions $K$, and then find a (unital) subring $Ssubseteq R$ such that the field of fractions of $S$ is still $K$, and $S$ is not integrally closed, i.e., there is $omegain Ksetminus S$ which satisfies a monic polynomial over $S$.



            This gives us the counterexamples from both of the other examples. Cameron Buie's has $R=BbbZ[i]$, $S=BbbZ[2i]$, $omega=i$. Bill Dubuque's has $R=BbbZ[sqrtn]$, $S=BbbZ[2sqrtn]$, and $omega = sqrtn$.



            Both of these examples are of rings of integers, however, we can also find a subring of a polynomial ring that is not a UFD via this strategy. Consider $R=k[t]$, $S=k[t^2,t^3]$, $omega = t$. We have $omega^2-t^2=0$, so $omega$ is integral over $S$. Note that $t$ is in the fraction field of $S$, since $t=fract^3t^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:30











            • $begingroup$
              @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
              $endgroup$
              – jgon
              Mar 24 at 15:38










            • $begingroup$
              No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:41
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Generalizing the examples given by Bill Dubuque and Cameron Buie, we can use the fact that a UFD is normal (that is, it is integrally closed in its field of fractions) to give us a strategy for finding counterexamples.



            Namely, take some UFD $R$, consider its field of fractions $K$, and then find a (unital) subring $Ssubseteq R$ such that the field of fractions of $S$ is still $K$, and $S$ is not integrally closed, i.e., there is $omegain Ksetminus S$ which satisfies a monic polynomial over $S$.



            This gives us the counterexamples from both of the other examples. Cameron Buie's has $R=BbbZ[i]$, $S=BbbZ[2i]$, $omega=i$. Bill Dubuque's has $R=BbbZ[sqrtn]$, $S=BbbZ[2sqrtn]$, and $omega = sqrtn$.



            Both of these examples are of rings of integers, however, we can also find a subring of a polynomial ring that is not a UFD via this strategy. Consider $R=k[t]$, $S=k[t^2,t^3]$, $omega = t$. We have $omega^2-t^2=0$, so $omega$ is integral over $S$. Note that $t$ is in the fraction field of $S$, since $t=fract^3t^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:30











            • $begingroup$
              @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
              $endgroup$
              – jgon
              Mar 24 at 15:38










            • $begingroup$
              No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:41














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Generalizing the examples given by Bill Dubuque and Cameron Buie, we can use the fact that a UFD is normal (that is, it is integrally closed in its field of fractions) to give us a strategy for finding counterexamples.



            Namely, take some UFD $R$, consider its field of fractions $K$, and then find a (unital) subring $Ssubseteq R$ such that the field of fractions of $S$ is still $K$, and $S$ is not integrally closed, i.e., there is $omegain Ksetminus S$ which satisfies a monic polynomial over $S$.



            This gives us the counterexamples from both of the other examples. Cameron Buie's has $R=BbbZ[i]$, $S=BbbZ[2i]$, $omega=i$. Bill Dubuque's has $R=BbbZ[sqrtn]$, $S=BbbZ[2sqrtn]$, and $omega = sqrtn$.



            Both of these examples are of rings of integers, however, we can also find a subring of a polynomial ring that is not a UFD via this strategy. Consider $R=k[t]$, $S=k[t^2,t^3]$, $omega = t$. We have $omega^2-t^2=0$, so $omega$ is integral over $S$. Note that $t$ is in the fraction field of $S$, since $t=fract^3t^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Generalizing the examples given by Bill Dubuque and Cameron Buie, we can use the fact that a UFD is normal (that is, it is integrally closed in its field of fractions) to give us a strategy for finding counterexamples.



            Namely, take some UFD $R$, consider its field of fractions $K$, and then find a (unital) subring $Ssubseteq R$ such that the field of fractions of $S$ is still $K$, and $S$ is not integrally closed, i.e., there is $omegain Ksetminus S$ which satisfies a monic polynomial over $S$.



            This gives us the counterexamples from both of the other examples. Cameron Buie's has $R=BbbZ[i]$, $S=BbbZ[2i]$, $omega=i$. Bill Dubuque's has $R=BbbZ[sqrtn]$, $S=BbbZ[2sqrtn]$, and $omega = sqrtn$.



            Both of these examples are of rings of integers, however, we can also find a subring of a polynomial ring that is not a UFD via this strategy. Consider $R=k[t]$, $S=k[t^2,t^3]$, $omega = t$. We have $omega^2-t^2=0$, so $omega$ is integral over $S$. Note that $t$ is in the fraction field of $S$, since $t=fract^3t^2$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 24 at 15:17









            jgonjgon

            18.3k32345




            18.3k32345











            • $begingroup$
              In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:30











            • $begingroup$
              @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
              $endgroup$
              – jgon
              Mar 24 at 15:38










            • $begingroup$
              No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:41

















            • $begingroup$
              In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:30











            • $begingroup$
              @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
              $endgroup$
              – jgon
              Mar 24 at 15:38










            • $begingroup$
              No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:41
















            $begingroup$
            In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Mar 24 at 15:30





            $begingroup$
            In case it was not obvious I chose the Rational Root form of integral closure since many beginners are not familiar with the more general ring-theoretic notion of integral closure (which is not really any more general here).
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Mar 24 at 15:30













            $begingroup$
            @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
            $endgroup$
            – jgon
            Mar 24 at 15:38




            $begingroup$
            @Bill Dubuque, I upvoted both your answer and Cameron Buie's, I wrote this answer because I felt that it wasn't necessarily clear how those examples were arrived at. It's possible that this answer will be less useful to the OP, but I did think that it might be useful to someone. :)
            $endgroup$
            – jgon
            Mar 24 at 15:38












            $begingroup$
            No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Mar 24 at 15:41





            $begingroup$
            No doubt. I didn't elaborate since it's already been done in many prior answers (and the CRUDE folks will soon be deleting this thread due to the "quality" of the question)
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Mar 24 at 15:41












            1












            $begingroup$

            Pick any quadratic number ring UFD $,R = Bbb Z[sqrt n],$ and let $,S = Bbb Z[2sqrt n]subset R.,$ Notice that $,w = (2sqrtn)/2 = sqrtn,$ is a fraction over $S$ and $,wnotin S,$ but $w$ is a root of the monic polynomial $,x^2 - n, ,$ contra the Rational Root Test (which is valid in any UFD). So $S$ is not a UFD.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 24 at 15:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:26















            1












            $begingroup$

            Pick any quadratic number ring UFD $,R = Bbb Z[sqrt n],$ and let $,S = Bbb Z[2sqrt n]subset R.,$ Notice that $,w = (2sqrtn)/2 = sqrtn,$ is a fraction over $S$ and $,wnotin S,$ but $w$ is a root of the monic polynomial $,x^2 - n, ,$ contra the Rational Root Test (which is valid in any UFD). So $S$ is not a UFD.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 24 at 15:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:26













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Pick any quadratic number ring UFD $,R = Bbb Z[sqrt n],$ and let $,S = Bbb Z[2sqrt n]subset R.,$ Notice that $,w = (2sqrtn)/2 = sqrtn,$ is a fraction over $S$ and $,wnotin S,$ but $w$ is a root of the monic polynomial $,x^2 - n, ,$ contra the Rational Root Test (which is valid in any UFD). So $S$ is not a UFD.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Pick any quadratic number ring UFD $,R = Bbb Z[sqrt n],$ and let $,S = Bbb Z[2sqrt n]subset R.,$ Notice that $,w = (2sqrtn)/2 = sqrtn,$ is a fraction over $S$ and $,wnotin S,$ but $w$ is a root of the monic polynomial $,x^2 - n, ,$ contra the Rational Root Test (which is valid in any UFD). So $S$ is not a UFD.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Mar 24 at 15:26

























            answered Mar 24 at 15:05









            Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

            217k29204668




            217k29204668











            • $begingroup$
              Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 24 at 15:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:26
















            • $begingroup$
              Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 24 at 15:23






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Mar 24 at 15:26















            $begingroup$
            Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
            $endgroup$
            – J. W. Tanner
            Mar 24 at 15:23




            $begingroup$
            Did you switch $R$ and $S$?
            $endgroup$
            – J. W. Tanner
            Mar 24 at 15:23




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Mar 24 at 15:26




            $begingroup$
            @J.W.Tanner Yes, typos now fixed, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Mar 24 at 15:26



            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현