Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript

What steps should I take to lawfully visit the United States as a tourist immediately after visiting on a B-1 visa?

Would dual wielding daggers be a viable choice for a covert bodyguard?

For a hashing function like MD5, how similar can two plaintext strings be and still generate the same hash?

Using Newton's shell theorem to accelerate a spaceship

Why doesn't sea level show seasonality?

What prevents someone from claiming to be the murderer in order to get the real murderer off?

Has anyone in space seen or photographed a simple laser pointer from Earth?

What does (void *)1 mean

Why does the U.S. tolerate foreign influence from Saudi Arabia and Israel on its domestic policies while not tolerating that from China or Russia?

Modulus Operandi

What's the point of having a RAID 1 configuration over incremental backups to a secondary drive?

How to ask for a LinkedIn endorsement?

Good resources for solving techniques (Metaheuristics, MILP, CP etc)

How would vampires avoid contracting diseases?

Is "I do not want you to go nowhere" a case of "DOUBLE-NEGATIVES" as claimed by Grammarly?

Single word for "refusing to move to next activity unless present one is completed."

Print the last, middle and first character of your code

How do you glue a text to a point?

Are randomly-generated passwords starting with "a" less secure?

Is a 10th-level Transmutation wizard considered a shapechanger for the purpose of effects such as Moonbeam?

Why isn't pressure filtration popular compared to vacuum filtration?

Keep milk (or milk alternative) for a day without a fridge

How to evolve human-like eyes that can stare at the sun without protection?

How is angular momentum conserved for the orbiting body if the centripetal force disappears?



Access current req object everywhere in Node.js Express


Why are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I wonder how to access req object if there's no 'req' parameter in callback.



This is the scenario:

In ExpressJs, I have a common function, it uses to handle something with 'req' object, but not pass req into it.



module.exports = 
get: function()
var req = global.currentRequest;
//do something...




My current solution is that I write a middleware for all request, I put the 'req' in global variable, then I can access the 'req' everywhere with 'global.currentRequest'.



// in app.js
app.use(function (req, res, next)
global.currentRequest= req;
next();
);


But I don't know if it's good? Can anyone have suggestions?

Thanks a lot!










share|improve this question






















  • Avoid using global variables unless you are really left without a choice. It is considered to be an anti-pattern. See: stackoverflow.com/questions/18635136/…

    – Samuel Toh
    Sep 6 '16 at 3:40











  • The only proper way is to pass the req through as an argument to all functions that need it. Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.

    – jfriend00
    Sep 6 '16 at 4:07












  • like jfriend00 wrote it's a really bad idea. Also, it was discussed hundreds of time on stack and you will not find a proper solution. The problem is that you try to apply sync thinking for async programming. Often in movie Kungfu master says that you have to change your way of thinking.

    – Boris Siscanu
    Sep 6 '16 at 6:48

















4















I wonder how to access req object if there's no 'req' parameter in callback.



This is the scenario:

In ExpressJs, I have a common function, it uses to handle something with 'req' object, but not pass req into it.



module.exports = 
get: function()
var req = global.currentRequest;
//do something...




My current solution is that I write a middleware for all request, I put the 'req' in global variable, then I can access the 'req' everywhere with 'global.currentRequest'.



// in app.js
app.use(function (req, res, next)
global.currentRequest= req;
next();
);


But I don't know if it's good? Can anyone have suggestions?

Thanks a lot!










share|improve this question






















  • Avoid using global variables unless you are really left without a choice. It is considered to be an anti-pattern. See: stackoverflow.com/questions/18635136/…

    – Samuel Toh
    Sep 6 '16 at 3:40











  • The only proper way is to pass the req through as an argument to all functions that need it. Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.

    – jfriend00
    Sep 6 '16 at 4:07












  • like jfriend00 wrote it's a really bad idea. Also, it was discussed hundreds of time on stack and you will not find a proper solution. The problem is that you try to apply sync thinking for async programming. Often in movie Kungfu master says that you have to change your way of thinking.

    – Boris Siscanu
    Sep 6 '16 at 6:48













4












4








4


2






I wonder how to access req object if there's no 'req' parameter in callback.



This is the scenario:

In ExpressJs, I have a common function, it uses to handle something with 'req' object, but not pass req into it.



module.exports = 
get: function()
var req = global.currentRequest;
//do something...




My current solution is that I write a middleware for all request, I put the 'req' in global variable, then I can access the 'req' everywhere with 'global.currentRequest'.



// in app.js
app.use(function (req, res, next)
global.currentRequest= req;
next();
);


But I don't know if it's good? Can anyone have suggestions?

Thanks a lot!










share|improve this question














I wonder how to access req object if there's no 'req' parameter in callback.



This is the scenario:

In ExpressJs, I have a common function, it uses to handle something with 'req' object, but not pass req into it.



module.exports = 
get: function()
var req = global.currentRequest;
//do something...




My current solution is that I write a middleware for all request, I put the 'req' in global variable, then I can access the 'req' everywhere with 'global.currentRequest'.



// in app.js
app.use(function (req, res, next)
global.currentRequest= req;
next();
);


But I don't know if it's good? Can anyone have suggestions?

Thanks a lot!







node.js express






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 6 '16 at 2:05









SkySky

311 silver badge4 bronze badges




311 silver badge4 bronze badges












  • Avoid using global variables unless you are really left without a choice. It is considered to be an anti-pattern. See: stackoverflow.com/questions/18635136/…

    – Samuel Toh
    Sep 6 '16 at 3:40











  • The only proper way is to pass the req through as an argument to all functions that need it. Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.

    – jfriend00
    Sep 6 '16 at 4:07












  • like jfriend00 wrote it's a really bad idea. Also, it was discussed hundreds of time on stack and you will not find a proper solution. The problem is that you try to apply sync thinking for async programming. Often in movie Kungfu master says that you have to change your way of thinking.

    – Boris Siscanu
    Sep 6 '16 at 6:48

















  • Avoid using global variables unless you are really left without a choice. It is considered to be an anti-pattern. See: stackoverflow.com/questions/18635136/…

    – Samuel Toh
    Sep 6 '16 at 3:40











  • The only proper way is to pass the req through as an argument to all functions that need it. Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.

    – jfriend00
    Sep 6 '16 at 4:07












  • like jfriend00 wrote it's a really bad idea. Also, it was discussed hundreds of time on stack and you will not find a proper solution. The problem is that you try to apply sync thinking for async programming. Often in movie Kungfu master says that you have to change your way of thinking.

    – Boris Siscanu
    Sep 6 '16 at 6:48
















Avoid using global variables unless you are really left without a choice. It is considered to be an anti-pattern. See: stackoverflow.com/questions/18635136/…

– Samuel Toh
Sep 6 '16 at 3:40





Avoid using global variables unless you are really left without a choice. It is considered to be an anti-pattern. See: stackoverflow.com/questions/18635136/…

– Samuel Toh
Sep 6 '16 at 3:40













The only proper way is to pass the req through as an argument to all functions that need it. Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.

– jfriend00
Sep 6 '16 at 4:07






The only proper way is to pass the req through as an argument to all functions that need it. Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.

– jfriend00
Sep 6 '16 at 4:07














like jfriend00 wrote it's a really bad idea. Also, it was discussed hundreds of time on stack and you will not find a proper solution. The problem is that you try to apply sync thinking for async programming. Often in movie Kungfu master says that you have to change your way of thinking.

– Boris Siscanu
Sep 6 '16 at 6:48





like jfriend00 wrote it's a really bad idea. Also, it was discussed hundreds of time on stack and you will not find a proper solution. The problem is that you try to apply sync thinking for async programming. Often in movie Kungfu master says that you have to change your way of thinking.

– Boris Siscanu
Sep 6 '16 at 6:48












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














The only proper way is to pass the req object through as an argument to all functions that need it.



Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.



You cannot put request-specific data into a global in node.js, ever. Doing so will create an opportunity for two requests that are in-flight at the same time to stomp on each other and for data to get confused between requests. Remember, this is a server that is potentially handling requests for many clients. You cannot use synchronous, one-at-a-time thinking for a server. A node.js server may potentially have many requests all in flight at the same time and thus plain globals cannot be used for request-specific data.



There is no shortcut here. You will just have to pass the req object through to the function that needs it. If that means you have to change the function signature of several intervening functions, then so-be-it. That's what you have to do. That is the only correct way to solve this type of problem.



There are some circumstances where you may be able to use a closure to "capture" the desired req object and then use it in inner functions without passing it to those inner functions, but it does not sound like that is your function structure. We'd have to see a lot more of your real/actual code to be able to know whether that's a possibility or not.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    Instead of going with globals, which is never the best idea,
    you can wrap module.exports to accept req as a param.



    module.exports = function (req) 
    function get()
    // it has access to req.
    console.log(req);


    return get;



    And you can require the above module as



    app.use(function (req, res, next) 
    const mod = require('/path/to/module')(req);
    next();
    );





    share|improve this answer























    • The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

      – Sky
      Sep 6 '16 at 3:59











    • @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

      – Swaraj Giri
      Sep 6 '16 at 15:44












    • I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

      – John
      Nov 14 '17 at 12:21



















    0














    Actually, this is possible with something like global-request-context



    This is using zone.js which let you persist variables across async tasks.






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f39339640%2faccess-current-req-object-everywhere-in-node-js-express%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      The only proper way is to pass the req object through as an argument to all functions that need it.



      Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.



      You cannot put request-specific data into a global in node.js, ever. Doing so will create an opportunity for two requests that are in-flight at the same time to stomp on each other and for data to get confused between requests. Remember, this is a server that is potentially handling requests for many clients. You cannot use synchronous, one-at-a-time thinking for a server. A node.js server may potentially have many requests all in flight at the same time and thus plain globals cannot be used for request-specific data.



      There is no shortcut here. You will just have to pass the req object through to the function that needs it. If that means you have to change the function signature of several intervening functions, then so-be-it. That's what you have to do. That is the only correct way to solve this type of problem.



      There are some circumstances where you may be able to use a closure to "capture" the desired req object and then use it in inner functions without passing it to those inner functions, but it does not sound like that is your function structure. We'd have to see a lot more of your real/actual code to be able to know whether that's a possibility or not.






      share|improve this answer



























        4














        The only proper way is to pass the req object through as an argument to all functions that need it.



        Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.



        You cannot put request-specific data into a global in node.js, ever. Doing so will create an opportunity for two requests that are in-flight at the same time to stomp on each other and for data to get confused between requests. Remember, this is a server that is potentially handling requests for many clients. You cannot use synchronous, one-at-a-time thinking for a server. A node.js server may potentially have many requests all in flight at the same time and thus plain globals cannot be used for request-specific data.



        There is no shortcut here. You will just have to pass the req object through to the function that needs it. If that means you have to change the function signature of several intervening functions, then so-be-it. That's what you have to do. That is the only correct way to solve this type of problem.



        There are some circumstances where you may be able to use a closure to "capture" the desired req object and then use it in inner functions without passing it to those inner functions, but it does not sound like that is your function structure. We'd have to see a lot more of your real/actual code to be able to know whether that's a possibility or not.






        share|improve this answer

























          4












          4








          4







          The only proper way is to pass the req object through as an argument to all functions that need it.



          Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.



          You cannot put request-specific data into a global in node.js, ever. Doing so will create an opportunity for two requests that are in-flight at the same time to stomp on each other and for data to get confused between requests. Remember, this is a server that is potentially handling requests for many clients. You cannot use synchronous, one-at-a-time thinking for a server. A node.js server may potentially have many requests all in flight at the same time and thus plain globals cannot be used for request-specific data.



          There is no shortcut here. You will just have to pass the req object through to the function that needs it. If that means you have to change the function signature of several intervening functions, then so-be-it. That's what you have to do. That is the only correct way to solve this type of problem.



          There are some circumstances where you may be able to use a closure to "capture" the desired req object and then use it in inner functions without passing it to those inner functions, but it does not sound like that is your function structure. We'd have to see a lot more of your real/actual code to be able to know whether that's a possibility or not.






          share|improve this answer













          The only proper way is to pass the req object through as an argument to all functions that need it.



          Stashing it in a global simply will not work because multiple requests can be in process at the same time if any requests use async calls as part of their processing and those multiple requests will stomp on each other making a hard to track down bug. There are no shortcuts here. Pass the current request as an argument to any code that needs it.



          You cannot put request-specific data into a global in node.js, ever. Doing so will create an opportunity for two requests that are in-flight at the same time to stomp on each other and for data to get confused between requests. Remember, this is a server that is potentially handling requests for many clients. You cannot use synchronous, one-at-a-time thinking for a server. A node.js server may potentially have many requests all in flight at the same time and thus plain globals cannot be used for request-specific data.



          There is no shortcut here. You will just have to pass the req object through to the function that needs it. If that means you have to change the function signature of several intervening functions, then so-be-it. That's what you have to do. That is the only correct way to solve this type of problem.



          There are some circumstances where you may be able to use a closure to "capture" the desired req object and then use it in inner functions without passing it to those inner functions, but it does not sound like that is your function structure. We'd have to see a lot more of your real/actual code to be able to know whether that's a possibility or not.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Sep 8 '16 at 5:19









          jfriend00jfriend00

          455k59 gold badges611 silver badges649 bronze badges




          455k59 gold badges611 silver badges649 bronze badges























              0














              Instead of going with globals, which is never the best idea,
              you can wrap module.exports to accept req as a param.



              module.exports = function (req) 
              function get()
              // it has access to req.
              console.log(req);


              return get;



              And you can require the above module as



              app.use(function (req, res, next) 
              const mod = require('/path/to/module')(req);
              next();
              );





              share|improve this answer























              • The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

                – Sky
                Sep 6 '16 at 3:59











              • @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

                – Swaraj Giri
                Sep 6 '16 at 15:44












              • I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

                – John
                Nov 14 '17 at 12:21
















              0














              Instead of going with globals, which is never the best idea,
              you can wrap module.exports to accept req as a param.



              module.exports = function (req) 
              function get()
              // it has access to req.
              console.log(req);


              return get;



              And you can require the above module as



              app.use(function (req, res, next) 
              const mod = require('/path/to/module')(req);
              next();
              );





              share|improve this answer























              • The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

                – Sky
                Sep 6 '16 at 3:59











              • @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

                – Swaraj Giri
                Sep 6 '16 at 15:44












              • I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

                – John
                Nov 14 '17 at 12:21














              0












              0








              0







              Instead of going with globals, which is never the best idea,
              you can wrap module.exports to accept req as a param.



              module.exports = function (req) 
              function get()
              // it has access to req.
              console.log(req);


              return get;



              And you can require the above module as



              app.use(function (req, res, next) 
              const mod = require('/path/to/module')(req);
              next();
              );





              share|improve this answer













              Instead of going with globals, which is never the best idea,
              you can wrap module.exports to accept req as a param.



              module.exports = function (req) 
              function get()
              // it has access to req.
              console.log(req);


              return get;



              And you can require the above module as



              app.use(function (req, res, next) 
              const mod = require('/path/to/module')(req);
              next();
              );






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Sep 6 '16 at 3:33









              Swaraj GiriSwaraj Giri

              3,1172 gold badges17 silver badges31 bronze badges




              3,1172 gold badges17 silver badges31 bronze badges












              • The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

                – Sky
                Sep 6 '16 at 3:59











              • @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

                – Swaraj Giri
                Sep 6 '16 at 15:44












              • I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

                – John
                Nov 14 '17 at 12:21


















              • The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

                – Sky
                Sep 6 '16 at 3:59











              • @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

                – Swaraj Giri
                Sep 6 '16 at 15:44












              • I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

                – John
                Nov 14 '17 at 12:21

















              The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

              – Sky
              Sep 6 '16 at 3:59





              The problem is just I cannot pass req as a param into that func, because the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers.

              – Sky
              Sep 6 '16 at 3:59













              @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

              – Swaraj Giri
              Sep 6 '16 at 15:44






              @Sky What do you mean by "the func has been called too much, then I have to modify all callers"? All http requests that are eventually passed by express onto req are unique.

              – Swaraj Giri
              Sep 6 '16 at 15:44














              I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

              – John
              Nov 14 '17 at 12:21






              I don't understand how this could work? Could you extend to give an example use?

              – John
              Nov 14 '17 at 12:21












              0














              Actually, this is possible with something like global-request-context



              This is using zone.js which let you persist variables across async tasks.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                Actually, this is possible with something like global-request-context



                This is using zone.js which let you persist variables across async tasks.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Actually, this is possible with something like global-request-context



                  This is using zone.js which let you persist variables across async tasks.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Actually, this is possible with something like global-request-context



                  This is using zone.js which let you persist variables across async tasks.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 26 at 2:04









                  Tom EsterezTom Esterez

                  15.4k7 gold badges26 silver badges33 bronze badges




                  15.4k7 gold badges26 silver badges33 bronze badges



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f39339640%2faccess-current-req-object-everywhere-in-node-js-express%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현