Calling method that exists in child classes but not in parent classB extends A, and in a list of As, some indexes are instanceof B. Why can't I then call a method with index.Bmethod()?Java - calling a method by passing child instance to a function with parameter of parent class typeHow can I access the method of the child class from parent reference?What's the difference between a method and a function?How do I call one constructor from another in Java?Getting the class name of an instance?Understanding Python super() with __init__() methodsInterface vs Abstract Class (general OO)Naming Classes - How to avoid calling everything a “<WhatEver>Manager”?What is the difference between an interface and abstract class?Should I avoid the use of set(Preferred|Maximum|Minimum)Size methods in Java Swing?Reference - What does this error mean in PHP?Why not inherit from List<T>?

How can I show that the speed of light in vacuum is the same in all reference frames?

What kind of curve (or model) should I fit to my percentage data?

What do Unicorns want?

My current job follows "worst practices". How can I talk about my experience in an interview without giving off red flags?

Does switching on an old games console without a cartridge damage it?

Count the identical pairs in two lists

Book in which the "mountain" in the distance was a hole in the flat world

Killing a star safely

is FIND WORDS in P?

How can I disable a reserved profile?

Can a creature sustain itself by eating its own severed body parts?

Is there an English word to describe when a sound "protrudes"?

Strange LED behavior

Why is the UH-60 tail rotor canted?

How should I handle a question regarding my regrets during an interview?

Editing specific portions of DEM using ArcGIS Desktop?

How much did NASA help with the making of "First Man"?

Is it OK to accept a job opportunity while planning on not taking it?

Importance of moon phases for Apollo missions

Can "Taking algebraic closure" be made into a functor?

Why was Quirrell said to be in the Black Forest if Voldemort was actually in Albania?

MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan 2019

How to handle not being able to attend as often as I'd like

Cargo capacity of a kayak



Calling method that exists in child classes but not in parent class


B extends A, and in a list of As, some indexes are instanceof B. Why can't I then call a method with index.Bmethod()?Java - calling a method by passing child instance to a function with parameter of parent class typeHow can I access the method of the child class from parent reference?What's the difference between a method and a function?How do I call one constructor from another in Java?Getting the class name of an instance?Understanding Python super() with __init__() methodsInterface vs Abstract Class (general OO)Naming Classes - How to avoid calling everything a “<WhatEver>Manager”?What is the difference between an interface and abstract class?Should I avoid the use of set(Preferred|Maximum|Minimum)Size methods in Java Swing?Reference - What does this error mean in PHP?Why not inherit from List<T>?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6















public class Parent 
....


public class Child1 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....



public class Child2 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....




Here method foo() only exists in the Child classes and CAN NOT be added to the Parent class (not even abstract method). In this situation when I want to call the foo() method on obj which is Parent class's reference then I need to use intanceof with multiple if..else which I want to avoid.



Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();


EDIT: I Need to use type of obj as Parent only. Else I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class.




My Solution: The approach that I am thinking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
((FooInterface)obj).foo();



Is there a better approach ? Or any improvement to this one?










share|improve this question
























  • Whenever a method is common in the child, it should be place in parent. Why u r not putting that method in abstract class??

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:00











  • I CAN NOT change Parent class, as I do not manage it.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 9:15











  • Then use interface which is stated in the solution given below in the answers.

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:30











  • Can you introduce an intermediary class between Parent and Child?

    – vikingsteve
    May 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes, I can do that.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 14:37

















6















public class Parent 
....


public class Child1 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....



public class Child2 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....




Here method foo() only exists in the Child classes and CAN NOT be added to the Parent class (not even abstract method). In this situation when I want to call the foo() method on obj which is Parent class's reference then I need to use intanceof with multiple if..else which I want to avoid.



Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();


EDIT: I Need to use type of obj as Parent only. Else I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class.




My Solution: The approach that I am thinking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
((FooInterface)obj).foo();



Is there a better approach ? Or any improvement to this one?










share|improve this question
























  • Whenever a method is common in the child, it should be place in parent. Why u r not putting that method in abstract class??

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:00











  • I CAN NOT change Parent class, as I do not manage it.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 9:15











  • Then use interface which is stated in the solution given below in the answers.

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:30











  • Can you introduce an intermediary class between Parent and Child?

    – vikingsteve
    May 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes, I can do that.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 14:37













6












6








6








public class Parent 
....


public class Child1 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....



public class Child2 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....




Here method foo() only exists in the Child classes and CAN NOT be added to the Parent class (not even abstract method). In this situation when I want to call the foo() method on obj which is Parent class's reference then I need to use intanceof with multiple if..else which I want to avoid.



Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();


EDIT: I Need to use type of obj as Parent only. Else I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class.




My Solution: The approach that I am thinking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
((FooInterface)obj).foo();



Is there a better approach ? Or any improvement to this one?










share|improve this question
















public class Parent 
....


public class Child1 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....



public class Child2 extends Parent
....
public void foo()
....




Here method foo() only exists in the Child classes and CAN NOT be added to the Parent class (not even abstract method). In this situation when I want to call the foo() method on obj which is Parent class's reference then I need to use intanceof with multiple if..else which I want to avoid.



Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();


EDIT: I Need to use type of obj as Parent only. Else I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class.




My Solution: The approach that I am thinking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
((FooInterface)obj).foo();



Is there a better approach ? Or any improvement to this one?







java oop class-design instanceof






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 6 '14 at 10:34







Learner

















asked May 6 '14 at 8:55









LearnerLearner

5442 gold badges10 silver badges26 bronze badges




5442 gold badges10 silver badges26 bronze badges












  • Whenever a method is common in the child, it should be place in parent. Why u r not putting that method in abstract class??

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:00











  • I CAN NOT change Parent class, as I do not manage it.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 9:15











  • Then use interface which is stated in the solution given below in the answers.

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:30











  • Can you introduce an intermediary class between Parent and Child?

    – vikingsteve
    May 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes, I can do that.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 14:37

















  • Whenever a method is common in the child, it should be place in parent. Why u r not putting that method in abstract class??

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:00











  • I CAN NOT change Parent class, as I do not manage it.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 9:15











  • Then use interface which is stated in the solution given below in the answers.

    – Shoaib Chikate
    May 6 '14 at 9:30











  • Can you introduce an intermediary class between Parent and Child?

    – vikingsteve
    May 6 '14 at 13:29











  • Yes, I can do that.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 14:37
















Whenever a method is common in the child, it should be place in parent. Why u r not putting that method in abstract class??

– Shoaib Chikate
May 6 '14 at 9:00





Whenever a method is common in the child, it should be place in parent. Why u r not putting that method in abstract class??

– Shoaib Chikate
May 6 '14 at 9:00













I CAN NOT change Parent class, as I do not manage it.

– Learner
May 6 '14 at 9:15





I CAN NOT change Parent class, as I do not manage it.

– Learner
May 6 '14 at 9:15













Then use interface which is stated in the solution given below in the answers.

– Shoaib Chikate
May 6 '14 at 9:30





Then use interface which is stated in the solution given below in the answers.

– Shoaib Chikate
May 6 '14 at 9:30













Can you introduce an intermediary class between Parent and Child?

– vikingsteve
May 6 '14 at 13:29





Can you introduce an intermediary class between Parent and Child?

– vikingsteve
May 6 '14 at 13:29













Yes, I can do that.

– Learner
May 6 '14 at 14:37





Yes, I can do that.

– Learner
May 6 '14 at 14:37












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















1














The polymorphism is applied on object reference, not a type. When you call



FooInterface obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
obj.foo();


the child class method foo() is called.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

    – Braj
    May 6 '14 at 9:05











  • @braj Why doesn't?

    – Roman C
    May 6 '14 at 9:09






  • 1





    How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

    – Braj
    May 6 '14 at 9:10







  • 2





    @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

    – Roman C
    May 6 '14 at 9:20






  • 1





    @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 9:21


















1














You can't do it with parent object reference until an unless method is declared in parent class/interface itself.



You have to downcast it to child class because parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class other than the contract defined between them.



Here contract means abstract methods.




you can try in this way where there is no need to put a check it.



FooInterface sc =new Child1();
sc.foo();

...

interface FooInterface
void foo();


public class Parent



public class Child1 extends Parent implements FooInterface

public void foo()




public class Child2 extends Parent implements FooInterface

public void foo()








share|improve this answer

























  • With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 11:35











  • have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

    – Braj
    May 6 '14 at 11:49











  • This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 12:56











  • so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

    – Braj
    May 6 '14 at 13:00












  • How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

    – Learner
    May 6 '14 at 14:32


















1














The approach that I am finally taking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
.....
if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
((FooInterface)obj).foo();






share|improve this answer






























    0














    If you want to typecast only then there is no need of adding interface. You can typecast it to your desired class and call the method. Example



    public class HelloWorld 
    public static void main(String args[]) throws FileNotFoundException
    SuperClass sc =new Child1();
    if(sc instanceof Child1)//Do same for Child2
    ((Child1)sc).foo();



    class SuperClass



    class Child1 extends SuperClass
    public void foo()
    System.out.println("From child1");



    class Child2 extends SuperClass
    public void foo()
    System.out.println("From child2");




    Output :
    From child1






    share|improve this answer























    • Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 9:10


















    0














    You could implement an AbstractChild inheriting from Parent and then extend this class instead of Parent:



    public class Parent 
    ....


    public abstract class AbstractChild extends Parent

    public abstract void foo();





    public class Child1 extends AbstractChild
    ....
    public void foo()
    ....



    public class Child2 extends AbstractChild
    ....
    public void foo()
    ....




    So you need to only check if your instance is instanceof AbstractChild.






    share|improve this answer



























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f23490151%2fcalling-method-that-exists-in-child-classes-but-not-in-parent-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      The polymorphism is applied on object reference, not a type. When you call



      FooInterface obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
      obj.foo();


      the child class method foo() is called.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:05











      • @braj Why doesn't?

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:09






      • 1





        How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:10







      • 2





        @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:20






      • 1





        @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 9:21















      1














      The polymorphism is applied on object reference, not a type. When you call



      FooInterface obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
      obj.foo();


      the child class method foo() is called.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:05











      • @braj Why doesn't?

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:09






      • 1





        How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:10







      • 2





        @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:20






      • 1





        @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 9:21













      1












      1








      1







      The polymorphism is applied on object reference, not a type. When you call



      FooInterface obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
      obj.foo();


      the child class method foo() is called.






      share|improve this answer















      The polymorphism is applied on object reference, not a type. When you call



      FooInterface obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
      obj.foo();


      the child class method foo() is called.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited May 6 '14 at 9:08

























      answered May 6 '14 at 9:03









      Roman CRoman C

      44.5k15 gold badges47 silver badges118 bronze badges




      44.5k15 gold badges47 silver badges118 bronze badges







      • 1





        Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:05











      • @braj Why doesn't?

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:09






      • 1





        How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:10







      • 2





        @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:20






      • 1





        @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 9:21












      • 1





        Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:05











      • @braj Why doesn't?

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:09






      • 1





        How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 9:10







      • 2





        @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

        – Roman C
        May 6 '14 at 9:20






      • 1





        @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 9:21







      1




      1





      Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 9:05





      Look at the OP question again. Parent doesn't have any foo() method.

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 9:05













      @braj Why doesn't?

      – Roman C
      May 6 '14 at 9:09





      @braj Why doesn't?

      – Roman C
      May 6 '14 at 9:09




      1




      1





      How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 9:10






      How can you call a method on the reference of interface where interface has not declared that method? Look at my post.

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 9:10





      2




      2





      @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

      – Roman C
      May 6 '14 at 9:20





      @Learner One more comment to you, when designing your classes consider coding to interfaces, not classes.

      – Roman C
      May 6 '14 at 9:20




      1




      1





      @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 9:21





      @RomanC, With this solution I will not be able to call methods on obj which exists in Parent class. Yes, I understand advantage of code to interface but this is legacy code and I CAN NOT modify Parent class.

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 9:21













      1














      You can't do it with parent object reference until an unless method is declared in parent class/interface itself.



      You have to downcast it to child class because parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class other than the contract defined between them.



      Here contract means abstract methods.




      you can try in this way where there is no need to put a check it.



      FooInterface sc =new Child1();
      sc.foo();

      ...

      interface FooInterface
      void foo();


      public class Parent



      public class Child1 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()




      public class Child2 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()








      share|improve this answer

























      • With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 11:35











      • have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 11:49











      • This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 12:56











      • so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 13:00












      • How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 14:32















      1














      You can't do it with parent object reference until an unless method is declared in parent class/interface itself.



      You have to downcast it to child class because parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class other than the contract defined between them.



      Here contract means abstract methods.




      you can try in this way where there is no need to put a check it.



      FooInterface sc =new Child1();
      sc.foo();

      ...

      interface FooInterface
      void foo();


      public class Parent



      public class Child1 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()




      public class Child2 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()








      share|improve this answer

























      • With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 11:35











      • have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 11:49











      • This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 12:56











      • so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 13:00












      • How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 14:32













      1












      1








      1







      You can't do it with parent object reference until an unless method is declared in parent class/interface itself.



      You have to downcast it to child class because parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class other than the contract defined between them.



      Here contract means abstract methods.




      you can try in this way where there is no need to put a check it.



      FooInterface sc =new Child1();
      sc.foo();

      ...

      interface FooInterface
      void foo();


      public class Parent



      public class Child1 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()




      public class Child2 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()








      share|improve this answer















      You can't do it with parent object reference until an unless method is declared in parent class/interface itself.



      You have to downcast it to child class because parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class other than the contract defined between them.



      Here contract means abstract methods.




      you can try in this way where there is no need to put a check it.



      FooInterface sc =new Child1();
      sc.foo();

      ...

      interface FooInterface
      void foo();


      public class Parent



      public class Child1 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()




      public class Child2 extends Parent implements FooInterface

      public void foo()









      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited May 6 '14 at 9:19

























      answered May 6 '14 at 9:07









      BrajBraj

      41.3k5 gold badges42 silver badges63 bronze badges




      41.3k5 gold badges42 silver badges63 bronze badges












      • With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 11:35











      • have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 11:49











      • This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 12:56











      • so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 13:00












      • How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 14:32

















      • With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 11:35











      • have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 11:49











      • This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 12:56











      • so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

        – Braj
        May 6 '14 at 13:00












      • How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

        – Learner
        May 6 '14 at 14:32
















      With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 11:35





      With this solution I will not be able to call methods on sc which exists in Parent class. I edited my question to mention this. Thanks.

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 11:35













      have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 11:49





      have you made Child1 implements FooInterface same for Child2?

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 11:49













      This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 12:56





      This is what I mentioned in My Solution, only difference is that in my solution, reference is of type Parent and thus I need to use instanceof once to see if it is of type FooInterface.

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 12:56













      so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 13:00






      so you don't want to change your design then its not possible as I told you parent class/interface doesn't have any knowledge about the child class. how would parent class/interface know that child has created x methods?

      – Braj
      May 6 '14 at 13:00














      How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 14:32





      How about my solution that I had mentioned in the question? it does solve my problem. But is good approach is what I want to know?

      – Learner
      May 6 '14 at 14:32











      1














      The approach that I am finally taking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



      Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
      .....
      if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
      ((FooInterface)obj).foo();






      share|improve this answer



























        1














        The approach that I am finally taking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



        Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
        .....
        if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
        ((FooInterface)obj).foo();






        share|improve this answer

























          1












          1








          1







          The approach that I am finally taking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



          Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
          .....
          if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
          ((FooInterface)obj).foo();






          share|improve this answer













          The approach that I am finally taking is to define an interface say FooInterface with foo() method and let all the child classes implement it, then I could just type cast the obj to that interface and call foo() method like this:



          Parent obj = ...// Object of one of the child classes
          .....
          if(obj instanceof FooInterface)
          ((FooInterface)obj).foo();







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 19 '14 at 5:17









          LearnerLearner

          5442 gold badges10 silver badges26 bronze badges




          5442 gold badges10 silver badges26 bronze badges





















              0














              If you want to typecast only then there is no need of adding interface. You can typecast it to your desired class and call the method. Example



              public class HelloWorld 
              public static void main(String args[]) throws FileNotFoundException
              SuperClass sc =new Child1();
              if(sc instanceof Child1)//Do same for Child2
              ((Child1)sc).foo();



              class SuperClass



              class Child1 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child1");



              class Child2 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child2");




              Output :
              From child1






              share|improve this answer























              • Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

                – Learner
                May 6 '14 at 9:10















              0














              If you want to typecast only then there is no need of adding interface. You can typecast it to your desired class and call the method. Example



              public class HelloWorld 
              public static void main(String args[]) throws FileNotFoundException
              SuperClass sc =new Child1();
              if(sc instanceof Child1)//Do same for Child2
              ((Child1)sc).foo();



              class SuperClass



              class Child1 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child1");



              class Child2 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child2");




              Output :
              From child1






              share|improve this answer























              • Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

                – Learner
                May 6 '14 at 9:10













              0












              0








              0







              If you want to typecast only then there is no need of adding interface. You can typecast it to your desired class and call the method. Example



              public class HelloWorld 
              public static void main(String args[]) throws FileNotFoundException
              SuperClass sc =new Child1();
              if(sc instanceof Child1)//Do same for Child2
              ((Child1)sc).foo();



              class SuperClass



              class Child1 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child1");



              class Child2 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child2");




              Output :
              From child1






              share|improve this answer













              If you want to typecast only then there is no need of adding interface. You can typecast it to your desired class and call the method. Example



              public class HelloWorld 
              public static void main(String args[]) throws FileNotFoundException
              SuperClass sc =new Child1();
              if(sc instanceof Child1)//Do same for Child2
              ((Child1)sc).foo();



              class SuperClass



              class Child1 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child1");



              class Child2 extends SuperClass
              public void foo()
              System.out.println("From child2");




              Output :
              From child1







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 6 '14 at 9:03









              Aniket ThakurAniket Thakur

              44.8k28 gold badges202 silver badges225 bronze badges




              44.8k28 gold badges202 silver badges225 bronze badges












              • Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

                – Learner
                May 6 '14 at 9:10

















              • Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

                – Learner
                May 6 '14 at 9:10
















              Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

              – Learner
              May 6 '14 at 9:10





              Well, that's what I think is not a good approach and hence don't want to use it. If there are multiple child classes then it would be ugly. Isn't it ?

              – Learner
              May 6 '14 at 9:10











              0














              You could implement an AbstractChild inheriting from Parent and then extend this class instead of Parent:



              public class Parent 
              ....


              public abstract class AbstractChild extends Parent

              public abstract void foo();





              public class Child1 extends AbstractChild
              ....
              public void foo()
              ....



              public class Child2 extends AbstractChild
              ....
              public void foo()
              ....




              So you need to only check if your instance is instanceof AbstractChild.






              share|improve this answer





























                0














                You could implement an AbstractChild inheriting from Parent and then extend this class instead of Parent:



                public class Parent 
                ....


                public abstract class AbstractChild extends Parent

                public abstract void foo();





                public class Child1 extends AbstractChild
                ....
                public void foo()
                ....



                public class Child2 extends AbstractChild
                ....
                public void foo()
                ....




                So you need to only check if your instance is instanceof AbstractChild.






                share|improve this answer



























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  You could implement an AbstractChild inheriting from Parent and then extend this class instead of Parent:



                  public class Parent 
                  ....


                  public abstract class AbstractChild extends Parent

                  public abstract void foo();





                  public class Child1 extends AbstractChild
                  ....
                  public void foo()
                  ....



                  public class Child2 extends AbstractChild
                  ....
                  public void foo()
                  ....




                  So you need to only check if your instance is instanceof AbstractChild.






                  share|improve this answer















                  You could implement an AbstractChild inheriting from Parent and then extend this class instead of Parent:



                  public class Parent 
                  ....


                  public abstract class AbstractChild extends Parent

                  public abstract void foo();





                  public class Child1 extends AbstractChild
                  ....
                  public void foo()
                  ....



                  public class Child2 extends AbstractChild
                  ....
                  public void foo()
                  ....




                  So you need to only check if your instance is instanceof AbstractChild.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited May 6 '14 at 13:27

























                  answered May 6 '14 at 13:08









                  daviooohdavioooh

                  11.1k26 gold badges104 silver badges205 bronze badges




                  11.1k26 gold badges104 silver badges205 bronze badges



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f23490151%2fcalling-method-that-exists-in-child-classes-but-not-in-parent-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현