Iterating through lists with periodic boundary condition and computing distances between elementsHow to iterate through two lists in parallel?Iterating over every two elements in a listProcessing a very very big data set in python - memory errorHistogram for data with periodic boundary conditionsnp.ndarray with Periodic Boundary conditionsEfficiently select random matrix indices with given probabilitiesEfficiently get permutation of 3 numpy arrays of differing sizes and typesDistance computation between (M,N) and (N,) arrayswindowed selection from a list in python

Category-theoretic treatment of diffs, patches and merging?

Tesco's Burger Relish Best Before End date number

How do I explain that I don't want to maintain old projects?

What are the effects of abstaining from eating a certain flavor?

What factors could lead to bishops establishing monastic armies?

How do resistors generate different heat if we make the current fixed and changed the voltage and resistance? Notice the flow of charge is constant

Did William Shakespeare hide things in his writings?

What is the highest level of accuracy in motion control a Victorian society could achieve?

Does the Wild Magic sorcerer's Tides of Chaos feature grant advantage on all attacks, or just the first one?

Why do people prefer metropolitan areas, considering monsters and villains?

Array or vector? Two dimensional array or matrix?

What was the nature of the known bugs in the Space Shuttle software?

Where are the Wazirs?

What does "frozen" mean (e.g. for catcodes)?

The Apéry's constant and the Airy function

What are some bad ways to subvert tropes?

How do ballistic trajectories work in a ring world?

Why are co-factors 4 and 8 so popular when co-factor is more than one?

How many Jimmys can fit?

How to say "is going" in Russian in "this game is going to perish"

Who goes first? Person disembarking bus or the bicycle?

Four ships at the ocean with the same distance

What do you call a situation where you have choices but no good choice?

Computer name naming convention for security



Iterating through lists with periodic boundary condition and computing distances between elements


How to iterate through two lists in parallel?Iterating over every two elements in a listProcessing a very very big data set in python - memory errorHistogram for data with periodic boundary conditionsnp.ndarray with Periodic Boundary conditionsEfficiently select random matrix indices with given probabilitiesEfficiently get permutation of 3 numpy arrays of differing sizes and typesDistance computation between (M,N) and (N,) arrayswindowed selection from a list in python






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I am trying to write a python function that takes an index of a list as an input n1, then in an interval of size w, selects [n1-w,n1+w] selects another index n2 with probability that decays as a function of the separation between n1 and n2 and returns the index n2 and the element of the list corresponding to n2.



In my current implementation ("Attempt 1"), first I compute all the probabilities using, then select an index with the weights.



This works fine (I think) given a list [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
and if my n1 is somewhere in the middle say 5 and w=2, then an element is being chosen from the interval
[3 4 5 6 7]
with probability weights [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667].



The problem I am dealing with is if I am selecting an element from the ends, for example, choosing n2choice(8) gives



[6 7 8 9]#indices interval
[0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



Instead I would like an interval



[6 7 8 9 0]# indices interval
[0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



Or similarly, at the other end, n2choice(1) gives [0 1 2 3]#interval
[0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



Instead I would like to get



[9 0 1 2 3]# indices interval
[0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



Essentially, I would like to convert the current "absorbing" boundary conditions I have implemented to "periodic boundaries" wherein the 1D list is in fact treated as a 1D ring.



To do so i used i tried using the % operator (see attempt 2). However this throws an "IndexError: list index out of range". I could use some help troubleshooting this code, and also suggestion on a fast, pythonic way to do this. I would like to be able to do this for arrays of arbitrary length, and with arbitrary w, instead of this simple test case presented here.



#Attempt 1
import numpy as np
import random
a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
w =2
mylist = np.array(a)
indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
def n2choice(n1):
prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size)]
prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
#for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
#print(i, i+(n1-w))

print(prob_wts)
print(sum(prob_wts))
print(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
n2 = random.choices(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
return np.array(n2_c)
n2choice(5)


#Attempt 2
import numpy as np
import random
import itertools
a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
w =2
mylist = np.array(a)
indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
def n2choice(n1):
prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)].size)]
prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
#for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
#print(i, i+(n1-w))

print(prob_wts)
print(sum(prob_wts))
print(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)])
n2 = random.choices(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
#print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
return np.array(n2_c)
n2choice(1)









share|improve this question




























    0















    I am trying to write a python function that takes an index of a list as an input n1, then in an interval of size w, selects [n1-w,n1+w] selects another index n2 with probability that decays as a function of the separation between n1 and n2 and returns the index n2 and the element of the list corresponding to n2.



    In my current implementation ("Attempt 1"), first I compute all the probabilities using, then select an index with the weights.



    This works fine (I think) given a list [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
    and if my n1 is somewhere in the middle say 5 and w=2, then an element is being chosen from the interval
    [3 4 5 6 7]
    with probability weights [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667].



    The problem I am dealing with is if I am selecting an element from the ends, for example, choosing n2choice(8) gives



    [6 7 8 9]#indices interval
    [0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



    Instead I would like an interval



    [6 7 8 9 0]# indices interval
    [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



    Or similarly, at the other end, n2choice(1) gives [0 1 2 3]#interval
    [0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



    Instead I would like to get



    [9 0 1 2 3]# indices interval
    [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



    Essentially, I would like to convert the current "absorbing" boundary conditions I have implemented to "periodic boundaries" wherein the 1D list is in fact treated as a 1D ring.



    To do so i used i tried using the % operator (see attempt 2). However this throws an "IndexError: list index out of range". I could use some help troubleshooting this code, and also suggestion on a fast, pythonic way to do this. I would like to be able to do this for arrays of arbitrary length, and with arbitrary w, instead of this simple test case presented here.



    #Attempt 1
    import numpy as np
    import random
    a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
    w =2
    mylist = np.array(a)
    indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
    def n2choice(n1):
    prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size)]
    prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
    #for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
    #print(i, i+(n1-w))

    print(prob_wts)
    print(sum(prob_wts))
    print(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
    n2 = random.choices(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
    print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
    n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
    return np.array(n2_c)
    n2choice(5)


    #Attempt 2
    import numpy as np
    import random
    import itertools
    a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
    w =2
    mylist = np.array(a)
    indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
    def n2choice(n1):
    prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)].size)]
    prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
    #for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
    #print(i, i+(n1-w))

    print(prob_wts)
    print(sum(prob_wts))
    print(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)])
    n2 = random.choices(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
    #print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
    n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
    return np.array(n2_c)
    n2choice(1)









    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0


      0






      I am trying to write a python function that takes an index of a list as an input n1, then in an interval of size w, selects [n1-w,n1+w] selects another index n2 with probability that decays as a function of the separation between n1 and n2 and returns the index n2 and the element of the list corresponding to n2.



      In my current implementation ("Attempt 1"), first I compute all the probabilities using, then select an index with the weights.



      This works fine (I think) given a list [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
      and if my n1 is somewhere in the middle say 5 and w=2, then an element is being chosen from the interval
      [3 4 5 6 7]
      with probability weights [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667].



      The problem I am dealing with is if I am selecting an element from the ends, for example, choosing n2choice(8) gives



      [6 7 8 9]#indices interval
      [0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



      Instead I would like an interval



      [6 7 8 9 0]# indices interval
      [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



      Or similarly, at the other end, n2choice(1) gives [0 1 2 3]#interval
      [0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



      Instead I would like to get



      [9 0 1 2 3]# indices interval
      [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



      Essentially, I would like to convert the current "absorbing" boundary conditions I have implemented to "periodic boundaries" wherein the 1D list is in fact treated as a 1D ring.



      To do so i used i tried using the % operator (see attempt 2). However this throws an "IndexError: list index out of range". I could use some help troubleshooting this code, and also suggestion on a fast, pythonic way to do this. I would like to be able to do this for arrays of arbitrary length, and with arbitrary w, instead of this simple test case presented here.



      #Attempt 1
      import numpy as np
      import random
      a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
      w =2
      mylist = np.array(a)
      indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
      def n2choice(n1):
      prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size)]
      prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
      #for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
      #print(i, i+(n1-w))

      print(prob_wts)
      print(sum(prob_wts))
      print(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
      n2 = random.choices(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
      print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
      n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
      return np.array(n2_c)
      n2choice(5)


      #Attempt 2
      import numpy as np
      import random
      import itertools
      a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
      w =2
      mylist = np.array(a)
      indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
      def n2choice(n1):
      prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)].size)]
      prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
      #for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
      #print(i, i+(n1-w))

      print(prob_wts)
      print(sum(prob_wts))
      print(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)])
      n2 = random.choices(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
      #print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
      n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
      return np.array(n2_c)
      n2choice(1)









      share|improve this question














      I am trying to write a python function that takes an index of a list as an input n1, then in an interval of size w, selects [n1-w,n1+w] selects another index n2 with probability that decays as a function of the separation between n1 and n2 and returns the index n2 and the element of the list corresponding to n2.



      In my current implementation ("Attempt 1"), first I compute all the probabilities using, then select an index with the weights.



      This works fine (I think) given a list [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
      and if my n1 is somewhere in the middle say 5 and w=2, then an element is being chosen from the interval
      [3 4 5 6 7]
      with probability weights [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667].



      The problem I am dealing with is if I am selecting an element from the ends, for example, choosing n2choice(8) gives



      [6 7 8 9]#indices interval
      [0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



      Instead I would like an interval



      [6 7 8 9 0]# indices interval
      [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



      Or similarly, at the other end, n2choice(1) gives [0 1 2 3]#interval
      [0.2 0.4 0. 0.4]#weights



      Instead I would like to get



      [9 0 1 2 3]# indices interval
      [0.16666667 0.33333333 0. 0.33333333 0.16666667]#weights



      Essentially, I would like to convert the current "absorbing" boundary conditions I have implemented to "periodic boundaries" wherein the 1D list is in fact treated as a 1D ring.



      To do so i used i tried using the % operator (see attempt 2). However this throws an "IndexError: list index out of range". I could use some help troubleshooting this code, and also suggestion on a fast, pythonic way to do this. I would like to be able to do this for arrays of arbitrary length, and with arbitrary w, instead of this simple test case presented here.



      #Attempt 1
      import numpy as np
      import random
      a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
      w =2
      mylist = np.array(a)
      indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
      def n2choice(n1):
      prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size)]
      prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
      #for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
      #print(i, i+(n1-w))

      print(prob_wts)
      print(sum(prob_wts))
      print(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
      n2 = random.choices(indices_list[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
      print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
      n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
      return np.array(n2_c)
      n2choice(5)


      #Attempt 2
      import numpy as np
      import random
      import itertools
      a = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
      w =2
      mylist = np.array(a)
      indices_list = np.arange(mylist.size)
      def n2choice(n1):
      prob_wts = [0 if i+(n1-w) == n1 else 1/(abs(i+(n1-w)-n1))**(1.) for i in np.arange(mylist[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)].size)]
      prob_wts = np.array(prob_wts)/sum(prob_wts)
      #for i in np.arange(mylist[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1].size):
      #print(i, i+(n1-w))

      print(prob_wts)
      print(sum(prob_wts))
      print(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)])
      n2 = random.choices(indices_list[(n1 - w)%len(mylist):(n1+w+1)%len(mylist)], weights=prob_wts,k=1)
      #print(prob_wts[max(n1-w,0):n1+w+1])
      n2_c = (n2[0], mylist[n2[0]])
      return np.array(n2_c)
      n2choice(1)






      python python-3.x numpy






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 25 at 21:30









      jcpjcp

      154 bronze badges




      154 bronze badges






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55346696%2fiterating-through-lists-with-periodic-boundary-condition-and-computing-distances%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes




          Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.







          Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55346696%2fiterating-through-lists-with-periodic-boundary-condition-and-computing-distances%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현