Issue with conditionally ranking p-valuesRank function in MySQLRemove rows with all or some NAs (missing values) in data.frameHow do I replace NA values with zeros in an R dataframe?r rank value in vectorRank function to rank 0 as 0, apply a function to elements of vector with certain values?R - extracting value by rankRank the dataframe values in RRank values column-wiseR: find value/index which is not in rankwhy ties.method of rank for repeated value works unexpectedly?

Return last number in sub-sequences in a list of integers

Is this popular optical illusion made of a grey-scale image with coloured lines?

Is verification of a blockchain computationally cheaper than recreating it?

Is Illustrator accurate for business card sizes?

cannot trash malware NGPlayerSetup.dmg

Partial Fractions: Why does this shortcut method work?

Applied Meditation

Why do we need a voltage divider when we get the same voltage at the output as the input?

Feedback diagram

speaker impedence

Should 2FA be enabled on service accounts?

Does the use of a new concept require a prior definition?

HackerRank Implement Queue using two stacks Solution

How does Rust's 128-bit integer `i128` work on a 64-bit system?

Will medical institutions reject an applicant based on being 28 years of age?

How do I respond appropriately to an overseas company that obtained a visa for me without hiring me?

Who's behind community AMIs on Amazon EC2?

Can I shorten this filter, that finds disk sizes over 100G?

Plotting Chebyshev polynomials using PolarPlot and FilledCurve

How is Sword Coast North governed?

δόλος = deceit in John 1:47

Why are prop blades not shaped like household fan blades?

Password management for kids - what's a good way to start?

Gold Battle KoTH



Issue with conditionally ranking p-values


Rank function in MySQLRemove rows with all or some NAs (missing values) in data.frameHow do I replace NA values with zeros in an R dataframe?r rank value in vectorRank function to rank 0 as 0, apply a function to elements of vector with certain values?R - extracting value by rankRank the dataframe values in RRank values column-wiseR: find value/index which is not in rankwhy ties.method of rank for repeated value works unexpectedly?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I am conducting some time series modelling and want to remove terms from my time series based on removing the lowest rank p-values. The criteria I have is to only rank p-values that exclude "ar", "ma", "intercept", "price.diff" and rank only if p>0.2.



Here is an example:



term pval rank
ar1 0.001 NA
ar2 0.292 NA
ar3 0.000 NA
ma1 0.000 NA
intercept 0.000 NA
Price.Diff 0.859 NA
School 0.818 2
Easter 0.149 NA
Christmas 0.049 NA
High.Week 0.000 NA
Low.Week 0.000 NA


This is the function I have written:



rank_p<-function(x) 
x["rank"]<-NA
x$rank<-ifelse(test = substr(x$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(x$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(x$term,1,stop = nchar(x$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(x$term,1, stop = nchar(x$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
x$pval > 0.2,
yes = rank(-x$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



My issue is that the rank for this example begins at 2.This would be the second highest p-value however because I am excluding price.diff, this should be ranked 1.



Is the issue in ordering of the conditions?










share|improve this question
























  • Your code may benefit from use of the %in% operator. To read about it, look at the ?match help page.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:39











  • Thanks for the reply. I see that the %in% will retur a vector of TRUE/FALSE, will i still not have the ranking issue though, unless I i base the ranking on TRUE values only?

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 0:44











  • You can use logical vectors to subset, removing the p-values that you don't want to consider in your ranking. See ?"[" if this sounds interesting.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:50












  • If the 2 was instead a 1, would that be a desired output? Or would Easter and Christmas also have a ranking?

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 4:20











  • Hi Croote, correct, 2 should be a 1. Eastern and Christmas should not have a ranking as their p-value is <0.2

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 4:28

















0















I am conducting some time series modelling and want to remove terms from my time series based on removing the lowest rank p-values. The criteria I have is to only rank p-values that exclude "ar", "ma", "intercept", "price.diff" and rank only if p>0.2.



Here is an example:



term pval rank
ar1 0.001 NA
ar2 0.292 NA
ar3 0.000 NA
ma1 0.000 NA
intercept 0.000 NA
Price.Diff 0.859 NA
School 0.818 2
Easter 0.149 NA
Christmas 0.049 NA
High.Week 0.000 NA
Low.Week 0.000 NA


This is the function I have written:



rank_p<-function(x) 
x["rank"]<-NA
x$rank<-ifelse(test = substr(x$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(x$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(x$term,1,stop = nchar(x$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(x$term,1, stop = nchar(x$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
x$pval > 0.2,
yes = rank(-x$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



My issue is that the rank for this example begins at 2.This would be the second highest p-value however because I am excluding price.diff, this should be ranked 1.



Is the issue in ordering of the conditions?










share|improve this question
























  • Your code may benefit from use of the %in% operator. To read about it, look at the ?match help page.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:39











  • Thanks for the reply. I see that the %in% will retur a vector of TRUE/FALSE, will i still not have the ranking issue though, unless I i base the ranking on TRUE values only?

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 0:44











  • You can use logical vectors to subset, removing the p-values that you don't want to consider in your ranking. See ?"[" if this sounds interesting.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:50












  • If the 2 was instead a 1, would that be a desired output? Or would Easter and Christmas also have a ranking?

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 4:20











  • Hi Croote, correct, 2 should be a 1. Eastern and Christmas should not have a ranking as their p-value is <0.2

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 4:28













0












0








0








I am conducting some time series modelling and want to remove terms from my time series based on removing the lowest rank p-values. The criteria I have is to only rank p-values that exclude "ar", "ma", "intercept", "price.diff" and rank only if p>0.2.



Here is an example:



term pval rank
ar1 0.001 NA
ar2 0.292 NA
ar3 0.000 NA
ma1 0.000 NA
intercept 0.000 NA
Price.Diff 0.859 NA
School 0.818 2
Easter 0.149 NA
Christmas 0.049 NA
High.Week 0.000 NA
Low.Week 0.000 NA


This is the function I have written:



rank_p<-function(x) 
x["rank"]<-NA
x$rank<-ifelse(test = substr(x$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(x$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(x$term,1,stop = nchar(x$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(x$term,1, stop = nchar(x$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
x$pval > 0.2,
yes = rank(-x$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



My issue is that the rank for this example begins at 2.This would be the second highest p-value however because I am excluding price.diff, this should be ranked 1.



Is the issue in ordering of the conditions?










share|improve this question














I am conducting some time series modelling and want to remove terms from my time series based on removing the lowest rank p-values. The criteria I have is to only rank p-values that exclude "ar", "ma", "intercept", "price.diff" and rank only if p>0.2.



Here is an example:



term pval rank
ar1 0.001 NA
ar2 0.292 NA
ar3 0.000 NA
ma1 0.000 NA
intercept 0.000 NA
Price.Diff 0.859 NA
School 0.818 2
Easter 0.149 NA
Christmas 0.049 NA
High.Week 0.000 NA
Low.Week 0.000 NA


This is the function I have written:



rank_p<-function(x) 
x["rank"]<-NA
x$rank<-ifelse(test = substr(x$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(x$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(x$term,1,stop = nchar(x$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(x$term,1, stop = nchar(x$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
x$pval > 0.2,
yes = rank(-x$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



My issue is that the rank for this example begins at 2.This would be the second highest p-value however because I am excluding price.diff, this should be ranked 1.



Is the issue in ordering of the conditions?







r conditional rank






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 27 at 0:34









e_conomicse_conomics

175 bronze badges




175 bronze badges















  • Your code may benefit from use of the %in% operator. To read about it, look at the ?match help page.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:39











  • Thanks for the reply. I see that the %in% will retur a vector of TRUE/FALSE, will i still not have the ranking issue though, unless I i base the ranking on TRUE values only?

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 0:44











  • You can use logical vectors to subset, removing the p-values that you don't want to consider in your ranking. See ?"[" if this sounds interesting.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:50












  • If the 2 was instead a 1, would that be a desired output? Or would Easter and Christmas also have a ranking?

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 4:20











  • Hi Croote, correct, 2 should be a 1. Eastern and Christmas should not have a ranking as their p-value is <0.2

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 4:28

















  • Your code may benefit from use of the %in% operator. To read about it, look at the ?match help page.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:39











  • Thanks for the reply. I see that the %in% will retur a vector of TRUE/FALSE, will i still not have the ranking issue though, unless I i base the ranking on TRUE values only?

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 0:44











  • You can use logical vectors to subset, removing the p-values that you don't want to consider in your ranking. See ?"[" if this sounds interesting.

    – lmo
    Mar 27 at 0:50












  • If the 2 was instead a 1, would that be a desired output? Or would Easter and Christmas also have a ranking?

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 4:20











  • Hi Croote, correct, 2 should be a 1. Eastern and Christmas should not have a ranking as their p-value is <0.2

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 4:28
















Your code may benefit from use of the %in% operator. To read about it, look at the ?match help page.

– lmo
Mar 27 at 0:39





Your code may benefit from use of the %in% operator. To read about it, look at the ?match help page.

– lmo
Mar 27 at 0:39













Thanks for the reply. I see that the %in% will retur a vector of TRUE/FALSE, will i still not have the ranking issue though, unless I i base the ranking on TRUE values only?

– e_conomics
Mar 27 at 0:44





Thanks for the reply. I see that the %in% will retur a vector of TRUE/FALSE, will i still not have the ranking issue though, unless I i base the ranking on TRUE values only?

– e_conomics
Mar 27 at 0:44













You can use logical vectors to subset, removing the p-values that you don't want to consider in your ranking. See ?"[" if this sounds interesting.

– lmo
Mar 27 at 0:50






You can use logical vectors to subset, removing the p-values that you don't want to consider in your ranking. See ?"[" if this sounds interesting.

– lmo
Mar 27 at 0:50














If the 2 was instead a 1, would that be a desired output? Or would Easter and Christmas also have a ranking?

– Croote
Mar 27 at 4:20





If the 2 was instead a 1, would that be a desired output? Or would Easter and Christmas also have a ranking?

– Croote
Mar 27 at 4:20













Hi Croote, correct, 2 should be a 1. Eastern and Christmas should not have a ranking as their p-value is <0.2

– e_conomics
Mar 27 at 4:28





Hi Croote, correct, 2 should be a 1. Eastern and Christmas should not have a ranking as their p-value is <0.2

– e_conomics
Mar 27 at 4:28












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The reason your ranking is not as desired is because your yes term includes the whole column. So you need to subset the column based on your condition.
What is happening in your current function is that you are ranking the column without a filter then changing to NA everything that doesn't fit the condition.



I have just added a slightly changed version of your code to do this.
All I changed was to define your condition then subset the data frame accordingly. EDIT: this will work on the displayed data but not if there are more than one rows which meet the condition.



rank_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2

x$rank <- ifelse(test = cond,
yes = rank(-x[cond, ]$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



What this does is only rank the rows that meet your condition( x[cond, ] ).



This can be further simplified because you have already set them to NA just change the ones that meet the condition. It doesn't seem like you need an ifelse at all! This will also assign a vector of ranking to a subset of the same length which should work for larger sets which contain more than 1 row which meets the condition.



rank1_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2
x[cond, "rank"] <- rank(-x[cond,]$pval, na.last = NA)

return(x)






share|improve this answer



























  • Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 5:41











  • I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:04











  • rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:05











  • Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

    – e_conomics
    Mar 28 at 0:19










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55368131%2fissue-with-conditionally-ranking-p-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














The reason your ranking is not as desired is because your yes term includes the whole column. So you need to subset the column based on your condition.
What is happening in your current function is that you are ranking the column without a filter then changing to NA everything that doesn't fit the condition.



I have just added a slightly changed version of your code to do this.
All I changed was to define your condition then subset the data frame accordingly. EDIT: this will work on the displayed data but not if there are more than one rows which meet the condition.



rank_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2

x$rank <- ifelse(test = cond,
yes = rank(-x[cond, ]$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



What this does is only rank the rows that meet your condition( x[cond, ] ).



This can be further simplified because you have already set them to NA just change the ones that meet the condition. It doesn't seem like you need an ifelse at all! This will also assign a vector of ranking to a subset of the same length which should work for larger sets which contain more than 1 row which meets the condition.



rank1_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2
x[cond, "rank"] <- rank(-x[cond,]$pval, na.last = NA)

return(x)






share|improve this answer



























  • Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 5:41











  • I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:04











  • rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:05











  • Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

    – e_conomics
    Mar 28 at 0:19















0














The reason your ranking is not as desired is because your yes term includes the whole column. So you need to subset the column based on your condition.
What is happening in your current function is that you are ranking the column without a filter then changing to NA everything that doesn't fit the condition.



I have just added a slightly changed version of your code to do this.
All I changed was to define your condition then subset the data frame accordingly. EDIT: this will work on the displayed data but not if there are more than one rows which meet the condition.



rank_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2

x$rank <- ifelse(test = cond,
yes = rank(-x[cond, ]$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



What this does is only rank the rows that meet your condition( x[cond, ] ).



This can be further simplified because you have already set them to NA just change the ones that meet the condition. It doesn't seem like you need an ifelse at all! This will also assign a vector of ranking to a subset of the same length which should work for larger sets which contain more than 1 row which meets the condition.



rank1_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2
x[cond, "rank"] <- rank(-x[cond,]$pval, na.last = NA)

return(x)






share|improve this answer



























  • Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 5:41











  • I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:04











  • rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:05











  • Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

    – e_conomics
    Mar 28 at 0:19













0












0








0







The reason your ranking is not as desired is because your yes term includes the whole column. So you need to subset the column based on your condition.
What is happening in your current function is that you are ranking the column without a filter then changing to NA everything that doesn't fit the condition.



I have just added a slightly changed version of your code to do this.
All I changed was to define your condition then subset the data frame accordingly. EDIT: this will work on the displayed data but not if there are more than one rows which meet the condition.



rank_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2

x$rank <- ifelse(test = cond,
yes = rank(-x[cond, ]$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



What this does is only rank the rows that meet your condition( x[cond, ] ).



This can be further simplified because you have already set them to NA just change the ones that meet the condition. It doesn't seem like you need an ifelse at all! This will also assign a vector of ranking to a subset of the same length which should work for larger sets which contain more than 1 row which meets the condition.



rank1_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2
x[cond, "rank"] <- rank(-x[cond,]$pval, na.last = NA)

return(x)






share|improve this answer















The reason your ranking is not as desired is because your yes term includes the whole column. So you need to subset the column based on your condition.
What is happening in your current function is that you are ranking the column without a filter then changing to NA everything that doesn't fit the condition.



I have just added a slightly changed version of your code to do this.
All I changed was to define your condition then subset the data frame accordingly. EDIT: this will work on the displayed data but not if there are more than one rows which meet the condition.



rank_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2

x$rank <- ifelse(test = cond,
yes = rank(-x[cond, ]$pval, na.last = NA),
no = NA)
return(x)



What this does is only rank the rows that meet your condition( x[cond, ] ).



This can be further simplified because you have already set them to NA just change the ones that meet the condition. It doesn't seem like you need an ifelse at all! This will also assign a vector of ranking to a subset of the same length which should work for larger sets which contain more than 1 row which meets the condition.



rank1_p <- function(x) 
x["rank"] <- NA
cond <- substr(df$term,1,2) != "ar" &
substr(df$term,1,2) != "ma" &
substr(df$term,1,stop = nchar(df$term)) != "intercept" &
substr(df$term,1, stop = nchar(df$term)) != "Price.Diff" &
df$pval > 0.2
x[cond, "rank"] <- rank(-x[cond,]$pval, na.last = NA)

return(x)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 27 at 6:07

























answered Mar 27 at 4:37









CrooteCroote

7523 silver badges14 bronze badges




7523 silver badges14 bronze badges















  • Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 5:41











  • I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:04











  • rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:05











  • Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

    – e_conomics
    Mar 28 at 0:19

















  • Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

    – e_conomics
    Mar 27 at 5:41











  • I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:04











  • rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

    – Croote
    Mar 27 at 6:05











  • Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

    – e_conomics
    Mar 28 at 0:19
















Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

– e_conomics
Mar 27 at 5:41





Thankyou Croote. That works perfectly. I have accepted your answer. Could you just clarify that rank(-x[cond,$pval) is indexing the rows of x in column pval and that whether the meet the cond criteria. Many thanks

– e_conomics
Mar 27 at 5:41













I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

– Croote
Mar 27 at 6:04





I see. Thinking on that question has shown me that there is another issue with the first solution and your ifelse() logic. It will not behave as desired because If there are multiple rows which meet the condition it will attempt to place a vector of ranks into a single row and simply take the first. The second solution is better and will fill the rows accordingly.

– Croote
Mar 27 at 6:04













rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

– Croote
Mar 27 at 6:05





rank function in your case is not indexing the rows to check if they meet the condition. It is simply trying to assign the output of rank to the yes condition in the ifelse

– Croote
Mar 27 at 6:05













Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

– e_conomics
Mar 28 at 0:19





Excellent. Thankyou for clarifying and explaining

– e_conomics
Mar 28 at 0:19








Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.







Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55368131%2fissue-with-conditionally-ranking-p-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현