Calling a fun with reified type parameter if you just have a KClass object?How does the reified keyword in Kotlin work?Why shouldn't Java enum literals be able to have generic type parameters?How do I access a Java static method on a Kotlin subclass?How can I store reified type data in instance fields in Kotlin?Kotlin reified type parameter as function parameterKotlin - Cannot use 'T' as reified type parameter. Use a class insteadHow type erasure worksWrong inference for reified type parameter in KotlinHow do you write secondary constructors for a class with type parameters?Using Fuel's responseObject with a generic call siteGet runtime class of a generic type parameter in Kotlin without reified keyword
How should I avoid someone patenting technology in my paper/poster?
Can さくじつ and きのう be used the same way?
Can one guy with a duplicator initiate a nuclear apocalypse?
What do solvers like Gurobi and CPLEX do when they run into hard instances of MIP
Very lazy puppy
What did the controller say during my approach to land (audio clip)?
Persuading players to be less attached to a pre-session 0 character concept
Should I inform my future product owner that there is a good chance that a team member will leave the company soon?
Why can't we use uninitialized local variable to access static content of its type?
Inquiry answerer
Audire, with accusative or dative?
Debussy as term for bathroom?
Do household ovens ventilate heat to the outdoors?
Why do things cool down?
Flying pigs arrive
I feel like most of my characters are the same, what can I do?
Who are the people reviewing far more papers than they're submitting for review?
Is it possible that the shadow of The Moon is a single dot during solar eclipse?
Get the encrypted payload from an unencrypted wrapper PDF document
How do you determine which representation of a function to use for Newton's method?
Madrid to London w/ Expired 90/180 days stay as US citizen
What's the purpose of autocorrelation?
Quick Kurodoko Puzzle: Threes and Triples
All numbers in a 5x5 Minesweeper grid
Calling a fun with reified type parameter if you just have a KClass object?
How does the reified keyword in Kotlin work?Why shouldn't Java enum literals be able to have generic type parameters?How do I access a Java static method on a Kotlin subclass?How can I store reified type data in instance fields in Kotlin?Kotlin reified type parameter as function parameterKotlin - Cannot use 'T' as reified type parameter. Use a class insteadHow type erasure worksWrong inference for reified type parameter in KotlinHow do you write secondary constructors for a class with type parameters?Using Fuel's responseObject with a generic call siteGet runtime class of a generic type parameter in Kotlin without reified keyword
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
One can only use reified type parameters with inline functions. So if I want such a parameter for a class I need a trick like this:
class Foo<T : Any>(private val clazz: KClass<T>)
companion object
inline fun <reified T: Any> create() = Foo(T::class)
I can then create instances of Foo
like this:
val foo = Foo.create<Bar>()
Within Foo
I have access clazz
but my question is can I then use clazz
when I need to call methods that require a reified type parameter`?
E.g. within Foo
I'd like to add a method like this:
fun print(list: List<Alpha>)
list.filterIsInstance<T>().forEach print(it)
But as far as I can see there's no way to get from clazz
to something I can use as a type parameter here.
And yes, I know there's a form of filterIsInstance
that takes a Class
so I can do:
list.filterIsInstance(clazz.java).forEach print(it)
However many libraries contain methods where both forms (explicit class parameter and reified type parameter) are not provided.
E.g. the Jackson Kotlin Extensions.kt. Actually this isn't a great example as the non-reified equivalents are all one-liners but this isn't always the case - then you end up unpacking the implementation of the reified-type-parameter method into your code.
generics kotlin kotlin-reified-type-parameters
add a comment
|
One can only use reified type parameters with inline functions. So if I want such a parameter for a class I need a trick like this:
class Foo<T : Any>(private val clazz: KClass<T>)
companion object
inline fun <reified T: Any> create() = Foo(T::class)
I can then create instances of Foo
like this:
val foo = Foo.create<Bar>()
Within Foo
I have access clazz
but my question is can I then use clazz
when I need to call methods that require a reified type parameter`?
E.g. within Foo
I'd like to add a method like this:
fun print(list: List<Alpha>)
list.filterIsInstance<T>().forEach print(it)
But as far as I can see there's no way to get from clazz
to something I can use as a type parameter here.
And yes, I know there's a form of filterIsInstance
that takes a Class
so I can do:
list.filterIsInstance(clazz.java).forEach print(it)
However many libraries contain methods where both forms (explicit class parameter and reified type parameter) are not provided.
E.g. the Jackson Kotlin Extensions.kt. Actually this isn't a great example as the non-reified equivalents are all one-liners but this isn't always the case - then you end up unpacking the implementation of the reified-type-parameter method into your code.
generics kotlin kotlin-reified-type-parameters
Given the description of how reification works in this other SO answer it seems clear anything to do withreified
is resolved at compile time so you cannot hope to do anything with aKClass
orClass
object that you've acquired at runtime (all methods involvingreified
have been inlined at this point and essentially don't exist in any real sense at runtime).
– George Hawkins
Apr 5 at 14:40
add a comment
|
One can only use reified type parameters with inline functions. So if I want such a parameter for a class I need a trick like this:
class Foo<T : Any>(private val clazz: KClass<T>)
companion object
inline fun <reified T: Any> create() = Foo(T::class)
I can then create instances of Foo
like this:
val foo = Foo.create<Bar>()
Within Foo
I have access clazz
but my question is can I then use clazz
when I need to call methods that require a reified type parameter`?
E.g. within Foo
I'd like to add a method like this:
fun print(list: List<Alpha>)
list.filterIsInstance<T>().forEach print(it)
But as far as I can see there's no way to get from clazz
to something I can use as a type parameter here.
And yes, I know there's a form of filterIsInstance
that takes a Class
so I can do:
list.filterIsInstance(clazz.java).forEach print(it)
However many libraries contain methods where both forms (explicit class parameter and reified type parameter) are not provided.
E.g. the Jackson Kotlin Extensions.kt. Actually this isn't a great example as the non-reified equivalents are all one-liners but this isn't always the case - then you end up unpacking the implementation of the reified-type-parameter method into your code.
generics kotlin kotlin-reified-type-parameters
One can only use reified type parameters with inline functions. So if I want such a parameter for a class I need a trick like this:
class Foo<T : Any>(private val clazz: KClass<T>)
companion object
inline fun <reified T: Any> create() = Foo(T::class)
I can then create instances of Foo
like this:
val foo = Foo.create<Bar>()
Within Foo
I have access clazz
but my question is can I then use clazz
when I need to call methods that require a reified type parameter`?
E.g. within Foo
I'd like to add a method like this:
fun print(list: List<Alpha>)
list.filterIsInstance<T>().forEach print(it)
But as far as I can see there's no way to get from clazz
to something I can use as a type parameter here.
And yes, I know there's a form of filterIsInstance
that takes a Class
so I can do:
list.filterIsInstance(clazz.java).forEach print(it)
However many libraries contain methods where both forms (explicit class parameter and reified type parameter) are not provided.
E.g. the Jackson Kotlin Extensions.kt. Actually this isn't a great example as the non-reified equivalents are all one-liners but this isn't always the case - then you end up unpacking the implementation of the reified-type-parameter method into your code.
generics kotlin kotlin-reified-type-parameters
generics kotlin kotlin-reified-type-parameters
asked Mar 28 at 14:12
George HawkinsGeorge Hawkins
24.7k5 gold badges19 silver badges33 bronze badges
24.7k5 gold badges19 silver badges33 bronze badges
Given the description of how reification works in this other SO answer it seems clear anything to do withreified
is resolved at compile time so you cannot hope to do anything with aKClass
orClass
object that you've acquired at runtime (all methods involvingreified
have been inlined at this point and essentially don't exist in any real sense at runtime).
– George Hawkins
Apr 5 at 14:40
add a comment
|
Given the description of how reification works in this other SO answer it seems clear anything to do withreified
is resolved at compile time so you cannot hope to do anything with aKClass
orClass
object that you've acquired at runtime (all methods involvingreified
have been inlined at this point and essentially don't exist in any real sense at runtime).
– George Hawkins
Apr 5 at 14:40
Given the description of how reification works in this other SO answer it seems clear anything to do with
reified
is resolved at compile time so you cannot hope to do anything with a KClass
or Class
object that you've acquired at runtime (all methods involving reified
have been inlined at this point and essentially don't exist in any real sense at runtime).– George Hawkins
Apr 5 at 14:40
Given the description of how reification works in this other SO answer it seems clear anything to do with
reified
is resolved at compile time so you cannot hope to do anything with a KClass
or Class
object that you've acquired at runtime (all methods involving reified
have been inlined at this point and essentially don't exist in any real sense at runtime).– George Hawkins
Apr 5 at 14:40
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
no, because those functions are inline
, they are inlined at compiletime
and a Class or KClass is using reflection at runtime
there are some tricks that you can do.. like with the companion class, but that does nto need the KClass<T>
at all.. anything else that provides a generic argument of T
would work just as well for the reified
type info
PS: reflection also cannot help you reliably because inline functions do not really exist at runtime, as explained by their modifier inline
add a comment
|
Unless I am missing something, everything you can do with T
in a function with reified T
can be translated to a use of KClass
: e.g. x is T
becomes clazz.isInstance(x)
, x as T
becomes clazz.cast(x)
, calls of other functions with reified type parameters are translated recursively, etc. Since the function has to be inline, all APIs it uses are visible at the call site so the translation can be made there.
But there's no automatic way to do this translation, as far as I know.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55399737%2fcalling-a-fun-with-reified-type-parameter-if-you-just-have-a-kclass-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
no, because those functions are inline
, they are inlined at compiletime
and a Class or KClass is using reflection at runtime
there are some tricks that you can do.. like with the companion class, but that does nto need the KClass<T>
at all.. anything else that provides a generic argument of T
would work just as well for the reified
type info
PS: reflection also cannot help you reliably because inline functions do not really exist at runtime, as explained by their modifier inline
add a comment
|
no, because those functions are inline
, they are inlined at compiletime
and a Class or KClass is using reflection at runtime
there are some tricks that you can do.. like with the companion class, but that does nto need the KClass<T>
at all.. anything else that provides a generic argument of T
would work just as well for the reified
type info
PS: reflection also cannot help you reliably because inline functions do not really exist at runtime, as explained by their modifier inline
add a comment
|
no, because those functions are inline
, they are inlined at compiletime
and a Class or KClass is using reflection at runtime
there are some tricks that you can do.. like with the companion class, but that does nto need the KClass<T>
at all.. anything else that provides a generic argument of T
would work just as well for the reified
type info
PS: reflection also cannot help you reliably because inline functions do not really exist at runtime, as explained by their modifier inline
no, because those functions are inline
, they are inlined at compiletime
and a Class or KClass is using reflection at runtime
there are some tricks that you can do.. like with the companion class, but that does nto need the KClass<T>
at all.. anything else that provides a generic argument of T
would work just as well for the reified
type info
PS: reflection also cannot help you reliably because inline functions do not really exist at runtime, as explained by their modifier inline
answered Mar 28 at 15:06
NikkyNikky
3231 silver badge8 bronze badges
3231 silver badge8 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Unless I am missing something, everything you can do with T
in a function with reified T
can be translated to a use of KClass
: e.g. x is T
becomes clazz.isInstance(x)
, x as T
becomes clazz.cast(x)
, calls of other functions with reified type parameters are translated recursively, etc. Since the function has to be inline, all APIs it uses are visible at the call site so the translation can be made there.
But there's no automatic way to do this translation, as far as I know.
add a comment
|
Unless I am missing something, everything you can do with T
in a function with reified T
can be translated to a use of KClass
: e.g. x is T
becomes clazz.isInstance(x)
, x as T
becomes clazz.cast(x)
, calls of other functions with reified type parameters are translated recursively, etc. Since the function has to be inline, all APIs it uses are visible at the call site so the translation can be made there.
But there's no automatic way to do this translation, as far as I know.
add a comment
|
Unless I am missing something, everything you can do with T
in a function with reified T
can be translated to a use of KClass
: e.g. x is T
becomes clazz.isInstance(x)
, x as T
becomes clazz.cast(x)
, calls of other functions with reified type parameters are translated recursively, etc. Since the function has to be inline, all APIs it uses are visible at the call site so the translation can be made there.
But there's no automatic way to do this translation, as far as I know.
Unless I am missing something, everything you can do with T
in a function with reified T
can be translated to a use of KClass
: e.g. x is T
becomes clazz.isInstance(x)
, x as T
becomes clazz.cast(x)
, calls of other functions with reified type parameters are translated recursively, etc. Since the function has to be inline, all APIs it uses are visible at the call site so the translation can be made there.
But there's no automatic way to do this translation, as far as I know.
answered Mar 28 at 17:39
Alexey RomanovAlexey Romanov
118k28 gold badges227 silver badges370 bronze badges
118k28 gold badges227 silver badges370 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55399737%2fcalling-a-fun-with-reified-type-parameter-if-you-just-have-a-kclass-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Given the description of how reification works in this other SO answer it seems clear anything to do with
reified
is resolved at compile time so you cannot hope to do anything with aKClass
orClass
object that you've acquired at runtime (all methods involvingreified
have been inlined at this point and essentially don't exist in any real sense at runtime).– George Hawkins
Apr 5 at 14:40