High Availability and Load Balancing in RabbitMqActiveMQ or RabbitMQ or ZeroMQ orRabbitMQ - high availability queues - but w/o messages replicationSetting up a load balancer for HA rabbitmqRabbitMQ clustering and mirror queues behavior behind the scenesRecognize RabbitMQ master node in high-availability clusterRabbitMQ with F5 Load BalancerRabbitMQ - Clustering & Client ConnectionsIs it possible to connect to other RabbitMQ nodes when one node is down?Rabbitmq high availability queues without message replicationRabbitMQ load balancing and high availability
Is there some sort of French saying for "a person's signature move"?
Why are some hotels asking you to book through Booking.com instead of matching the price at the front desk?
If I change my cassette, should I also change the chain?
Could this estimate of the size and mass of the Chicxulub Impactor be accurate?
How do English-speaking kids loudly request something?
What are some countries where you can be imprisoned for reading or owning a Bible?
Why did Tony's Arc Reactor do this?
Why would image resources loaded from different origins triggering HTTP authentication dialogs be harmful?
Male viewpoint in an erotic novel
Dissuading my girlfriend from a scam
Did the Byzantines ever attempt to move their capital to Rome?
Global variables and information security
How do I use NEC PC-6001 .p6 or .cas files?
Professor refuses to write a recommendation letter to students who haven't written a research paper with him
Is the Levitate spell supposed to basically disable a melee-based enemy?
What exactly is Apple Cider
Mute single speaker?
How to measure the statistical "distance" between two frequency distributions?
If I sell my PS4 game disc and buy a digital version, can I still access my saved game?
Entering the US with dual citizenship but US passport is long expired?
SQL Always On COPY ONLY backups - what's the point if I cant restore the AG from these backups?
Is there a neutral term for people who tend to avoid face-to-face or video/audio communication?
Are there mathematical concepts that exist in the fourth dimension, but not in the third dimension?
Was Rosie the Riveter sourced from a Michelangelo painting?
High Availability and Load Balancing in RabbitMq
ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ or ZeroMQ orRabbitMQ - high availability queues - but w/o messages replicationSetting up a load balancer for HA rabbitmqRabbitMQ clustering and mirror queues behavior behind the scenesRecognize RabbitMQ master node in high-availability clusterRabbitMQ with F5 Load BalancerRabbitMQ - Clustering & Client ConnectionsIs it possible to connect to other RabbitMQ nodes when one node is down?Rabbitmq high availability queues without message replicationRabbitMQ load balancing and high availability
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Consider a cluster with A and B nodes,I want a solution which meet these requirements:
1) When node A goes down the system continue working properly with node B till node A comes up again
2) Preventing extra network hop when master node is on Node A and client was connected to Node B, so when client publish a message, RAbbitmq route it to Node A i want to pervent this extra network hop
I should write my balancer or any framework (like HA Proxy) exist that can do these requirements?
rabbitmq
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
add a comment |
Consider a cluster with A and B nodes,I want a solution which meet these requirements:
1) When node A goes down the system continue working properly with node B till node A comes up again
2) Preventing extra network hop when master node is on Node A and client was connected to Node B, so when client publish a message, RAbbitmq route it to Node A i want to pervent this extra network hop
I should write my balancer or any framework (like HA Proxy) exist that can do these requirements?
rabbitmq
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
I think question 1 is fairly straightforward, but it's not clear at all by what you mean in question 2. Could you please clarify?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:47
add a comment |
Consider a cluster with A and B nodes,I want a solution which meet these requirements:
1) When node A goes down the system continue working properly with node B till node A comes up again
2) Preventing extra network hop when master node is on Node A and client was connected to Node B, so when client publish a message, RAbbitmq route it to Node A i want to pervent this extra network hop
I should write my balancer or any framework (like HA Proxy) exist that can do these requirements?
rabbitmq
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
Consider a cluster with A and B nodes,I want a solution which meet these requirements:
1) When node A goes down the system continue working properly with node B till node A comes up again
2) Preventing extra network hop when master node is on Node A and client was connected to Node B, so when client publish a message, RAbbitmq route it to Node A i want to pervent this extra network hop
I should write my balancer or any framework (like HA Proxy) exist that can do these requirements?
rabbitmq
rabbitmq
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
asked Mar 28 at 4:45
pejmanpejman
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
9665 gold badges16 silver badges45 bronze badges
I think question 1 is fairly straightforward, but it's not clear at all by what you mean in question 2. Could you please clarify?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:47
add a comment |
I think question 1 is fairly straightforward, but it's not clear at all by what you mean in question 2. Could you please clarify?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:47
I think question 1 is fairly straightforward, but it's not clear at all by what you mean in question 2. Could you please clarify?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:47
I think question 1 is fairly straightforward, but it's not clear at all by what you mean in question 2. Could you please clarify?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:47
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your question was recently discussed on the rabbitmq-users mailing list: link.
I recommend reading it.
For question #2, don't worry about the extra hop unless you have proof it causes an issue for you.
NOTE: the RabbitMQ team monitors the rabbitmq-users mailing list and only sometimes answers questions on StackOverflow.
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
1
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
1
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55390318%2fhigh-availability-and-load-balancing-in-rabbitmq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your question was recently discussed on the rabbitmq-users mailing list: link.
I recommend reading it.
For question #2, don't worry about the extra hop unless you have proof it causes an issue for you.
NOTE: the RabbitMQ team monitors the rabbitmq-users mailing list and only sometimes answers questions on StackOverflow.
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
1
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
1
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
|
show 1 more comment
Your question was recently discussed on the rabbitmq-users mailing list: link.
I recommend reading it.
For question #2, don't worry about the extra hop unless you have proof it causes an issue for you.
NOTE: the RabbitMQ team monitors the rabbitmq-users mailing list and only sometimes answers questions on StackOverflow.
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
1
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
1
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
|
show 1 more comment
Your question was recently discussed on the rabbitmq-users mailing list: link.
I recommend reading it.
For question #2, don't worry about the extra hop unless you have proof it causes an issue for you.
NOTE: the RabbitMQ team monitors the rabbitmq-users mailing list and only sometimes answers questions on StackOverflow.
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
Your question was recently discussed on the rabbitmq-users mailing list: link.
I recommend reading it.
For question #2, don't worry about the extra hop unless you have proof it causes an issue for you.
NOTE: the RabbitMQ team monitors the rabbitmq-users mailing list and only sometimes answers questions on StackOverflow.
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
answered Mar 28 at 14:44
Luke BakkenLuke Bakken
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
4,5052 gold badges11 silver badges20 bronze badges
1
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
1
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
|
show 1 more comment
1
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
1
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
1
1
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
I feel this answer could use a bit more meat. Have you considered pulling the relevant points from the discussion?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:46
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
Writing something once is enough. That's what links are for. If someone else wants to copypasta, they can have at it.
– Luke Bakken
Mar 28 at 20:09
1
1
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
Links go dead, and this answer may outlast the link, which is why the answer guidelines strongly discourage link-only answers. As-is, this is a comment, not an answer. Sorry :/
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 20:55
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
@LukeBakken theMayer is right that in general, we want our content to survive link rot. This is not about copy-pasta, but about providing the relevant information in the answer itself (which may or may not involve direct quotes).
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:37
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
That said, this is at least a partial answer, answering #2, so more than a comment.
– Baum mit Augen♦
Mar 28 at 23:44
|
show 1 more comment
Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.
Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55390318%2fhigh-availability-and-load-balancing-in-rabbitmq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think question 1 is fairly straightforward, but it's not clear at all by what you mean in question 2. Could you please clarify?
– theMayer
Mar 28 at 14:47