How to force Docker for a clean build of an image The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAlembic revision autogenerate wrong configuration readHow is Docker different from a virtual machine?Should I use Vagrant or Docker for creating an isolated environment?How to list containers in DockerHow to get a Docker container's IP address from the host?How to remove old Docker containersHow does one remove an image in Docker?How to deal with persistent storage (e.g. databases) in DockerCopying files from host to Docker containerHow to copy Docker images from one host to another without using a repositoryHow to remove old and unused Docker images
How do I solve this limit?
Grabbing quick drinks
declare as function pointer and initialize in the same line
Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?
Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?
Why is Miller's case titled R (Miller)?
Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Can a single photon have an energy density?
Explicit solution of a Hamiltonian system
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
Under what conditions does the function C = f(A,B) satisfy H(C|A) = H(B)?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?
What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?
What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?
How do I construct this japanese bowl?
Only print output after finding pattern
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?
India just shot down a satellite from the ground. At what altitude range is the resulting debris field?
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
How can I quit an app using Terminal?
How to force Docker for a clean build of an image
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAlembic revision autogenerate wrong configuration readHow is Docker different from a virtual machine?Should I use Vagrant or Docker for creating an isolated environment?How to list containers in DockerHow to get a Docker container's IP address from the host?How to remove old Docker containersHow does one remove an image in Docker?How to deal with persistent storage (e.g. databases) in DockerCopying files from host to Docker containerHow to copy Docker images from one host to another without using a repositoryHow to remove old and unused Docker images
I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.
$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .
When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:
Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84
The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?
docker aerospike
add a comment |
I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.
$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .
When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:
Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84
The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?
docker aerospike
5
As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number ofRUNdirectives.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29
@tripleee Can you explain why?
– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59
@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for eachRUNdirective, so aDockerfilewith manyRUNdirectives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.
– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02
add a comment |
I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.
$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .
When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:
Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84
The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?
docker aerospike
I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.
$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .
When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:
Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84
The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?
docker aerospike
docker aerospike
edited Jan 14 at 0:53
Ronen Botzer
5,6221733
5,6221733
asked Feb 24 '16 at 6:37
Pavan GuptaPavan Gupta
3,30731122
3,30731122
5
As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number ofRUNdirectives.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29
@tripleee Can you explain why?
– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59
@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for eachRUNdirective, so aDockerfilewith manyRUNdirectives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.
– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02
add a comment |
5
As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number ofRUNdirectives.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29
@tripleee Can you explain why?
– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59
@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for eachRUNdirective, so aDockerfilewith manyRUNdirectives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.
– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02
5
5
As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of
RUN directives.– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29
As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of
RUN directives.– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29
@tripleee Can you explain why?
– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59
@tripleee Can you explain why?
– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59
@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each
RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02
@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each
RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
There's a --no-cache option:
docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .
In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.
26
Also note that--no-cacheworks withdocker-compose build.
– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
4
You might also want to use--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to--no-cacheif you already have the base image (ex:ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.
– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
add a comment |
In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:
docker system prune
The command will ask you for your confirmation:
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all volumes not used by at least one container
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all images without at least one container associated to them
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.
3
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
1
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4
– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
1
@PerLundberg, I updateddockerto the same version and it works, thank you.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
2
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
add a comment |
The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.
Our Dockerfile was:
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm
But should have been:
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm
To prevent caching the update and install separately.
See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles
7
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy ofRUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpmyou would still see it get reused with the old contents.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
5
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.
You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.
I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget
You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.
It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...
1
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
add a comment |
You can manage the builder cache with docker builder
To clean all the cache with no prompt:docker builder prune -af
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f35594987%2fhow-to-force-docker-for-a-clean-build-of-an-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's a --no-cache option:
docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .
In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.
26
Also note that--no-cacheworks withdocker-compose build.
– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
4
You might also want to use--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to--no-cacheif you already have the base image (ex:ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.
– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
add a comment |
There's a --no-cache option:
docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .
In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.
26
Also note that--no-cacheworks withdocker-compose build.
– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
4
You might also want to use--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to--no-cacheif you already have the base image (ex:ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.
– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
add a comment |
There's a --no-cache option:
docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .
In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.
There's a --no-cache option:
docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .
In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.
edited Jul 24 '18 at 15:38
Peter Mortensen
13.8k1987113
13.8k1987113
answered Feb 24 '16 at 6:40
Assaf LavieAssaf Lavie
42.8k28127184
42.8k28127184
26
Also note that--no-cacheworks withdocker-compose build.
– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
4
You might also want to use--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to--no-cacheif you already have the base image (ex:ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.
– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
add a comment |
26
Also note that--no-cacheworks withdocker-compose build.
– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
4
You might also want to use--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to--no-cacheif you already have the base image (ex:ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.
– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
26
26
Also note that
--no-cache works with docker-compose build.– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
Also note that
--no-cache works with docker-compose build.– Blackus
Aug 25 '17 at 12:53
4
4
You might also want to use
--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
You might also want to use
--pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.– Collin Krawll
Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
add a comment |
In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:
docker system prune
The command will ask you for your confirmation:
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all volumes not used by at least one container
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all images without at least one container associated to them
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.
3
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
1
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4
– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
1
@PerLundberg, I updateddockerto the same version and it works, thank you.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
2
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
add a comment |
In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:
docker system prune
The command will ask you for your confirmation:
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all volumes not used by at least one container
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all images without at least one container associated to them
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.
3
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
1
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4
– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
1
@PerLundberg, I updateddockerto the same version and it works, thank you.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
2
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
add a comment |
In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:
docker system prune
The command will ask you for your confirmation:
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all volumes not used by at least one container
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all images without at least one container associated to them
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.
In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:
docker system prune
The command will ask you for your confirmation:
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all volumes not used by at least one container
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all images without at least one container associated to them
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.
edited Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
Iulian Onofrei
4,13734279
4,13734279
answered Jul 14 '17 at 7:43
Wallace SidhréeWallace Sidhrée
6,95033552
6,95033552
3
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
1
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4
– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
1
@PerLundberg, I updateddockerto the same version and it works, thank you.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
2
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
add a comment |
3
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
1
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4
– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
1
@PerLundberg, I updateddockerto the same version and it works, thank you.
– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
2
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
3
3
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
adding -a -f makes it better
– Ravi
Oct 4 '17 at 2:22
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
docker: 'system' is not a docker command.– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 17 '17 at 16:01
1
1
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,
Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
@IulianOnofrei Works for me,
Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4– Per Lundberg
Nov 23 '17 at 10:10
1
1
@PerLundberg, I updated
docker to the same version and it works, thank you.– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
@PerLundberg, I updated
docker to the same version and it works, thank you.– Iulian Onofrei
Nov 23 '17 at 10:13
2
2
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
Still doesn't clear layer cache.
– Damien Roche
Mar 24 '18 at 20:58
add a comment |
The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.
Our Dockerfile was:
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm
But should have been:
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm
To prevent caching the update and install separately.
See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles
7
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy ofRUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpmyou would still see it get reused with the old contents.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
5
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.
Our Dockerfile was:
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm
But should have been:
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm
To prevent caching the update and install separately.
See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles
7
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy ofRUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpmyou would still see it get reused with the old contents.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
5
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.
Our Dockerfile was:
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm
But should have been:
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm
To prevent caching the update and install separately.
See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles
The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.
Our Dockerfile was:
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm
But should have been:
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm
To prevent caching the update and install separately.
See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles
edited Jul 24 '18 at 15:39
Peter Mortensen
13.8k1987113
13.8k1987113
answered Dec 13 '16 at 11:11
YouniteusYouniteus
58942
58942
7
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy ofRUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpmyou would still see it get reused with the old contents.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
5
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
7
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy ofRUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpmyou would still see it get reused with the old contents.
– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
5
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
7
7
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:28
5
5
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)
– John Chadwick
Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
add a comment |
I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.
You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.
I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget
You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.
It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...
1
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
add a comment |
I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.
You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.
I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget
You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.
It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...
1
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
add a comment |
I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.
You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.
I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget
You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.
It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...
I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.
You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.
I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget
You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.
It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...
edited Jul 24 '18 at 15:40
Peter Mortensen
13.8k1987113
13.8k1987113
answered Jul 12 '18 at 13:31
OlivierOlivier
6781821
6781821
1
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
add a comment |
1
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
1
1
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)
– leszek.hanusz
Nov 13 '18 at 7:31
add a comment |
You can manage the builder cache with docker builder
To clean all the cache with no prompt:docker builder prune -af
add a comment |
You can manage the builder cache with docker builder
To clean all the cache with no prompt:docker builder prune -af
add a comment |
You can manage the builder cache with docker builder
To clean all the cache with no prompt:docker builder prune -af
You can manage the builder cache with docker builder
To clean all the cache with no prompt:docker builder prune -af
answered Mar 21 at 16:31
ShawnShawn
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f35594987%2fhow-to-force-docker-for-a-clean-build-of-an-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of
RUNdirectives.– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29
@tripleee Can you explain why?
– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59
@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each
RUNdirective, so aDockerfilewith manyRUNdirectives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02