How to force Docker for a clean build of an image The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAlembic revision autogenerate wrong configuration readHow is Docker different from a virtual machine?Should I use Vagrant or Docker for creating an isolated environment?How to list containers in DockerHow to get a Docker container's IP address from the host?How to remove old Docker containersHow does one remove an image in Docker?How to deal with persistent storage (e.g. databases) in DockerCopying files from host to Docker containerHow to copy Docker images from one host to another without using a repositoryHow to remove old and unused Docker images

How do I solve this limit?

Grabbing quick drinks

declare as function pointer and initialize in the same line

Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

Why is Miller's case titled R (Miller)?

Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Can a single photon have an energy density?

Explicit solution of a Hamiltonian system

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?

Under what conditions does the function C = f(A,B) satisfy H(C|A) = H(B)?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?

What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?

What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?

How do I construct this japanese bowl?

Only print output after finding pattern

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?

India just shot down a satellite from the ground. At what altitude range is the resulting debris field?

Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!

How can I quit an app using Terminal?



How to force Docker for a clean build of an image



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAlembic revision autogenerate wrong configuration readHow is Docker different from a virtual machine?Should I use Vagrant or Docker for creating an isolated environment?How to list containers in DockerHow to get a Docker container's IP address from the host?How to remove old Docker containersHow does one remove an image in Docker?How to deal with persistent storage (e.g. databases) in DockerCopying files from host to Docker containerHow to copy Docker images from one host to another without using a repositoryHow to remove old and unused Docker images










455















I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.



$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .


When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:



Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84


The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?










share|improve this question



















  • 5





    As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of RUN directives.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:29











  • @tripleee Can you explain why?

    – Ya.
    Feb 20 at 16:59











  • @Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.

    – tripleee
    Feb 20 at 17:02
















455















I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.



$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .


When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:



Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84


The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?










share|improve this question



















  • 5





    As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of RUN directives.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:29











  • @tripleee Can you explain why?

    – Ya.
    Feb 20 at 16:59











  • @Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.

    – tripleee
    Feb 20 at 17:02














455












455








455


59






I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.



$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .


When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:



Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84


The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?










share|improve this question
















I have build a Docker image from a Docker file using the below command.



$ docker build -t u12_core -f u12_core .


When I am trying to rebuild it with the same command, it's using the build cache like:



Step 1 : FROM ubuntu:12.04
---> eb965dfb09d2
Step 2 : MAINTAINER Pavan Gupta <pavan.gupta@gmail.com>
---> Using cache
---> 4354ccf9dcd8
Step 3 : RUN apt-get update
---> Using cache
---> bcbca2fcf204
Step 4 : RUN apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jdk
---> Using cache
---> 103f1a261d44
Step 5 : RUN apt-get install -y openssh-server
---> Using cache
---> dde41f8d0904
Step 6 : RUN apt-get install -y git-core
---> Using cache
---> 9be002f08b6a
Step 7 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential
---> Using cache
---> a752fd73a698
Step 8 : RUN apt-get install -y logrotate
---> Using cache
---> 93bca09b509d
Step 9 : RUN apt-get install -y lsb-release
---> Using cache
---> fd4d10cf18bc
Step 10 : RUN mkdir /var/run/sshd
---> Using cache
---> 63b4ecc39ff0
Step 11 : RUN echo 'root:root' | chpasswd
---> Using cache
---> 9532e31518a6
Step 12 : RUN sed -i 's/PermitRootLogin without-password/PermitRootLogin yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
---> Using cache
---> 47d1660bd544
Step 13 : RUN sed 's@sessions*requireds*pam_loginuid.so@session optional pam_loginuid.so@g' -i /etc/pam.d/sshd
---> Using cache
---> d1f97f1c52f7
Step 14 : RUN wget -O aerospike.tgz 'http://aerospike.com/download/server/latest/artifact/ubuntu12'
---> Using cache
---> bd7dde7a98b9
Step 15 : RUN tar -xvf aerospike.tgz
---> Using cache
---> 54adaa09921f
Step 16 : RUN dpkg -i aerospike-server-community-*/*.deb
---> Using cache
---> 11aba013eea5
Step 17 : EXPOSE 22 3000 3001 3002 3003
---> Using cache
---> e33aaa78a931
Step 18 : CMD /usr/sbin/sshd -D
---> Using cache
---> 25f5fe70fa84
Successfully built 25f5fe70fa84


The cache shows that aerospike is installed. However, I don't find it inside containers spawn from this image, so I want to rebuild this image without using the cache. How can I force Docker to rebuild a clean image without the cache?







docker aerospike






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 14 at 0:53









Ronen Botzer

5,6221733




5,6221733










asked Feb 24 '16 at 6:37









Pavan GuptaPavan Gupta

3,30731122




3,30731122







  • 5





    As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of RUN directives.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:29











  • @tripleee Can you explain why?

    – Ya.
    Feb 20 at 16:59











  • @Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.

    – tripleee
    Feb 20 at 17:02













  • 5





    As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of RUN directives.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:29











  • @tripleee Can you explain why?

    – Ya.
    Feb 20 at 16:59











  • @Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.

    – tripleee
    Feb 20 at 17:02








5




5





As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of RUN directives.

– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29





As an aside, you should generally try to minimize the number of RUN directives.

– tripleee
Sep 27 '17 at 11:29













@tripleee Can you explain why?

– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59





@tripleee Can you explain why?

– Ya.
Feb 20 at 16:59













@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.

– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02






@Ya. It used to be that Docker always created a separate layer for each RUN directive, so a Dockerfile with many RUN directives would consume ginormous amounts of disk space; but this has apparently been improved somewhat in recent versions.

– tripleee
Feb 20 at 17:02













5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















854














There's a --no-cache option:



docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .


In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.






share|improve this answer




















  • 26





    Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

    – Blackus
    Aug 25 '17 at 12:53







  • 4





    You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

    – Collin Krawll
    Dec 19 '18 at 20:39



















80














In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:



docker system prune


The command will ask you for your confirmation:



WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all volumes not used by at least one container
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all images without at least one container associated to them
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]


This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    adding -a -f makes it better

    – Ravi
    Oct 4 '17 at 2:22











  • docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

    – Iulian Onofrei
    Nov 17 '17 at 16:01






  • 1





    @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

    – Per Lundberg
    Nov 23 '17 at 10:10






  • 1





    @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

    – Iulian Onofrei
    Nov 23 '17 at 10:13






  • 2





    Still doesn't clear layer cache.

    – Damien Roche
    Mar 24 '18 at 20:58


















48














The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.



Our Dockerfile was:



RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm


But should have been:



RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm


To prevent caching the update and install separately.



See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles






share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:28






  • 5





    Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

    – John Chadwick
    Jan 24 '18 at 17:12



















9














I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.



You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.



I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget



You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.



It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

    – leszek.hanusz
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:31


















0














You can manage the builder cache with docker builder



To clean all the cache with no prompt:
docker builder prune -af






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f35594987%2fhow-to-force-docker-for-a-clean-build-of-an-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    854














    There's a --no-cache option:



    docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .


    In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 26





      Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

      – Blackus
      Aug 25 '17 at 12:53







    • 4





      You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

      – Collin Krawll
      Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
















    854














    There's a --no-cache option:



    docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .


    In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 26





      Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

      – Blackus
      Aug 25 '17 at 12:53







    • 4





      You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

      – Collin Krawll
      Dec 19 '18 at 20:39














    854












    854








    854







    There's a --no-cache option:



    docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .


    In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.






    share|improve this answer















    There's a --no-cache option:



    docker build --no-cache -t u12_core -f u12_core .


    In older versions of Docker you needed to pass --no-cache=true, but this is no longer the case.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 24 '18 at 15:38









    Peter Mortensen

    13.8k1987113




    13.8k1987113










    answered Feb 24 '16 at 6:40









    Assaf LavieAssaf Lavie

    42.8k28127184




    42.8k28127184







    • 26





      Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

      – Blackus
      Aug 25 '17 at 12:53







    • 4





      You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

      – Collin Krawll
      Dec 19 '18 at 20:39













    • 26





      Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

      – Blackus
      Aug 25 '17 at 12:53







    • 4





      You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

      – Collin Krawll
      Dec 19 '18 at 20:39








    26




    26





    Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

    – Blackus
    Aug 25 '17 at 12:53






    Also note that --no-cache works with docker-compose build.

    – Blackus
    Aug 25 '17 at 12:53





    4




    4





    You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

    – Collin Krawll
    Dec 19 '18 at 20:39






    You might also want to use --pull. This will tell docker to get the latest version of the base image. This is necessary in addition to --no-cache if you already have the base image (ex: ubuntu/latest) and the base image has been updated since you last pulled it. See the docs here.

    – Collin Krawll
    Dec 19 '18 at 20:39














    80














    In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:



    docker system prune


    The command will ask you for your confirmation:



    WARNING! This will remove:
    - all stopped containers
    - all volumes not used by at least one container
    - all networks not used by at least one container
    - all images without at least one container associated to them
    Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]


    This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      adding -a -f makes it better

      – Ravi
      Oct 4 '17 at 2:22











    • docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 17 '17 at 16:01






    • 1





      @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

      – Per Lundberg
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:10






    • 1





      @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:13






    • 2





      Still doesn't clear layer cache.

      – Damien Roche
      Mar 24 '18 at 20:58















    80














    In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:



    docker system prune


    The command will ask you for your confirmation:



    WARNING! This will remove:
    - all stopped containers
    - all volumes not used by at least one container
    - all networks not used by at least one container
    - all images without at least one container associated to them
    Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]


    This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      adding -a -f makes it better

      – Ravi
      Oct 4 '17 at 2:22











    • docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 17 '17 at 16:01






    • 1





      @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

      – Per Lundberg
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:10






    • 1





      @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:13






    • 2





      Still doesn't clear layer cache.

      – Damien Roche
      Mar 24 '18 at 20:58













    80












    80








    80







    In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:



    docker system prune


    The command will ask you for your confirmation:



    WARNING! This will remove:
    - all stopped containers
    - all volumes not used by at least one container
    - all networks not used by at least one container
    - all images without at least one container associated to them
    Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]


    This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.






    share|improve this answer















    In some extreme cases, your only way around recurring build failures is by running:



    docker system prune


    The command will ask you for your confirmation:



    WARNING! This will remove:
    - all stopped containers
    - all volumes not used by at least one container
    - all networks not used by at least one container
    - all images without at least one container associated to them
    Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]


    This is of course not a direct answer to the question, but might save some lives... It did save mine.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 23 '17 at 10:13









    Iulian Onofrei

    4,13734279




    4,13734279










    answered Jul 14 '17 at 7:43









    Wallace SidhréeWallace Sidhrée

    6,95033552




    6,95033552







    • 3





      adding -a -f makes it better

      – Ravi
      Oct 4 '17 at 2:22











    • docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 17 '17 at 16:01






    • 1





      @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

      – Per Lundberg
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:10






    • 1





      @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:13






    • 2





      Still doesn't clear layer cache.

      – Damien Roche
      Mar 24 '18 at 20:58












    • 3





      adding -a -f makes it better

      – Ravi
      Oct 4 '17 at 2:22











    • docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 17 '17 at 16:01






    • 1





      @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

      – Per Lundberg
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:10






    • 1





      @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

      – Iulian Onofrei
      Nov 23 '17 at 10:13






    • 2





      Still doesn't clear layer cache.

      – Damien Roche
      Mar 24 '18 at 20:58







    3




    3





    adding -a -f makes it better

    – Ravi
    Oct 4 '17 at 2:22





    adding -a -f makes it better

    – Ravi
    Oct 4 '17 at 2:22













    docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

    – Iulian Onofrei
    Nov 17 '17 at 16:01





    docker: 'system' is not a docker command.

    – Iulian Onofrei
    Nov 17 '17 at 16:01




    1




    1





    @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

    – Per Lundberg
    Nov 23 '17 at 10:10





    @IulianOnofrei Works for me, Docker version 17.09.0-ce, build afdb6d4

    – Per Lundberg
    Nov 23 '17 at 10:10




    1




    1





    @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

    – Iulian Onofrei
    Nov 23 '17 at 10:13





    @PerLundberg, I updated docker to the same version and it works, thank you.

    – Iulian Onofrei
    Nov 23 '17 at 10:13




    2




    2





    Still doesn't clear layer cache.

    – Damien Roche
    Mar 24 '18 at 20:58





    Still doesn't clear layer cache.

    – Damien Roche
    Mar 24 '18 at 20:58











    48














    The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.



    Our Dockerfile was:



    RUN apt-get update
    RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    But should have been:



    RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    To prevent caching the update and install separately.



    See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles






    share|improve this answer




















    • 7





      The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

      – tripleee
      Sep 27 '17 at 11:28






    • 5





      Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

      – John Chadwick
      Jan 24 '18 at 17:12
















    48














    The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.



    Our Dockerfile was:



    RUN apt-get update
    RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    But should have been:



    RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    To prevent caching the update and install separately.



    See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles






    share|improve this answer




















    • 7





      The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

      – tripleee
      Sep 27 '17 at 11:28






    • 5





      Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

      – John Chadwick
      Jan 24 '18 at 17:12














    48












    48








    48







    The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.



    Our Dockerfile was:



    RUN apt-get update
    RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    But should have been:



    RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    To prevent caching the update and install separately.



    See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles






    share|improve this answer















    The command docker build --no-cache . solved our similar problem.



    Our Dockerfile was:



    RUN apt-get update
    RUN apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    But should have been:



    RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm


    To prevent caching the update and install separately.



    See: Best practices for writing Dockerfiles







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 24 '18 at 15:39









    Peter Mortensen

    13.8k1987113




    13.8k1987113










    answered Dec 13 '16 at 11:11









    YouniteusYouniteus

    58942




    58942







    • 7





      The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

      – tripleee
      Sep 27 '17 at 11:28






    • 5





      Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

      – John Chadwick
      Jan 24 '18 at 17:12













    • 7





      The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

      – tripleee
      Sep 27 '17 at 11:28






    • 5





      Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

      – John Chadwick
      Jan 24 '18 at 17:12








    7




    7





    The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:28





    The "should have been" is misleading. If Docker sees that it has a cached copy of RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install php5-fpm you would still see it get reused with the old contents.

    – tripleee
    Sep 27 '17 at 11:28




    5




    5





    Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

    – John Chadwick
    Jan 24 '18 at 17:12






    Actually it still makes sense to join them, because otherwise if you change the installation line, it will still use the old package cache, which will often have problems if the cache is out of date (usually, files will 404.)

    – John Chadwick
    Jan 24 '18 at 17:12












    9














    I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.



    You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.



    I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget



    You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.



    It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

      – leszek.hanusz
      Nov 13 '18 at 7:31















    9














    I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.



    You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.



    I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget



    You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.



    It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

      – leszek.hanusz
      Nov 13 '18 at 7:31













    9












    9








    9







    I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.



    You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.



    I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget



    You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.



    It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...






    share|improve this answer















    I would not recommend using --no-cache in your case.



    You are running a couple of installations from step 3 to 9 (I would, by the way, prefer using a one liner) and if you don't want the overhead of re-running these steps each time you are building your image you can modify your Dockerfile with a temporary step prior to your wget instruction.



    I use to do something like RUN ls . and change it to RUN ls ./ then RUN ls ./. and so on for each modification done on the tarball retrieved by wget



    You can of course do something like RUN echo 'test1' > test && rm test increasing the number in 'test1 for each iteration.



    It looks dirty, but as far as I know it's the most efficient way to continue benefiting from the cache system of Docker, which saves time when you have many layers...







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 24 '18 at 15:40









    Peter Mortensen

    13.8k1987113




    13.8k1987113










    answered Jul 12 '18 at 13:31









    OlivierOlivier

    6781821




    6781821







    • 1





      The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

      – leszek.hanusz
      Nov 13 '18 at 7:31












    • 1





      The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

      – leszek.hanusz
      Nov 13 '18 at 7:31







    1




    1





    The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

    – leszek.hanusz
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:31





    The ability to be able to not use the cache after a certain point is a feature requested by many (see github.com/moby/moby/issues/1996 for alternatives for cache busting)

    – leszek.hanusz
    Nov 13 '18 at 7:31











    0














    You can manage the builder cache with docker builder



    To clean all the cache with no prompt:
    docker builder prune -af






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      You can manage the builder cache with docker builder



      To clean all the cache with no prompt:
      docker builder prune -af






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        You can manage the builder cache with docker builder



        To clean all the cache with no prompt:
        docker builder prune -af






        share|improve this answer













        You can manage the builder cache with docker builder



        To clean all the cache with no prompt:
        docker builder prune -af







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 21 at 16:31









        ShawnShawn

        1




        1



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f35594987%2fhow-to-force-docker-for-a-clean-build-of-an-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

            155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해