Why are ultraweak *-homomorphisms the `right' morphisms for von Neumann algebras (and say, not ultrastrong)? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowNon-commutative geometry from von Neumann algebras?Reference for the Gelfand-Neumark theorem for commutative von Neumann algebrasCan we recover a von Neumann algebra from its predual?Mono- and epi-morphisms for C*-algebrasWhich complete Boolean algebras arise as the algebras of projections of commutative von Neumann algebras?Morphism of von Neumann AlgebrasContinuity of a weight on its definition domain in a von Neumann algebraTrivializing unitary cocycles in abelian von Neumann algebras that are uniformly close to the trivial oneExamples of isomorphic W* algebra with non-homeomorphic weak topologyUltraweak topology in abelian von Neumann algebras

Why are ultraweak *-homomorphisms the `right' morphisms for von Neumann algebras (and say, not ultrastrong)?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowNon-commutative geometry from von Neumann algebras?Reference for the Gelfand-Neumark theorem for commutative von Neumann algebrasCan we recover a von Neumann algebra from its predual?Mono- and epi-morphisms for C*-algebrasWhich complete Boolean algebras arise as the algebras of projections of commutative von Neumann algebras?Morphism of von Neumann AlgebrasContinuity of a weight on its definition domain in a von Neumann algebraTrivializing unitary cocycles in abelian von Neumann algebras that are uniformly close to the trivial oneExamples of isomorphic W* algebra with non-homeomorphic weak topologyUltraweak topology in abelian von Neumann algebras










4












$begingroup$


Both the ultraweak and ultrastrong topologies are intrinsic topologies in the sense that the image of a continuous (unital) $*$-homomorphism between von Neumann algebras (in either topology) is a von Neumann subalgebra of the target von Neumann algebra, unlike say just norm-continuous $*$-homomorphisms. One may then speak of the category of von Neumann algebras with morphisms as ultrastrong $*$-homomorphisms.



Why do we predominantly think of the ultraweak topology as the intrinsic one when presumably there could be many more topologies that are intrinsic in the above sense? I understand that the ultraweak topology is the weak-topology coming from the pre-dual and hence quite natural to study. But is there a guiding logical or category-theoretic principle that tells us to make this choice?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ultrastrongly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms are normal, i.e. preserve suprema of bounded, increasing nets, hence they are ultraweakly continuous. So the class of ultraweakly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms is potentially broader; might be the same, I'm not sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    The ultraweak topology is the coarsest topology such that the normal linear functionals are continuous. But perhaps there are coarser topologies ($mathcalT$) in which, under a *-homomorphism that is continuous in this topology the image of a von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann algebra. In other words, an ultraweak continuous $*$-homomorphism is automatically $mathcalT - mathcalT$-continuous. (Of course one could use trivial topologies. But my question is about a study of the collection of such topologies and identifying other potentially interesting topologies.)
    $endgroup$
    – condexp
    Mar 21 at 12:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, weak operator topology also has this property and it is coarser than the ultraweak topology, but it is hardly intrinsic, because it depends on the particular representation as operators on a Hilbert space.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:57















4












$begingroup$


Both the ultraweak and ultrastrong topologies are intrinsic topologies in the sense that the image of a continuous (unital) $*$-homomorphism between von Neumann algebras (in either topology) is a von Neumann subalgebra of the target von Neumann algebra, unlike say just norm-continuous $*$-homomorphisms. One may then speak of the category of von Neumann algebras with morphisms as ultrastrong $*$-homomorphisms.



Why do we predominantly think of the ultraweak topology as the intrinsic one when presumably there could be many more topologies that are intrinsic in the above sense? I understand that the ultraweak topology is the weak-topology coming from the pre-dual and hence quite natural to study. But is there a guiding logical or category-theoretic principle that tells us to make this choice?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ultrastrongly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms are normal, i.e. preserve suprema of bounded, increasing nets, hence they are ultraweakly continuous. So the class of ultraweakly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms is potentially broader; might be the same, I'm not sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    The ultraweak topology is the coarsest topology such that the normal linear functionals are continuous. But perhaps there are coarser topologies ($mathcalT$) in which, under a *-homomorphism that is continuous in this topology the image of a von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann algebra. In other words, an ultraweak continuous $*$-homomorphism is automatically $mathcalT - mathcalT$-continuous. (Of course one could use trivial topologies. But my question is about a study of the collection of such topologies and identifying other potentially interesting topologies.)
    $endgroup$
    – condexp
    Mar 21 at 12:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, weak operator topology also has this property and it is coarser than the ultraweak topology, but it is hardly intrinsic, because it depends on the particular representation as operators on a Hilbert space.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:57













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


Both the ultraweak and ultrastrong topologies are intrinsic topologies in the sense that the image of a continuous (unital) $*$-homomorphism between von Neumann algebras (in either topology) is a von Neumann subalgebra of the target von Neumann algebra, unlike say just norm-continuous $*$-homomorphisms. One may then speak of the category of von Neumann algebras with morphisms as ultrastrong $*$-homomorphisms.



Why do we predominantly think of the ultraweak topology as the intrinsic one when presumably there could be many more topologies that are intrinsic in the above sense? I understand that the ultraweak topology is the weak-topology coming from the pre-dual and hence quite natural to study. But is there a guiding logical or category-theoretic principle that tells us to make this choice?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Both the ultraweak and ultrastrong topologies are intrinsic topologies in the sense that the image of a continuous (unital) $*$-homomorphism between von Neumann algebras (in either topology) is a von Neumann subalgebra of the target von Neumann algebra, unlike say just norm-continuous $*$-homomorphisms. One may then speak of the category of von Neumann algebras with morphisms as ultrastrong $*$-homomorphisms.



Why do we predominantly think of the ultraweak topology as the intrinsic one when presumably there could be many more topologies that are intrinsic in the above sense? I understand that the ultraweak topology is the weak-topology coming from the pre-dual and hence quite natural to study. But is there a guiding logical or category-theoretic principle that tells us to make this choice?



Thank you.







oa.operator-algebras von-neumann-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 14:38









YCor

28.5k484139




28.5k484139










asked Mar 21 at 11:46









condexpcondexp

673




673







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ultrastrongly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms are normal, i.e. preserve suprema of bounded, increasing nets, hence they are ultraweakly continuous. So the class of ultraweakly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms is potentially broader; might be the same, I'm not sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    The ultraweak topology is the coarsest topology such that the normal linear functionals are continuous. But perhaps there are coarser topologies ($mathcalT$) in which, under a *-homomorphism that is continuous in this topology the image of a von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann algebra. In other words, an ultraweak continuous $*$-homomorphism is automatically $mathcalT - mathcalT$-continuous. (Of course one could use trivial topologies. But my question is about a study of the collection of such topologies and identifying other potentially interesting topologies.)
    $endgroup$
    – condexp
    Mar 21 at 12:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, weak operator topology also has this property and it is coarser than the ultraweak topology, but it is hardly intrinsic, because it depends on the particular representation as operators on a Hilbert space.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:57












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ultrastrongly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms are normal, i.e. preserve suprema of bounded, increasing nets, hence they are ultraweakly continuous. So the class of ultraweakly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms is potentially broader; might be the same, I'm not sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    The ultraweak topology is the coarsest topology such that the normal linear functionals are continuous. But perhaps there are coarser topologies ($mathcalT$) in which, under a *-homomorphism that is continuous in this topology the image of a von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann algebra. In other words, an ultraweak continuous $*$-homomorphism is automatically $mathcalT - mathcalT$-continuous. (Of course one could use trivial topologies. But my question is about a study of the collection of such topologies and identifying other potentially interesting topologies.)
    $endgroup$
    – condexp
    Mar 21 at 12:30







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, weak operator topology also has this property and it is coarser than the ultraweak topology, but it is hardly intrinsic, because it depends on the particular representation as operators on a Hilbert space.
    $endgroup$
    – Mateusz Wasilewski
    Mar 21 at 12:57







1




1




$begingroup$
Ultrastrongly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms are normal, i.e. preserve suprema of bounded, increasing nets, hence they are ultraweakly continuous. So the class of ultraweakly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms is potentially broader; might be the same, I'm not sure.
$endgroup$
– Mateusz Wasilewski
Mar 21 at 12:18




$begingroup$
Ultrastrongly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms are normal, i.e. preserve suprema of bounded, increasing nets, hence they are ultraweakly continuous. So the class of ultraweakly continuous $ast$-homomorphisms is potentially broader; might be the same, I'm not sure.
$endgroup$
– Mateusz Wasilewski
Mar 21 at 12:18












$begingroup$
The ultraweak topology is the coarsest topology such that the normal linear functionals are continuous. But perhaps there are coarser topologies ($mathcalT$) in which, under a *-homomorphism that is continuous in this topology the image of a von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann algebra. In other words, an ultraweak continuous $*$-homomorphism is automatically $mathcalT - mathcalT$-continuous. (Of course one could use trivial topologies. But my question is about a study of the collection of such topologies and identifying other potentially interesting topologies.)
$endgroup$
– condexp
Mar 21 at 12:30





$begingroup$
The ultraweak topology is the coarsest topology such that the normal linear functionals are continuous. But perhaps there are coarser topologies ($mathcalT$) in which, under a *-homomorphism that is continuous in this topology the image of a von Neumann algebra is a von Neumann algebra. In other words, an ultraweak continuous $*$-homomorphism is automatically $mathcalT - mathcalT$-continuous. (Of course one could use trivial topologies. But my question is about a study of the collection of such topologies and identifying other potentially interesting topologies.)
$endgroup$
– condexp
Mar 21 at 12:30





1




1




$begingroup$
Well, weak operator topology also has this property and it is coarser than the ultraweak topology, but it is hardly intrinsic, because it depends on the particular representation as operators on a Hilbert space.
$endgroup$
– Mateusz Wasilewski
Mar 21 at 12:57




$begingroup$
Well, weak operator topology also has this property and it is coarser than the ultraweak topology, but it is hardly intrinsic, because it depends on the particular representation as operators on a Hilbert space.
$endgroup$
– Mateusz Wasilewski
Mar 21 at 12:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

A $*$-homomorphism between two von Neumann algebras is weak* to weak* continuous if and only if it is ultrastrong to ultrastrong continuous. See Proposition III.2.2.2 of Blackadar's book (which, basically, answers all questions of this type that you might have).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    A von Neumann algebra is a $C^*$-algebra $A$ that admits a predual,
    i.e., a Banach space $A_*$ such that there is an isomorphism $Ato(A_*)^*$.



    A morphism of von Neumann algebras is a morphism of $C^*$-algebras $Ato B$ that admits a predual,
    i.e., a morphism of Banach spaces $B_*to A_*$ such that
    $(A_*)^*to (B_*)^*$ is isomorphic to $Ato B$.



    The weak topology induced by the predual on $A$ is precisely the ultraweak topology,
    and so ultraweakly continuous morphisms are precisely those morphisms that admit a predual.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "504"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325949%2fwhy-are-ultraweak-homomorphisms-the-right-morphisms-for-von-neumann-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      A $*$-homomorphism between two von Neumann algebras is weak* to weak* continuous if and only if it is ultrastrong to ultrastrong continuous. See Proposition III.2.2.2 of Blackadar's book (which, basically, answers all questions of this type that you might have).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$

        A $*$-homomorphism between two von Neumann algebras is weak* to weak* continuous if and only if it is ultrastrong to ultrastrong continuous. See Proposition III.2.2.2 of Blackadar's book (which, basically, answers all questions of this type that you might have).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          A $*$-homomorphism between two von Neumann algebras is weak* to weak* continuous if and only if it is ultrastrong to ultrastrong continuous. See Proposition III.2.2.2 of Blackadar's book (which, basically, answers all questions of this type that you might have).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          A $*$-homomorphism between two von Neumann algebras is weak* to weak* continuous if and only if it is ultrastrong to ultrastrong continuous. See Proposition III.2.2.2 of Blackadar's book (which, basically, answers all questions of this type that you might have).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 21 at 13:40









          Nik WeaverNik Weaver

          22k150131




          22k150131





















              2












              $begingroup$

              A von Neumann algebra is a $C^*$-algebra $A$ that admits a predual,
              i.e., a Banach space $A_*$ such that there is an isomorphism $Ato(A_*)^*$.



              A morphism of von Neumann algebras is a morphism of $C^*$-algebras $Ato B$ that admits a predual,
              i.e., a morphism of Banach spaces $B_*to A_*$ such that
              $(A_*)^*to (B_*)^*$ is isomorphic to $Ato B$.



              The weak topology induced by the predual on $A$ is precisely the ultraweak topology,
              and so ultraweakly continuous morphisms are precisely those morphisms that admit a predual.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                A von Neumann algebra is a $C^*$-algebra $A$ that admits a predual,
                i.e., a Banach space $A_*$ such that there is an isomorphism $Ato(A_*)^*$.



                A morphism of von Neumann algebras is a morphism of $C^*$-algebras $Ato B$ that admits a predual,
                i.e., a morphism of Banach spaces $B_*to A_*$ such that
                $(A_*)^*to (B_*)^*$ is isomorphic to $Ato B$.



                The weak topology induced by the predual on $A$ is precisely the ultraweak topology,
                and so ultraweakly continuous morphisms are precisely those morphisms that admit a predual.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  A von Neumann algebra is a $C^*$-algebra $A$ that admits a predual,
                  i.e., a Banach space $A_*$ such that there is an isomorphism $Ato(A_*)^*$.



                  A morphism of von Neumann algebras is a morphism of $C^*$-algebras $Ato B$ that admits a predual,
                  i.e., a morphism of Banach spaces $B_*to A_*$ such that
                  $(A_*)^*to (B_*)^*$ is isomorphic to $Ato B$.



                  The weak topology induced by the predual on $A$ is precisely the ultraweak topology,
                  and so ultraweakly continuous morphisms are precisely those morphisms that admit a predual.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  A von Neumann algebra is a $C^*$-algebra $A$ that admits a predual,
                  i.e., a Banach space $A_*$ such that there is an isomorphism $Ato(A_*)^*$.



                  A morphism of von Neumann algebras is a morphism of $C^*$-algebras $Ato B$ that admits a predual,
                  i.e., a morphism of Banach spaces $B_*to A_*$ such that
                  $(A_*)^*to (B_*)^*$ is isomorphic to $Ato B$.



                  The weak topology induced by the predual on $A$ is precisely the ultraweak topology,
                  and so ultraweakly continuous morphisms are precisely those morphisms that admit a predual.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 21 at 15:29









                  LSpice

                  2,87822627




                  2,87822627










                  answered Mar 21 at 14:32









                  Dmitri PavlovDmitri Pavlov

                  13.7k43486




                  13.7k43486



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325949%2fwhy-are-ultraweak-homomorphisms-the-right-morphisms-for-von-neumann-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

                      Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript