Decorator Causing All Functions to Return TrueCalling a function of a module by using its name (a string)How to return multiple values from a function?Using global variables in a functionHow to make a chain of function decorators?How to upgrade all python packages with pip?How do I list all files of a directory?python, confused in decorate and closureHow does the @property decorator work?python decorator for class methodsGet access to kwargs and args at the wrapper of decorator

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

Nails holding drywall

Complex numbers z=-3-4i polar form

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?

Find the identical rows in a matrix

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum

Multiple fireplaces in an apartment building?

Unknown code in script

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

Drawing a german abacus as in the books of Adam Ries

Which big number is bigger?

Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

A ​Note ​on ​N!



Decorator Causing All Functions to Return True


Calling a function of a module by using its name (a string)How to return multiple values from a function?Using global variables in a functionHow to make a chain of function decorators?How to upgrade all python packages with pip?How do I list all files of a directory?python, confused in decorate and closureHow does the @property decorator work?python decorator for class methodsGet access to kwargs and args at the wrapper of decorator






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















In an attempt to debug an online permissions system I was having problems with, I've created a couple of classes and functions designed to replicate the issue offline. Unfortunately, I'm having a problem, in which turning a function into a decorator completely changes the results of a decorated function.



My code is as follows, I've kept it as basic as possible, to illustrate my point.




  1. Setting up User class:



    class User(object):

    def __init__(self, forename=None, surname=None, logged_in=True, exists=True, poop=False, admin=False):
    self.forename = forename
    self.surname = surname
    self.logged_in = logged_in
    self.exists = exists
    self.poop = poop
    self.admin = admin

    def __repr__(self):
    return f'User: self.forename self.surname.'

    user1 = User('Paddy', 'McHugh', True, True, False, True)
    user2 = User('Rodney', 'Donger', False, False, True, False)
    user3 = User('Bob', 'Dangler', True, True, True, True)



  2. Creating functions to test against a user:



    def user_just_is(user):
    return user.exists


    def user_is_poop(user):
    return user.poop


    def user_is_admin(user):
    return user.admin



  3. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a regular function:



    class Permissions2(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return

    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    else:
    print('All of the conditions were met.')


    Permissions2().requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)



  4. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a decorator function:



    class Permissions(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    def decorator(func):
    @wraps(func)
    def allower(*args, **kwargs):
    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return


    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    return

    return func(*args, **kwargs)

    return allower

    return decorator


    @Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)
    def print_stuff():
    print('All of the conditions were met.')

    print_stuff()


I'd expect the outcome of both the regular and decorator function to be the same. That if User.logged_in == False, then it would print: 'You're not logged in, please log in.'. That if all the Boolean variables were True, it would print: 'All of the conditions were met.'. That if any of the conditions were False, it would print: 'Not all of the conditions were met.'.



The decorator function still returns the 'You're not logged in, please log in', but if User.logged_if == True, then the other Booleans don't matter, it always returns True to the all() function and print 'All of the conditions were met.'.



What is it about putting it in a decorator that means all() seems to return True to all of the tested functions?










share|improve this question
























  • fwiw, print returns None

    – DeepSpace
    Mar 22 at 16:27











  • Why do you keep returning the result of print calls? That will always return None

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:28











  • @DeepSpace @juanpa.arrivillaga Apologies, that was just a leftover from when I was testing if that made a difference. Edited now. I do want to return None, however, to prevent the decorated function from returning, no?

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 16:32

















1















In an attempt to debug an online permissions system I was having problems with, I've created a couple of classes and functions designed to replicate the issue offline. Unfortunately, I'm having a problem, in which turning a function into a decorator completely changes the results of a decorated function.



My code is as follows, I've kept it as basic as possible, to illustrate my point.




  1. Setting up User class:



    class User(object):

    def __init__(self, forename=None, surname=None, logged_in=True, exists=True, poop=False, admin=False):
    self.forename = forename
    self.surname = surname
    self.logged_in = logged_in
    self.exists = exists
    self.poop = poop
    self.admin = admin

    def __repr__(self):
    return f'User: self.forename self.surname.'

    user1 = User('Paddy', 'McHugh', True, True, False, True)
    user2 = User('Rodney', 'Donger', False, False, True, False)
    user3 = User('Bob', 'Dangler', True, True, True, True)



  2. Creating functions to test against a user:



    def user_just_is(user):
    return user.exists


    def user_is_poop(user):
    return user.poop


    def user_is_admin(user):
    return user.admin



  3. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a regular function:



    class Permissions2(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return

    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    else:
    print('All of the conditions were met.')


    Permissions2().requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)



  4. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a decorator function:



    class Permissions(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    def decorator(func):
    @wraps(func)
    def allower(*args, **kwargs):
    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return


    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    return

    return func(*args, **kwargs)

    return allower

    return decorator


    @Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)
    def print_stuff():
    print('All of the conditions were met.')

    print_stuff()


I'd expect the outcome of both the regular and decorator function to be the same. That if User.logged_in == False, then it would print: 'You're not logged in, please log in.'. That if all the Boolean variables were True, it would print: 'All of the conditions were met.'. That if any of the conditions were False, it would print: 'Not all of the conditions were met.'.



The decorator function still returns the 'You're not logged in, please log in', but if User.logged_if == True, then the other Booleans don't matter, it always returns True to the all() function and print 'All of the conditions were met.'.



What is it about putting it in a decorator that means all() seems to return True to all of the tested functions?










share|improve this question
























  • fwiw, print returns None

    – DeepSpace
    Mar 22 at 16:27











  • Why do you keep returning the result of print calls? That will always return None

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:28











  • @DeepSpace @juanpa.arrivillaga Apologies, that was just a leftover from when I was testing if that made a difference. Edited now. I do want to return None, however, to prevent the decorated function from returning, no?

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 16:32













1












1








1








In an attempt to debug an online permissions system I was having problems with, I've created a couple of classes and functions designed to replicate the issue offline. Unfortunately, I'm having a problem, in which turning a function into a decorator completely changes the results of a decorated function.



My code is as follows, I've kept it as basic as possible, to illustrate my point.




  1. Setting up User class:



    class User(object):

    def __init__(self, forename=None, surname=None, logged_in=True, exists=True, poop=False, admin=False):
    self.forename = forename
    self.surname = surname
    self.logged_in = logged_in
    self.exists = exists
    self.poop = poop
    self.admin = admin

    def __repr__(self):
    return f'User: self.forename self.surname.'

    user1 = User('Paddy', 'McHugh', True, True, False, True)
    user2 = User('Rodney', 'Donger', False, False, True, False)
    user3 = User('Bob', 'Dangler', True, True, True, True)



  2. Creating functions to test against a user:



    def user_just_is(user):
    return user.exists


    def user_is_poop(user):
    return user.poop


    def user_is_admin(user):
    return user.admin



  3. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a regular function:



    class Permissions2(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return

    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    else:
    print('All of the conditions were met.')


    Permissions2().requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)



  4. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a decorator function:



    class Permissions(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    def decorator(func):
    @wraps(func)
    def allower(*args, **kwargs):
    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return


    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    return

    return func(*args, **kwargs)

    return allower

    return decorator


    @Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)
    def print_stuff():
    print('All of the conditions were met.')

    print_stuff()


I'd expect the outcome of both the regular and decorator function to be the same. That if User.logged_in == False, then it would print: 'You're not logged in, please log in.'. That if all the Boolean variables were True, it would print: 'All of the conditions were met.'. That if any of the conditions were False, it would print: 'Not all of the conditions were met.'.



The decorator function still returns the 'You're not logged in, please log in', but if User.logged_if == True, then the other Booleans don't matter, it always returns True to the all() function and print 'All of the conditions were met.'.



What is it about putting it in a decorator that means all() seems to return True to all of the tested functions?










share|improve this question
















In an attempt to debug an online permissions system I was having problems with, I've created a couple of classes and functions designed to replicate the issue offline. Unfortunately, I'm having a problem, in which turning a function into a decorator completely changes the results of a decorated function.



My code is as follows, I've kept it as basic as possible, to illustrate my point.




  1. Setting up User class:



    class User(object):

    def __init__(self, forename=None, surname=None, logged_in=True, exists=True, poop=False, admin=False):
    self.forename = forename
    self.surname = surname
    self.logged_in = logged_in
    self.exists = exists
    self.poop = poop
    self.admin = admin

    def __repr__(self):
    return f'User: self.forename self.surname.'

    user1 = User('Paddy', 'McHugh', True, True, False, True)
    user2 = User('Rodney', 'Donger', False, False, True, False)
    user3 = User('Bob', 'Dangler', True, True, True, True)



  2. Creating functions to test against a user:



    def user_just_is(user):
    return user.exists


    def user_is_poop(user):
    return user.poop


    def user_is_admin(user):
    return user.admin



  3. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a regular function:



    class Permissions2(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return

    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    else:
    print('All of the conditions were met.')


    Permissions2().requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)



  4. Testing those functions against the chosen user with a decorator function:



    class Permissions(object):

    def __init__(self):
    pass

    def requires(self, *args):
    user = user2

    def decorator(func):
    @wraps(func)
    def allower(*args, **kwargs):
    if not user.logged_in:
    print('You're not logged in, please log in.')
    return


    if not all(i(user) for i in args):
    print('Not all of the conditions were met.')
    return

    return func(*args, **kwargs)

    return allower

    return decorator


    @Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)
    def print_stuff():
    print('All of the conditions were met.')

    print_stuff()


I'd expect the outcome of both the regular and decorator function to be the same. That if User.logged_in == False, then it would print: 'You're not logged in, please log in.'. That if all the Boolean variables were True, it would print: 'All of the conditions were met.'. That if any of the conditions were False, it would print: 'Not all of the conditions were met.'.



The decorator function still returns the 'You're not logged in, please log in', but if User.logged_if == True, then the other Booleans don't matter, it always returns True to the all() function and print 'All of the conditions were met.'.



What is it about putting it in a decorator that means all() seems to return True to all of the tested functions?







python






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 16:30







patrick.mchugh4

















asked Mar 22 at 16:21









patrick.mchugh4patrick.mchugh4

155




155












  • fwiw, print returns None

    – DeepSpace
    Mar 22 at 16:27











  • Why do you keep returning the result of print calls? That will always return None

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:28











  • @DeepSpace @juanpa.arrivillaga Apologies, that was just a leftover from when I was testing if that made a difference. Edited now. I do want to return None, however, to prevent the decorated function from returning, no?

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 16:32

















  • fwiw, print returns None

    – DeepSpace
    Mar 22 at 16:27











  • Why do you keep returning the result of print calls? That will always return None

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:28











  • @DeepSpace @juanpa.arrivillaga Apologies, that was just a leftover from when I was testing if that made a difference. Edited now. I do want to return None, however, to prevent the decorated function from returning, no?

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 16:32
















fwiw, print returns None

– DeepSpace
Mar 22 at 16:27





fwiw, print returns None

– DeepSpace
Mar 22 at 16:27













Why do you keep returning the result of print calls? That will always return None

– juanpa.arrivillaga
Mar 22 at 16:28





Why do you keep returning the result of print calls? That will always return None

– juanpa.arrivillaga
Mar 22 at 16:28













@DeepSpace @juanpa.arrivillaga Apologies, that was just a leftover from when I was testing if that made a difference. Edited now. I do want to return None, however, to prevent the decorated function from returning, no?

– patrick.mchugh4
Mar 22 at 16:32





@DeepSpace @juanpa.arrivillaga Apologies, that was just a leftover from when I was testing if that made a difference. Edited now. I do want to return None, however, to prevent the decorated function from returning, no?

– patrick.mchugh4
Mar 22 at 16:32












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














The args parameter for your allower function shadows the args parameter of requires, so when you iterate over args here:



if not all(i(user) for i in args):


you are not iterating through the list of functions passed in to requires as args anymore, but rather the args passed to the decorated function. You should rename the parameter to avoid the naming conflict.



Moreover, you're defining Permissions.requires as an instance method so its first parameter is self, the object that the method is bound to, so when you call:



@Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)


user_just_is is passed as self, rather than becoming part of args. Since requires does not actually make use of self, it should be defined as a static method instead.



So with the above issues fixed, your Permissions class should look like:



class Permissions(object):
@staticmethod
def requires(*conditions):
user = user2

def decorator(func):
@wraps(func)
def allower(*args, **kwargs):
if not user.logged_in:
return print('You're not logged in, please log in.')

if not all(i(user) for i in conditions):
return print('Not all of the conditions were met.')

return func(*args, **kwargs)

return allower

return decorator





share|improve this answer























  • It should just be defined outside the class

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:41











  • Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

    – blhsing
    Mar 22 at 17:04












  • The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 17:18







  • 1





    @blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 19:50











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55303870%2fdecorator-causing-all-functions-to-return-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














The args parameter for your allower function shadows the args parameter of requires, so when you iterate over args here:



if not all(i(user) for i in args):


you are not iterating through the list of functions passed in to requires as args anymore, but rather the args passed to the decorated function. You should rename the parameter to avoid the naming conflict.



Moreover, you're defining Permissions.requires as an instance method so its first parameter is self, the object that the method is bound to, so when you call:



@Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)


user_just_is is passed as self, rather than becoming part of args. Since requires does not actually make use of self, it should be defined as a static method instead.



So with the above issues fixed, your Permissions class should look like:



class Permissions(object):
@staticmethod
def requires(*conditions):
user = user2

def decorator(func):
@wraps(func)
def allower(*args, **kwargs):
if not user.logged_in:
return print('You're not logged in, please log in.')

if not all(i(user) for i in conditions):
return print('Not all of the conditions were met.')

return func(*args, **kwargs)

return allower

return decorator





share|improve this answer























  • It should just be defined outside the class

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:41











  • Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

    – blhsing
    Mar 22 at 17:04












  • The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 17:18







  • 1





    @blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 19:50















2














The args parameter for your allower function shadows the args parameter of requires, so when you iterate over args here:



if not all(i(user) for i in args):


you are not iterating through the list of functions passed in to requires as args anymore, but rather the args passed to the decorated function. You should rename the parameter to avoid the naming conflict.



Moreover, you're defining Permissions.requires as an instance method so its first parameter is self, the object that the method is bound to, so when you call:



@Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)


user_just_is is passed as self, rather than becoming part of args. Since requires does not actually make use of self, it should be defined as a static method instead.



So with the above issues fixed, your Permissions class should look like:



class Permissions(object):
@staticmethod
def requires(*conditions):
user = user2

def decorator(func):
@wraps(func)
def allower(*args, **kwargs):
if not user.logged_in:
return print('You're not logged in, please log in.')

if not all(i(user) for i in conditions):
return print('Not all of the conditions were met.')

return func(*args, **kwargs)

return allower

return decorator





share|improve this answer























  • It should just be defined outside the class

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:41











  • Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

    – blhsing
    Mar 22 at 17:04












  • The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 17:18







  • 1





    @blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 19:50













2












2








2







The args parameter for your allower function shadows the args parameter of requires, so when you iterate over args here:



if not all(i(user) for i in args):


you are not iterating through the list of functions passed in to requires as args anymore, but rather the args passed to the decorated function. You should rename the parameter to avoid the naming conflict.



Moreover, you're defining Permissions.requires as an instance method so its first parameter is self, the object that the method is bound to, so when you call:



@Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)


user_just_is is passed as self, rather than becoming part of args. Since requires does not actually make use of self, it should be defined as a static method instead.



So with the above issues fixed, your Permissions class should look like:



class Permissions(object):
@staticmethod
def requires(*conditions):
user = user2

def decorator(func):
@wraps(func)
def allower(*args, **kwargs):
if not user.logged_in:
return print('You're not logged in, please log in.')

if not all(i(user) for i in conditions):
return print('Not all of the conditions were met.')

return func(*args, **kwargs)

return allower

return decorator





share|improve this answer













The args parameter for your allower function shadows the args parameter of requires, so when you iterate over args here:



if not all(i(user) for i in args):


you are not iterating through the list of functions passed in to requires as args anymore, but rather the args passed to the decorated function. You should rename the parameter to avoid the naming conflict.



Moreover, you're defining Permissions.requires as an instance method so its first parameter is self, the object that the method is bound to, so when you call:



@Permissions.requires(user_just_is, user_is_poop, user_is_admin)


user_just_is is passed as self, rather than becoming part of args. Since requires does not actually make use of self, it should be defined as a static method instead.



So with the above issues fixed, your Permissions class should look like:



class Permissions(object):
@staticmethod
def requires(*conditions):
user = user2

def decorator(func):
@wraps(func)
def allower(*args, **kwargs):
if not user.logged_in:
return print('You're not logged in, please log in.')

if not all(i(user) for i in conditions):
return print('Not all of the conditions were met.')

return func(*args, **kwargs)

return allower

return decorator






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 22 at 16:31









blhsingblhsing

45.2k51747




45.2k51747












  • It should just be defined outside the class

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:41











  • Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

    – blhsing
    Mar 22 at 17:04












  • The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 17:18







  • 1





    @blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 19:50

















  • It should just be defined outside the class

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 16:41











  • Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

    – blhsing
    Mar 22 at 17:04












  • The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

    – juanpa.arrivillaga
    Mar 22 at 17:18







  • 1





    @blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

    – patrick.mchugh4
    Mar 22 at 19:50
















It should just be defined outside the class

– juanpa.arrivillaga
Mar 22 at 16:41





It should just be defined outside the class

– juanpa.arrivillaga
Mar 22 at 16:41













Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

– blhsing
Mar 22 at 17:04






Static methods can always be defined outside the class, but are usually defined as static methods just to group similarly-purposed functions together for better readability. So if the OP does have other permission-related decorators not shown here then it can make sense to keep requires as a static method of the Permissions class.

– blhsing
Mar 22 at 17:04














The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

– juanpa.arrivillaga
Mar 22 at 17:18






The natural way to namespace a bunch of functions that don't require shared state is to just use a module. At the end, though, it is a matter of taste.

– juanpa.arrivillaga
Mar 22 at 17:18





1




1





@blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

– patrick.mchugh4
Mar 22 at 19:50





@blhsing you absolute hero, that's done the trick! Thanks very much!

– patrick.mchugh4
Mar 22 at 19:50



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55303870%2fdecorator-causing-all-functions-to-return-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현