Algorithm for Validation of Reference File with WildcardsWhat is stability in sorting algorithms and why is it important?Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?What is the best algorithm for an overridden System.Object.GetHashCode?How do I create a file and write to it in Java?How to avoid Java code in JSP files?Easy interview question got harder: given numbers 1..100, find the missing number(s) given exactly k are missingUkkonen's suffix tree algorithm in plain EnglishImage Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionHow to find time complexity of an algorithmBomb dropping algorithmWhat is the optimal algorithm for the game 2048?

How can I support myself financially as a 17 year old with a loan?

Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?

If I readied a spell with the trigger "When I take damage", do I have to make a constitution saving throw to avoid losing Concentration?

Shantae Dance Matching

Why isn't nylon as strong as kevlar?

Which module had more 'comfort' in terms of living space, the Lunar Module or the Command module?

Building a list of products from the elements in another list

As matter approaches a black hole, does it speed up?

How to apply differences on part of a list and keep the rest

Has a commercial or military jet bi-plane ever been manufactured?

Getting a W on your transcript for grad school applications

Can my company stop me from working overtime?

How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?

What was the first instance of a "planet eater" in sci-fi?

Verb "geeitet" in an old scientific text

Make some Prime Squares!

Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?

Set collection doesn't always enforce uniqueness with the Date datatype? Does the following example seem correct?

Would Hubble Space Telescope improve black hole image observed by EHT if it joined array of telesopes?

Pressure inside an infinite ocean?

How to model the curly cable part of the phone

Why Isn’t SQL More Refactorable?

Send iMessage from Firefox

Have I damaged my car by attempting to reverse with hand/park brake up?



Algorithm for Validation of Reference File with Wildcards


What is stability in sorting algorithms and why is it important?Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?What is the best algorithm for an overridden System.Object.GetHashCode?How do I create a file and write to it in Java?How to avoid Java code in JSP files?Easy interview question got harder: given numbers 1..100, find the missing number(s) given exactly k are missingUkkonen's suffix tree algorithm in plain EnglishImage Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionHow to find time complexity of an algorithmBomb dropping algorithmWhat is the optimal algorithm for the game 2048?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








3















I have a file like below, which I want to validate for correctness. The file is used as a reference file for processing some data. I match my input data with ColA, ColB and ColC of this file and return OutA of the first match from top. The wildcards '*' match anything. For example, if my input data has X4 Y2 Z3 it will return 13 from the file.



Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
1 X1 Y1 Z1 10
2 X2 Y2 * 11
3 X3 * Z2 12
4 * Y2 Z3 13
5 * * Z4 14
6 * Y3 Z4 15
7 * * * 16


Now the file can have some entries that are never used or reachable. For example, if I receive X9 Y3 Z4 as my input, it will match with row 5, and will never look at row 6 although row 6 also matches my input. If we exchange the position of row 5 and row 6, it will work as expected. I want to find such unreachable records before my actual process runs.



Any idea on how to find such entries in the file. I am looking for an algorithm. Note that, I have reduced the number of columns and rows in this example. The actual file has around 10 columns and 50 rows.










share|improve this question






























    3















    I have a file like below, which I want to validate for correctness. The file is used as a reference file for processing some data. I match my input data with ColA, ColB and ColC of this file and return OutA of the first match from top. The wildcards '*' match anything. For example, if my input data has X4 Y2 Z3 it will return 13 from the file.



    Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
    1 X1 Y1 Z1 10
    2 X2 Y2 * 11
    3 X3 * Z2 12
    4 * Y2 Z3 13
    5 * * Z4 14
    6 * Y3 Z4 15
    7 * * * 16


    Now the file can have some entries that are never used or reachable. For example, if I receive X9 Y3 Z4 as my input, it will match with row 5, and will never look at row 6 although row 6 also matches my input. If we exchange the position of row 5 and row 6, it will work as expected. I want to find such unreachable records before my actual process runs.



    Any idea on how to find such entries in the file. I am looking for an algorithm. Note that, I have reduced the number of columns and rows in this example. The actual file has around 10 columns and 50 rows.










    share|improve this question


























      3












      3








      3


      0






      I have a file like below, which I want to validate for correctness. The file is used as a reference file for processing some data. I match my input data with ColA, ColB and ColC of this file and return OutA of the first match from top. The wildcards '*' match anything. For example, if my input data has X4 Y2 Z3 it will return 13 from the file.



      Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
      1 X1 Y1 Z1 10
      2 X2 Y2 * 11
      3 X3 * Z2 12
      4 * Y2 Z3 13
      5 * * Z4 14
      6 * Y3 Z4 15
      7 * * * 16


      Now the file can have some entries that are never used or reachable. For example, if I receive X9 Y3 Z4 as my input, it will match with row 5, and will never look at row 6 although row 6 also matches my input. If we exchange the position of row 5 and row 6, it will work as expected. I want to find such unreachable records before my actual process runs.



      Any idea on how to find such entries in the file. I am looking for an algorithm. Note that, I have reduced the number of columns and rows in this example. The actual file has around 10 columns and 50 rows.










      share|improve this question
















      I have a file like below, which I want to validate for correctness. The file is used as a reference file for processing some data. I match my input data with ColA, ColB and ColC of this file and return OutA of the first match from top. The wildcards '*' match anything. For example, if my input data has X4 Y2 Z3 it will return 13 from the file.



      Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
      1 X1 Y1 Z1 10
      2 X2 Y2 * 11
      3 X3 * Z2 12
      4 * Y2 Z3 13
      5 * * Z4 14
      6 * Y3 Z4 15
      7 * * * 16


      Now the file can have some entries that are never used or reachable. For example, if I receive X9 Y3 Z4 as my input, it will match with row 5, and will never look at row 6 although row 6 also matches my input. If we exchange the position of row 5 and row 6, it will work as expected. I want to find such unreachable records before my actual process runs.



      Any idea on how to find such entries in the file. I am looking for an algorithm. Note that, I have reduced the number of columns and rows in this example. The actual file has around 10 columns and 50 rows.







      java algorithm






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 23 at 0:10







      Samik

















      asked Mar 22 at 22:15









      SamikSamik

      2,84711621




      2,84711621






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Assuming that wildcards match every string (specifically, for each column, there exists a valid symbol that does not appear as a literal), it suffices to check each pair of rows to see whether the first matches a superset of what the second matches. This is the case if and only if, for each column, if the second row has a literal, and then first row has the same literal or a wildcard, and if the second row has a wildcard, then the first row has a wildcard.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 4:56


















          2














          I would take the approach most web servers use to match request urls to controllers. They take exactly that controller, which fits the resource url best.



          /users
          /users/userId


          If you see a request like /users/2 you would, of course, prefer the second resource controller.



          Now back to your problem, the varibale part (you want to match best) relates to the use of *. If you want to achieve a best-fit, you have to sort all entries, those with the lowest amount of * at the top, those with the highest at the bottom. (Since you iterate from top to bottom and return upon first match.)



          However, for all entries that have the same amount of *, there can be mutliple fitting rows and there is no way to prevent that. You have to decide, which is one taken.



          An simple example demonstrates this:



          Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
          20 X3 * Z3 12
          21 * Y2 Z3 13


          What do you do with X3, Y2, Z3? The output is not clear and will depend on the sort order. My adwise: Use a stable sorting algorithm to make the output predictable.



          For implementation, just create a custom comparator that counts the amount of * used.



          A quick look at List#sort also shows, that a stable sorting algorithm is already used so you don´t have to worry about it. (Reference)




          This implementation is a stable, adaptive, iterative mergesort [...]







          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:04











          • On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:30












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55308474%2falgorithm-for-validation-of-reference-file-with-wildcards%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Assuming that wildcards match every string (specifically, for each column, there exists a valid symbol that does not appear as a literal), it suffices to check each pair of rows to see whether the first matches a superset of what the second matches. This is the case if and only if, for each column, if the second row has a literal, and then first row has the same literal or a wildcard, and if the second row has a wildcard, then the first row has a wildcard.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 4:56















          2














          Assuming that wildcards match every string (specifically, for each column, there exists a valid symbol that does not appear as a literal), it suffices to check each pair of rows to see whether the first matches a superset of what the second matches. This is the case if and only if, for each column, if the second row has a literal, and then first row has the same literal or a wildcard, and if the second row has a wildcard, then the first row has a wildcard.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 4:56













          2












          2








          2







          Assuming that wildcards match every string (specifically, for each column, there exists a valid symbol that does not appear as a literal), it suffices to check each pair of rows to see whether the first matches a superset of what the second matches. This is the case if and only if, for each column, if the second row has a literal, and then first row has the same literal or a wildcard, and if the second row has a wildcard, then the first row has a wildcard.






          share|improve this answer













          Assuming that wildcards match every string (specifically, for each column, there exists a valid symbol that does not appear as a literal), it suffices to check each pair of rows to see whether the first matches a superset of what the second matches. This is the case if and only if, for each column, if the second row has a literal, and then first row has the same literal or a wildcard, and if the second row has a wildcard, then the first row has a wildcard.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 23 at 4:32









          David EisenstatDavid Eisenstat

          38.8k73576




          38.8k73576












          • Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 4:56

















          • Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 4:56
















          Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

          – Samik
          Mar 23 at 4:56





          Thanks David. So for my 50 row file, I have to do (49+48+...+3+2+1) row compares, which isn't bad. I will try this.

          – Samik
          Mar 23 at 4:56













          2














          I would take the approach most web servers use to match request urls to controllers. They take exactly that controller, which fits the resource url best.



          /users
          /users/userId


          If you see a request like /users/2 you would, of course, prefer the second resource controller.



          Now back to your problem, the varibale part (you want to match best) relates to the use of *. If you want to achieve a best-fit, you have to sort all entries, those with the lowest amount of * at the top, those with the highest at the bottom. (Since you iterate from top to bottom and return upon first match.)



          However, for all entries that have the same amount of *, there can be mutliple fitting rows and there is no way to prevent that. You have to decide, which is one taken.



          An simple example demonstrates this:



          Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
          20 X3 * Z3 12
          21 * Y2 Z3 13


          What do you do with X3, Y2, Z3? The output is not clear and will depend on the sort order. My adwise: Use a stable sorting algorithm to make the output predictable.



          For implementation, just create a custom comparator that counts the amount of * used.



          A quick look at List#sort also shows, that a stable sorting algorithm is already used so you don´t have to worry about it. (Reference)




          This implementation is a stable, adaptive, iterative mergesort [...]







          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:04











          • On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:30
















          2














          I would take the approach most web servers use to match request urls to controllers. They take exactly that controller, which fits the resource url best.



          /users
          /users/userId


          If you see a request like /users/2 you would, of course, prefer the second resource controller.



          Now back to your problem, the varibale part (you want to match best) relates to the use of *. If you want to achieve a best-fit, you have to sort all entries, those with the lowest amount of * at the top, those with the highest at the bottom. (Since you iterate from top to bottom and return upon first match.)



          However, for all entries that have the same amount of *, there can be mutliple fitting rows and there is no way to prevent that. You have to decide, which is one taken.



          An simple example demonstrates this:



          Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
          20 X3 * Z3 12
          21 * Y2 Z3 13


          What do you do with X3, Y2, Z3? The output is not clear and will depend on the sort order. My adwise: Use a stable sorting algorithm to make the output predictable.



          For implementation, just create a custom comparator that counts the amount of * used.



          A quick look at List#sort also shows, that a stable sorting algorithm is already used so you don´t have to worry about it. (Reference)




          This implementation is a stable, adaptive, iterative mergesort [...]







          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:04











          • On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:30














          2












          2








          2







          I would take the approach most web servers use to match request urls to controllers. They take exactly that controller, which fits the resource url best.



          /users
          /users/userId


          If you see a request like /users/2 you would, of course, prefer the second resource controller.



          Now back to your problem, the varibale part (you want to match best) relates to the use of *. If you want to achieve a best-fit, you have to sort all entries, those with the lowest amount of * at the top, those with the highest at the bottom. (Since you iterate from top to bottom and return upon first match.)



          However, for all entries that have the same amount of *, there can be mutliple fitting rows and there is no way to prevent that. You have to decide, which is one taken.



          An simple example demonstrates this:



          Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
          20 X3 * Z3 12
          21 * Y2 Z3 13


          What do you do with X3, Y2, Z3? The output is not clear and will depend on the sort order. My adwise: Use a stable sorting algorithm to make the output predictable.



          For implementation, just create a custom comparator that counts the amount of * used.



          A quick look at List#sort also shows, that a stable sorting algorithm is already used so you don´t have to worry about it. (Reference)




          This implementation is a stable, adaptive, iterative mergesort [...]







          share|improve this answer















          I would take the approach most web servers use to match request urls to controllers. They take exactly that controller, which fits the resource url best.



          /users
          /users/userId


          If you see a request like /users/2 you would, of course, prefer the second resource controller.



          Now back to your problem, the varibale part (you want to match best) relates to the use of *. If you want to achieve a best-fit, you have to sort all entries, those with the lowest amount of * at the top, those with the highest at the bottom. (Since you iterate from top to bottom and return upon first match.)



          However, for all entries that have the same amount of *, there can be mutliple fitting rows and there is no way to prevent that. You have to decide, which is one taken.



          An simple example demonstrates this:



          Seq ColA ColB ColC OutA
          20 X3 * Z3 12
          21 * Y2 Z3 13


          What do you do with X3, Y2, Z3? The output is not clear and will depend on the sort order. My adwise: Use a stable sorting algorithm to make the output predictable.



          For implementation, just create a custom comparator that counts the amount of * used.



          A quick look at List#sort also shows, that a stable sorting algorithm is already used so you don´t have to worry about it. (Reference)




          This implementation is a stable, adaptive, iterative mergesort [...]








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 22 at 23:14

























          answered Mar 22 at 23:07









          GlainsGlains

          1,270920




          1,270920












          • Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:04











          • On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:30


















          • Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:04











          • On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

            – Samik
            Mar 23 at 0:30

















          Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

          – Samik
          Mar 23 at 0:04





          Thanks Glains. Stable sort looks promising. But since the file is maintained by our end users, I would rather alert them on the wrong sort order instead of sorting it myself. I guess what I was asking can be accomplished by simply counting the number of * and find out at which row it decreased.

          – Samik
          Mar 23 at 0:04













          On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

          – Samik
          Mar 23 at 0:30






          On second thought, that is not going to work. if I have two entries like this X4 * */X5 Y5 * . They are perfectly valid.

          – Samik
          Mar 23 at 0:30


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55308474%2falgorithm-for-validation-of-reference-file-with-wildcards%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현