Mocking new instance creation inside testing class using mockitoEfficiency of Java “Double Brace Initialization”?How to make mock to void methods with MockitoInjecting Mockito mocks into a Spring beanHow to mock an exception when creating an instance of a new class using MockitoMocking static methods with PowerMock and MockitoNeed to mock creation of a object inside a constructor of the class to be testedMockito: inject a class mock into a private interface fieldMocking constructor and static method from same class with Mockito and PowermockMock final class with Mockito 2Mockito cannot mock this class: interface
Which are the methodologies for interpreting Vedas?
Approach sick days in feedback meeting
Is it good practice to create tables dynamically?
Realistic, logical way for men with medieval-era weaponry to compete with much larger and physically stronger foes
Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone
Undocumented incompatibility between changes and siunitx?
Why would a car salesman tell me not to get my credit pulled again?
Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?
Do Veracrypt encrypted volumes have any kind of brute force protection?
What's the difference between DHCP and NAT? Are they mutually exclusive?
Why didn't all the iron and heavier elements find their way to the center of the accretion disc in the early solar system?
Print "N NE E SE S SW W NW"
Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?
About the paper by Buekenhout, Delandtsheer, Doyen, Kleidman, Liebeck and Saxl
Why are ambiguous grammars bad?
Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship
Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?
Are athlete's college degrees discounted by employers and graduate school admissions?
Do they make "karaoke" versions of concertos for solo practice?
A team managed by my peer is close to melting down
Idiom for 'person who gets violent when drunk"
How to represent jealousy in a cute way?
ISP is not hashing the password I log in with online. Should I take any action?
Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?
Mocking new instance creation inside testing class using mockito
Efficiency of Java “Double Brace Initialization”?How to make mock to void methods with MockitoInjecting Mockito mocks into a Spring beanHow to mock an exception when creating an instance of a new class using MockitoMocking static methods with PowerMock and MockitoNeed to mock creation of a object inside a constructor of the class to be testedMockito: inject a class mock into a private interface fieldMocking constructor and static method from same class with Mockito and PowermockMock final class with Mockito 2Mockito cannot mock this class: interface
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I am attempting to mock the new instance of an object inside the class I'm testing but I'm struggling to find a way to do this using Mockito.
If I understand this correctly, this might be something that can be achieved using Powermock but I only have Mockito at my disposal I can use.
Here's what I'm trying to do
private class MyTestClass
private doSomethingMethod()
Object obj = new Object();
obj.getSomething;
I am currently spying on MyTest class and would like to mock the new Object so that I can manipulate the result of obj.getSomething()
Is this something achievable using Mockito?
Thank you
java initialization mockito spy
|
show 1 more comment
I am attempting to mock the new instance of an object inside the class I'm testing but I'm struggling to find a way to do this using Mockito.
If I understand this correctly, this might be something that can be achieved using Powermock but I only have Mockito at my disposal I can use.
Here's what I'm trying to do
private class MyTestClass
private doSomethingMethod()
Object obj = new Object();
obj.getSomething;
I am currently spying on MyTest class and would like to mock the new Object so that I can manipulate the result of obj.getSomething()
Is this something achievable using Mockito?
Thank you
java initialization mockito spy
Unfortunately, Powermock(ito) is one answer. Mockito doesn't intercept object instantiation :( ** Edit - unless you move the object instantiation to a new package-visible method and then mock the response to that method in your spy. But then your code is written at the whim of your tests.
– Not a JD
Mar 25 at 0:47
Without PowerMock you will need to refactor your code to make the instance available for mocking, for example, moving your object creation to a factory or a provider method, and then mock the method/factory return accodingly
– nullptr
Mar 25 at 1:12
Check this out. But, as pointed out in the earlier comments, refactoring is required for sure. (though it is easy in PowerMock)
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 7:26
Thank you guys, that's what I was afraid of, sadly refactoring is limited as this is legacy code and I'm trying to achieve some test coverage with minimal refactoring. Powermock seems like the only option. I'm just wondering, so far I'm using mockito, if I add powermock, will it start conflicting with my mockito tests?
– Sgr
Mar 25 at 8:55
@Sgr No it won't. We use Powermock along with Mockito and there are no conflicts.
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 9:31
|
show 1 more comment
I am attempting to mock the new instance of an object inside the class I'm testing but I'm struggling to find a way to do this using Mockito.
If I understand this correctly, this might be something that can be achieved using Powermock but I only have Mockito at my disposal I can use.
Here's what I'm trying to do
private class MyTestClass
private doSomethingMethod()
Object obj = new Object();
obj.getSomething;
I am currently spying on MyTest class and would like to mock the new Object so that I can manipulate the result of obj.getSomething()
Is this something achievable using Mockito?
Thank you
java initialization mockito spy
I am attempting to mock the new instance of an object inside the class I'm testing but I'm struggling to find a way to do this using Mockito.
If I understand this correctly, this might be something that can be achieved using Powermock but I only have Mockito at my disposal I can use.
Here's what I'm trying to do
private class MyTestClass
private doSomethingMethod()
Object obj = new Object();
obj.getSomething;
I am currently spying on MyTest class and would like to mock the new Object so that I can manipulate the result of obj.getSomething()
Is this something achievable using Mockito?
Thank you
java initialization mockito spy
java initialization mockito spy
asked Mar 25 at 0:21
SgrSgr
268
268
Unfortunately, Powermock(ito) is one answer. Mockito doesn't intercept object instantiation :( ** Edit - unless you move the object instantiation to a new package-visible method and then mock the response to that method in your spy. But then your code is written at the whim of your tests.
– Not a JD
Mar 25 at 0:47
Without PowerMock you will need to refactor your code to make the instance available for mocking, for example, moving your object creation to a factory or a provider method, and then mock the method/factory return accodingly
– nullptr
Mar 25 at 1:12
Check this out. But, as pointed out in the earlier comments, refactoring is required for sure. (though it is easy in PowerMock)
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 7:26
Thank you guys, that's what I was afraid of, sadly refactoring is limited as this is legacy code and I'm trying to achieve some test coverage with minimal refactoring. Powermock seems like the only option. I'm just wondering, so far I'm using mockito, if I add powermock, will it start conflicting with my mockito tests?
– Sgr
Mar 25 at 8:55
@Sgr No it won't. We use Powermock along with Mockito and there are no conflicts.
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 9:31
|
show 1 more comment
Unfortunately, Powermock(ito) is one answer. Mockito doesn't intercept object instantiation :( ** Edit - unless you move the object instantiation to a new package-visible method and then mock the response to that method in your spy. But then your code is written at the whim of your tests.
– Not a JD
Mar 25 at 0:47
Without PowerMock you will need to refactor your code to make the instance available for mocking, for example, moving your object creation to a factory or a provider method, and then mock the method/factory return accodingly
– nullptr
Mar 25 at 1:12
Check this out. But, as pointed out in the earlier comments, refactoring is required for sure. (though it is easy in PowerMock)
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 7:26
Thank you guys, that's what I was afraid of, sadly refactoring is limited as this is legacy code and I'm trying to achieve some test coverage with minimal refactoring. Powermock seems like the only option. I'm just wondering, so far I'm using mockito, if I add powermock, will it start conflicting with my mockito tests?
– Sgr
Mar 25 at 8:55
@Sgr No it won't. We use Powermock along with Mockito and there are no conflicts.
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 9:31
Unfortunately, Powermock(ito) is one answer. Mockito doesn't intercept object instantiation :( ** Edit - unless you move the object instantiation to a new package-visible method and then mock the response to that method in your spy. But then your code is written at the whim of your tests.
– Not a JD
Mar 25 at 0:47
Unfortunately, Powermock(ito) is one answer. Mockito doesn't intercept object instantiation :( ** Edit - unless you move the object instantiation to a new package-visible method and then mock the response to that method in your spy. But then your code is written at the whim of your tests.
– Not a JD
Mar 25 at 0:47
Without PowerMock you will need to refactor your code to make the instance available for mocking, for example, moving your object creation to a factory or a provider method, and then mock the method/factory return accodingly
– nullptr
Mar 25 at 1:12
Without PowerMock you will need to refactor your code to make the instance available for mocking, for example, moving your object creation to a factory or a provider method, and then mock the method/factory return accodingly
– nullptr
Mar 25 at 1:12
Check this out. But, as pointed out in the earlier comments, refactoring is required for sure. (though it is easy in PowerMock)
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 7:26
Check this out. But, as pointed out in the earlier comments, refactoring is required for sure. (though it is easy in PowerMock)
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 7:26
Thank you guys, that's what I was afraid of, sadly refactoring is limited as this is legacy code and I'm trying to achieve some test coverage with minimal refactoring. Powermock seems like the only option. I'm just wondering, so far I'm using mockito, if I add powermock, will it start conflicting with my mockito tests?
– Sgr
Mar 25 at 8:55
Thank you guys, that's what I was afraid of, sadly refactoring is limited as this is legacy code and I'm trying to achieve some test coverage with minimal refactoring. Powermock seems like the only option. I'm just wondering, so far I'm using mockito, if I add powermock, will it start conflicting with my mockito tests?
– Sgr
Mar 25 at 8:55
@Sgr No it won't. We use Powermock along with Mockito and there are no conflicts.
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 9:31
@Sgr No it won't. We use Powermock along with Mockito and there are no conflicts.
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 9:31
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
IMHO everything is better in your case than using Powermock, as you already stated.
In similar cases I am using a solution which puts the "unmockable" code in an as-small-as-possible method and @Spy
around like:
public class SpyTest
@Spy
private MyTestClass myTestClass;
@Before
public void initMocks()
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@Test
public void spyInsteadOfPowermock()
when(myTestClass.getObject()).thenReturn(Integer.valueOf(3));
assertThat(myTestClass.doSomethingMethod()).isEqualTo("3");
class MyTestClass
public String doSomethingMethod()
return getObject().toString();
Object getObject()
return new Object();
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55329877%2fmocking-new-instance-creation-inside-testing-class-using-mockito%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
IMHO everything is better in your case than using Powermock, as you already stated.
In similar cases I am using a solution which puts the "unmockable" code in an as-small-as-possible method and @Spy
around like:
public class SpyTest
@Spy
private MyTestClass myTestClass;
@Before
public void initMocks()
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@Test
public void spyInsteadOfPowermock()
when(myTestClass.getObject()).thenReturn(Integer.valueOf(3));
assertThat(myTestClass.doSomethingMethod()).isEqualTo("3");
class MyTestClass
public String doSomethingMethod()
return getObject().toString();
Object getObject()
return new Object();
add a comment |
IMHO everything is better in your case than using Powermock, as you already stated.
In similar cases I am using a solution which puts the "unmockable" code in an as-small-as-possible method and @Spy
around like:
public class SpyTest
@Spy
private MyTestClass myTestClass;
@Before
public void initMocks()
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@Test
public void spyInsteadOfPowermock()
when(myTestClass.getObject()).thenReturn(Integer.valueOf(3));
assertThat(myTestClass.doSomethingMethod()).isEqualTo("3");
class MyTestClass
public String doSomethingMethod()
return getObject().toString();
Object getObject()
return new Object();
add a comment |
IMHO everything is better in your case than using Powermock, as you already stated.
In similar cases I am using a solution which puts the "unmockable" code in an as-small-as-possible method and @Spy
around like:
public class SpyTest
@Spy
private MyTestClass myTestClass;
@Before
public void initMocks()
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@Test
public void spyInsteadOfPowermock()
when(myTestClass.getObject()).thenReturn(Integer.valueOf(3));
assertThat(myTestClass.doSomethingMethod()).isEqualTo("3");
class MyTestClass
public String doSomethingMethod()
return getObject().toString();
Object getObject()
return new Object();
IMHO everything is better in your case than using Powermock, as you already stated.
In similar cases I am using a solution which puts the "unmockable" code in an as-small-as-possible method and @Spy
around like:
public class SpyTest
@Spy
private MyTestClass myTestClass;
@Before
public void initMocks()
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@Test
public void spyInsteadOfPowermock()
when(myTestClass.getObject()).thenReturn(Integer.valueOf(3));
assertThat(myTestClass.doSomethingMethod()).isEqualTo("3");
class MyTestClass
public String doSomethingMethod()
return getObject().toString();
Object getObject()
return new Object();
answered Mar 25 at 14:17
mlemle
1,4911320
1,4911320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55329877%2fmocking-new-instance-creation-inside-testing-class-using-mockito%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Unfortunately, Powermock(ito) is one answer. Mockito doesn't intercept object instantiation :( ** Edit - unless you move the object instantiation to a new package-visible method and then mock the response to that method in your spy. But then your code is written at the whim of your tests.
– Not a JD
Mar 25 at 0:47
Without PowerMock you will need to refactor your code to make the instance available for mocking, for example, moving your object creation to a factory or a provider method, and then mock the method/factory return accodingly
– nullptr
Mar 25 at 1:12
Check this out. But, as pointed out in the earlier comments, refactoring is required for sure. (though it is easy in PowerMock)
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 7:26
Thank you guys, that's what I was afraid of, sadly refactoring is limited as this is legacy code and I'm trying to achieve some test coverage with minimal refactoring. Powermock seems like the only option. I'm just wondering, so far I'm using mockito, if I add powermock, will it start conflicting with my mockito tests?
– Sgr
Mar 25 at 8:55
@Sgr No it won't. We use Powermock along with Mockito and there are no conflicts.
– Aditya Bhardwaj
Mar 25 at 9:31