Trying to understand ClassTag and TypeTag in ScalaWhat is a “context bound” in Scala?Read entire file in Scala?Scala vs. Groovy vs. ClojureIs the Scala 2.8 collections library a case of “the longest suicide note in history”?Difference between object and class in ScalaWhat are all the uses of an underscore in Scala?Understanding implicit in ScalaScala: What is a TypeTag and how do I use it?How save a TypeTag and then use it later to reattach the type to an Any (Scala 2.10)How to map HList to List[Type], List[TypeTag], or List[String]Scala ambiguity with paren-less function calls

Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?

The best in flight meal option for those suffering from reflux

Are skill challenges an official option or homebrewed?

Did I need a visa in 2004 and 2006?

Is Jesus the last Prophet?

Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?

Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?

What did the 8086 (and 8088) do upon encountering an illegal instruction?

What is the theme of analysis?

Must I use my personal social media account for work?

Is there a frequency comparator device?

How can calculate the turn-off time of an LDO?

What class is best to play when a level behind the rest of the party?

Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone

Is there a radar system monitoring the UK mainland border?

Why is my Taiyaki (Cake that looks like a fish) too hard and dry?

Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?

Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?

Can I get a photo of an Ancient Arrow?

Is it true that "only photographers care about noise"?

Changing the PK column of a data extension without completely recreating it

Undocumented incompatibility between changes and siunitx?

What do you call the action of "describing events as they happen" like sports anchors do?



Trying to understand ClassTag and TypeTag in Scala


What is a “context bound” in Scala?Read entire file in Scala?Scala vs. Groovy vs. ClojureIs the Scala 2.8 collections library a case of “the longest suicide note in history”?Difference between object and class in ScalaWhat are all the uses of an underscore in Scala?Understanding implicit in ScalaScala: What is a TypeTag and how do I use it?How save a TypeTag and then use it later to reattach the type to an Any (Scala 2.10)How to map HList to List[Type], List[TypeTag], or List[String]Scala ambiguity with paren-less function calls






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








2















I am trying to understand how we can overcome type erasure in scala using ClassTag and TypeTag. I wrote the following examples which are generic functions that try to filter out List[TNode] where TNode is equal to TMatch. However, I expect in recognizeUsingTypeTag, the function shall not call extractUsingClassTag is the generic type of list is equal to TMatch (or the message gets printed), but my assumption is apparently wrong. Thank you.



object Extractor 
import scala.reflect.ClassTag

def extractFail[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode]) = list.filter
case _: TMatch => true
case _ => false
.map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

def extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: ClassTag[TNode], tag2: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list.filter
case _: TMatch => true
case _ => false
.map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._

def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: TypeTag[TNode], tag2: TypeTag[TMatch], tag3: ClassTag[TNode], tag4: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list match
case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
//
// Why this does not get printed for List[String]
//
println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



val homogeneous: List[String] = List("Hello", "World!")
val heterogeneous: List[Any] = List("Hello", "World!", 123, false)

println("extractFail")
println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](homogeneous))
println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

println("extractUsingClassTag")
println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

println("recognizeUsingTypeTag")
println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")


Console:



extractFail
List(Hello, World!)
List(Hello, World!, 123, false)

extractUsingClassTag
List(Hello, World!)
List(Hello, World!)

recognizeUsingTypeTag
List(Hello, World!)
List(Hello, World!)









share|improve this question




























    2















    I am trying to understand how we can overcome type erasure in scala using ClassTag and TypeTag. I wrote the following examples which are generic functions that try to filter out List[TNode] where TNode is equal to TMatch. However, I expect in recognizeUsingTypeTag, the function shall not call extractUsingClassTag is the generic type of list is equal to TMatch (or the message gets printed), but my assumption is apparently wrong. Thank you.



    object Extractor 
    import scala.reflect.ClassTag

    def extractFail[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode]) = list.filter
    case _: TMatch => true
    case _ => false
    .map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

    def extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: ClassTag[TNode], tag2: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list.filter
    case _: TMatch => true
    case _ => false
    .map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

    import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._

    def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: TypeTag[TNode], tag2: TypeTag[TMatch], tag3: ClassTag[TNode], tag4: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list match
    case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
    //
    // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
    //
    println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
    list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

    case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



    val homogeneous: List[String] = List("Hello", "World!")
    val heterogeneous: List[Any] = List("Hello", "World!", 123, false)

    println("extractFail")
    println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](homogeneous))
    println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

    println("extractUsingClassTag")
    println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
    println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

    println("recognizeUsingTypeTag")
    println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
    println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")


    Console:



    extractFail
    List(Hello, World!)
    List(Hello, World!, 123, false)

    extractUsingClassTag
    List(Hello, World!)
    List(Hello, World!)

    recognizeUsingTypeTag
    List(Hello, World!)
    List(Hello, World!)









    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      I am trying to understand how we can overcome type erasure in scala using ClassTag and TypeTag. I wrote the following examples which are generic functions that try to filter out List[TNode] where TNode is equal to TMatch. However, I expect in recognizeUsingTypeTag, the function shall not call extractUsingClassTag is the generic type of list is equal to TMatch (or the message gets printed), but my assumption is apparently wrong. Thank you.



      object Extractor 
      import scala.reflect.ClassTag

      def extractFail[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode]) = list.filter
      case _: TMatch => true
      case _ => false
      .map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

      def extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: ClassTag[TNode], tag2: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list.filter
      case _: TMatch => true
      case _ => false
      .map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

      import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._

      def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: TypeTag[TNode], tag2: TypeTag[TMatch], tag3: ClassTag[TNode], tag4: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list match
      case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
      //
      // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
      //
      println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
      list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

      case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



      val homogeneous: List[String] = List("Hello", "World!")
      val heterogeneous: List[Any] = List("Hello", "World!", 123, false)

      println("extractFail")
      println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](homogeneous))
      println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

      println("extractUsingClassTag")
      println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
      println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

      println("recognizeUsingTypeTag")
      println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
      println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")


      Console:



      extractFail
      List(Hello, World!)
      List(Hello, World!, 123, false)

      extractUsingClassTag
      List(Hello, World!)
      List(Hello, World!)

      recognizeUsingTypeTag
      List(Hello, World!)
      List(Hello, World!)









      share|improve this question














      I am trying to understand how we can overcome type erasure in scala using ClassTag and TypeTag. I wrote the following examples which are generic functions that try to filter out List[TNode] where TNode is equal to TMatch. However, I expect in recognizeUsingTypeTag, the function shall not call extractUsingClassTag is the generic type of list is equal to TMatch (or the message gets printed), but my assumption is apparently wrong. Thank you.



      object Extractor 
      import scala.reflect.ClassTag

      def extractFail[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode]) = list.filter
      case _: TMatch => true
      case _ => false
      .map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

      def extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: ClassTag[TNode], tag2: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list.filter
      case _: TMatch => true
      case _ => false
      .map(x => x.asInstanceOf[TMatch])

      import scala.reflect.runtime.universe._

      def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TNode, TMatch](list: List[TNode])(implicit tag1: TypeTag[TNode], tag2: TypeTag[TMatch], tag3: ClassTag[TNode], tag4: ClassTag[TMatch]) = list match
      case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
      //
      // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
      //
      println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
      list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

      case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



      val homogeneous: List[String] = List("Hello", "World!")
      val heterogeneous: List[Any] = List("Hello", "World!", 123, false)

      println("extractFail")
      println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](homogeneous))
      println(Extractor.extractFail[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

      println("extractUsingClassTag")
      println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
      println(Extractor.extractUsingClassTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")

      println("recognizeUsingTypeTag")
      println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](homogeneous))
      println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[Any, String](heterogeneous) + "n")


      Console:



      extractFail
      List(Hello, World!)
      List(Hello, World!, 123, false)

      extractUsingClassTag
      List(Hello, World!)
      List(Hello, World!)

      recognizeUsingTypeTag
      List(Hello, World!)
      List(Hello, World!)






      scala






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 25 at 0:10









      Node.JSNode.JS

      97611041




      97611041






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1















          Why this does not get printed for List[String]




          Because you specified explicit type parameters: [Any, String], so case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] compares typeOf[Any] =:= typeOf[String].



          Since you do need to specify String for TMatch, but want TNode to be inferred, the usual way to do it is splitting type parameters into two lists by creating an intermediate class:



          // in Extractor
          class RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag]
          def apply[TNode : TypeTag : ClassTag](list: List[TNode]) = list match
          case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
          //
          // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
          //
          println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
          list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

          case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



          def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag] = new RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch]


          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(homogeneous)) // inferred as apply[String]
          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(heterogeneous) + "n") // inferred as apply[Any]


          When you have implicit parameters like that and don't need their names, it's preferred to use context bounds: T : TypeTag : ClassTag adds two implicit parameters of types TypeTag[T] and ClassTag[T].






          share|improve this answer

























          • I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

            – Node.JS
            Mar 25 at 13:12







          • 1





            @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

            – Alexey Romanov
            Mar 25 at 13:28











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55329802%2ftrying-to-understand-classtag-and-typetag-in-scala%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1















          Why this does not get printed for List[String]




          Because you specified explicit type parameters: [Any, String], so case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] compares typeOf[Any] =:= typeOf[String].



          Since you do need to specify String for TMatch, but want TNode to be inferred, the usual way to do it is splitting type parameters into two lists by creating an intermediate class:



          // in Extractor
          class RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag]
          def apply[TNode : TypeTag : ClassTag](list: List[TNode]) = list match
          case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
          //
          // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
          //
          println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
          list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

          case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



          def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag] = new RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch]


          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(homogeneous)) // inferred as apply[String]
          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(heterogeneous) + "n") // inferred as apply[Any]


          When you have implicit parameters like that and don't need their names, it's preferred to use context bounds: T : TypeTag : ClassTag adds two implicit parameters of types TypeTag[T] and ClassTag[T].






          share|improve this answer

























          • I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

            – Node.JS
            Mar 25 at 13:12







          • 1





            @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

            – Alexey Romanov
            Mar 25 at 13:28















          1















          Why this does not get printed for List[String]




          Because you specified explicit type parameters: [Any, String], so case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] compares typeOf[Any] =:= typeOf[String].



          Since you do need to specify String for TMatch, but want TNode to be inferred, the usual way to do it is splitting type parameters into two lists by creating an intermediate class:



          // in Extractor
          class RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag]
          def apply[TNode : TypeTag : ClassTag](list: List[TNode]) = list match
          case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
          //
          // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
          //
          println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
          list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

          case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



          def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag] = new RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch]


          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(homogeneous)) // inferred as apply[String]
          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(heterogeneous) + "n") // inferred as apply[Any]


          When you have implicit parameters like that and don't need their names, it's preferred to use context bounds: T : TypeTag : ClassTag adds two implicit parameters of types TypeTag[T] and ClassTag[T].






          share|improve this answer

























          • I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

            – Node.JS
            Mar 25 at 13:12







          • 1





            @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

            – Alexey Romanov
            Mar 25 at 13:28













          1












          1








          1








          Why this does not get printed for List[String]




          Because you specified explicit type parameters: [Any, String], so case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] compares typeOf[Any] =:= typeOf[String].



          Since you do need to specify String for TMatch, but want TNode to be inferred, the usual way to do it is splitting type parameters into two lists by creating an intermediate class:



          // in Extractor
          class RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag]
          def apply[TNode : TypeTag : ClassTag](list: List[TNode]) = list match
          case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
          //
          // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
          //
          println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
          list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

          case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



          def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag] = new RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch]


          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(homogeneous)) // inferred as apply[String]
          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(heterogeneous) + "n") // inferred as apply[Any]


          When you have implicit parameters like that and don't need their names, it's preferred to use context bounds: T : TypeTag : ClassTag adds two implicit parameters of types TypeTag[T] and ClassTag[T].






          share|improve this answer
















          Why this does not get printed for List[String]




          Because you specified explicit type parameters: [Any, String], so case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] compares typeOf[Any] =:= typeOf[String].



          Since you do need to specify String for TMatch, but want TNode to be inferred, the usual way to do it is splitting type parameters into two lists by creating an intermediate class:



          // in Extractor
          class RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag]
          def apply[TNode : TypeTag : ClassTag](list: List[TNode]) = list match
          case _ if typeOf[TNode] =:= typeOf[TMatch] =>
          //
          // Why this does not get printed for List[String]
          //
          println("This should get printed when called for homogeneous")
          list.asInstanceOf[List[TMatch]]

          case _ => extractUsingClassTag[TNode, TMatch](list)



          def recognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch : TypeTag : ClassTag] = new RecognizeUsingTypeTag[TMatch]


          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(homogeneous)) // inferred as apply[String]
          println(Extractor.recognizeUsingTypeTag[String].apply(heterogeneous) + "n") // inferred as apply[Any]


          When you have implicit parameters like that and don't need their names, it's preferred to use context bounds: T : TypeTag : ClassTag adds two implicit parameters of types TypeTag[T] and ClassTag[T].







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 25 at 13:28

























          answered Mar 25 at 7:16









          Alexey RomanovAlexey Romanov

          114k26218364




          114k26218364












          • I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

            – Node.JS
            Mar 25 at 13:12







          • 1





            @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

            – Alexey Romanov
            Mar 25 at 13:28

















          • I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

            – Node.JS
            Mar 25 at 13:12







          • 1





            @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

            – Alexey Romanov
            Mar 25 at 13:28
















          I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

          – Node.JS
          Mar 25 at 13:12






          I am getting a compile error. I think those implicit parameters for the apply methods need to be specified beside the method generic types, not beside the List[TNode]

          – Node.JS
          Mar 25 at 13:12





          1




          1





          @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

          – Alexey Romanov
          Mar 25 at 13:28





          @Node.JS Yes, fixed.

          – Alexey Romanov
          Mar 25 at 13:28



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55329802%2ftrying-to-understand-classtag-and-typetag-in-scala%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현