accessing all keys in a dictionary simultaneouslyHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I sort a list of dictionaries by a value of the dictionary?What is the best way to iterate over a dictionary?Accessing the index in 'for' loops?How do I sort a dictionary by value?Add new keys to a dictionary?Check if a given key already exists in a dictionaryHow do I list all files of a directory?Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loopsHow to remove a key from a Python dictionary?

How can I tell if there was a power cut while I was out?

Replacing tongue and groove floorboards: but can't find a match

How do campaign rallies gain candidates votes?

Can two figures have the same area, perimeter, and same number of segments have different shape?

Invert Some Switches on a Switchboard

Does academia have a lazy work culture?

This message is flooding my syslog, how to find where it comes from?

How may I concisely assign different values to a variable, depending on another variable?

What are the exact meanings of roll, pitch and yaw?

How to get the two pictures aligned

Is there anything wrong with Thrawn?

How do we explain the E major chord in this progression?

Why is my read in of data taking so long?

Why is chess failing to attract big name sponsors?

Is my employer paying me fairly? Going from 1099 to W2

Airplanes in static display at Whiteman AFB

What is the max number of outlets on a GFCI circuit?

Inadvertently nuked my disk permission structure - why?

Automatic Habit of Meditation

Terence Tao–type books in other fields?

Why no ";" after "do" in sh loops?

A planet illuminated by a black hole?

Other than a swing wing, what types of variable geometry have flown?

Print sums of all subsets



accessing all keys in a dictionary simultaneously


How to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I sort a list of dictionaries by a value of the dictionary?What is the best way to iterate over a dictionary?Accessing the index in 'for' loops?How do I sort a dictionary by value?Add new keys to a dictionary?Check if a given key already exists in a dictionaryHow do I list all files of a directory?Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loopsHow to remove a key from a Python dictionary?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I have a dictionary in python which looks like this:



mydict=
"key1": np.array([1, 2, 3]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5, 6]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8, 9])



Now, I'd like to obtain the dictionary but with just the first the nth entry in each of the value arrays. Something like mydict2=mydict[:][1]. The expected output would be:



mydict2=
"key1": 2
"key2": 5
"key3": 8



And I would like to get parts of all arrays simultaneously. For example mydict3=mydict[:][:2]. Here, I expect:



mydict3=
"key1": np.array([1, 2]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8])



Obviously, indexing via [:] doesn't work.
How do I achieve this?










share|improve this question
























  • By simultaneously, you mean that you don't want to write code individually for each key?

    – CristiFati
    Mar 26 at 16:51

















0















I have a dictionary in python which looks like this:



mydict=
"key1": np.array([1, 2, 3]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5, 6]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8, 9])



Now, I'd like to obtain the dictionary but with just the first the nth entry in each of the value arrays. Something like mydict2=mydict[:][1]. The expected output would be:



mydict2=
"key1": 2
"key2": 5
"key3": 8



And I would like to get parts of all arrays simultaneously. For example mydict3=mydict[:][:2]. Here, I expect:



mydict3=
"key1": np.array([1, 2]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8])



Obviously, indexing via [:] doesn't work.
How do I achieve this?










share|improve this question
























  • By simultaneously, you mean that you don't want to write code individually for each key?

    – CristiFati
    Mar 26 at 16:51













0












0








0








I have a dictionary in python which looks like this:



mydict=
"key1": np.array([1, 2, 3]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5, 6]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8, 9])



Now, I'd like to obtain the dictionary but with just the first the nth entry in each of the value arrays. Something like mydict2=mydict[:][1]. The expected output would be:



mydict2=
"key1": 2
"key2": 5
"key3": 8



And I would like to get parts of all arrays simultaneously. For example mydict3=mydict[:][:2]. Here, I expect:



mydict3=
"key1": np.array([1, 2]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8])



Obviously, indexing via [:] doesn't work.
How do I achieve this?










share|improve this question
















I have a dictionary in python which looks like this:



mydict=
"key1": np.array([1, 2, 3]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5, 6]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8, 9])



Now, I'd like to obtain the dictionary but with just the first the nth entry in each of the value arrays. Something like mydict2=mydict[:][1]. The expected output would be:



mydict2=
"key1": 2
"key2": 5
"key3": 8



And I would like to get parts of all arrays simultaneously. For example mydict3=mydict[:][:2]. Here, I expect:



mydict3=
"key1": np.array([1, 2]),
"key2": np.array([4, 5]),
"key3": np.array([7, 8])



Obviously, indexing via [:] doesn't work.
How do I achieve this?







python dictionary






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 16:58









Martijn Pieters

749k161 gold badges2701 silver badges2428 bronze badges




749k161 gold badges2701 silver badges2428 bronze badges










asked Mar 26 at 16:46









riddleculousriddleculous

1561 silver badge9 bronze badges




1561 silver badge9 bronze badges












  • By simultaneously, you mean that you don't want to write code individually for each key?

    – CristiFati
    Mar 26 at 16:51

















  • By simultaneously, you mean that you don't want to write code individually for each key?

    – CristiFati
    Mar 26 at 16:51
















By simultaneously, you mean that you don't want to write code individually for each key?

– CristiFati
Mar 26 at 16:51





By simultaneously, you mean that you don't want to write code individually for each key?

– CristiFati
Mar 26 at 16:51












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














What you are describing is a feature mostly offered by numpy, where slicing gives you views. Dictionaries are different beasts, partly because dictionaries are unordered.



You'll have to iterate in a dict comprehension:



mydict2 = k: v[1] for k, v in mydict.items()


and



mydict3 = k: v[:2] for k, v in mydict.items()


I'd simply not store numpy arrays in a dictionary, and use a larger array instead:



fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)


and, at most, use a dictionary to map keys to slices on that array. These slices give you views so altering the full array is reflected in the references in the dictionary:



>>> import numpy as np
>>> fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)
>>> mydict1 = 'key1': fullarray[0, :], 'key2': fullarray[1, :], 'key3': fullarray[2, :]
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 2, 3]), 'key2': array([4, 5, 6]), 'key3': array([7, 8, 9])
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([2, 5, 8])
>>> fullarray[:, 1] *= 2
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([ 4, 10, 16])
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 4, 3]), 'key2': array([ 4, 10, 6]), 'key3': array([ 7, 16, 9])


but accessing a column is just simpler via the full numpy array, so fullarray[:, 0] and fullarray[:, :2].



Another option is to use structured arrays to produce rows with names:



>>> import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn
>>> structured = rfn.unstructured_to_structured(np.arange(1, 10).reshape((3, 3)).T, names=('key1', 'key2', 'key3'))


at which point indexing with a key name gives you arrays:



>>> structured['key1']
array([1, 2, 3]


but you can also index by 'column', including slicing:



>>> structured[0]
(1, 4, 7)
>>> structured[:2]
array([(1, 4, 7), (2, 5, 8)],
dtype=[('key1', '<i8'), ('key2', '<i8'), ('key3', '<i8')])
>>> structured[:2]['key1']
array([1, 2])
>>> structured[:2]['key2']
array([4, 5])
>>> structured[:2]['key3']
array([7, 8])


Converting an existing dictionary would require stacking the values:



import numpy as np
import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn

def dict_to_structured(d):
return rfn.unstructured_to_structured(
np.stack(list(mydict.values()), axis=1),
names=list(mydict)
)





share|improve this answer

























  • thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 26 at 17:05






  • 1





    @riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

    – Martijn Pieters
    Mar 26 at 17:27











  • thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 28 at 16:29










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55362309%2faccessing-all-keys-in-a-dictionary-simultaneously%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














What you are describing is a feature mostly offered by numpy, where slicing gives you views. Dictionaries are different beasts, partly because dictionaries are unordered.



You'll have to iterate in a dict comprehension:



mydict2 = k: v[1] for k, v in mydict.items()


and



mydict3 = k: v[:2] for k, v in mydict.items()


I'd simply not store numpy arrays in a dictionary, and use a larger array instead:



fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)


and, at most, use a dictionary to map keys to slices on that array. These slices give you views so altering the full array is reflected in the references in the dictionary:



>>> import numpy as np
>>> fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)
>>> mydict1 = 'key1': fullarray[0, :], 'key2': fullarray[1, :], 'key3': fullarray[2, :]
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 2, 3]), 'key2': array([4, 5, 6]), 'key3': array([7, 8, 9])
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([2, 5, 8])
>>> fullarray[:, 1] *= 2
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([ 4, 10, 16])
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 4, 3]), 'key2': array([ 4, 10, 6]), 'key3': array([ 7, 16, 9])


but accessing a column is just simpler via the full numpy array, so fullarray[:, 0] and fullarray[:, :2].



Another option is to use structured arrays to produce rows with names:



>>> import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn
>>> structured = rfn.unstructured_to_structured(np.arange(1, 10).reshape((3, 3)).T, names=('key1', 'key2', 'key3'))


at which point indexing with a key name gives you arrays:



>>> structured['key1']
array([1, 2, 3]


but you can also index by 'column', including slicing:



>>> structured[0]
(1, 4, 7)
>>> structured[:2]
array([(1, 4, 7), (2, 5, 8)],
dtype=[('key1', '<i8'), ('key2', '<i8'), ('key3', '<i8')])
>>> structured[:2]['key1']
array([1, 2])
>>> structured[:2]['key2']
array([4, 5])
>>> structured[:2]['key3']
array([7, 8])


Converting an existing dictionary would require stacking the values:



import numpy as np
import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn

def dict_to_structured(d):
return rfn.unstructured_to_structured(
np.stack(list(mydict.values()), axis=1),
names=list(mydict)
)





share|improve this answer

























  • thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 26 at 17:05






  • 1





    @riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

    – Martijn Pieters
    Mar 26 at 17:27











  • thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 28 at 16:29















3














What you are describing is a feature mostly offered by numpy, where slicing gives you views. Dictionaries are different beasts, partly because dictionaries are unordered.



You'll have to iterate in a dict comprehension:



mydict2 = k: v[1] for k, v in mydict.items()


and



mydict3 = k: v[:2] for k, v in mydict.items()


I'd simply not store numpy arrays in a dictionary, and use a larger array instead:



fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)


and, at most, use a dictionary to map keys to slices on that array. These slices give you views so altering the full array is reflected in the references in the dictionary:



>>> import numpy as np
>>> fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)
>>> mydict1 = 'key1': fullarray[0, :], 'key2': fullarray[1, :], 'key3': fullarray[2, :]
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 2, 3]), 'key2': array([4, 5, 6]), 'key3': array([7, 8, 9])
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([2, 5, 8])
>>> fullarray[:, 1] *= 2
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([ 4, 10, 16])
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 4, 3]), 'key2': array([ 4, 10, 6]), 'key3': array([ 7, 16, 9])


but accessing a column is just simpler via the full numpy array, so fullarray[:, 0] and fullarray[:, :2].



Another option is to use structured arrays to produce rows with names:



>>> import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn
>>> structured = rfn.unstructured_to_structured(np.arange(1, 10).reshape((3, 3)).T, names=('key1', 'key2', 'key3'))


at which point indexing with a key name gives you arrays:



>>> structured['key1']
array([1, 2, 3]


but you can also index by 'column', including slicing:



>>> structured[0]
(1, 4, 7)
>>> structured[:2]
array([(1, 4, 7), (2, 5, 8)],
dtype=[('key1', '<i8'), ('key2', '<i8'), ('key3', '<i8')])
>>> structured[:2]['key1']
array([1, 2])
>>> structured[:2]['key2']
array([4, 5])
>>> structured[:2]['key3']
array([7, 8])


Converting an existing dictionary would require stacking the values:



import numpy as np
import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn

def dict_to_structured(d):
return rfn.unstructured_to_structured(
np.stack(list(mydict.values()), axis=1),
names=list(mydict)
)





share|improve this answer

























  • thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 26 at 17:05






  • 1





    @riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

    – Martijn Pieters
    Mar 26 at 17:27











  • thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 28 at 16:29













3












3








3







What you are describing is a feature mostly offered by numpy, where slicing gives you views. Dictionaries are different beasts, partly because dictionaries are unordered.



You'll have to iterate in a dict comprehension:



mydict2 = k: v[1] for k, v in mydict.items()


and



mydict3 = k: v[:2] for k, v in mydict.items()


I'd simply not store numpy arrays in a dictionary, and use a larger array instead:



fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)


and, at most, use a dictionary to map keys to slices on that array. These slices give you views so altering the full array is reflected in the references in the dictionary:



>>> import numpy as np
>>> fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)
>>> mydict1 = 'key1': fullarray[0, :], 'key2': fullarray[1, :], 'key3': fullarray[2, :]
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 2, 3]), 'key2': array([4, 5, 6]), 'key3': array([7, 8, 9])
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([2, 5, 8])
>>> fullarray[:, 1] *= 2
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([ 4, 10, 16])
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 4, 3]), 'key2': array([ 4, 10, 6]), 'key3': array([ 7, 16, 9])


but accessing a column is just simpler via the full numpy array, so fullarray[:, 0] and fullarray[:, :2].



Another option is to use structured arrays to produce rows with names:



>>> import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn
>>> structured = rfn.unstructured_to_structured(np.arange(1, 10).reshape((3, 3)).T, names=('key1', 'key2', 'key3'))


at which point indexing with a key name gives you arrays:



>>> structured['key1']
array([1, 2, 3]


but you can also index by 'column', including slicing:



>>> structured[0]
(1, 4, 7)
>>> structured[:2]
array([(1, 4, 7), (2, 5, 8)],
dtype=[('key1', '<i8'), ('key2', '<i8'), ('key3', '<i8')])
>>> structured[:2]['key1']
array([1, 2])
>>> structured[:2]['key2']
array([4, 5])
>>> structured[:2]['key3']
array([7, 8])


Converting an existing dictionary would require stacking the values:



import numpy as np
import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn

def dict_to_structured(d):
return rfn.unstructured_to_structured(
np.stack(list(mydict.values()), axis=1),
names=list(mydict)
)





share|improve this answer















What you are describing is a feature mostly offered by numpy, where slicing gives you views. Dictionaries are different beasts, partly because dictionaries are unordered.



You'll have to iterate in a dict comprehension:



mydict2 = k: v[1] for k, v in mydict.items()


and



mydict3 = k: v[:2] for k, v in mydict.items()


I'd simply not store numpy arrays in a dictionary, and use a larger array instead:



fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)


and, at most, use a dictionary to map keys to slices on that array. These slices give you views so altering the full array is reflected in the references in the dictionary:



>>> import numpy as np
>>> fullarray = np.arange(1, 10).reshape(3, 3)
>>> mydict1 = 'key1': fullarray[0, :], 'key2': fullarray[1, :], 'key3': fullarray[2, :]
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 2, 3]), 'key2': array([4, 5, 6]), 'key3': array([7, 8, 9])
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([2, 5, 8])
>>> fullarray[:, 1] *= 2
>>> fullarray[:, 1]
array([ 4, 10, 16])
>>> mydict1
'key1': array([1, 4, 3]), 'key2': array([ 4, 10, 6]), 'key3': array([ 7, 16, 9])


but accessing a column is just simpler via the full numpy array, so fullarray[:, 0] and fullarray[:, :2].



Another option is to use structured arrays to produce rows with names:



>>> import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn
>>> structured = rfn.unstructured_to_structured(np.arange(1, 10).reshape((3, 3)).T, names=('key1', 'key2', 'key3'))


at which point indexing with a key name gives you arrays:



>>> structured['key1']
array([1, 2, 3]


but you can also index by 'column', including slicing:



>>> structured[0]
(1, 4, 7)
>>> structured[:2]
array([(1, 4, 7), (2, 5, 8)],
dtype=[('key1', '<i8'), ('key2', '<i8'), ('key3', '<i8')])
>>> structured[:2]['key1']
array([1, 2])
>>> structured[:2]['key2']
array([4, 5])
>>> structured[:2]['key3']
array([7, 8])


Converting an existing dictionary would require stacking the values:



import numpy as np
import numpy.lib.recfunctions as rfn

def dict_to_structured(d):
return rfn.unstructured_to_structured(
np.stack(list(mydict.values()), axis=1),
names=list(mydict)
)






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 17:27

























answered Mar 26 at 16:52









Martijn PietersMartijn Pieters

749k161 gold badges2701 silver badges2428 bronze badges




749k161 gold badges2701 silver badges2428 bronze badges












  • thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 26 at 17:05






  • 1





    @riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

    – Martijn Pieters
    Mar 26 at 17:27











  • thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 28 at 16:29

















  • thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 26 at 17:05






  • 1





    @riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

    – Martijn Pieters
    Mar 26 at 17:27











  • thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

    – riddleculous
    Mar 28 at 16:29
















thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

– riddleculous
Mar 26 at 17:05





thanks for the very pythonic-looking solution! This is exactly what I want. I am using dictionaries since that's what I get using scipy.signal.find_peaks. And thanks once more for the great idea of adding keys to an array.

– riddleculous
Mar 26 at 17:05




1




1





@riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

– Martijn Pieters
Mar 26 at 17:27





@riddleculous: you could convert the scipy result to a structured result too, I added an example function.

– Martijn Pieters
Mar 26 at 17:27













thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

– riddleculous
Mar 28 at 16:29





thanks also for the great example using structured arrays. I didn't try out conversion since at the moment I don't want to update to the latest numpy release but I will keep it in mind for the future.

– riddleculous
Mar 28 at 16:29








Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.







Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55362309%2faccessing-all-keys-in-a-dictionary-simultaneously%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현