How could Frankenstein get the parts for his second creature?Questions on the meaning of a passage about friendship in Frankenstein, Letter 4How did the monster learn so many words so quickly in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley?Does “Natural Lord” in Frankenstein mean “Father” or something to that effect?What is the origin of the name “Frankenstein”?Where did the idea that Frankenstein is the name of the monster come from?

Character Frequency in a String

Is it OK to accept a job opportunity while planning on not taking it?

I have a domain, static IP address and many devices I'd like to access outside my house. How do I route them?

Where is this photo of a group of hikers taken? Is it really in the Ural?

How to Sow[] until I've Reap[]'d enough?

If a check is written for bill, but account number is not mentioned on memo line, is it still processed?

Company requiring me to let them review research from before I was hired

What is the relationship between the theme songs in Sherlock Holmes (2009 movie) and Sherlock (BBC series)?

In Local Search, which reheating techniques have a good track record?

Why did modems have speakers?

Monty Hall Problem with a Fallible Monty

Historicity doubted by Romans

What rules turn any attack that hits a given target into a critical hit?

Why did NASA use Imperial units?

Is there a way to shorten this while condition?

What was the rationale behind 36 bit computer architectures?

Why does the salt in the oceans not sink to the bottom?

What's the 1 inch size square knob sticking out of wall?

Why are MEMS in QFN packages?

what to say when a company asks you why someone (a friend) who was fired left?

How can I make sure my players' decisions have consequences?

Using "Kollege" as "university friend"?

Are gangsters hired to attack people at a train station classified as a terrorist attack?

Extrapolation v. Interpolation



How could Frankenstein get the parts for his second creature?


Questions on the meaning of a passage about friendship in Frankenstein, Letter 4How did the monster learn so many words so quickly in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley?Does “Natural Lord” in Frankenstein mean “Father” or something to that effect?What is the origin of the name “Frankenstein”?Where did the idea that Frankenstein is the name of the monster come from?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10















When the creature is first created we get a strong impression that it is built up from body parts, quoting from chapter 4:




I collected bones from charnel-houses and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame. [...] The dissecting room and the slaughter-house furnished many of my materials; and often did my human nature turn with loathing from my occupation...




The creature then demands a female companion, and in chapter 19, Victor sets out to create one on a tiny, remote island (emphasis mine):




With this resolution I traversed the northern highlands and fixed on one of the remotest of the Orkneys as the scene of my labours. It was a place fitted for such a work, being hardly more than a rock whose high sides were continually beaten upon by the waves. The soil was barren, scarcely affording pasture for a few miserable cows, and oatmeal for its inhabitants, which consisted of five persons, whose gaunt and scraggy limbs gave tokens of their miserable fare. Vegetables and bread, when they indulged in such luxuries, and even fresh water, was to be procured from the mainland, which was about five miles distant.




Clearly, such a barren rock would not have an abundance of dead bodies that Victor could use as a source for the new creature, and bringing them in by boat to such a small community would like raise too many questions. It is however clear that he does build something, since he destroys it after being reminded of his first creation:




I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged. The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness...




Is this ever explained in some other version of the book, or in external sources?










share|improve this question






























    10















    When the creature is first created we get a strong impression that it is built up from body parts, quoting from chapter 4:




    I collected bones from charnel-houses and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame. [...] The dissecting room and the slaughter-house furnished many of my materials; and often did my human nature turn with loathing from my occupation...




    The creature then demands a female companion, and in chapter 19, Victor sets out to create one on a tiny, remote island (emphasis mine):




    With this resolution I traversed the northern highlands and fixed on one of the remotest of the Orkneys as the scene of my labours. It was a place fitted for such a work, being hardly more than a rock whose high sides were continually beaten upon by the waves. The soil was barren, scarcely affording pasture for a few miserable cows, and oatmeal for its inhabitants, which consisted of five persons, whose gaunt and scraggy limbs gave tokens of their miserable fare. Vegetables and bread, when they indulged in such luxuries, and even fresh water, was to be procured from the mainland, which was about five miles distant.




    Clearly, such a barren rock would not have an abundance of dead bodies that Victor could use as a source for the new creature, and bringing them in by boat to such a small community would like raise too many questions. It is however clear that he does build something, since he destroys it after being reminded of his first creation:




    I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged. The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness...




    Is this ever explained in some other version of the book, or in external sources?










    share|improve this question


























      10












      10








      10


      0






      When the creature is first created we get a strong impression that it is built up from body parts, quoting from chapter 4:




      I collected bones from charnel-houses and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame. [...] The dissecting room and the slaughter-house furnished many of my materials; and often did my human nature turn with loathing from my occupation...




      The creature then demands a female companion, and in chapter 19, Victor sets out to create one on a tiny, remote island (emphasis mine):




      With this resolution I traversed the northern highlands and fixed on one of the remotest of the Orkneys as the scene of my labours. It was a place fitted for such a work, being hardly more than a rock whose high sides were continually beaten upon by the waves. The soil was barren, scarcely affording pasture for a few miserable cows, and oatmeal for its inhabitants, which consisted of five persons, whose gaunt and scraggy limbs gave tokens of their miserable fare. Vegetables and bread, when they indulged in such luxuries, and even fresh water, was to be procured from the mainland, which was about five miles distant.




      Clearly, such a barren rock would not have an abundance of dead bodies that Victor could use as a source for the new creature, and bringing them in by boat to such a small community would like raise too many questions. It is however clear that he does build something, since he destroys it after being reminded of his first creation:




      I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged. The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness...




      Is this ever explained in some other version of the book, or in external sources?










      share|improve this question
















      When the creature is first created we get a strong impression that it is built up from body parts, quoting from chapter 4:




      I collected bones from charnel-houses and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame. [...] The dissecting room and the slaughter-house furnished many of my materials; and often did my human nature turn with loathing from my occupation...




      The creature then demands a female companion, and in chapter 19, Victor sets out to create one on a tiny, remote island (emphasis mine):




      With this resolution I traversed the northern highlands and fixed on one of the remotest of the Orkneys as the scene of my labours. It was a place fitted for such a work, being hardly more than a rock whose high sides were continually beaten upon by the waves. The soil was barren, scarcely affording pasture for a few miserable cows, and oatmeal for its inhabitants, which consisted of five persons, whose gaunt and scraggy limbs gave tokens of their miserable fare. Vegetables and bread, when they indulged in such luxuries, and even fresh water, was to be procured from the mainland, which was about five miles distant.




      Clearly, such a barren rock would not have an abundance of dead bodies that Victor could use as a source for the new creature, and bringing them in by boat to such a small community would like raise too many questions. It is however clear that he does build something, since he destroys it after being reminded of his first creation:




      I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged. The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness...




      Is this ever explained in some other version of the book, or in external sources?







      frankenstein mary-shelley






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 27 at 6:26









      V2Blast

      1053 bronze badges




      1053 bronze badges










      asked Mar 26 at 13:15









      pipepipe

      1537 bronze badges




      1537 bronze badges




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          11














          The beginning of chapter 19 says that Frankenstein spent six months in London assembling the ‘materials’ for the new creature, before setting out for the Scottish island.




          London was our present point of rest; we determined to remain several months in this wonderful and celebrated city. […]



          I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation […]



          We had arrived in England at the beginning of October, and it was now February. We accordingly determined to commence our journey towards the north at the expiration of another month. In this expedition we did not intend to follow the great road to Edinburgh, but to visit Windsor, Oxford, Matlock, and the Cumberland lakes, resolving to arrive at the completion of this tour about the end of July. I packed up my chemical instruments and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook in the northern highlands of Scotland.




          It is not clear if he took these ‘materials’ with him on his tour of Britain, or whether he left them in London and later sent for them to be delivered once he had found a suitable island. Presumably they were packed into cases or crates and the boatmen would not have been aware of their contents.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

            – sharur
            Mar 26 at 18:50






          • 3





            @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

            – Joshua
            Mar 26 at 19:10













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "668"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fliterature.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fhow-could-frankenstein-get-the-parts-for-his-second-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          11














          The beginning of chapter 19 says that Frankenstein spent six months in London assembling the ‘materials’ for the new creature, before setting out for the Scottish island.




          London was our present point of rest; we determined to remain several months in this wonderful and celebrated city. […]



          I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation […]



          We had arrived in England at the beginning of October, and it was now February. We accordingly determined to commence our journey towards the north at the expiration of another month. In this expedition we did not intend to follow the great road to Edinburgh, but to visit Windsor, Oxford, Matlock, and the Cumberland lakes, resolving to arrive at the completion of this tour about the end of July. I packed up my chemical instruments and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook in the northern highlands of Scotland.




          It is not clear if he took these ‘materials’ with him on his tour of Britain, or whether he left them in London and later sent for them to be delivered once he had found a suitable island. Presumably they were packed into cases or crates and the boatmen would not have been aware of their contents.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

            – sharur
            Mar 26 at 18:50






          • 3





            @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

            – Joshua
            Mar 26 at 19:10















          11














          The beginning of chapter 19 says that Frankenstein spent six months in London assembling the ‘materials’ for the new creature, before setting out for the Scottish island.




          London was our present point of rest; we determined to remain several months in this wonderful and celebrated city. […]



          I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation […]



          We had arrived in England at the beginning of October, and it was now February. We accordingly determined to commence our journey towards the north at the expiration of another month. In this expedition we did not intend to follow the great road to Edinburgh, but to visit Windsor, Oxford, Matlock, and the Cumberland lakes, resolving to arrive at the completion of this tour about the end of July. I packed up my chemical instruments and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook in the northern highlands of Scotland.




          It is not clear if he took these ‘materials’ with him on his tour of Britain, or whether he left them in London and later sent for them to be delivered once he had found a suitable island. Presumably they were packed into cases or crates and the boatmen would not have been aware of their contents.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

            – sharur
            Mar 26 at 18:50






          • 3





            @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

            – Joshua
            Mar 26 at 19:10













          11












          11








          11







          The beginning of chapter 19 says that Frankenstein spent six months in London assembling the ‘materials’ for the new creature, before setting out for the Scottish island.




          London was our present point of rest; we determined to remain several months in this wonderful and celebrated city. […]



          I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation […]



          We had arrived in England at the beginning of October, and it was now February. We accordingly determined to commence our journey towards the north at the expiration of another month. In this expedition we did not intend to follow the great road to Edinburgh, but to visit Windsor, Oxford, Matlock, and the Cumberland lakes, resolving to arrive at the completion of this tour about the end of July. I packed up my chemical instruments and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook in the northern highlands of Scotland.




          It is not clear if he took these ‘materials’ with him on his tour of Britain, or whether he left them in London and later sent for them to be delivered once he had found a suitable island. Presumably they were packed into cases or crates and the boatmen would not have been aware of their contents.






          share|improve this answer















          The beginning of chapter 19 says that Frankenstein spent six months in London assembling the ‘materials’ for the new creature, before setting out for the Scottish island.




          London was our present point of rest; we determined to remain several months in this wonderful and celebrated city. […]



          I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation […]



          We had arrived in England at the beginning of October, and it was now February. We accordingly determined to commence our journey towards the north at the expiration of another month. In this expedition we did not intend to follow the great road to Edinburgh, but to visit Windsor, Oxford, Matlock, and the Cumberland lakes, resolving to arrive at the completion of this tour about the end of July. I packed up my chemical instruments and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook in the northern highlands of Scotland.




          It is not clear if he took these ‘materials’ with him on his tour of Britain, or whether he left them in London and later sent for them to be delivered once he had found a suitable island. Presumably they were packed into cases or crates and the boatmen would not have been aware of their contents.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 26 at 13:37

























          answered Mar 26 at 13:32









          Gareth ReesGareth Rees

          9,3411 gold badge18 silver badges87 bronze badges




          9,3411 gold badge18 silver badges87 bronze badges







          • 1





            +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

            – sharur
            Mar 26 at 18:50






          • 3





            @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

            – Joshua
            Mar 26 at 19:10












          • 1





            +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

            – sharur
            Mar 26 at 18:50






          • 3





            @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

            – Joshua
            Mar 26 at 19:10







          1




          1





          +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

          – sharur
          Mar 26 at 18:50





          +1: But one thing: it is possible that the boatmen, etc. would only need to be bribed to look the other way. Surgeons and scientists were known to pay "resurrection men" to steal corpses for direction during this time period.

          – sharur
          Mar 26 at 18:50




          3




          3





          @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

          – Joshua
          Mar 26 at 19:10





          @sharur: Spectacular autocorrect fail on dissection.

          – Joshua
          Mar 26 at 19:10

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Literature Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fliterature.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fhow-could-frankenstein-get-the-parts-for-his-second-creature%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

          155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해