Gitlab CI for multiple app folder in 1 Project RepoGitlabs artifact of one project used in further projectsPushing to GitLab repo does not trigger the Jenkins buildSetting up continues Integration on TFS with GitLab as RepoGitLab CI Pipeline on specific branch onlyImplementing a CI with gitlabHow to update repository with built project?Break Push in GitLab based on SonarQube Analysis ResultDocker build failed: tag invalid reference format (Gitlab CI)Gitlab CI: Is it possible to have sequential builds?
How can I implement regular expressions on an embedded device?
How to find better food in airports
How could a planet have one hemisphere way warmer than the other without the planet being tidally locked?
Why there are construction cranes on apparently completed buildings in New York?
Why is に used with this verb?
Tiny image scraper for xkcd.com
Life post thesis submission is terrifying - Help!
A magician's sleight of hand
Can doublestrike kill a creature with totem armor?
Left my gmail logged in when I was fired
What's the point of this macro?
Are language and thought the same?
Is it possible to observe space debris with Binoculars?
A Meal fit for a King
Round away from zero
Did the US Climate Reference Network Show No New Warming Since 2005 in the US?
What's the difference between a share and a stock?
Does blackhole merging breaks their event horizon seggregation?
Dissuading my girlfriend from a scam
Comparing elements in a nested list to generate a new list
Travel to USA with a stuffed puppet
Global variables and information security
'This one' as a pronoun
Never make public members virtual/abstract - really?
Gitlab CI for multiple app folder in 1 Project Repo
Gitlabs artifact of one project used in further projectsPushing to GitLab repo does not trigger the Jenkins buildSetting up continues Integration on TFS with GitLab as RepoGitLab CI Pipeline on specific branch onlyImplementing a CI with gitlabHow to update repository with built project?Break Push in GitLab based on SonarQube Analysis ResultDocker build failed: tag invalid reference format (Gitlab CI)Gitlab CI: Is it possible to have sequential builds?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
We have following setup
1 Project repo with
–> App1 (source code)
–> App2 (source code)
Now we have single(1) .gitlab-ci.yml at repo level.
What we want to achieve is:
With each checkin/commit to Apps (App1 or App2) should trigger CI build and push its own artifacts to registry.
Can we execute Gitlab-CI[with the same .gitlab-ci.yml from root level] based upon commit/checkin specific Folder Name Apps (App1 or App2)(which has the commit changes ,to be build) ?
Is it possible?
Please guide.
gitlab gitlab-ci
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
add a comment |
We have following setup
1 Project repo with
–> App1 (source code)
–> App2 (source code)
Now we have single(1) .gitlab-ci.yml at repo level.
What we want to achieve is:
With each checkin/commit to Apps (App1 or App2) should trigger CI build and push its own artifacts to registry.
Can we execute Gitlab-CI[with the same .gitlab-ci.yml from root level] based upon commit/checkin specific Folder Name Apps (App1 or App2)(which has the commit changes ,to be build) ?
Is it possible?
Please guide.
gitlab gitlab-ci
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
what do you mean 'can we do parameterze'? do you want to trigger a different build step by the committed code?
– Amityo
Mar 28 at 17:33
Thanks Amityo , what I mean to say is that by parameterise is that same CI file getting fired upon commit into any of Apps (App1 or App2) in the single Repo Project
– Jas Singh
Mar 29 at 5:31
add a comment |
We have following setup
1 Project repo with
–> App1 (source code)
–> App2 (source code)
Now we have single(1) .gitlab-ci.yml at repo level.
What we want to achieve is:
With each checkin/commit to Apps (App1 or App2) should trigger CI build and push its own artifacts to registry.
Can we execute Gitlab-CI[with the same .gitlab-ci.yml from root level] based upon commit/checkin specific Folder Name Apps (App1 or App2)(which has the commit changes ,to be build) ?
Is it possible?
Please guide.
gitlab gitlab-ci
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
We have following setup
1 Project repo with
–> App1 (source code)
–> App2 (source code)
Now we have single(1) .gitlab-ci.yml at repo level.
What we want to achieve is:
With each checkin/commit to Apps (App1 or App2) should trigger CI build and push its own artifacts to registry.
Can we execute Gitlab-CI[with the same .gitlab-ci.yml from root level] based upon commit/checkin specific Folder Name Apps (App1 or App2)(which has the commit changes ,to be build) ?
Is it possible?
Please guide.
gitlab gitlab-ci
gitlab gitlab-ci
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
edited Mar 29 at 7:55
Jas Singh
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
asked Mar 28 at 3:43
Jas SinghJas Singh
11 bronze badge
11 bronze badge
what do you mean 'can we do parameterze'? do you want to trigger a different build step by the committed code?
– Amityo
Mar 28 at 17:33
Thanks Amityo , what I mean to say is that by parameterise is that same CI file getting fired upon commit into any of Apps (App1 or App2) in the single Repo Project
– Jas Singh
Mar 29 at 5:31
add a comment |
what do you mean 'can we do parameterze'? do you want to trigger a different build step by the committed code?
– Amityo
Mar 28 at 17:33
Thanks Amityo , what I mean to say is that by parameterise is that same CI file getting fired upon commit into any of Apps (App1 or App2) in the single Repo Project
– Jas Singh
Mar 29 at 5:31
what do you mean 'can we do parameterze'? do you want to trigger a different build step by the committed code?
– Amityo
Mar 28 at 17:33
what do you mean 'can we do parameterze'? do you want to trigger a different build step by the committed code?
– Amityo
Mar 28 at 17:33
Thanks Amityo , what I mean to say is that by parameterise is that same CI file getting fired upon commit into any of Apps (App1 or App2) in the single Repo Project
– Jas Singh
Mar 29 at 5:31
Thanks Amityo , what I mean to say is that by parameterise is that same CI file getting fired upon commit into any of Apps (App1 or App2) in the single Repo Project
– Jas Singh
Mar 29 at 5:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you run a specific stage based on the changes in App1 or App2 you can use the only+ changes keywords:
Using the changes keyword with only or except, makes it possible to define if a job should be created based on files modified by a git push event.
Define two stages - one for App1, one for App2 and add the only + changes keyword:
build_App1:
script: ...
only:
changes:
- path/to/App1/**/*
see here for more details. And make sure to read the caveats here
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55389839%2fgitlab-ci-for-multiple-app-folder-in-1-project-repo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you run a specific stage based on the changes in App1 or App2 you can use the only+ changes keywords:
Using the changes keyword with only or except, makes it possible to define if a job should be created based on files modified by a git push event.
Define two stages - one for App1, one for App2 and add the only + changes keyword:
build_App1:
script: ...
only:
changes:
- path/to/App1/**/*
see here for more details. And make sure to read the caveats here
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
add a comment |
If you run a specific stage based on the changes in App1 or App2 you can use the only+ changes keywords:
Using the changes keyword with only or except, makes it possible to define if a job should be created based on files modified by a git push event.
Define two stages - one for App1, one for App2 and add the only + changes keyword:
build_App1:
script: ...
only:
changes:
- path/to/App1/**/*
see here for more details. And make sure to read the caveats here
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
add a comment |
If you run a specific stage based on the changes in App1 or App2 you can use the only+ changes keywords:
Using the changes keyword with only or except, makes it possible to define if a job should be created based on files modified by a git push event.
Define two stages - one for App1, one for App2 and add the only + changes keyword:
build_App1:
script: ...
only:
changes:
- path/to/App1/**/*
see here for more details. And make sure to read the caveats here
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
If you run a specific stage based on the changes in App1 or App2 you can use the only+ changes keywords:
Using the changes keyword with only or except, makes it possible to define if a job should be created based on files modified by a git push event.
Define two stages - one for App1, one for App2 and add the only + changes keyword:
build_App1:
script: ...
only:
changes:
- path/to/App1/**/*
see here for more details. And make sure to read the caveats here
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
answered Mar 29 at 8:55
AmityoAmityo
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
1,93912 silver badges21 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.
Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55389839%2fgitlab-ci-for-multiple-app-folder-in-1-project-repo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
what do you mean 'can we do parameterze'? do you want to trigger a different build step by the committed code?
– Amityo
Mar 28 at 17:33
Thanks Amityo , what I mean to say is that by parameterise is that same CI file getting fired upon commit into any of Apps (App1 or App2) in the single Repo Project
– Jas Singh
Mar 29 at 5:31