I just assigned a variable, but echo $variable shows something elseHow do I preserve newlines in a quoted string in Bash?grep output prints only single line in bash scriptBash: preserve string with spaces input on command line?How to store output from printf with formatting in a variable?How to preserve spaces when outputting a shell variable?echo trims multiple spaces from a Bash variableecho removes leading whitespace in a Bash variableHow to write a multiline string to a file in BashBash script echo seems to remove my new lines?In bash how to insert a variable in a grep command and affect output to another?sudo echo “something” >> /etc/privilegedFile doesn't workHow to assign a heredoc value to a variable in Bash?Assigning default values to shell variables with a single command in bashCommand not found error in Bash variable assignmentHow to assign the output of a Bash command to a variable?Read a file line by line assigning the value to a variableShell script: setting title for new gnome-terminal tabcorrect bash parsing of unquoted file arguments containing backslash spaces instead of quotesBash script: paste and execute an external bash scriptHow can you echo the 'output' of echoing a variable in bash?

Can anyone give me the reason why music is taught this way?

Avoiding dust scattering when you drill

Can I cast Death Ward on additional creatures without causing previous castings to end?

Everyone Gets a Window Seat

Can a passenger predict that an airline or a tour operator is about to go bankrupt?

Why most footers have a background color as a divider of section?

Why has Speaker Pelosi been so hesitant to impeach President Trump?

Shell Sort, Insertion Sort, Bubble Sort, Selection Sort Algorithms (Python)

How to interpret the challenge rating of creatures?

MaxCounters solution in C# from Codility

All over the place

Would an object shot from earth fall into the sun?

What does a textbook look like while you are writing it?

How dangerous is a very out-of-true disc brake wheel?

How to find places to store/land a private airplane?

How to identify whether a publisher is genuine or not?

How important is knowledge of trig identities for use in Calculus

SOQL injection vulnerability issue

French license plates

How to "Start as close to the end as possible", and why to do so?

Should I be an author on another PhD student's paper if I went to their meetings and gave advice?

Looking for circuit board material that can be dissolved

What does the triangle look like in this diagram?

A word that refers to saying something in an attempt to anger or embarrass someone into doing something that they don’t want to do?



I just assigned a variable, but echo $variable shows something else


How do I preserve newlines in a quoted string in Bash?grep output prints only single line in bash scriptBash: preserve string with spaces input on command line?How to store output from printf with formatting in a variable?How to preserve spaces when outputting a shell variable?echo trims multiple spaces from a Bash variableecho removes leading whitespace in a Bash variableHow to write a multiline string to a file in BashBash script echo seems to remove my new lines?In bash how to insert a variable in a grep command and affect output to another?sudo echo “something” >> /etc/privilegedFile doesn't workHow to assign a heredoc value to a variable in Bash?Assigning default values to shell variables with a single command in bashCommand not found error in Bash variable assignmentHow to assign the output of a Bash command to a variable?Read a file line by line assigning the value to a variableShell script: setting title for new gnome-terminal tabcorrect bash parsing of unquoted file arguments containing backslash spaces instead of quotesBash script: paste and execute an external bash scriptHow can you echo the 'output' of echoing a variable in bash?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









81















Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.



How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?



Asterisks



The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:



$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...


Square brackets



The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!



$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c


Line feeds (newlines)



The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!



$ cat file
foo
bar
baz

$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz


Multiple spaces



I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!



$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count


Tabs



I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!



$ var=$'keytvalue'
$ echo $var
key value









share|improve this question





















  • 2





    Thanks for doing this. I encounter the line feeds one often. So var=$(cat file) is fine, but echo "$var" is needed.

    – snd
    Apr 1 '15 at 0:07







  • 3





    BTW, this is also BashPitfalls #14: mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#echo_.24foo

    – Charles Duffy
    May 20 '15 at 16:47











  • See also stackoverflow.com/questions/10067266/…

    – tripleee
    Jul 9 '15 at 14:39











  • Also, see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2414150/…

    – tripleee
    Dec 18 '15 at 16:21

















81















Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.



How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?



Asterisks



The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:



$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...


Square brackets



The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!



$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c


Line feeds (newlines)



The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!



$ cat file
foo
bar
baz

$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz


Multiple spaces



I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!



$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count


Tabs



I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!



$ var=$'keytvalue'
$ echo $var
key value









share|improve this question





















  • 2





    Thanks for doing this. I encounter the line feeds one often. So var=$(cat file) is fine, but echo "$var" is needed.

    – snd
    Apr 1 '15 at 0:07







  • 3





    BTW, this is also BashPitfalls #14: mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#echo_.24foo

    – Charles Duffy
    May 20 '15 at 16:47











  • See also stackoverflow.com/questions/10067266/…

    – tripleee
    Jul 9 '15 at 14:39











  • Also, see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2414150/…

    – tripleee
    Dec 18 '15 at 16:21













81












81








81


19






Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.



How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?



Asterisks



The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:



$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...


Square brackets



The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!



$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c


Line feeds (newlines)



The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!



$ cat file
foo
bar
baz

$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz


Multiple spaces



I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!



$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count


Tabs



I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!



$ var=$'keytvalue'
$ echo $var
key value









share|improve this question
















Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.



How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?



Asterisks



The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:



$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...


Square brackets



The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!



$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c


Line feeds (newlines)



The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!



$ cat file
foo
bar
baz

$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz


Multiple spaces



I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!



$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count


Tabs



I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!



$ var=$'keytvalue'
$ echo $var
key value






bash shell sh quoting






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 25 '18 at 17:41







that other guy

















asked Mar 31 '15 at 21:05









that other guythat other guy

80.8k9 gold badges94 silver badges133 bronze badges




80.8k9 gold badges94 silver badges133 bronze badges










  • 2





    Thanks for doing this. I encounter the line feeds one often. So var=$(cat file) is fine, but echo "$var" is needed.

    – snd
    Apr 1 '15 at 0:07







  • 3





    BTW, this is also BashPitfalls #14: mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#echo_.24foo

    – Charles Duffy
    May 20 '15 at 16:47











  • See also stackoverflow.com/questions/10067266/…

    – tripleee
    Jul 9 '15 at 14:39











  • Also, see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2414150/…

    – tripleee
    Dec 18 '15 at 16:21












  • 2





    Thanks for doing this. I encounter the line feeds one often. So var=$(cat file) is fine, but echo "$var" is needed.

    – snd
    Apr 1 '15 at 0:07







  • 3





    BTW, this is also BashPitfalls #14: mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#echo_.24foo

    – Charles Duffy
    May 20 '15 at 16:47











  • See also stackoverflow.com/questions/10067266/…

    – tripleee
    Jul 9 '15 at 14:39











  • Also, see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2414150/…

    – tripleee
    Dec 18 '15 at 16:21







2




2





Thanks for doing this. I encounter the line feeds one often. So var=$(cat file) is fine, but echo "$var" is needed.

– snd
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07






Thanks for doing this. I encounter the line feeds one often. So var=$(cat file) is fine, but echo "$var" is needed.

– snd
Apr 1 '15 at 0:07





3




3





BTW, this is also BashPitfalls #14: mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#echo_.24foo

– Charles Duffy
May 20 '15 at 16:47





BTW, this is also BashPitfalls #14: mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#echo_.24foo

– Charles Duffy
May 20 '15 at 16:47













See also stackoverflow.com/questions/10067266/…

– tripleee
Jul 9 '15 at 14:39





See also stackoverflow.com/questions/10067266/…

– tripleee
Jul 9 '15 at 14:39













Also, see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2414150/…

– tripleee
Dec 18 '15 at 16:21





Also, see also stackoverflow.com/questions/2414150/…

– tripleee
Dec 18 '15 at 16:21












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















101
















In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:



echo "$var"


This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!




Why?



When a variable is unquoted, it will:




  1. Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):



    Before: /* Foobar is free software */



    After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */




  2. Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:



    Before: /*



    After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...




  3. Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving



    /bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/


    instead of the variable's value.



When the variable is quoted it will:



  1. Be substituted for its value.

  2. There is no step 2.

This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.






share|improve this answer

























  • it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

    – recolic
    May 5 at 3:08






  • 1





    Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

    – that other guy
    Jun 6 at 19:17


















13
















You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:




Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?



$foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
something much more complex:



  • First, take the value of the variable.

  • Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
    contains foo * bar ​ then the result of this step is the 3-element
    list foo, *, bar.

  • Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
    pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
    unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
    following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
    bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
    bar.

Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
"$@" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$@" is
equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $@?)



The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
`foo`
. On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.



The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
-).



See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
cases when you can leave out the quotes.



Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
security
holes.







share|improve this answer


































    5
















    In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).



    To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.



    Thus:



    $ vars="-e -n -a"
    $ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
    -a
    $ echo "$vars"
    -e -n -a


    However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:



    $ vars="-n"
    $ echo $vars
    $ ## not even an empty line was printed


    ...whereas it will save you with printf:



    $ vars="-n"
    $ printf '%sn' "$vars"
    -n





    share|improve this answer

























    • Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

      – that other guy
      Sep 21 '18 at 23:24











    • Did you mean consume -n as well?

      – PesaThe
      Jan 7 at 15:32






    • 1





      @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

      – Charles Duffy
      Jan 7 at 15:46












    • Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

      – PesaThe
      Jan 7 at 21:03


















    3
















    user double quote to get the exact value. like this:



    echo "$var"


    and it will read your value correctly.






    share|improve this answer
































      1
















      echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:



      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
      ^I$


      This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.



      One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :




      If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.




      Setting to null means setting to empty
      value:



      IFS=



      Test:



      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
      ^I$
      [ks@localhost ~]$ var=$'keynvalue'
      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
      key value
      [ks@localhost ~]$ IFS=
      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
      key
      value
      [ks@localhost ~]$





      share|improve this answer




















      • 2





        You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

        – that other guy
        Nov 15 '15 at 18:31











      • @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

        – ks1322
        Nov 16 '15 at 9:02






      • 1





        Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

        – that other guy
        Nov 16 '15 at 17:05











      • I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

        – ks1322
        Nov 17 '15 at 8:42


















      -2
















      Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.



      $ echo $var | tr " " "n"
      foo
      bar
      baz


      Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 2





        But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

        – user000001
        May 20 '15 at 18:06












      • True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

        – Alek
        May 20 '15 at 19:00






      • 3





        Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

        – tripleee
        Feb 1 '16 at 6:22











      • @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

        – Charles Duffy
        Jan 23 '17 at 21:43






      • 1





        @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

        – Charles Duffy
        Jan 23 '17 at 21:45











      protected by codeforester Aug 5 '18 at 17:11



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      101
















      In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:



      echo "$var"


      This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!




      Why?



      When a variable is unquoted, it will:




      1. Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):



        Before: /* Foobar is free software */



        After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */




      2. Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:



        Before: /*



        After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...




      3. Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving



        /bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/


        instead of the variable's value.



      When the variable is quoted it will:



      1. Be substituted for its value.

      2. There is no step 2.

      This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.






      share|improve this answer

























      • it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

        – recolic
        May 5 at 3:08






      • 1





        Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

        – that other guy
        Jun 6 at 19:17















      101
















      In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:



      echo "$var"


      This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!




      Why?



      When a variable is unquoted, it will:




      1. Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):



        Before: /* Foobar is free software */



        After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */




      2. Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:



        Before: /*



        After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...




      3. Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving



        /bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/


        instead of the variable's value.



      When the variable is quoted it will:



      1. Be substituted for its value.

      2. There is no step 2.

      This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.






      share|improve this answer

























      • it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

        – recolic
        May 5 at 3:08






      • 1





        Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

        – that other guy
        Jun 6 at 19:17













      101














      101










      101









      In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:



      echo "$var"


      This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!




      Why?



      When a variable is unquoted, it will:




      1. Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):



        Before: /* Foobar is free software */



        After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */




      2. Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:



        Before: /*



        After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...




      3. Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving



        /bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/


        instead of the variable's value.



      When the variable is quoted it will:



      1. Be substituted for its value.

      2. There is no step 2.

      This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.






      share|improve this answer













      In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:



      echo "$var"


      This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!




      Why?



      When a variable is unquoted, it will:




      1. Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):



        Before: /* Foobar is free software */



        After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */




      2. Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:



        Before: /*



        After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...




      3. Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving



        /bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/


        instead of the variable's value.



      When the variable is quoted it will:



      1. Be substituted for its value.

      2. There is no step 2.

      This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 31 '15 at 21:05









      that other guythat other guy

      80.8k9 gold badges94 silver badges133 bronze badges




      80.8k9 gold badges94 silver badges133 bronze badges















      • it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

        – recolic
        May 5 at 3:08






      • 1





        Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

        – that other guy
        Jun 6 at 19:17

















      • it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

        – recolic
        May 5 at 3:08






      • 1





        Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

        – that other guy
        Jun 6 at 19:17
















      it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

      – recolic
      May 5 at 3:08





      it's not always working. I can give an example: paste.ubuntu.com/p/8RjR6CS668

      – recolic
      May 5 at 3:08




      1




      1





      Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

      – that other guy
      Jun 6 at 19:17





      Yup, $(..) strips trailing linefeeds. You can use var=$(cat file; printf x); var="$var%x" to work around it.

      – that other guy
      Jun 6 at 19:17













      13
















      You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:




      Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?



      $foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
      something much more complex:



      • First, take the value of the variable.

      • Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
        contains foo * bar ​ then the result of this step is the 3-element
        list foo, *, bar.

      • Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
        pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
        unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
        following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
        bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
        bar.

      Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
      shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
      filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
      the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
      double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
      "$@" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$@" is
      equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
      parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $@?)



      The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
      `foo`
      . On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
      weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
      is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.



      The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
      expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
      non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
      -).



      See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
      cases when you can leave out the quotes.



      Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
      always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
      take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
      security
      holes.







      share|improve this answer































        13
















        You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:




        Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?



        $foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
        something much more complex:



        • First, take the value of the variable.

        • Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
          contains foo * bar ​ then the result of this step is the 3-element
          list foo, *, bar.

        • Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
          pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
          unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
          following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
          bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
          bar.

        Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
        shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
        filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
        the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
        double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
        "$@" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$@" is
        equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
        parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $@?)



        The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
        `foo`
        . On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
        weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
        is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.



        The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
        expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
        non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
        -).



        See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
        cases when you can leave out the quotes.



        Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
        always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
        take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
        security
        holes.







        share|improve this answer





























          13














          13










          13









          You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:




          Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?



          $foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
          something much more complex:



          • First, take the value of the variable.

          • Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
            contains foo * bar ​ then the result of this step is the 3-element
            list foo, *, bar.

          • Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
            pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
            unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
            following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
            bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
            bar.

          Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
          shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
          filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
          the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
          double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
          "$@" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$@" is
          equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
          parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $@?)



          The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
          `foo`
          . On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
          weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
          is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.



          The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
          expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
          non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
          -).



          See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
          cases when you can leave out the quotes.



          Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
          always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
          take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
          security
          holes.







          share|improve this answer















          You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:




          Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?



          $foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
          something much more complex:



          • First, take the value of the variable.

          • Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
            contains foo * bar ​ then the result of this step is the 3-element
            list foo, *, bar.

          • Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
            pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
            unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
            following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
            bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
            bar.

          Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
          shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
          filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
          the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
          double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
          "$@" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$@" is
          equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
          parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $@?)



          The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
          `foo`
          . On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
          weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
          is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.



          The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
          expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
          non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
          -).



          See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
          cases when you can leave out the quotes.



          Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
          always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
          take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
          security
          holes.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 23 '17 at 12:18









          Community

          11 silver badge




          11 silver badge










          answered Jul 9 '15 at 14:20









          fedorquifedorqui

          184k58 gold badges379 silver badges421 bronze badges




          184k58 gold badges379 silver badges421 bronze badges
























              5
















              In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).



              To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.



              Thus:



              $ vars="-e -n -a"
              $ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
              -a
              $ echo "$vars"
              -e -n -a


              However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ echo $vars
              $ ## not even an empty line was printed


              ...whereas it will save you with printf:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ printf '%sn' "$vars"
              -n





              share|improve this answer

























              • Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

                – that other guy
                Sep 21 '18 at 23:24











              • Did you mean consume -n as well?

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 15:32






              • 1





                @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

                – Charles Duffy
                Jan 7 at 15:46












              • Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 21:03















              5
















              In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).



              To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.



              Thus:



              $ vars="-e -n -a"
              $ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
              -a
              $ echo "$vars"
              -e -n -a


              However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ echo $vars
              $ ## not even an empty line was printed


              ...whereas it will save you with printf:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ printf '%sn' "$vars"
              -n





              share|improve this answer

























              • Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

                – that other guy
                Sep 21 '18 at 23:24











              • Did you mean consume -n as well?

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 15:32






              • 1





                @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

                – Charles Duffy
                Jan 7 at 15:46












              • Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 21:03













              5














              5










              5









              In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).



              To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.



              Thus:



              $ vars="-e -n -a"
              $ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
              -a
              $ echo "$vars"
              -e -n -a


              However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ echo $vars
              $ ## not even an empty line was printed


              ...whereas it will save you with printf:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ printf '%sn' "$vars"
              -n





              share|improve this answer













              In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).



              To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.



              Thus:



              $ vars="-e -n -a"
              $ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
              -a
              $ echo "$vars"
              -e -n -a


              However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ echo $vars
              $ ## not even an empty line was printed


              ...whereas it will save you with printf:



              $ vars="-n"
              $ printf '%sn' "$vars"
              -n






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Sep 21 '18 at 22:31









              Charles DuffyCharles Duffy

              194k29 gold badges222 silver badges279 bronze badges




              194k29 gold badges222 silver badges279 bronze badges















              • Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

                – that other guy
                Sep 21 '18 at 23:24











              • Did you mean consume -n as well?

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 15:32






              • 1





                @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

                – Charles Duffy
                Jan 7 at 15:46












              • Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 21:03

















              • Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

                – that other guy
                Sep 21 '18 at 23:24











              • Did you mean consume -n as well?

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 15:32






              • 1





                @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

                – Charles Duffy
                Jan 7 at 15:46












              • Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

                – PesaThe
                Jan 7 at 21:03
















              Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

              – that other guy
              Sep 21 '18 at 23:24





              Yay, we need a good dedup for this! I agree this fits the question title, but I don't think it'll get the visibility it deserves here. How about a new question à la "Why is my -e/-n/backslash not showing up?" We can add links from here as appropriate.

              – that other guy
              Sep 21 '18 at 23:24













              Did you mean consume -n as well?

              – PesaThe
              Jan 7 at 15:32





              Did you mean consume -n as well?

              – PesaThe
              Jan 7 at 15:32




              1




              1





              @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

              – Charles Duffy
              Jan 7 at 15:46






              @PesaThe, no, I meant -e. The standard for echo does not specify output when its first argument is -n, making any/all possible output legal in that case; there is no such provision for -e.

              – Charles Duffy
              Jan 7 at 15:46














              Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

              – PesaThe
              Jan 7 at 21:03





              Oh...I can't read. Let's blame my English for that. Thanks for the explanation.

              – PesaThe
              Jan 7 at 21:03











              3
















              user double quote to get the exact value. like this:



              echo "$var"


              and it will read your value correctly.






              share|improve this answer





























                3
















                user double quote to get the exact value. like this:



                echo "$var"


                and it will read your value correctly.






                share|improve this answer



























                  3














                  3










                  3









                  user double quote to get the exact value. like this:



                  echo "$var"


                  and it will read your value correctly.






                  share|improve this answer













                  user double quote to get the exact value. like this:



                  echo "$var"


                  and it will read your value correctly.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 3 '18 at 4:47









                  vanishedzhouvanishedzhou

                  1211 silver badge4 bronze badges




                  1211 silver badge4 bronze badges
























                      1
















                      echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$


                      This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.



                      One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :




                      If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.




                      Setting to null means setting to empty
                      value:



                      IFS=



                      Test:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ var=$'keynvalue'
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ IFS=
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key
                      value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$





                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 2





                        You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 15 '15 at 18:31











                      • @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 16 '15 at 9:02






                      • 1





                        Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 16 '15 at 17:05











                      • I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 17 '15 at 8:42















                      1
















                      echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$


                      This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.



                      One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :




                      If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.




                      Setting to null means setting to empty
                      value:



                      IFS=



                      Test:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ var=$'keynvalue'
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ IFS=
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key
                      value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$





                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 2





                        You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 15 '15 at 18:31











                      • @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 16 '15 at 9:02






                      • 1





                        Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 16 '15 at 17:05











                      • I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 17 '15 at 8:42













                      1














                      1










                      1









                      echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$


                      This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.



                      One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :




                      If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.




                      Setting to null means setting to empty
                      value:



                      IFS=



                      Test:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ var=$'keynvalue'
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ IFS=
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key
                      value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$





                      share|improve this answer













                      echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$


                      This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.



                      One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :




                      If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.




                      Setting to null means setting to empty
                      value:



                      IFS=



                      Test:



                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
                      ^I$
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ var=$'keynvalue'
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ IFS=
                      [ks@localhost ~]$ echo $var
                      key
                      value
                      [ks@localhost ~]$






                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Nov 15 '15 at 12:14









                      ks1322ks1322

                      24.1k11 gold badges72 silver badges116 bronze badges




                      24.1k11 gold badges72 silver badges116 bronze badges










                      • 2





                        You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 15 '15 at 18:31











                      • @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 16 '15 at 9:02






                      • 1





                        Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 16 '15 at 17:05











                      • I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 17 '15 at 8:42












                      • 2





                        You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 15 '15 at 18:31











                      • @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 16 '15 at 9:02






                      • 1





                        Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

                        – that other guy
                        Nov 16 '15 at 17:05











                      • I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

                        – ks1322
                        Nov 17 '15 at 8:42







                      2




                      2





                      You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

                      – that other guy
                      Nov 15 '15 at 18:31





                      You would also have to set -f to prevent globbing

                      – that other guy
                      Nov 15 '15 at 18:31













                      @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

                      – ks1322
                      Nov 16 '15 at 9:02





                      @thatotherguy, is it really necessary for your 1-st example with path expansion? With IFS set to null, echo $var will be expanded to echo '/* Foobar is free software */' and path expansion is not performed inside single quoted strings.

                      – ks1322
                      Nov 16 '15 at 9:02




                      1




                      1





                      Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

                      – that other guy
                      Nov 16 '15 at 17:05





                      Yes. If you mkdir "/this thing called Foobar is free software etc/" you'll see that it still expands. It's obviously more practical for the [a-z] example.

                      – that other guy
                      Nov 16 '15 at 17:05













                      I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

                      – ks1322
                      Nov 17 '15 at 8:42





                      I see, this makes sense for [a-z] example.

                      – ks1322
                      Nov 17 '15 at 8:42











                      -2
















                      Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.



                      $ echo $var | tr " " "n"
                      foo
                      bar
                      baz


                      Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.






                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 2





                        But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

                        – user000001
                        May 20 '15 at 18:06












                      • True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

                        – Alek
                        May 20 '15 at 19:00






                      • 3





                        Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

                        – tripleee
                        Feb 1 '16 at 6:22











                      • @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:43






                      • 1





                        @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:45
















                      -2
















                      Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.



                      $ echo $var | tr " " "n"
                      foo
                      bar
                      baz


                      Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.






                      share|improve this answer




















                      • 2





                        But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

                        – user000001
                        May 20 '15 at 18:06












                      • True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

                        – Alek
                        May 20 '15 at 19:00






                      • 3





                        Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

                        – tripleee
                        Feb 1 '16 at 6:22











                      • @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:43






                      • 1





                        @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:45














                      -2














                      -2










                      -2









                      Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.



                      $ echo $var | tr " " "n"
                      foo
                      bar
                      baz


                      Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.



                      $ echo $var | tr " " "n"
                      foo
                      bar
                      baz


                      Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered May 20 '15 at 16:33









                      AlekAlek

                      747 bronze badges




                      747 bronze badges










                      • 2





                        But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

                        – user000001
                        May 20 '15 at 18:06












                      • True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

                        – Alek
                        May 20 '15 at 19:00






                      • 3





                        Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

                        – tripleee
                        Feb 1 '16 at 6:22











                      • @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:43






                      • 1





                        @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:45













                      • 2





                        But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

                        – user000001
                        May 20 '15 at 18:06












                      • True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

                        – Alek
                        May 20 '15 at 19:00






                      • 3





                        Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

                        – tripleee
                        Feb 1 '16 at 6:22











                      • @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:43






                      • 1





                        @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

                        – Charles Duffy
                        Jan 23 '17 at 21:45








                      2




                      2





                      But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

                      – user000001
                      May 20 '15 at 18:06






                      But this substitutes all spaces to newlines. Quoting preserves the existing newlines and spaces.

                      – user000001
                      May 20 '15 at 18:06














                      True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

                      – Alek
                      May 20 '15 at 19:00





                      True, yes. I suppose it depends on what is within the variable. I actually use tr the other way around to create arrays from text files.

                      – Alek
                      May 20 '15 at 19:00




                      3




                      3





                      Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

                      – tripleee
                      Feb 1 '16 at 6:22





                      Creating a problem by not quoting the variable properly and then working around it with a hamfisted extra process is not good programming.

                      – tripleee
                      Feb 1 '16 at 6:22













                      @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

                      – Charles Duffy
                      Jan 23 '17 at 21:43





                      @Alek, ...err, what? There's no tr needed to properly/correctly create an array from a text file -- you can specify whatever separator you want by setting IFS. For instance: IFS=$'n' read -r -d '' -a arrayname < <(cat file.txt && printf '') works all the way back through bash 3.2 (the oldest version in wide circulation), and correctly sets exit status to false if your cat failed. And if you wanted, say, tabs instead newlines, you'd just replace the $'n' with $'t'.

                      – Charles Duffy
                      Jan 23 '17 at 21:43




                      1




                      1





                      @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

                      – Charles Duffy
                      Jan 23 '17 at 21:45






                      @Alek, ...if you're doing something like arrayname=( $( cat file | tr 'n' ' ' ) ), then that's broken on multiple layers: It's globbing your results (so a * turns into a list of files in the current directory), and it would work just as well without the tr (or the cat, for that matter; one could just use arrayname=$( $(<file) ) and it would be broken in the same ways, but less inefficiently so).

                      – Charles Duffy
                      Jan 23 '17 at 21:45






                      protected by codeforester Aug 5 '18 at 17:11



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현