Windows Ethernet showing “Network cable unplugged” when connected to Linux machine [closed]How to detect the physical connected state of a network cable/connector?Specify source IP address for TCP socket when using Linux network device aliasesCan't connect to MySQL server error 111SIP and EC2 elastic IPsGet the network interface type in Linux via C programJpcapCaptor.getDeviceList() returns an empty arrayUDP broadcasting with QTiwlist p2p0 scan returning “p2p0 Interface doesn't support scanning : Operation not supported”IPV6 Binding Failure Error: Cannot assign requested address.NET Core app not accessible outside Linux server
What is the difference between increasing volume and increasing gain?
Why such a singular place for bird watching?
How can Germany increase investments in Russia while EU economic sanctions against Russia are still in place?
How dangerous is a very out-of-true disc brake wheel?
Does the US Armed Forces refuse to recruit anyone with an IQ less than 83?
The answer is a girl's name (my future granddaughter) - can anyone help?
Giving a good fancy look to a simple table
Can I cast Death Ward on additional creatures without causing previous castings to end?
Avoiding dust scattering when you drill
麦酒 (ばくしゅ) for "beer"
What is the meaning of first flight and introduction in aircraft production?
Parent asking for money after moving out
A word that refers to saying something in an attempt to anger or embarrass someone into doing something that they don’t want to do?
If I travelled back in time to invest in X company to make a fortune, roughly what is the probability that it would fail?
How dangerous are my worn rims?
IEEE 754 square root with Newton-Raphson
Confusion regarding control system of Mars Rover?
Why do Russians sometimes spell "жирный" (fatty) as "жырный"?
Could the Queen overturn the UK Supreme Court ruling regarding prorogation of Parliament?
Could Boris Johnson face criminal charges for illegally proroguing Parliament?
How to say "respectively" in German when listing (enumerating) things
Is the "spacetime" the same thing as the mathematical 4th dimension?
Would an object shot from earth fall into the sun?
How to level a picture frame hung on a single nail?
Windows Ethernet showing “Network cable unplugged” when connected to Linux machine [closed]
How to detect the physical connected state of a network cable/connector?Specify source IP address for TCP socket when using Linux network device aliasesCan't connect to MySQL server error 111SIP and EC2 elastic IPsGet the network interface type in Linux via C programJpcapCaptor.getDeviceList() returns an empty arrayUDP broadcasting with QTiwlist p2p0 scan returning “p2p0 Interface doesn't support scanning : Operation not supported”IPV6 Binding Failure Error: Cannot assign requested address.NET Core app not accessible outside Linux server
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I currently have a Windows 10 machine connected to a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6.10 machine by Cat 5 Ethernet cable.
I plug an Ethernet cable from eth2
port on the Linux machine to Ethernet
on Windows machine.
I run ifconfig eth2 down
on the Linux machine to take down the network connection. The Network Connections window on the Windows Machine show that Ethernet
is connected to an Unidentified network. I cannot ping the static ip address for eth2
however.
If I run ifconfig eth2 up
on the Linux machine to bring up the network connection Windows shows Ethernet
as "Network cable unplugged'. When running ifconfig
on the Linux machine the following shows:
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr __:__:__:__:__:__
inet addr: 192.168.1.11 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:17
If I ping 192.168.1.11
on the Windows machine I get the message Destination Host Unreachable
.
What might be causing this?
linux windows redhat ethernet ifconfig
closed as off-topic by jww, Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, DavidW, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR Apr 11 at 8:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Questions on professional server- or networking-related infrastructure administration are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve programming or programming tools. You may be able to get help on Server Fault." – Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR
- "Questions about general computing hardware and software are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve tools used primarily for programming. You may be able to get help on Super User." – jww, DavidW
add a comment
|
I currently have a Windows 10 machine connected to a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6.10 machine by Cat 5 Ethernet cable.
I plug an Ethernet cable from eth2
port on the Linux machine to Ethernet
on Windows machine.
I run ifconfig eth2 down
on the Linux machine to take down the network connection. The Network Connections window on the Windows Machine show that Ethernet
is connected to an Unidentified network. I cannot ping the static ip address for eth2
however.
If I run ifconfig eth2 up
on the Linux machine to bring up the network connection Windows shows Ethernet
as "Network cable unplugged'. When running ifconfig
on the Linux machine the following shows:
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr __:__:__:__:__:__
inet addr: 192.168.1.11 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:17
If I ping 192.168.1.11
on the Windows machine I get the message Destination Host Unreachable
.
What might be causing this?
linux windows redhat ethernet ifconfig
closed as off-topic by jww, Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, DavidW, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR Apr 11 at 8:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Questions on professional server- or networking-related infrastructure administration are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve programming or programming tools. You may be able to get help on Server Fault." – Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR
- "Questions about general computing hardware and software are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve tools used primarily for programming. You may be able to get help on Super User." – jww, DavidW
add a comment
|
I currently have a Windows 10 machine connected to a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6.10 machine by Cat 5 Ethernet cable.
I plug an Ethernet cable from eth2
port on the Linux machine to Ethernet
on Windows machine.
I run ifconfig eth2 down
on the Linux machine to take down the network connection. The Network Connections window on the Windows Machine show that Ethernet
is connected to an Unidentified network. I cannot ping the static ip address for eth2
however.
If I run ifconfig eth2 up
on the Linux machine to bring up the network connection Windows shows Ethernet
as "Network cable unplugged'. When running ifconfig
on the Linux machine the following shows:
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr __:__:__:__:__:__
inet addr: 192.168.1.11 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:17
If I ping 192.168.1.11
on the Windows machine I get the message Destination Host Unreachable
.
What might be causing this?
linux windows redhat ethernet ifconfig
I currently have a Windows 10 machine connected to a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6.10 machine by Cat 5 Ethernet cable.
I plug an Ethernet cable from eth2
port on the Linux machine to Ethernet
on Windows machine.
I run ifconfig eth2 down
on the Linux machine to take down the network connection. The Network Connections window on the Windows Machine show that Ethernet
is connected to an Unidentified network. I cannot ping the static ip address for eth2
however.
If I run ifconfig eth2 up
on the Linux machine to bring up the network connection Windows shows Ethernet
as "Network cable unplugged'. When running ifconfig
on the Linux machine the following shows:
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr __:__:__:__:__:__
inet addr: 192.168.1.11 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:17
If I ping 192.168.1.11
on the Windows machine I get the message Destination Host Unreachable
.
What might be causing this?
linux windows redhat ethernet ifconfig
linux windows redhat ethernet ifconfig
asked Mar 28 at 20:54
SamSam
1,0972 gold badges8 silver badges24 bronze badges
1,0972 gold badges8 silver badges24 bronze badges
closed as off-topic by jww, Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, DavidW, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR Apr 11 at 8:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Questions on professional server- or networking-related infrastructure administration are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve programming or programming tools. You may be able to get help on Server Fault." – Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR
- "Questions about general computing hardware and software are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve tools used primarily for programming. You may be able to get help on Super User." – jww, DavidW
closed as off-topic by jww, Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, DavidW, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR Apr 11 at 8:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Questions on professional server- or networking-related infrastructure administration are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve programming or programming tools. You may be able to get help on Server Fault." – Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR
- "Questions about general computing hardware and software are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve tools used primarily for programming. You may be able to get help on Super User." – jww, DavidW
closed as off-topic by jww, Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, DavidW, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR Apr 11 at 8:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:
- "Questions on professional server- or networking-related infrastructure administration are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve programming or programming tools. You may be able to get help on Server Fault." – Tanktalus, Tsyvarev, E_net4 the Meta-RemoveR
- "Questions about general computing hardware and software are off-topic for Stack Overflow unless they directly involve tools used primarily for programming. You may be able to get help on Super User." – jww, DavidW
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
You don't specify how you configured your interfaces on both sides.
From your ifconfig on Linux side it appears that you configured it with a static IP 192.168.1.11/24. What about Windows side? Is the interface also configured to have some static IP in the same network? E.g. 192.168.1.12 with netmask 255.255.255.0?
BTW, most modern Ethernet interfaces feature automatic polarity detection, so the need to have a crossover cable is quite rare these days.
add a comment
|
There is no point to touch IP configuration until you see link is UP
- Check if cards are blinking
- Try replacing the cable
- Try lowering link speed with duplex change with ethtool (windows:network settings GUI)
ethtool -s eth2 speed 10 duplex half autoneg off
add a comment
|
Most likely, you need a cross-over cable - an ethernet cable where the receive terminal from one side connects to the transmit terminal on the other, and vice versa. Or just use a modern hub or switch as an intermediary - most automatically switch the direction automatically. Plug both machines into the hub or switch, and they should be able to communicate from their static IPs just fine.
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
add a comment
|
You must use a Cross-Over cable (Pin 1,2 to 3,6 and visavi).
And don't forget to manualy set up your IP configuration (Gateway is not needed) in the same subnetmask. There is now no DHCP server between.
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You don't specify how you configured your interfaces on both sides.
From your ifconfig on Linux side it appears that you configured it with a static IP 192.168.1.11/24. What about Windows side? Is the interface also configured to have some static IP in the same network? E.g. 192.168.1.12 with netmask 255.255.255.0?
BTW, most modern Ethernet interfaces feature automatic polarity detection, so the need to have a crossover cable is quite rare these days.
add a comment
|
You don't specify how you configured your interfaces on both sides.
From your ifconfig on Linux side it appears that you configured it with a static IP 192.168.1.11/24. What about Windows side? Is the interface also configured to have some static IP in the same network? E.g. 192.168.1.12 with netmask 255.255.255.0?
BTW, most modern Ethernet interfaces feature automatic polarity detection, so the need to have a crossover cable is quite rare these days.
add a comment
|
You don't specify how you configured your interfaces on both sides.
From your ifconfig on Linux side it appears that you configured it with a static IP 192.168.1.11/24. What about Windows side? Is the interface also configured to have some static IP in the same network? E.g. 192.168.1.12 with netmask 255.255.255.0?
BTW, most modern Ethernet interfaces feature automatic polarity detection, so the need to have a crossover cable is quite rare these days.
You don't specify how you configured your interfaces on both sides.
From your ifconfig on Linux side it appears that you configured it with a static IP 192.168.1.11/24. What about Windows side? Is the interface also configured to have some static IP in the same network? E.g. 192.168.1.12 with netmask 255.255.255.0?
BTW, most modern Ethernet interfaces feature automatic polarity detection, so the need to have a crossover cable is quite rare these days.
answered Apr 8 at 0:30
WantedWanted
3211 silver badge3 bronze badges
3211 silver badge3 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
There is no point to touch IP configuration until you see link is UP
- Check if cards are blinking
- Try replacing the cable
- Try lowering link speed with duplex change with ethtool (windows:network settings GUI)
ethtool -s eth2 speed 10 duplex half autoneg off
add a comment
|
There is no point to touch IP configuration until you see link is UP
- Check if cards are blinking
- Try replacing the cable
- Try lowering link speed with duplex change with ethtool (windows:network settings GUI)
ethtool -s eth2 speed 10 duplex half autoneg off
add a comment
|
There is no point to touch IP configuration until you see link is UP
- Check if cards are blinking
- Try replacing the cable
- Try lowering link speed with duplex change with ethtool (windows:network settings GUI)
ethtool -s eth2 speed 10 duplex half autoneg off
There is no point to touch IP configuration until you see link is UP
- Check if cards are blinking
- Try replacing the cable
- Try lowering link speed with duplex change with ethtool (windows:network settings GUI)
ethtool -s eth2 speed 10 duplex half autoneg off
answered Apr 8 at 17:17
k010mb0k010mb0
1812 silver badges4 bronze badges
1812 silver badges4 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Most likely, you need a cross-over cable - an ethernet cable where the receive terminal from one side connects to the transmit terminal on the other, and vice versa. Or just use a modern hub or switch as an intermediary - most automatically switch the direction automatically. Plug both machines into the hub or switch, and they should be able to communicate from their static IPs just fine.
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
add a comment
|
Most likely, you need a cross-over cable - an ethernet cable where the receive terminal from one side connects to the transmit terminal on the other, and vice versa. Or just use a modern hub or switch as an intermediary - most automatically switch the direction automatically. Plug both machines into the hub or switch, and they should be able to communicate from their static IPs just fine.
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
add a comment
|
Most likely, you need a cross-over cable - an ethernet cable where the receive terminal from one side connects to the transmit terminal on the other, and vice versa. Or just use a modern hub or switch as an intermediary - most automatically switch the direction automatically. Plug both machines into the hub or switch, and they should be able to communicate from their static IPs just fine.
Most likely, you need a cross-over cable - an ethernet cable where the receive terminal from one side connects to the transmit terminal on the other, and vice versa. Or just use a modern hub or switch as an intermediary - most automatically switch the direction automatically. Plug both machines into the hub or switch, and they should be able to communicate from their static IPs just fine.
answered Mar 28 at 20:57
TanktalusTanktalus
18k4 gold badges34 silver badges63 bronze badges
18k4 gold badges34 silver badges63 bronze badges
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
add a comment
|
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
this is my first thought too, though whoever downvoted this answer before maybe had some other awesome idea.. still, getting the peers to talk is another matter. is samba still the norm?
– ocæon
Apr 7 at 3:32
add a comment
|
You must use a Cross-Over cable (Pin 1,2 to 3,6 and visavi).
And don't forget to manualy set up your IP configuration (Gateway is not needed) in the same subnetmask. There is now no DHCP server between.
add a comment
|
You must use a Cross-Over cable (Pin 1,2 to 3,6 and visavi).
And don't forget to manualy set up your IP configuration (Gateway is not needed) in the same subnetmask. There is now no DHCP server between.
add a comment
|
You must use a Cross-Over cable (Pin 1,2 to 3,6 and visavi).
And don't forget to manualy set up your IP configuration (Gateway is not needed) in the same subnetmask. There is now no DHCP server between.
You must use a Cross-Over cable (Pin 1,2 to 3,6 and visavi).
And don't forget to manualy set up your IP configuration (Gateway is not needed) in the same subnetmask. There is now no DHCP server between.
answered Apr 7 at 19:36
LovntolaLovntola
9736 silver badges22 bronze badges
9736 silver badges22 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|