Using case_when with multiple vectorsTest if a vector contains a given elementHow to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)Group by multiple columns in dplyr, using string vector inputExtract a dplyr tbl column as a vectorcase_when in mutate pipeKeep value if not in case_when statementProgrammatically choosing which variables to put into dplyr pipeComplex ID Assignment with conditions, iterative calculations, and tolerance matchingpassing a vector into case_when inside mutate_atdplyr: case_when() over multiple columns with multiple conditions

Does the US Armed Forces refuse to recruit anyone with an IQ less than 83?

Is there an in-universe explanation of how Frodo's arrival in Valinor was recorded in the Red Book?

How are proofs normally constructed in a write up, in one line or split up into multiple lines?

What is the point of impeaching Trump?

Did the Soviet army intentionally send troops (e.g. penal battalions) running over minefields?

Avoiding dust scattering when you drill

Is there a way to replace Smite with Sharpness on a weapon?

Do jackscrews suffer from blowdown?

Is "Ram married his daughter" ambiguous?

Quote to show students don't have to fear making mistakes

Looking for circuit board material that can be dissolved

Sending mail to the Professor for PhD, after seeing his tweet

Would a horse be sufficient buffer to prevent injury when falling from a great height?

Realistically, how much do you need to start investing?

Why has Speaker Pelosi been so hesitant to impeach President Trump?

Does Bank Manager's discretion still exist in Mortgage Lending

Why do personal finance apps focus on outgoings rather than income

Why the first octet of a MAC address always end with a binary 0?

Could Boris Johnson face criminal charges for illegally proroguing Parliament?

As a team leader is it appropriate to bring in fundraiser candy?

GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?

Notation clarity question for a conglomerate of accidentals

French license plates

IEEE 754 square root with Newton-Raphson



Using case_when with multiple vectors


Test if a vector contains a given elementHow to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)Group by multiple columns in dplyr, using string vector inputExtract a dplyr tbl column as a vectorcase_when in mutate pipeKeep value if not in case_when statementProgrammatically choosing which variables to put into dplyr pipeComplex ID Assignment with conditions, iterative calculations, and tolerance matchingpassing a vector into case_when inside mutate_atdplyr: case_when() over multiple columns with multiple conditions






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









2















I am trying to use case_when to modify/mutate a column based on two separate inputs. One that used to create the LHS logical and the respective input value on the RHS. An example is provided below.



library(dplyr)
library(purrr)
library(tibble)

df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
new_labels <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

df %>%
mutate(test = map2(match_var , new_labels,
~case_when(
var == .x ~ .y,
TRUE ~ label
)
))


I think the issue is that within case_when everything is evaluated as expression but I'm not completely sure. One can manually type out all 7 lines within case_when but my application requires me to accomplish this when the vectors match_vars and new_labels are very long - making manual typing of case_when infeasible.



df %>% 
mutate(label = case_when(
var == match_var[1] ~ new_labels[1],
var == match_var[2] ~ new_labels[2],
var == match_var[3] ~ new_labels[3],
var == match_var[4] ~ new_labels[4],
var == match_var[5] ~ new_labels[5],
var == match_var[6] ~ new_labels[6],
var == match_var[7] ~ new_labels[7],
TRUE ~ label
))


EDIT: the desired result can be accomplished using a for loop but now I want to know if is this possible using case_when and map2_* function?



for (i in seq_along(match_var)) 
df$label <- ifelse(df$var == match_var[i], new_labels[i], df$label)










share|improve this question
































    2















    I am trying to use case_when to modify/mutate a column based on two separate inputs. One that used to create the LHS logical and the respective input value on the RHS. An example is provided below.



    library(dplyr)
    library(purrr)
    library(tibble)

    df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
    label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

    match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
    new_labels <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

    df %>%
    mutate(test = map2(match_var , new_labels,
    ~case_when(
    var == .x ~ .y,
    TRUE ~ label
    )
    ))


    I think the issue is that within case_when everything is evaluated as expression but I'm not completely sure. One can manually type out all 7 lines within case_when but my application requires me to accomplish this when the vectors match_vars and new_labels are very long - making manual typing of case_when infeasible.



    df %>% 
    mutate(label = case_when(
    var == match_var[1] ~ new_labels[1],
    var == match_var[2] ~ new_labels[2],
    var == match_var[3] ~ new_labels[3],
    var == match_var[4] ~ new_labels[4],
    var == match_var[5] ~ new_labels[5],
    var == match_var[6] ~ new_labels[6],
    var == match_var[7] ~ new_labels[7],
    TRUE ~ label
    ))


    EDIT: the desired result can be accomplished using a for loop but now I want to know if is this possible using case_when and map2_* function?



    for (i in seq_along(match_var)) 
    df$label <- ifelse(df$var == match_var[i], new_labels[i], df$label)










    share|improve this question




























      2












      2








      2


      1






      I am trying to use case_when to modify/mutate a column based on two separate inputs. One that used to create the LHS logical and the respective input value on the RHS. An example is provided below.



      library(dplyr)
      library(purrr)
      library(tibble)

      df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
      label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

      match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
      new_labels <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

      df %>%
      mutate(test = map2(match_var , new_labels,
      ~case_when(
      var == .x ~ .y,
      TRUE ~ label
      )
      ))


      I think the issue is that within case_when everything is evaluated as expression but I'm not completely sure. One can manually type out all 7 lines within case_when but my application requires me to accomplish this when the vectors match_vars and new_labels are very long - making manual typing of case_when infeasible.



      df %>% 
      mutate(label = case_when(
      var == match_var[1] ~ new_labels[1],
      var == match_var[2] ~ new_labels[2],
      var == match_var[3] ~ new_labels[3],
      var == match_var[4] ~ new_labels[4],
      var == match_var[5] ~ new_labels[5],
      var == match_var[6] ~ new_labels[6],
      var == match_var[7] ~ new_labels[7],
      TRUE ~ label
      ))


      EDIT: the desired result can be accomplished using a for loop but now I want to know if is this possible using case_when and map2_* function?



      for (i in seq_along(match_var)) 
      df$label <- ifelse(df$var == match_var[i], new_labels[i], df$label)










      share|improve this question
















      I am trying to use case_when to modify/mutate a column based on two separate inputs. One that used to create the LHS logical and the respective input value on the RHS. An example is provided below.



      library(dplyr)
      library(purrr)
      library(tibble)

      df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
      label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

      match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
      new_labels <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

      df %>%
      mutate(test = map2(match_var , new_labels,
      ~case_when(
      var == .x ~ .y,
      TRUE ~ label
      )
      ))


      I think the issue is that within case_when everything is evaluated as expression but I'm not completely sure. One can manually type out all 7 lines within case_when but my application requires me to accomplish this when the vectors match_vars and new_labels are very long - making manual typing of case_when infeasible.



      df %>% 
      mutate(label = case_when(
      var == match_var[1] ~ new_labels[1],
      var == match_var[2] ~ new_labels[2],
      var == match_var[3] ~ new_labels[3],
      var == match_var[4] ~ new_labels[4],
      var == match_var[5] ~ new_labels[5],
      var == match_var[6] ~ new_labels[6],
      var == match_var[7] ~ new_labels[7],
      TRUE ~ label
      ))


      EDIT: the desired result can be accomplished using a for loop but now I want to know if is this possible using case_when and map2_* function?



      for (i in seq_along(match_var)) 
      df$label <- ifelse(df$var == match_var[i], new_labels[i], df$label)







      r dplyr






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 28 at 21:22







      EJJ

















      asked Mar 28 at 21:17









      EJJEJJ

      1539 bronze badges




      1539 bronze badges

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2
















          We create a named vector and use that to match the the values in 'var' so as to change the NA elements to 'new_labels'



          library(tibble)
          library(dplyr)
          df %>%
          mutate(label = case_when(is.na(label) ~
          deframe(tibble(match_var, new_labels))[var],
          TRUE ~ label))
          # A tibble: 10 x 2
          # var label
          # <chr> <chr>
          # 1 var1 label1
          # 2 var2 label2
          # 3 var3 add_this_label3
          # 4 var4 add_this_label4
          # 5 var5 add_this_label5
          # 6 var6 add_this_label6
          # 7 var7 add_this_label7
          # 8 var8 add_this_label8
          # 9 var9 add_this_label9
          #10 var10 label10


          NOTE: Instead of using deframe, the named vector can be created with setNames as well






          share|improve this answer



























          • this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:56


















          1
















          You can join the new labels to the data frame and fill in with the old label as necessary.



          library("tidyverse")

          df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
          label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

          match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
          new_label <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

          new_labels <- tibble(match_var, new_label)

          df %>%
          left_join(new_labels, by = c("var" = "match_var")) %>%
          mutate(new_label = if_else(is.na(new_label), label, new_label))
          #> # A tibble: 10 x 3
          #> var label new_label
          #> <chr> <chr> <chr>
          #> 1 var1 label1 label1
          #> 2 var2 label2 label2
          #> 3 var3 <NA> add_this_label3
          #> 4 var4 <NA> add_this_label4
          #> 5 var5 <NA> add_this_label5
          #> 6 var6 <NA> add_this_label6
          #> 7 var7 <NA> add_this_label7
          #> 8 var8 <NA> add_this_label8
          #> 9 var9 <NA> add_this_label9
          #> 10 var10 label10 label10


          Created on 2019-03-28 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)






          share|improve this answer

























          • This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:58












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55406974%2fusing-case-when-with-multiple-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2
















          We create a named vector and use that to match the the values in 'var' so as to change the NA elements to 'new_labels'



          library(tibble)
          library(dplyr)
          df %>%
          mutate(label = case_when(is.na(label) ~
          deframe(tibble(match_var, new_labels))[var],
          TRUE ~ label))
          # A tibble: 10 x 2
          # var label
          # <chr> <chr>
          # 1 var1 label1
          # 2 var2 label2
          # 3 var3 add_this_label3
          # 4 var4 add_this_label4
          # 5 var5 add_this_label5
          # 6 var6 add_this_label6
          # 7 var7 add_this_label7
          # 8 var8 add_this_label8
          # 9 var9 add_this_label9
          #10 var10 label10


          NOTE: Instead of using deframe, the named vector can be created with setNames as well






          share|improve this answer



























          • this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:56















          2
















          We create a named vector and use that to match the the values in 'var' so as to change the NA elements to 'new_labels'



          library(tibble)
          library(dplyr)
          df %>%
          mutate(label = case_when(is.na(label) ~
          deframe(tibble(match_var, new_labels))[var],
          TRUE ~ label))
          # A tibble: 10 x 2
          # var label
          # <chr> <chr>
          # 1 var1 label1
          # 2 var2 label2
          # 3 var3 add_this_label3
          # 4 var4 add_this_label4
          # 5 var5 add_this_label5
          # 6 var6 add_this_label6
          # 7 var7 add_this_label7
          # 8 var8 add_this_label8
          # 9 var9 add_this_label9
          #10 var10 label10


          NOTE: Instead of using deframe, the named vector can be created with setNames as well






          share|improve this answer



























          • this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:56













          2














          2










          2









          We create a named vector and use that to match the the values in 'var' so as to change the NA elements to 'new_labels'



          library(tibble)
          library(dplyr)
          df %>%
          mutate(label = case_when(is.na(label) ~
          deframe(tibble(match_var, new_labels))[var],
          TRUE ~ label))
          # A tibble: 10 x 2
          # var label
          # <chr> <chr>
          # 1 var1 label1
          # 2 var2 label2
          # 3 var3 add_this_label3
          # 4 var4 add_this_label4
          # 5 var5 add_this_label5
          # 6 var6 add_this_label6
          # 7 var7 add_this_label7
          # 8 var8 add_this_label8
          # 9 var9 add_this_label9
          #10 var10 label10


          NOTE: Instead of using deframe, the named vector can be created with setNames as well






          share|improve this answer















          We create a named vector and use that to match the the values in 'var' so as to change the NA elements to 'new_labels'



          library(tibble)
          library(dplyr)
          df %>%
          mutate(label = case_when(is.na(label) ~
          deframe(tibble(match_var, new_labels))[var],
          TRUE ~ label))
          # A tibble: 10 x 2
          # var label
          # <chr> <chr>
          # 1 var1 label1
          # 2 var2 label2
          # 3 var3 add_this_label3
          # 4 var4 add_this_label4
          # 5 var5 add_this_label5
          # 6 var6 add_this_label6
          # 7 var7 add_this_label7
          # 8 var8 add_this_label8
          # 9 var9 add_this_label9
          #10 var10 label10


          NOTE: Instead of using deframe, the named vector can be created with setNames as well







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 28 at 21:28

























          answered Mar 28 at 21:21









          akrunakrun

          470k15 gold badges261 silver badges343 bronze badges




          470k15 gold badges261 silver badges343 bronze badges















          • this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:56

















          • this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:56
















          this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

          – EJJ
          Mar 28 at 21:56





          this is great! if you don’t mind me asking, could you explain how named vectors work within ‘case_when’? Is it related to NSE?

          – EJJ
          Mar 28 at 21:56













          1
















          You can join the new labels to the data frame and fill in with the old label as necessary.



          library("tidyverse")

          df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
          label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

          match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
          new_label <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

          new_labels <- tibble(match_var, new_label)

          df %>%
          left_join(new_labels, by = c("var" = "match_var")) %>%
          mutate(new_label = if_else(is.na(new_label), label, new_label))
          #> # A tibble: 10 x 3
          #> var label new_label
          #> <chr> <chr> <chr>
          #> 1 var1 label1 label1
          #> 2 var2 label2 label2
          #> 3 var3 <NA> add_this_label3
          #> 4 var4 <NA> add_this_label4
          #> 5 var5 <NA> add_this_label5
          #> 6 var6 <NA> add_this_label6
          #> 7 var7 <NA> add_this_label7
          #> 8 var8 <NA> add_this_label8
          #> 9 var9 <NA> add_this_label9
          #> 10 var10 label10 label10


          Created on 2019-03-28 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)






          share|improve this answer

























          • This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:58















          1
















          You can join the new labels to the data frame and fill in with the old label as necessary.



          library("tidyverse")

          df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
          label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

          match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
          new_label <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

          new_labels <- tibble(match_var, new_label)

          df %>%
          left_join(new_labels, by = c("var" = "match_var")) %>%
          mutate(new_label = if_else(is.na(new_label), label, new_label))
          #> # A tibble: 10 x 3
          #> var label new_label
          #> <chr> <chr> <chr>
          #> 1 var1 label1 label1
          #> 2 var2 label2 label2
          #> 3 var3 <NA> add_this_label3
          #> 4 var4 <NA> add_this_label4
          #> 5 var5 <NA> add_this_label5
          #> 6 var6 <NA> add_this_label6
          #> 7 var7 <NA> add_this_label7
          #> 8 var8 <NA> add_this_label8
          #> 9 var9 <NA> add_this_label9
          #> 10 var10 label10 label10


          Created on 2019-03-28 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)






          share|improve this answer

























          • This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:58













          1














          1










          1









          You can join the new labels to the data frame and fill in with the old label as necessary.



          library("tidyverse")

          df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
          label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

          match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
          new_label <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

          new_labels <- tibble(match_var, new_label)

          df %>%
          left_join(new_labels, by = c("var" = "match_var")) %>%
          mutate(new_label = if_else(is.na(new_label), label, new_label))
          #> # A tibble: 10 x 3
          #> var label new_label
          #> <chr> <chr> <chr>
          #> 1 var1 label1 label1
          #> 2 var2 label2 label2
          #> 3 var3 <NA> add_this_label3
          #> 4 var4 <NA> add_this_label4
          #> 5 var5 <NA> add_this_label5
          #> 6 var6 <NA> add_this_label6
          #> 7 var7 <NA> add_this_label7
          #> 8 var8 <NA> add_this_label8
          #> 9 var9 <NA> add_this_label9
          #> 10 var10 label10 label10


          Created on 2019-03-28 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)






          share|improve this answer













          You can join the new labels to the data frame and fill in with the old label as necessary.



          library("tidyverse")

          df <- tibble(var = paste0(rep("var", 10), 1:10),
          label = c("label1", "label2", rep(NA, 7), "label10"))

          match_var <- paste0(rep("var", 7), 3:9)
          new_label <- paste0(rep("add_this_label", 7), 3:9)

          new_labels <- tibble(match_var, new_label)

          df %>%
          left_join(new_labels, by = c("var" = "match_var")) %>%
          mutate(new_label = if_else(is.na(new_label), label, new_label))
          #> # A tibble: 10 x 3
          #> var label new_label
          #> <chr> <chr> <chr>
          #> 1 var1 label1 label1
          #> 2 var2 label2 label2
          #> 3 var3 <NA> add_this_label3
          #> 4 var4 <NA> add_this_label4
          #> 5 var5 <NA> add_this_label5
          #> 6 var6 <NA> add_this_label6
          #> 7 var7 <NA> add_this_label7
          #> 8 var8 <NA> add_this_label8
          #> 9 var9 <NA> add_this_label9
          #> 10 var10 label10 label10


          Created on 2019-03-28 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 28 at 21:31









          dipetkovdipetkov

          1,5061 silver badge8 bronze badges




          1,5061 silver badge8 bronze badges















          • This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:58

















          • This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

            – EJJ
            Mar 28 at 21:58
















          This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

          – EJJ
          Mar 28 at 21:58





          This is a creative approach using joins I didn’t consider. I might opt for @akrun solution just because I want to avoid joins due to performance but I will test that tomorrow

          – EJJ
          Mar 28 at 21:58


















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55406974%2fusing-case-when-with-multiple-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현