Matching free terms in a polynom with real coefficients using regexMatch all occurrences of a regexEfficiency of Java “Double Brace Initialization”?RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tagsCheck whether a string matches a regex in JSWhy it's not possible to use regex to parse HTML/XML: a formal explanation in layman's termsregex: Match at least two search termsMatching algebraic termsnot matching empty string for regexHow to match a regex only if it matches exactlyUsing regex to match numbers which have 5 increasing consecutive digits somewhere in them
Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century
How do I extrude a face to a single vertex
Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?
We have a love-hate relationship
Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened?
What's the difference between 違法 and 不法?
How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?
Bob has never been a M before
If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?
Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name
Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?
What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?
Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?
Create all possible words using a set or letters
Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?
Is there a word to describe the feeling of being transfixed out of horror?
Could the E-bike drivetrain wear down till needing replacement after 400 km?
Why has "pence" been used in this sentence, not "pences"?
Matching free terms in a polynom with real coefficients using regex
Match all occurrences of a regexEfficiency of Java “Double Brace Initialization”?RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tagsCheck whether a string matches a regex in JSWhy it's not possible to use regex to parse HTML/XML: a formal explanation in layman's termsregex: Match at least two search termsMatching algebraic termsnot matching empty string for regexHow to match a regex only if it matches exactlyUsing regex to match numbers which have 5 increasing consecutive digits somewhere in them
I have to make an assignment for Programming Techniques and I have struggled to match the free terms in a polynomial, (2.0x^2+3.5x-3.0 or 45x+2), which is given as a string. I have tried to use the following regex:
(-0,1d+(.d+)0,1)(?![0-9].*x^d))
I know the way the way I approached it might not be too good, but I did not have too much time for understanding regex in a more complex way, only slightly, and I got stuck at the point in which I would like to get only the numbers like with the format: ±# or ±#.# which are not followed by: x or x^# where # represents one or more digits.
java regex
|
show 3 more comments
I have to make an assignment for Programming Techniques and I have struggled to match the free terms in a polynomial, (2.0x^2+3.5x-3.0 or 45x+2), which is given as a string. I have tried to use the following regex:
(-0,1d+(.d+)0,1)(?![0-9].*x^d))
I know the way the way I approached it might not be too good, but I did not have too much time for understanding regex in a more complex way, only slightly, and I got stuck at the point in which I would like to get only the numbers like with the format: ±# or ±#.# which are not followed by: x or x^# where # represents one or more digits.
java regex
1
Is it always the last term? Because that would make things much easier.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:15
No, actually it can be anywhere in the polynomial, I forgot to mention that..
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:21
What language is this regex used in? The environment makes a difference with regex.
– Adam
Mar 21 at 13:22
The regex is used in Java, and for testing I have used this site: regexr.com/4amm9, and for other patterns it had worked fine
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:22
Are you asked to solve the whole thing in regex, or can you use a bit of Java plumbing? Because(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
works, but I doubt that's what you're asked for
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:25
|
show 3 more comments
I have to make an assignment for Programming Techniques and I have struggled to match the free terms in a polynomial, (2.0x^2+3.5x-3.0 or 45x+2), which is given as a string. I have tried to use the following regex:
(-0,1d+(.d+)0,1)(?![0-9].*x^d))
I know the way the way I approached it might not be too good, but I did not have too much time for understanding regex in a more complex way, only slightly, and I got stuck at the point in which I would like to get only the numbers like with the format: ±# or ±#.# which are not followed by: x or x^# where # represents one or more digits.
java regex
I have to make an assignment for Programming Techniques and I have struggled to match the free terms in a polynomial, (2.0x^2+3.5x-3.0 or 45x+2), which is given as a string. I have tried to use the following regex:
(-0,1d+(.d+)0,1)(?![0-9].*x^d))
I know the way the way I approached it might not be too good, but I did not have too much time for understanding regex in a more complex way, only slightly, and I got stuck at the point in which I would like to get only the numbers like with the format: ±# or ±#.# which are not followed by: x or x^# where # represents one or more digits.
java regex
java regex
edited Mar 21 at 13:24
Adam
1,615719
1,615719
asked Mar 21 at 13:10
Manuel MaiorManuel Maior
33
33
1
Is it always the last term? Because that would make things much easier.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:15
No, actually it can be anywhere in the polynomial, I forgot to mention that..
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:21
What language is this regex used in? The environment makes a difference with regex.
– Adam
Mar 21 at 13:22
The regex is used in Java, and for testing I have used this site: regexr.com/4amm9, and for other patterns it had worked fine
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:22
Are you asked to solve the whole thing in regex, or can you use a bit of Java plumbing? Because(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
works, but I doubt that's what you're asked for
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:25
|
show 3 more comments
1
Is it always the last term? Because that would make things much easier.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:15
No, actually it can be anywhere in the polynomial, I forgot to mention that..
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:21
What language is this regex used in? The environment makes a difference with regex.
– Adam
Mar 21 at 13:22
The regex is used in Java, and for testing I have used this site: regexr.com/4amm9, and for other patterns it had worked fine
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:22
Are you asked to solve the whole thing in regex, or can you use a bit of Java plumbing? Because(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
works, but I doubt that's what you're asked for
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:25
1
1
Is it always the last term? Because that would make things much easier.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:15
Is it always the last term? Because that would make things much easier.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:15
No, actually it can be anywhere in the polynomial, I forgot to mention that..
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:21
No, actually it can be anywhere in the polynomial, I forgot to mention that..
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:21
What language is this regex used in? The environment makes a difference with regex.
– Adam
Mar 21 at 13:22
What language is this regex used in? The environment makes a difference with regex.
– Adam
Mar 21 at 13:22
The regex is used in Java, and for testing I have used this site: regexr.com/4amm9, and for other patterns it had worked fine
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:22
The regex is used in Java, and for testing I have used this site: regexr.com/4amm9, and for other patterns it had worked fine
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:22
Are you asked to solve the whole thing in regex, or can you use a bit of Java plumbing? Because
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
works, but I doubt that's what you're asked for– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:25
Are you asked to solve the whole thing in regex, or can you use a bit of Java plumbing? Because
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
works, but I doubt that's what you're asked for– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:25
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Full regex solution :
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
(?<!^)
won't match if the previous character is a^
[-+]?
will match an optional sign characterd+(.d+)?
will match the number which is composed of an integer part followed by an optional floating part(?=$|[-+])
won't match unless what follows is a sign character or the end of the string
You can try it here.
Java solution with term-matching :
Pattern termPattern = Pattern.compile("\d+(?:\.\d+)?(x(?:\^\d+)?)?");
Matcher termMatcher = termPattern.matcher(input);
while (termMatcher.find())
if (termMatcher.group(1) == null)
// you have a free term
The regex matches an integer part followed by an optional floating part then an optional x^n
part which is captured in a capturing group. A Matcher
is created from applying the pattern to the input. Calling Matcher.find
allows us to iterate over the multiple matches on the input string. For each match we check the content of the first capturing group, when it's null we have a free term.
You can try it here.
Yet anoter solution would be to simply split the string around [+-]
and for each part test whether it contains x
or not.
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part ofx^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with anx^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lonex
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
add a comment |
This will do it: (?<!^)(d+(?:.d+)?)(?![x.d])
(?<! | Negative lookbehind:
^ | A literal "^"
) | Close group
( | Capture the following:
d+ | Match one or more digits
(?: | Match the following group:
. | A literal "."
d+ | One or more digits
)? | Close group, optional match
) | End capture
(?! | Negative lookahead:
[x.d] | Either an "x", ".", or any digit
) | Close group
Try it here
String s = "5x-50.1+x^2-2+20x";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(?<!\^)(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)(?![x.\d])");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find())
System.out.println(m.group(1)); // Output: 50.1
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55281196%2fmatching-free-terms-in-a-polynom-with-real-coefficients-using-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Full regex solution :
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
(?<!^)
won't match if the previous character is a^
[-+]?
will match an optional sign characterd+(.d+)?
will match the number which is composed of an integer part followed by an optional floating part(?=$|[-+])
won't match unless what follows is a sign character or the end of the string
You can try it here.
Java solution with term-matching :
Pattern termPattern = Pattern.compile("\d+(?:\.\d+)?(x(?:\^\d+)?)?");
Matcher termMatcher = termPattern.matcher(input);
while (termMatcher.find())
if (termMatcher.group(1) == null)
// you have a free term
The regex matches an integer part followed by an optional floating part then an optional x^n
part which is captured in a capturing group. A Matcher
is created from applying the pattern to the input. Calling Matcher.find
allows us to iterate over the multiple matches on the input string. For each match we check the content of the first capturing group, when it's null we have a free term.
You can try it here.
Yet anoter solution would be to simply split the string around [+-]
and for each part test whether it contains x
or not.
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part ofx^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with anx^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lonex
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
add a comment |
Full regex solution :
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
(?<!^)
won't match if the previous character is a^
[-+]?
will match an optional sign characterd+(.d+)?
will match the number which is composed of an integer part followed by an optional floating part(?=$|[-+])
won't match unless what follows is a sign character or the end of the string
You can try it here.
Java solution with term-matching :
Pattern termPattern = Pattern.compile("\d+(?:\.\d+)?(x(?:\^\d+)?)?");
Matcher termMatcher = termPattern.matcher(input);
while (termMatcher.find())
if (termMatcher.group(1) == null)
// you have a free term
The regex matches an integer part followed by an optional floating part then an optional x^n
part which is captured in a capturing group. A Matcher
is created from applying the pattern to the input. Calling Matcher.find
allows us to iterate over the multiple matches on the input string. For each match we check the content of the first capturing group, when it's null we have a free term.
You can try it here.
Yet anoter solution would be to simply split the string around [+-]
and for each part test whether it contains x
or not.
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part ofx^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with anx^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lonex
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
add a comment |
Full regex solution :
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
(?<!^)
won't match if the previous character is a^
[-+]?
will match an optional sign characterd+(.d+)?
will match the number which is composed of an integer part followed by an optional floating part(?=$|[-+])
won't match unless what follows is a sign character or the end of the string
You can try it here.
Java solution with term-matching :
Pattern termPattern = Pattern.compile("\d+(?:\.\d+)?(x(?:\^\d+)?)?");
Matcher termMatcher = termPattern.matcher(input);
while (termMatcher.find())
if (termMatcher.group(1) == null)
// you have a free term
The regex matches an integer part followed by an optional floating part then an optional x^n
part which is captured in a capturing group. A Matcher
is created from applying the pattern to the input. Calling Matcher.find
allows us to iterate over the multiple matches on the input string. For each match we check the content of the first capturing group, when it's null we have a free term.
You can try it here.
Yet anoter solution would be to simply split the string around [+-]
and for each part test whether it contains x
or not.
Full regex solution :
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
(?<!^)
won't match if the previous character is a^
[-+]?
will match an optional sign characterd+(.d+)?
will match the number which is composed of an integer part followed by an optional floating part(?=$|[-+])
won't match unless what follows is a sign character or the end of the string
You can try it here.
Java solution with term-matching :
Pattern termPattern = Pattern.compile("\d+(?:\.\d+)?(x(?:\^\d+)?)?");
Matcher termMatcher = termPattern.matcher(input);
while (termMatcher.find())
if (termMatcher.group(1) == null)
// you have a free term
The regex matches an integer part followed by an optional floating part then an optional x^n
part which is captured in a capturing group. A Matcher
is created from applying the pattern to the input. Calling Matcher.find
allows us to iterate over the multiple matches on the input string. For each match we check the content of the first capturing group, when it's null we have a free term.
You can try it here.
Yet anoter solution would be to simply split the string around [+-]
and for each part test whether it contains x
or not.
edited Mar 21 at 13:57
answered Mar 21 at 13:38
AaronAaron
16.1k11636
16.1k11636
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part ofx^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with anx^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lonex
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
add a comment |
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part ofx^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with anx^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lonex
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
Yes, finally I have tested the solution you have given and it seems to work good. Also thank you for explaining each part in the solution. It is really clear now.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:47
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
@ManuelMaior you're welcome ! Note that lookarounds (positive/negative lookafter/lookbehind) are an advanced feature of regex which you usually don't learn right away, so if you haven't explored regexs that much I think your teacher would rather expect something like the second solution.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:50
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
Yes, the second solution might seem more simple and it also has a good logic.
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:52
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part of
x^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with an x^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lone x
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
I've edited the second regex to make the exponent part of
x^n
optional. This doesn't change your result since you don't care about the results with an x^n
part for now, but if you're made to capture every term it is necessary (so would matching terms without coefficient such as the lone x
in your sample input, but I'll leave that part to you)– Aaron
Mar 21 at 14:01
add a comment |
This will do it: (?<!^)(d+(?:.d+)?)(?![x.d])
(?<! | Negative lookbehind:
^ | A literal "^"
) | Close group
( | Capture the following:
d+ | Match one or more digits
(?: | Match the following group:
. | A literal "."
d+ | One or more digits
)? | Close group, optional match
) | End capture
(?! | Negative lookahead:
[x.d] | Either an "x", ".", or any digit
) | Close group
Try it here
String s = "5x-50.1+x^2-2+20x";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(?<!\^)(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)(?![x.\d])");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find())
System.out.println(m.group(1)); // Output: 50.1
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
add a comment |
This will do it: (?<!^)(d+(?:.d+)?)(?![x.d])
(?<! | Negative lookbehind:
^ | A literal "^"
) | Close group
( | Capture the following:
d+ | Match one or more digits
(?: | Match the following group:
. | A literal "."
d+ | One or more digits
)? | Close group, optional match
) | End capture
(?! | Negative lookahead:
[x.d] | Either an "x", ".", or any digit
) | Close group
Try it here
String s = "5x-50.1+x^2-2+20x";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(?<!\^)(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)(?![x.\d])");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find())
System.out.println(m.group(1)); // Output: 50.1
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
add a comment |
This will do it: (?<!^)(d+(?:.d+)?)(?![x.d])
(?<! | Negative lookbehind:
^ | A literal "^"
) | Close group
( | Capture the following:
d+ | Match one or more digits
(?: | Match the following group:
. | A literal "."
d+ | One or more digits
)? | Close group, optional match
) | End capture
(?! | Negative lookahead:
[x.d] | Either an "x", ".", or any digit
) | Close group
Try it here
String s = "5x-50.1+x^2-2+20x";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(?<!\^)(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)(?![x.\d])");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find())
System.out.println(m.group(1)); // Output: 50.1
This will do it: (?<!^)(d+(?:.d+)?)(?![x.d])
(?<! | Negative lookbehind:
^ | A literal "^"
) | Close group
( | Capture the following:
d+ | Match one or more digits
(?: | Match the following group:
. | A literal "."
d+ | One or more digits
)? | Close group, optional match
) | End capture
(?! | Negative lookahead:
[x.d] | Either an "x", ".", or any digit
) | Close group
Try it here
String s = "5x-50.1+x^2-2+20x";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(?<!\^)(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)(?![x.\d])");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find())
System.out.println(m.group(1)); // Output: 50.1
answered Mar 21 at 13:59
AdamAdam
1,615719
1,615719
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
add a comment |
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
thank you for this alternative solution and for the explainations!
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 14:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55281196%2fmatching-free-terms-in-a-polynom-with-real-coefficients-using-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Is it always the last term? Because that would make things much easier.
– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:15
No, actually it can be anywhere in the polynomial, I forgot to mention that..
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:21
What language is this regex used in? The environment makes a difference with regex.
– Adam
Mar 21 at 13:22
The regex is used in Java, and for testing I have used this site: regexr.com/4amm9, and for other patterns it had worked fine
– Manuel Maior
Mar 21 at 13:22
Are you asked to solve the whole thing in regex, or can you use a bit of Java plumbing? Because
(?<!^)[-+]?d+(.d+)?(?=$|[-+])
works, but I doubt that's what you're asked for– Aaron
Mar 21 at 13:25