CSS Transition: Opacity vs changing Background-Color?Set cellpadding and cellspacing in CSS?How do I give text or an image a transparent background using CSS?Is there a CSS parent selector?Change an HTML5 input's placeholder color with CSSTransitions on the display: propertyHow can I transition height: 0; to height: auto; using CSS?CSS opacity only to background color, not the text on it?Why does HTML think “chucknorris” is a color?CSS Background OpacityIs it possible to apply CSS to half of a character?
Is bounce rate of a website a ranking factor?
Adding command shortcuts to bin
How did the Venus Express detect lightning?
Can a Tiefling have more than two horns?
How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?
Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?
Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project
Is “snitty” a popular American English term? What is its origin?
How to increase the size of the cursor in Lubuntu 19.04?
Has the Hulk always been able to talk?
Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?
Refinish or replace an old staircase
In Russian, how do you idiomatically express the idea of the figurative "overnight"?
Word meaning as function of the composition of its phonemes
How do LIGO and VIRGO know that a gravitational wave has its origin in a neutron star or a black hole?
Should I decline this job offer that requires relocating to an area with high cost of living?
What does this wavy downward arrow preceding a piano chord mean?
How to write a 12-bar blues melody
How can I get people to remember my character's gender?
Find the cheapest shipping option based on item weight
Floor of Riemann zeta function
US born but as a child of foreign diplomat
What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?
Why does sound not move through a wall?
CSS Transition: Opacity vs changing Background-Color?
Set cellpadding and cellspacing in CSS?How do I give text or an image a transparent background using CSS?Is there a CSS parent selector?Change an HTML5 input's placeholder color with CSSTransitions on the display: propertyHow can I transition height: 0; to height: auto; using CSS?CSS opacity only to background color, not the text on it?Why does HTML think “chucknorris” is a color?CSS Background OpacityIs it possible to apply CSS to half of a character?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I am curious if there is an industry standard for transitioning colour since there are multiple ways to accomplish the desired transition effect.
There are multiple ways to make a particular colour brighter or darker to indicate to the user that the element is intractable.
For example, if you have a p
tag and you want to add a hover over effect you could:
HTML
<div><p> P tag text </p></div>
CSS v1 using opacity
div
background-color:black;
p
color: white;
opacity: 0.8;
transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
opacity: 1;
CSS v2 using colour
div
background-color:black;
p
color: #ccc;
transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
color: #fff;
As far I'm aware both methods provide similar results however, I am still curious whether or not there is a correct way to do this kind of thing.
css colors css-transitions opacity
add a comment |
I am curious if there is an industry standard for transitioning colour since there are multiple ways to accomplish the desired transition effect.
There are multiple ways to make a particular colour brighter or darker to indicate to the user that the element is intractable.
For example, if you have a p
tag and you want to add a hover over effect you could:
HTML
<div><p> P tag text </p></div>
CSS v1 using opacity
div
background-color:black;
p
color: white;
opacity: 0.8;
transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
opacity: 1;
CSS v2 using colour
div
background-color:black;
p
color: #ccc;
transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
color: #fff;
As far I'm aware both methods provide similar results however, I am still curious whether or not there is a correct way to do this kind of thing.
css colors css-transitions opacity
There is more than the ways you provided and since it's working then it's correct. There is never one way to achieve something.
– Temani Afif
Mar 23 at 0:34
add a comment |
I am curious if there is an industry standard for transitioning colour since there are multiple ways to accomplish the desired transition effect.
There are multiple ways to make a particular colour brighter or darker to indicate to the user that the element is intractable.
For example, if you have a p
tag and you want to add a hover over effect you could:
HTML
<div><p> P tag text </p></div>
CSS v1 using opacity
div
background-color:black;
p
color: white;
opacity: 0.8;
transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
opacity: 1;
CSS v2 using colour
div
background-color:black;
p
color: #ccc;
transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
color: #fff;
As far I'm aware both methods provide similar results however, I am still curious whether or not there is a correct way to do this kind of thing.
css colors css-transitions opacity
I am curious if there is an industry standard for transitioning colour since there are multiple ways to accomplish the desired transition effect.
There are multiple ways to make a particular colour brighter or darker to indicate to the user that the element is intractable.
For example, if you have a p
tag and you want to add a hover over effect you could:
HTML
<div><p> P tag text </p></div>
CSS v1 using opacity
div
background-color:black;
p
color: white;
opacity: 0.8;
transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
opacity: 1;
CSS v2 using colour
div
background-color:black;
p
color: #ccc;
transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out;
p:hover
color: #fff;
As far I'm aware both methods provide similar results however, I am still curious whether or not there is a correct way to do this kind of thing.
css colors css-transitions opacity
css colors css-transitions opacity
asked Mar 23 at 0:07
Dzyuv001Dzyuv001
88215
88215
There is more than the ways you provided and since it's working then it's correct. There is never one way to achieve something.
– Temani Afif
Mar 23 at 0:34
add a comment |
There is more than the ways you provided and since it's working then it's correct. There is never one way to achieve something.
– Temani Afif
Mar 23 at 0:34
There is more than the ways you provided and since it's working then it's correct. There is never one way to achieve something.
– Temani Afif
Mar 23 at 0:34
There is more than the ways you provided and since it's working then it's correct. There is never one way to achieve something.
– Temani Afif
Mar 23 at 0:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The main thing you should realize is that opacity
affects an entire element and all its descendants, whereas color
and background-color
do not.
In your simple example, white text with reduced opacity on a solid black background looks gray, so the visual effect is basically the same as changing the color
from gray to pure white.
But in any more complicated example – say, the background of your paragraph's parent div is an image rather than a solid color, or you're using opacity on an element that contains other elements and not merely on text – what you're gonna end up with is things that truly look see-through. That also may mean that text becomes harder to read.
So the answer is less about there being any particular industry standard and more about choosing the right tool for the job. If you just want to make some text a lighter color, transition color
itself. If you want to make things see-through, use opacity
.
That's the theory, anyway, but in real life sometimes it's not that clean cut. Maybe a designer gives you a mockup with text that's color: #C44242; opacity: 0.87
on top of a solid-colored background that's background-color: #B48927
. You could compute what the opaque version of that text color would be, but it may not be worth your time to do so. The world won't end if you just stick with opacity.
1
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55309310%2fcss-transition-opacity-vs-changing-background-color%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The main thing you should realize is that opacity
affects an entire element and all its descendants, whereas color
and background-color
do not.
In your simple example, white text with reduced opacity on a solid black background looks gray, so the visual effect is basically the same as changing the color
from gray to pure white.
But in any more complicated example – say, the background of your paragraph's parent div is an image rather than a solid color, or you're using opacity on an element that contains other elements and not merely on text – what you're gonna end up with is things that truly look see-through. That also may mean that text becomes harder to read.
So the answer is less about there being any particular industry standard and more about choosing the right tool for the job. If you just want to make some text a lighter color, transition color
itself. If you want to make things see-through, use opacity
.
That's the theory, anyway, but in real life sometimes it's not that clean cut. Maybe a designer gives you a mockup with text that's color: #C44242; opacity: 0.87
on top of a solid-colored background that's background-color: #B48927
. You could compute what the opaque version of that text color would be, but it may not be worth your time to do so. The world won't end if you just stick with opacity.
1
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
add a comment |
The main thing you should realize is that opacity
affects an entire element and all its descendants, whereas color
and background-color
do not.
In your simple example, white text with reduced opacity on a solid black background looks gray, so the visual effect is basically the same as changing the color
from gray to pure white.
But in any more complicated example – say, the background of your paragraph's parent div is an image rather than a solid color, or you're using opacity on an element that contains other elements and not merely on text – what you're gonna end up with is things that truly look see-through. That also may mean that text becomes harder to read.
So the answer is less about there being any particular industry standard and more about choosing the right tool for the job. If you just want to make some text a lighter color, transition color
itself. If you want to make things see-through, use opacity
.
That's the theory, anyway, but in real life sometimes it's not that clean cut. Maybe a designer gives you a mockup with text that's color: #C44242; opacity: 0.87
on top of a solid-colored background that's background-color: #B48927
. You could compute what the opaque version of that text color would be, but it may not be worth your time to do so. The world won't end if you just stick with opacity.
1
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
add a comment |
The main thing you should realize is that opacity
affects an entire element and all its descendants, whereas color
and background-color
do not.
In your simple example, white text with reduced opacity on a solid black background looks gray, so the visual effect is basically the same as changing the color
from gray to pure white.
But in any more complicated example – say, the background of your paragraph's parent div is an image rather than a solid color, or you're using opacity on an element that contains other elements and not merely on text – what you're gonna end up with is things that truly look see-through. That also may mean that text becomes harder to read.
So the answer is less about there being any particular industry standard and more about choosing the right tool for the job. If you just want to make some text a lighter color, transition color
itself. If you want to make things see-through, use opacity
.
That's the theory, anyway, but in real life sometimes it's not that clean cut. Maybe a designer gives you a mockup with text that's color: #C44242; opacity: 0.87
on top of a solid-colored background that's background-color: #B48927
. You could compute what the opaque version of that text color would be, but it may not be worth your time to do so. The world won't end if you just stick with opacity.
The main thing you should realize is that opacity
affects an entire element and all its descendants, whereas color
and background-color
do not.
In your simple example, white text with reduced opacity on a solid black background looks gray, so the visual effect is basically the same as changing the color
from gray to pure white.
But in any more complicated example – say, the background of your paragraph's parent div is an image rather than a solid color, or you're using opacity on an element that contains other elements and not merely on text – what you're gonna end up with is things that truly look see-through. That also may mean that text becomes harder to read.
So the answer is less about there being any particular industry standard and more about choosing the right tool for the job. If you just want to make some text a lighter color, transition color
itself. If you want to make things see-through, use opacity
.
That's the theory, anyway, but in real life sometimes it's not that clean cut. Maybe a designer gives you a mockup with text that's color: #C44242; opacity: 0.87
on top of a solid-colored background that's background-color: #B48927
. You could compute what the opaque version of that text color would be, but it may not be worth your time to do so. The world won't end if you just stick with opacity.
answered Mar 23 at 0:43
cjl750cjl750
2,48231020
2,48231020
1
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
add a comment |
1
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
1
1
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
Glad to hear I wasn't doing anything wrong and thank you for pointing out that the children element would be affected.
– Dzyuv001
Mar 23 at 0:53
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55309310%2fcss-transition-opacity-vs-changing-background-color%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
There is more than the ways you provided and since it's working then it's correct. There is never one way to achieve something.
– Temani Afif
Mar 23 at 0:34