Database accidentally deleted with a bash script [duplicate]Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /Restore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTigerAccidentally formated external usb harddrive (500GB) with bootable iso (1GB), how can I recover my data?What is the difference between double and single square brackets in bash?Accidentally rm -rf /usr/* as root, what now?How to add a timestamp to bash script log?Large incremental backup sizes although minimal changes with cPanel tarballsUbuntu OS recovery – accidentally deleted ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from /lib64 folder in Ubuntu 14.04Decode & restore files from /dev/md3 (Hacked server)Synology: How to restore data from an accidentally deleted volumeX (BTRFS)?Mapped VMDK no longer accessible - VMware ESX - recover dataRestore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTiger
Solve Riddle With Algebra
What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)
What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?
I've been given a project I can't complete, what should I do?
Why am I getting a strange double quote (“) in Open Office instead of the ordinary one (")?
Why did Intel abandon unified CPU cache?
How to publish items after pipeline is finished?
Excel division by 0 error when trying to average results of formulas
60s or 70s novel about Empire of Man making 1st contact with 1st discovered alien race
Live action TV show where High school Kids go into the virtual world and have to clear levels
New bike, tubeless tire will not inflate
Can all groups be thought of as the symmetries of a geometrical object?
Teaching a class likely meant to inflate the GPA of student athletes
Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)
How can I end combat quickly when the outcome is inevitable?
How can I make 12 tone and atonal melodies sound interesting?
Are there any normal animals in Pokemon universe?
Which languages would be most useful in Europe at the end of the 19th century?
Non-aqueous eyes?
What is the meaning of the Russian idiom "to taste tuna" ("отведать тунца")?
If there's something that implicates the president why is there then a national security issue? (John Dowd)
Scientist couple raises alien baby
Next date with distinct digits
What is the purpose of bonds within an investment portfolio?
Database accidentally deleted with a bash script [duplicate]
Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /Restore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTigerAccidentally formated external usb harddrive (500GB) with bootable iso (1GB), how can I recover my data?What is the difference between double and single square brackets in bash?Accidentally rm -rf /usr/* as root, what now?How to add a timestamp to bash script log?Large incremental backup sizes although minimal changes with cPanel tarballsUbuntu OS recovery – accidentally deleted ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from /lib64 folder in Ubuntu 14.04Decode & restore files from /dev/md3 (Hacked server)Synology: How to restore data from an accidentally deleted volumeX (BTRFS)?Mapped VMDK no longer accessible - VMware ESX - recover dataRestore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTiger
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
This question already has an answer here:
Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
10 answers
Edit: a follow-up question: Restore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTiger.
My developer committed a huge mistake and we cannot find our Mongo database anywhere in the server.
He logged into the server, and saved the following shell under ~/crontab/mongod_back.sh
:
#!/bin/sh
DUMP=mongodump
OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp // 备份文件临时目录
TAR_DIR=/data/backup/mongod // 备份文件正式目录
DATE=`date +%Y_%m_%d_%H_%M_%S` // 备份文件将以备份对间保存
DB_USER=Guitang // 数库操作员
DB_PASS=qq■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ // 数掘库操作员密码
DAYS=14 // 保留最新14天的份
TARBAK="mongod_bak_$DATE.tar.gz" // 备份文件命名格式
cd $OUT_DIR // 创建文件夹
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/* // 清空临时目录
mkdir -p $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 创建本次备份文件夹
$DUMP -d wecard -u $DB_USER -p $DB_PASS -o $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 执行备份命令
tar -zcvf $TAR_DIR/$TAR_BAK $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 将份文件打包放入正式
find $TAR_DIR/ -mtime +$DAYS -delete // 除14天前的旧备
And then he ran it and it outputted permission denied
messages, so he pressed Ctrl+C
. The server shut down automatically. He tried to restart it but got a grub error:
He contacted AliCloud, the engineer connected the disk to another working server so that he could check the disk. Looks like some folders are gone, including /data/
where the mongodb is!
- We don't understand how the script could destroy the disk including
/data/
; - And of course, is it possible to get the
/data/
back?
PS: He did not take snapshot of the disk before.
PS2: As people mention "backups" a lot, we have lots of important users and data coming these 2 days, the purpose of this action was to backup them (for the first time), then they turned out to be entirely deleted.
filesystems shell ubuntu-14.04 data-recovery disaster-recovery
marked as duplicate by Jenny D, womble♦ Mar 25 at 0:54
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
|
show 6 more comments
This question already has an answer here:
Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
10 answers
Edit: a follow-up question: Restore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTiger.
My developer committed a huge mistake and we cannot find our Mongo database anywhere in the server.
He logged into the server, and saved the following shell under ~/crontab/mongod_back.sh
:
#!/bin/sh
DUMP=mongodump
OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp // 备份文件临时目录
TAR_DIR=/data/backup/mongod // 备份文件正式目录
DATE=`date +%Y_%m_%d_%H_%M_%S` // 备份文件将以备份对间保存
DB_USER=Guitang // 数库操作员
DB_PASS=qq■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ // 数掘库操作员密码
DAYS=14 // 保留最新14天的份
TARBAK="mongod_bak_$DATE.tar.gz" // 备份文件命名格式
cd $OUT_DIR // 创建文件夹
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/* // 清空临时目录
mkdir -p $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 创建本次备份文件夹
$DUMP -d wecard -u $DB_USER -p $DB_PASS -o $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 执行备份命令
tar -zcvf $TAR_DIR/$TAR_BAK $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 将份文件打包放入正式
find $TAR_DIR/ -mtime +$DAYS -delete // 除14天前的旧备
And then he ran it and it outputted permission denied
messages, so he pressed Ctrl+C
. The server shut down automatically. He tried to restart it but got a grub error:
He contacted AliCloud, the engineer connected the disk to another working server so that he could check the disk. Looks like some folders are gone, including /data/
where the mongodb is!
- We don't understand how the script could destroy the disk including
/data/
; - And of course, is it possible to get the
/data/
back?
PS: He did not take snapshot of the disk before.
PS2: As people mention "backups" a lot, we have lots of important users and data coming these 2 days, the purpose of this action was to backup them (for the first time), then they turned out to be entirely deleted.
filesystems shell ubuntu-14.04 data-recovery disaster-recovery
marked as duplicate by Jenny D, womble♦ Mar 25 at 0:54
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
4
Your script has no error checking. If the linecd $OUT_DIR
fails, it's going to delete everything in the current path, which may well be/
. This is why you have backups - use them.
– Jenny D
Mar 24 at 11:42
He run the shell under~/crontab/
, how couldrm
orfind -delete
delete folders under/
?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 11:50
8
Wow - did this script get into your version control system? Did it go through peer review?rm -rf $OUT_DIR/*
really? And why was the script not tested on a non-production server? Once you have restored from backup you have many critical procedural failings to address here before automating anything else. I hope you're not too hard on your developer over it, as a result (though they also have quite a bit to answer for)
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:30
3
Re: this was to be your backup script, never test a new procedure against the only copy of your data. Prior to your very first backup, create a separate test database, put in some fake data, and restore test that.
– John Mahowald
Mar 24 at 22:12
2
Two suggestions to improve your questions: 1) use all-English. The problem with the non-English content is that people don't understanding it, also don't know if it is important or not. Thus, they can't be sure that their answer is okay, and thus they tend to rather don't answer. 2) If you can use textual copy-paste, use that and never use screenshots.
– peterh
Mar 25 at 7:31
|
show 6 more comments
This question already has an answer here:
Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
10 answers
Edit: a follow-up question: Restore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTiger.
My developer committed a huge mistake and we cannot find our Mongo database anywhere in the server.
He logged into the server, and saved the following shell under ~/crontab/mongod_back.sh
:
#!/bin/sh
DUMP=mongodump
OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp // 备份文件临时目录
TAR_DIR=/data/backup/mongod // 备份文件正式目录
DATE=`date +%Y_%m_%d_%H_%M_%S` // 备份文件将以备份对间保存
DB_USER=Guitang // 数库操作员
DB_PASS=qq■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ // 数掘库操作员密码
DAYS=14 // 保留最新14天的份
TARBAK="mongod_bak_$DATE.tar.gz" // 备份文件命名格式
cd $OUT_DIR // 创建文件夹
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/* // 清空临时目录
mkdir -p $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 创建本次备份文件夹
$DUMP -d wecard -u $DB_USER -p $DB_PASS -o $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 执行备份命令
tar -zcvf $TAR_DIR/$TAR_BAK $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 将份文件打包放入正式
find $TAR_DIR/ -mtime +$DAYS -delete // 除14天前的旧备
And then he ran it and it outputted permission denied
messages, so he pressed Ctrl+C
. The server shut down automatically. He tried to restart it but got a grub error:
He contacted AliCloud, the engineer connected the disk to another working server so that he could check the disk. Looks like some folders are gone, including /data/
where the mongodb is!
- We don't understand how the script could destroy the disk including
/data/
; - And of course, is it possible to get the
/data/
back?
PS: He did not take snapshot of the disk before.
PS2: As people mention "backups" a lot, we have lots of important users and data coming these 2 days, the purpose of this action was to backup them (for the first time), then they turned out to be entirely deleted.
filesystems shell ubuntu-14.04 data-recovery disaster-recovery
This question already has an answer here:
Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
10 answers
Edit: a follow-up question: Restore mongoDB by --repair and WiredTiger.
My developer committed a huge mistake and we cannot find our Mongo database anywhere in the server.
He logged into the server, and saved the following shell under ~/crontab/mongod_back.sh
:
#!/bin/sh
DUMP=mongodump
OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp // 备份文件临时目录
TAR_DIR=/data/backup/mongod // 备份文件正式目录
DATE=`date +%Y_%m_%d_%H_%M_%S` // 备份文件将以备份对间保存
DB_USER=Guitang // 数库操作员
DB_PASS=qq■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ // 数掘库操作员密码
DAYS=14 // 保留最新14天的份
TARBAK="mongod_bak_$DATE.tar.gz" // 备份文件命名格式
cd $OUT_DIR // 创建文件夹
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/* // 清空临时目录
mkdir -p $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 创建本次备份文件夹
$DUMP -d wecard -u $DB_USER -p $DB_PASS -o $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 执行备份命令
tar -zcvf $TAR_DIR/$TAR_BAK $OUT_DIR/$DATE // 将份文件打包放入正式
find $TAR_DIR/ -mtime +$DAYS -delete // 除14天前的旧备
And then he ran it and it outputted permission denied
messages, so he pressed Ctrl+C
. The server shut down automatically. He tried to restart it but got a grub error:
He contacted AliCloud, the engineer connected the disk to another working server so that he could check the disk. Looks like some folders are gone, including /data/
where the mongodb is!
- We don't understand how the script could destroy the disk including
/data/
; - And of course, is it possible to get the
/data/
back?
PS: He did not take snapshot of the disk before.
PS2: As people mention "backups" a lot, we have lots of important users and data coming these 2 days, the purpose of this action was to backup them (for the first time), then they turned out to be entirely deleted.
This question already has an answer here:
Monday morning mistake: sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
10 answers
filesystems shell ubuntu-14.04 data-recovery disaster-recovery
filesystems shell ubuntu-14.04 data-recovery disaster-recovery
edited Mar 25 at 13:37
SoftTimur
asked Mar 24 at 11:36
SoftTimurSoftTimur
12318
12318
marked as duplicate by Jenny D, womble♦ Mar 25 at 0:54
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Jenny D, womble♦ Mar 25 at 0:54
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
4
Your script has no error checking. If the linecd $OUT_DIR
fails, it's going to delete everything in the current path, which may well be/
. This is why you have backups - use them.
– Jenny D
Mar 24 at 11:42
He run the shell under~/crontab/
, how couldrm
orfind -delete
delete folders under/
?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 11:50
8
Wow - did this script get into your version control system? Did it go through peer review?rm -rf $OUT_DIR/*
really? And why was the script not tested on a non-production server? Once you have restored from backup you have many critical procedural failings to address here before automating anything else. I hope you're not too hard on your developer over it, as a result (though they also have quite a bit to answer for)
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:30
3
Re: this was to be your backup script, never test a new procedure against the only copy of your data. Prior to your very first backup, create a separate test database, put in some fake data, and restore test that.
– John Mahowald
Mar 24 at 22:12
2
Two suggestions to improve your questions: 1) use all-English. The problem with the non-English content is that people don't understanding it, also don't know if it is important or not. Thus, they can't be sure that their answer is okay, and thus they tend to rather don't answer. 2) If you can use textual copy-paste, use that and never use screenshots.
– peterh
Mar 25 at 7:31
|
show 6 more comments
4
Your script has no error checking. If the linecd $OUT_DIR
fails, it's going to delete everything in the current path, which may well be/
. This is why you have backups - use them.
– Jenny D
Mar 24 at 11:42
He run the shell under~/crontab/
, how couldrm
orfind -delete
delete folders under/
?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 11:50
8
Wow - did this script get into your version control system? Did it go through peer review?rm -rf $OUT_DIR/*
really? And why was the script not tested on a non-production server? Once you have restored from backup you have many critical procedural failings to address here before automating anything else. I hope you're not too hard on your developer over it, as a result (though they also have quite a bit to answer for)
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:30
3
Re: this was to be your backup script, never test a new procedure against the only copy of your data. Prior to your very first backup, create a separate test database, put in some fake data, and restore test that.
– John Mahowald
Mar 24 at 22:12
2
Two suggestions to improve your questions: 1) use all-English. The problem with the non-English content is that people don't understanding it, also don't know if it is important or not. Thus, they can't be sure that their answer is okay, and thus they tend to rather don't answer. 2) If you can use textual copy-paste, use that and never use screenshots.
– peterh
Mar 25 at 7:31
4
4
Your script has no error checking. If the line
cd $OUT_DIR
fails, it's going to delete everything in the current path, which may well be /
. This is why you have backups - use them.– Jenny D
Mar 24 at 11:42
Your script has no error checking. If the line
cd $OUT_DIR
fails, it's going to delete everything in the current path, which may well be /
. This is why you have backups - use them.– Jenny D
Mar 24 at 11:42
He run the shell under
~/crontab/
, how could rm
or find -delete
delete folders under /
?– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 11:50
He run the shell under
~/crontab/
, how could rm
or find -delete
delete folders under /
?– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 11:50
8
8
Wow - did this script get into your version control system? Did it go through peer review?
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/*
really? And why was the script not tested on a non-production server? Once you have restored from backup you have many critical procedural failings to address here before automating anything else. I hope you're not too hard on your developer over it, as a result (though they also have quite a bit to answer for)– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:30
Wow - did this script get into your version control system? Did it go through peer review?
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/*
really? And why was the script not tested on a non-production server? Once you have restored from backup you have many critical procedural failings to address here before automating anything else. I hope you're not too hard on your developer over it, as a result (though they also have quite a bit to answer for)– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:30
3
3
Re: this was to be your backup script, never test a new procedure against the only copy of your data. Prior to your very first backup, create a separate test database, put in some fake data, and restore test that.
– John Mahowald
Mar 24 at 22:12
Re: this was to be your backup script, never test a new procedure against the only copy of your data. Prior to your very first backup, create a separate test database, put in some fake data, and restore test that.
– John Mahowald
Mar 24 at 22:12
2
2
Two suggestions to improve your questions: 1) use all-English. The problem with the non-English content is that people don't understanding it, also don't know if it is important or not. Thus, they can't be sure that their answer is okay, and thus they tend to rather don't answer. 2) If you can use textual copy-paste, use that and never use screenshots.
– peterh
Mar 25 at 7:31
Two suggestions to improve your questions: 1) use all-English. The problem with the non-English content is that people don't understanding it, also don't know if it is important or not. Thus, they can't be sure that their answer is okay, and thus they tend to rather don't answer. 2) If you can use textual copy-paste, use that and never use screenshots.
– peterh
Mar 25 at 7:31
|
show 6 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Easy enough. The //
sequence isn't a comment in bash (#
is).
The statement OUT_DIR=x // text
had no effect* except a cryptic error message.
Thus, with the OUT_DIR being an empty string, one of the commands eventually executed was rm -rf /*
. Some directories placed directly underneath /
weren't removed due to user not having permissions, but it appears that some vital directories were removed. You need to restore from backup.
* The peculiar form of bash statement A=b c d e f
is roughly similar to:
export A=b
c d e f
unset A
A common example:
export VISUAL=vi # A standard visual editor to use is `vi`
visudo -f dummy_sudoers1 # Starts vi to edit a fake sudo config. Type :q! to exit
VISUAL=nano visudo -f dummy_sudoers2 # Starts nano to edit a fake sudo config
visudo -f dummy_sudoers3 # Starts vi again (!)
And the problematic line of script amounted to this:
export OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
// 备份文件临时目录 # shell error as `//` isn't an executable file!
unset OUT_DIR
3
This is one of the reasons I always useset -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
add a comment |
1) He erroneously assumed that //
was a bash comment. It is not, only #
is.
The shell interpreted // text
as a normal command, and did not find a binary called //
, and did nothing.
In bash, when you have a variable assignment (OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
) directly preceding a command (// text
), it only sets the variable while running the command. Therefore, it unsets OUT_DIR
immediately, and when the rm line is reached, OUT_DIR
is now unset, and rm -rf /
is now called, deleting everything you have permission to delete.
2) The solution is the same as all rm -rf /
cases: restore from backup. There is no other solution because you do not have physical access to the hard drive.
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
1
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know thatrm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.
– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
2
@SoftTimurrm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
add a comment |
1) Bash comments start with #. Sorry for your loss.
2) Restore from backup is the only way to proceed here, unfortunately.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Easy enough. The //
sequence isn't a comment in bash (#
is).
The statement OUT_DIR=x // text
had no effect* except a cryptic error message.
Thus, with the OUT_DIR being an empty string, one of the commands eventually executed was rm -rf /*
. Some directories placed directly underneath /
weren't removed due to user not having permissions, but it appears that some vital directories were removed. You need to restore from backup.
* The peculiar form of bash statement A=b c d e f
is roughly similar to:
export A=b
c d e f
unset A
A common example:
export VISUAL=vi # A standard visual editor to use is `vi`
visudo -f dummy_sudoers1 # Starts vi to edit a fake sudo config. Type :q! to exit
VISUAL=nano visudo -f dummy_sudoers2 # Starts nano to edit a fake sudo config
visudo -f dummy_sudoers3 # Starts vi again (!)
And the problematic line of script amounted to this:
export OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
// 备份文件临时目录 # shell error as `//` isn't an executable file!
unset OUT_DIR
3
This is one of the reasons I always useset -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
add a comment |
Easy enough. The //
sequence isn't a comment in bash (#
is).
The statement OUT_DIR=x // text
had no effect* except a cryptic error message.
Thus, with the OUT_DIR being an empty string, one of the commands eventually executed was rm -rf /*
. Some directories placed directly underneath /
weren't removed due to user not having permissions, but it appears that some vital directories were removed. You need to restore from backup.
* The peculiar form of bash statement A=b c d e f
is roughly similar to:
export A=b
c d e f
unset A
A common example:
export VISUAL=vi # A standard visual editor to use is `vi`
visudo -f dummy_sudoers1 # Starts vi to edit a fake sudo config. Type :q! to exit
VISUAL=nano visudo -f dummy_sudoers2 # Starts nano to edit a fake sudo config
visudo -f dummy_sudoers3 # Starts vi again (!)
And the problematic line of script amounted to this:
export OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
// 备份文件临时目录 # shell error as `//` isn't an executable file!
unset OUT_DIR
3
This is one of the reasons I always useset -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
add a comment |
Easy enough. The //
sequence isn't a comment in bash (#
is).
The statement OUT_DIR=x // text
had no effect* except a cryptic error message.
Thus, with the OUT_DIR being an empty string, one of the commands eventually executed was rm -rf /*
. Some directories placed directly underneath /
weren't removed due to user not having permissions, but it appears that some vital directories were removed. You need to restore from backup.
* The peculiar form of bash statement A=b c d e f
is roughly similar to:
export A=b
c d e f
unset A
A common example:
export VISUAL=vi # A standard visual editor to use is `vi`
visudo -f dummy_sudoers1 # Starts vi to edit a fake sudo config. Type :q! to exit
VISUAL=nano visudo -f dummy_sudoers2 # Starts nano to edit a fake sudo config
visudo -f dummy_sudoers3 # Starts vi again (!)
And the problematic line of script amounted to this:
export OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
// 备份文件临时目录 # shell error as `//` isn't an executable file!
unset OUT_DIR
Easy enough. The //
sequence isn't a comment in bash (#
is).
The statement OUT_DIR=x // text
had no effect* except a cryptic error message.
Thus, with the OUT_DIR being an empty string, one of the commands eventually executed was rm -rf /*
. Some directories placed directly underneath /
weren't removed due to user not having permissions, but it appears that some vital directories were removed. You need to restore from backup.
* The peculiar form of bash statement A=b c d e f
is roughly similar to:
export A=b
c d e f
unset A
A common example:
export VISUAL=vi # A standard visual editor to use is `vi`
visudo -f dummy_sudoers1 # Starts vi to edit a fake sudo config. Type :q! to exit
VISUAL=nano visudo -f dummy_sudoers2 # Starts nano to edit a fake sudo config
visudo -f dummy_sudoers3 # Starts vi again (!)
And the problematic line of script amounted to this:
export OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
// 备份文件临时目录 # shell error as `//` isn't an executable file!
unset OUT_DIR
edited Mar 25 at 8:58
answered Mar 24 at 12:11
kubanczykkubanczyk
10.8k42946
10.8k42946
3
This is one of the reasons I always useset -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
add a comment |
3
This is one of the reasons I always useset -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
3
3
This is one of the reasons I always use
set -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
This is one of the reasons I always use
set -euo pipefail
, would have resulted in an exit instead of blundering forward with unset variables– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:45
add a comment |
1) He erroneously assumed that //
was a bash comment. It is not, only #
is.
The shell interpreted // text
as a normal command, and did not find a binary called //
, and did nothing.
In bash, when you have a variable assignment (OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
) directly preceding a command (// text
), it only sets the variable while running the command. Therefore, it unsets OUT_DIR
immediately, and when the rm line is reached, OUT_DIR
is now unset, and rm -rf /
is now called, deleting everything you have permission to delete.
2) The solution is the same as all rm -rf /
cases: restore from backup. There is no other solution because you do not have physical access to the hard drive.
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
1
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know thatrm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.
– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
2
@SoftTimurrm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
add a comment |
1) He erroneously assumed that //
was a bash comment. It is not, only #
is.
The shell interpreted // text
as a normal command, and did not find a binary called //
, and did nothing.
In bash, when you have a variable assignment (OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
) directly preceding a command (// text
), it only sets the variable while running the command. Therefore, it unsets OUT_DIR
immediately, and when the rm line is reached, OUT_DIR
is now unset, and rm -rf /
is now called, deleting everything you have permission to delete.
2) The solution is the same as all rm -rf /
cases: restore from backup. There is no other solution because you do not have physical access to the hard drive.
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
1
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know thatrm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.
– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
2
@SoftTimurrm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
add a comment |
1) He erroneously assumed that //
was a bash comment. It is not, only #
is.
The shell interpreted // text
as a normal command, and did not find a binary called //
, and did nothing.
In bash, when you have a variable assignment (OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
) directly preceding a command (// text
), it only sets the variable while running the command. Therefore, it unsets OUT_DIR
immediately, and when the rm line is reached, OUT_DIR
is now unset, and rm -rf /
is now called, deleting everything you have permission to delete.
2) The solution is the same as all rm -rf /
cases: restore from backup. There is no other solution because you do not have physical access to the hard drive.
1) He erroneously assumed that //
was a bash comment. It is not, only #
is.
The shell interpreted // text
as a normal command, and did not find a binary called //
, and did nothing.
In bash, when you have a variable assignment (OUT_DIR=/data/backup/mongod/tmp
) directly preceding a command (// text
), it only sets the variable while running the command. Therefore, it unsets OUT_DIR
immediately, and when the rm line is reached, OUT_DIR
is now unset, and rm -rf /
is now called, deleting everything you have permission to delete.
2) The solution is the same as all rm -rf /
cases: restore from backup. There is no other solution because you do not have physical access to the hard drive.
answered Mar 24 at 19:01
Ray WuRay Wu
711
711
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
1
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know thatrm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.
– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
2
@SoftTimurrm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
add a comment |
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
1
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know thatrm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.
– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
2
@SoftTimurrm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
why having physical access to the hard drive may help to restore?
– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 19:02
1
1
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know that
rm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
Possible forensics, professional hard drive recovery methods. I know this because I know that
rm -rf
is not extremely secure, and doesn't overwrite the hard drive.– Ray Wu
Mar 24 at 19:03
2
2
@SoftTimur
rm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
@SoftTimur
rm
usually just "unlinks" files but the data is still physically there until overwritten. This is why professionals can "undelete" sometimes if they have physical access and you haven't done lots of things with the disk after the catastrophe occurred. If you don't have backups, that's the best you can hope for.– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 19:52
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
You don't need physical access, with almost no disk activity since the deletion file restore utilities might be able to relatively easily find almost everything
– ThisGuy
Mar 25 at 17:47
add a comment |
1) Bash comments start with #. Sorry for your loss.
2) Restore from backup is the only way to proceed here, unfortunately.
add a comment |
1) Bash comments start with #. Sorry for your loss.
2) Restore from backup is the only way to proceed here, unfortunately.
add a comment |
1) Bash comments start with #. Sorry for your loss.
2) Restore from backup is the only way to proceed here, unfortunately.
1) Bash comments start with #. Sorry for your loss.
2) Restore from backup is the only way to proceed here, unfortunately.
answered Mar 24 at 19:25
RMPJRMPJ
311
311
add a comment |
add a comment |
4
Your script has no error checking. If the line
cd $OUT_DIR
fails, it's going to delete everything in the current path, which may well be/
. This is why you have backups - use them.– Jenny D
Mar 24 at 11:42
He run the shell under
~/crontab/
, how couldrm
orfind -delete
delete folders under/
?– SoftTimur
Mar 24 at 11:50
8
Wow - did this script get into your version control system? Did it go through peer review?
rm -rf $OUT_DIR/*
really? And why was the script not tested on a non-production server? Once you have restored from backup you have many critical procedural failings to address here before automating anything else. I hope you're not too hard on your developer over it, as a result (though they also have quite a bit to answer for)– Lightness Races in Orbit
Mar 24 at 18:30
3
Re: this was to be your backup script, never test a new procedure against the only copy of your data. Prior to your very first backup, create a separate test database, put in some fake data, and restore test that.
– John Mahowald
Mar 24 at 22:12
2
Two suggestions to improve your questions: 1) use all-English. The problem with the non-English content is that people don't understanding it, also don't know if it is important or not. Thus, they can't be sure that their answer is okay, and thus they tend to rather don't answer. 2) If you can use textual copy-paste, use that and never use screenshots.
– peterh
Mar 25 at 7:31