Request info on 12/48v PSUDoes the pin order matter for an EPS12V 8-pin +12V connector?DC PSU questions (+/- voltages, home-built ammeter)Current flow priorities in PSU / PSU reviewConnecting potentiometer to an ATX PSUATX power supply only 0.1A from 12V rail?Split External 5V PSU 4 waysNeed help interpreting a printer PS labelCan AC floating ground be used as a common ground to a DC circuit?Has Anyone Ever Gotten a Delta DPS-400AB-5 A PSU to Work Standalone?XBOX 360 PSU for walkie-talkie chargers

Using credit/debit card details vs swiping a card in a payment (credit card) terminal

What does the view outside my ship traveling at light speed look like?

Does Nitrogen inside commercial airliner wheels prevent blowouts on touchdown?

Simple fuzz pedal using breadboard

What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?

Is there a way to make it so the cursor is included when I prtscr key?

Would jet fuel for an F-16 or F-35 be producible during WW2?

Why doesn't the Earth accelerate towards the Moon?

How to execute this code on startup?

Python program to implement pow(x, n)

Employer asking for online access to bank account - Is this a scam?

How to use Palladio font in text body but Computer Modern for Equations?

In general, would I need to season a meat when making a sauce?

Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?

Where have Brexit voters gone?

Crossing US border with music files I'm legally allowed to possess

Pirate democracy at its finest

Why does the 6502 have the BIT instruction?

Why colon to denote that a value belongs to a type?

What will be the real voltage along the line with a voltage source and a capacitor?

Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?

Why does this if-statement combining assignment and an equality check return true?

Construct a word ladder

Why aren't space telescopes put in GEO?



Request info on 12/48v PSU


Does the pin order matter for an EPS12V 8-pin +12V connector?DC PSU questions (+/- voltages, home-built ammeter)Current flow priorities in PSU / PSU reviewConnecting potentiometer to an ATX PSUATX power supply only 0.1A from 12V rail?Split External 5V PSU 4 waysNeed help interpreting a printer PS labelCan AC floating ground be used as a common ground to a DC circuit?Has Anyone Ever Gotten a Delta DPS-400AB-5 A PSU to Work Standalone?XBOX 360 PSU for walkie-talkie chargers






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



  1. Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?


  2. Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?


  3. Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?


Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    Mar 24 at 0:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    Mar 24 at 0:44

















2












$begingroup$


I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



  1. Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?


  2. Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?


  3. Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?


Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    Mar 24 at 0:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    Mar 24 at 0:44













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



  1. Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?


  2. Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?


  3. Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?


Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.



In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".



My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).



Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?



Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?



I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:



  1. Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?


  2. Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?


  3. Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?


Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:



enter image description here







power-supply






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 14:37









Electric_90

1,868519




1,868519










asked Mar 24 at 0:33









steviebstevieb

1338




1338







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    Mar 24 at 0:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    Mar 24 at 0:44












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – K. S.
    Mar 24 at 0:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
    $endgroup$
    – stevieb
    Mar 24 at 0:44







2




2




$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42




$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42




1




1




$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44




$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428753%2frequest-info-on-12-48v-psu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



    Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



      Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



        Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.



        Note also that $12 mathrmV·2.99 mathrmA + 48 mathrmV·0.82 mathrmA = 75.24 mathrmW$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 24 at 1:58









        Jasen

        12.6k11733




        12.6k11733










        answered Mar 24 at 0:50









        HearthHearth

        5,81311443




        5,81311443



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428753%2frequest-info-on-12-48v-psu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

            SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

            은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현