Tictoc Tutorial:Why are the positions of the module vectors overlapping,not separate?Gate is not connected to a submodule errorOMNeT++: Error in module during network setup: Class not foundwhy omnet++ version 5 ned file suddenly corruptedBuild a central routing database using the routing example in Omnet++Establish connection to module at runtime in Omnet++How omnet initialize modules and model?How to send back a message to a specified node?OMNet++-How to set up the connection between RSU node and Vehicle nodesModify beaconing in a VANET projectPredefining route for message to take on OMNeT++
What is the difference between 型 and 形?
Generate Brainfuck for the numbers 1–255
As a 16 year old, how can I keep my money safe from my mother?
Does this Foo machine halt?
Why is transplanting a specific intact brain impossible if it is generally possible?
Why isn’t SHA-3 in wider use?
A tool to replace all words with antonyms
English - Acceptable use of parentheses in an author's name
How to avoid the "need" to learn more before conducting research?
How can I solve for the intersection points of two ellipses?
Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic
How many different ways are there to checkmate in the early game?
Are there any financial disadvantages to living significantly "below your means"?
Is TA-ing worth the opportunity cost?
What game uses dice with sides powers of 2?
What does "sardine box" mean?
How to create all combinations from a nested list while preserving the structure using R?
Visa National - No Exit Stamp From France on Return to the UK
What are the uses and limitations of Persuasion, Insight, and Deception against other PCs?
How would I as a DM create a smart phone-like spell/device my players could use?
What are the conventions for transcribing Semitic languages into Greek?
How does this kind of structure made?
Why should we care about syntactic proofs if we can show semantically that statements are true?
Is it okay for a ticket seller to grab a tip in the USA?
Tictoc Tutorial:Why are the positions of the module vectors overlapping,not separate?
Gate is not connected to a submodule errorOMNeT++: Error in module during network setup: Class not foundwhy omnet++ version 5 ned file suddenly corruptedBuild a central routing database using the routing example in Omnet++Establish connection to module at runtime in Omnet++How omnet initialize modules and model?How to send back a message to a specified node?OMNet++-How to set up the connection between RSU node and Vehicle nodesModify beaconing in a VANET projectPredefining route for message to take on OMNeT++
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".
According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.
I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.
simple Txc10
parameters:
@display("i=block/routing");
gates:
input in[];
output out[];
network Tictoc10
submodules:
tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
//different positions
//ingnore the connections
Thank you for any suggestions.
omnet++
add a comment |
I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".
According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.
I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.
simple Txc10
parameters:
@display("i=block/routing");
gates:
input in[];
output out[];
network Tictoc10
submodules:
tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
//different positions
//ingnore the connections
Thank you for any suggestions.
omnet++
add a comment |
I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".
According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.
I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.
simple Txc10
parameters:
@display("i=block/routing");
gates:
input in[];
output out[];
network Tictoc10
submodules:
tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
//different positions
//ingnore the connections
Thank you for any suggestions.
omnet++
I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".
According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.
I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.
simple Txc10
parameters:
@display("i=block/routing");
gates:
input in[];
output out[];
network Tictoc10
submodules:
tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
//different positions
//ingnore the connections
Thank you for any suggestions.
omnet++
omnet++
asked Mar 27 at 8:24
余星光余星光
11 bronze badge
11 bronze badge
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
add a comment |
There are two places to pay attention to.
1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55372641%2ftictoc-tutorialwhy-are-the-positions-of-the-module-vectors-overlapping-not-sepa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
add a comment |
The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
add a comment |
The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.
The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.
answered Mar 27 at 8:31
RudiRudi
3,3511 gold badge12 silver badges16 bronze badges
3,3511 gold badge12 silver badges16 bronze badges
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
add a comment |
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?
– 余星光
Mar 27 at 9:26
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.
– Rudi
Mar 27 at 9:48
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.
– Rudi
Apr 2 at 12:15
add a comment |
There are two places to pay attention to.
1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.
add a comment |
There are two places to pay attention to.
1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.
add a comment |
There are two places to pay attention to.
1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.
There are two places to pay attention to.
1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.
answered Apr 2 at 15:37
余星光余星光
11 bronze badge
11 bronze badge
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55372641%2ftictoc-tutorialwhy-are-the-positions-of-the-module-vectors-overlapping-not-sepa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown