Tictoc Tutorial:Why are the positions of the module vectors overlapping,not separate?Gate is not connected to a submodule errorOMNeT++: Error in module during network setup: Class not foundwhy omnet++ version 5 ned file suddenly corruptedBuild a central routing database using the routing example in Omnet++Establish connection to module at runtime in Omnet++How omnet initialize modules and model?How to send back a message to a specified node?OMNet++-How to set up the connection between RSU node and Vehicle nodesModify beaconing in a VANET projectPredefining route for message to take on OMNeT++

What is the difference between 型 and 形?

Generate Brainfuck for the numbers 1–255

As a 16 year old, how can I keep my money safe from my mother?

Does this Foo machine halt?

Why is transplanting a specific intact brain impossible if it is generally possible?

Why isn’t SHA-3 in wider use?

A tool to replace all words with antonyms

English - Acceptable use of parentheses in an author's name

How to avoid the "need" to learn more before conducting research?

How can I solve for the intersection points of two ellipses?

Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic

How many different ways are there to checkmate in the early game?

Are there any financial disadvantages to living significantly "below your means"?

Is TA-ing worth the opportunity cost?

What game uses dice with sides powers of 2?

What does "sardine box" mean?

How to create all combinations from a nested list while preserving the structure using R?

Visa National - No Exit Stamp From France on Return to the UK

What are the uses and limitations of Persuasion, Insight, and Deception against other PCs?

How would I as a DM create a smart phone-like spell/device my players could use?

What are the conventions for transcribing Semitic languages into Greek?

How does this kind of structure made?

Why should we care about syntactic proofs if we can show semantically that statements are true?

Is it okay for a ticket seller to grab a tip in the USA?



Tictoc Tutorial:Why are the positions of the module vectors overlapping,not separate?


Gate is not connected to a submodule errorOMNeT++: Error in module during network setup: Class not foundwhy omnet++ version 5 ned file suddenly corruptedBuild a central routing database using the routing example in Omnet++Establish connection to module at runtime in Omnet++How omnet initialize modules and model?How to send back a message to a specified node?OMNet++-How to set up the connection between RSU node and Vehicle nodesModify beaconing in a VANET projectPredefining route for message to take on OMNeT++






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".



According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.



I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.



simple Txc10

parameters:
@display("i=block/routing");
gates:
input in[];
output out[];

network Tictoc10

submodules:
tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
//different positions
//ingnore the connections



Thank you for any suggestions.










share|improve this question






























    0















    I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".



    According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.



    I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.



    simple Txc10

    parameters:
    @display("i=block/routing");
    gates:
    input in[];
    output out[];

    network Tictoc10

    submodules:
    tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
    //different positions
    //ingnore the connections



    Thank you for any suggestions.










    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".



      According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.



      I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.



      simple Txc10

      parameters:
      @display("i=block/routing");
      gates:
      input in[];
      output out[];

      network Tictoc10

      submodules:
      tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
      //different positions
      //ingnore the connections



      Thank you for any suggestions.










      share|improve this question














      I am learing the OMNeT++ With Tictoc Tutorial,however I encounter a problem in the part4.1 "More than two nodes".



      According to the tutorial, the tictoc10.ned can generate six simple modules in different locations.But there is just a module vector icon in my ned file even if I completely copy the tictoc10.ned file.



      I guess there maybe some properties which I need to set but it doesn't work at all.And I also scrolling through the 'simulation manual' with no result.



      simple Txc10

      parameters:
      @display("i=block/routing");
      gates:
      input in[];
      output out[];

      network Tictoc10

      submodules:
      tic[6]: Txc10; //this line should generate 6 Txc10 modules with
      //different positions
      //ingnore the connections



      Thank you for any suggestions.







      omnet++






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 27 at 8:24









      余星光余星光

      11 bronze badge




      11 bronze badge

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

            – 余星光
            Mar 27 at 9:26











          • Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

            – Rudi
            Mar 27 at 9:48












          • If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

            – Rudi
            Apr 2 at 12:15


















          0














          There are two places to pay attention to.



          1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
          2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.






          share|improve this answer



























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55372641%2ftictoc-tutorialwhy-are-the-positions-of-the-module-vectors-overlapping-not-sepa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

              – 余星光
              Mar 27 at 9:26











            • Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

              – Rudi
              Mar 27 at 9:48












            • If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

              – Rudi
              Apr 2 at 12:15















            1














            The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

              – 余星光
              Mar 27 at 9:26











            • Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

              – Rudi
              Mar 27 at 9:48












            • If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

              – Rudi
              Apr 2 at 12:15













            1












            1








            1







            The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.






            share|improve this answer













            The NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. I.e. you will not see several icons in the graphical editor only a single icon that represents the vector. On the other hand, when you actually run the simulation, the correct number of instances from the node will be instantiated and the autolayouter will arrange them.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 27 at 8:31









            RudiRudi

            3,3511 gold badge12 silver badges16 bronze badges




            3,3511 gold badge12 silver badges16 bronze badges















            • Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

              – 余星光
              Mar 27 at 9:26











            • Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

              – Rudi
              Mar 27 at 9:48












            • If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

              – Rudi
              Apr 2 at 12:15

















            • Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

              – 余星光
              Mar 27 at 9:26











            • Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

              – Rudi
              Mar 27 at 9:48












            • If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

              – Rudi
              Apr 2 at 12:15
















            Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

            – 余星光
            Mar 27 at 9:26





            Thank you! It's strange that I didn't seem to see several nodes when I ran the simulation before.Anyway I found it this time and appreciate your answer. But their positions are so confusing that it can't show the connections of the gates.And the effect of button "Re-layout" dose not seem to be very good. So the "autolayout" which you say is same to "Re-layout" button?And do you have some good ideas to improver their layout to show the connections better?

            – 余星光
            Mar 27 at 9:26













            Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

            – Rudi
            Mar 27 at 9:48






            Obviously, if you don't have connections between the submodules, the autolayouter cannot work out a good layout. You can force various layouts manually. See the P display tag. doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/… ring layout would be a good start.

            – Rudi
            Mar 27 at 9:48














            If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

            – Rudi
            Apr 2 at 12:15





            If that answers your question, you should accept it on the UI so it will be categorized as correct so other people will find it more easily.

            – Rudi
            Apr 2 at 12:15













            0














            There are two places to pay attention to.



            1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
            2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.






            share|improve this answer





























              0














              There are two places to pay attention to.



              1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
              2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.






              share|improve this answer



























                0












                0








                0







                There are two places to pay attention to.



                1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
                2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.






                share|improve this answer













                There are two places to pay attention to.



                1.as like the former answer says,the NED editor in the IDE displays only the structures present in the NED file. And you can find the several module icons when you run the simulation.
                2.The size of the network in the 'Design' mode of the NED file need to be adjusted according to the quatity of the submodules in this network. In this example,the size of network is so small that submodules overlapp and the connections between can't be found.After I enlarge it the problem is solved.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 2 at 15:37









                余星光余星光

                11 bronze badge




                11 bronze badge






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55372641%2ftictoc-tutorialwhy-are-the-positions-of-the-module-vectors-overlapping-not-sepa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                    용인 삼성생명 블루밍스 목차 통계 역대 감독 선수단 응원단 경기장 같이 보기 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴samsungblueminx.comeh선수 명단용인 삼성생명 블루밍스용인 삼성생명 블루밍스ehsamsungblueminx.comeheheheh

                    155 수학 과학 기타 둘러보기 메뉴eh추가해eh문서를 완성해