Async call in Controller, calling a void method in model. (asp.net MVC C#)?Calling the base constructor in C#Cross-thread operation not valid: Control accessed from a thread other than the thread it was created onCompile Views in ASP.NET MVCHow do you create a dropdownlist from an enum in ASP.NET MVC?ASP.NET MVC - Set custom IIdentity or IPrincipalDistinct() with lambda?File Upload ASP.NET MVC 3.0How to safely call an async method in C# without awaitAsync Void, ASP.Net, and Count of Outstanding OperationsWhy not inherit from List<T>?

Am I legally required to provide a (GPL licensed) source code even after a project is abandoned?

Why does cooking oatmeal starting with cold milk make it creamy?

Why do textbooks often include the solutions to odd or even numbered problems but not both?

Android Material and appcompat Manifest merger failed in react-native or ExpoKit

What happened to Steve's Shield in Iron Man 2?

Can Ogre clerics use Purify Food and Drink on humanoid characters?

I found a password with hashcat, but it doesn't work

Hit the Bulls Eye with T in the Center

What are Elsa's reasons for selecting the Holy Grail on behalf of Donovan?

Did the CIA blow up a Siberian pipeline in 1982?

What does it mean to not be able to take the derivative of a function multiple times?

Do I have to explain the mechanical superiority of the player-character within the fiction of the game?

Do I need a shock-proof watch for cycling?

Do I have any obligations to my PhD supervisor's requests after I have graduated?

Is there any proof that high saturation and contrast makes a picture more appealing in social media?

How do I professionally let my manager know I'll quit over an issue?

Can White Castle?

What can I do with a research project that is my university’s intellectual property?

Count All Possible Unique Combinations of Letters in a Word

Shooting someone's past self using special relativity

How would modern naval warfare have to have developed differently for battleships to still be relevant in the 21st century?

How many people are necessary to maintain modern civilisation?

Term or phrase for simply moving a problem from one area to another

career in signal processing



Async call in Controller, calling a void method in model. (asp.net MVC C#)?


Calling the base constructor in C#Cross-thread operation not valid: Control accessed from a thread other than the thread it was created onCompile Views in ASP.NET MVCHow do you create a dropdownlist from an enum in ASP.NET MVC?ASP.NET MVC - Set custom IIdentity or IPrincipalDistinct() with lambda?File Upload ASP.NET MVC 3.0How to safely call an async method in C# without awaitAsync Void, ASP.Net, and Count of Outstanding OperationsWhy not inherit from List<T>?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















BACKGROUND: I'm trying to make an async Task in my MVCcontroller class that will call a method in my modelclass which will insert a bunch of data into multiple sql tables using an already existing sql table.
As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.
Once it is done with it's operations it should write to a file that I will see and understand that all computations are done.
Yes, there might be smarter ways of calling the Task but that's for later, for now I just wish to figure out how to do the async set-up.



PROBLEM/QUESTION:
Controller says that the await_part can not await void, can I just return something like Json(success)? Or how do I do this set up? I'm kind of a rookie.



In the model method I wish to look at the existing sql-table and use it to create more sql-tables that I will persist in the database, not really interested in sending anything back besides something that says "I'm done with the calculations".



Controller calling the model method that will perform actions.



 public async Task GenerateBackEndCalculations(string sqlTableName)

if (nameOfTable == "sqlTableName")

await _context.BackEndCalculations();





the model method that looks like this



public void BackEndCalculations ()

Do something here, and maybe return something if I have to???











share|improve this question






















  • use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait();

    – brykneval
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:13











  • Async should only return void for event handlers. In your case it should not return void. Furthermore, even if this is done async, keep in mind that the response will not return to the front end until the whole operation is completed. The front end can issue the request asyn and then do other things until the repsonse is returned from the server but you need to do that on the front end side.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19






  • 1





    Don't use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait(); Wrapping already asynchronous method with Task.Run is waste of resources(threads) and you will loose all benefits of asynchronous methods.

    – Fabio
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19











  • ...............................

    – Johan
    Jul 23 '17 at 16:40


















1















BACKGROUND: I'm trying to make an async Task in my MVCcontroller class that will call a method in my modelclass which will insert a bunch of data into multiple sql tables using an already existing sql table.
As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.
Once it is done with it's operations it should write to a file that I will see and understand that all computations are done.
Yes, there might be smarter ways of calling the Task but that's for later, for now I just wish to figure out how to do the async set-up.



PROBLEM/QUESTION:
Controller says that the await_part can not await void, can I just return something like Json(success)? Or how do I do this set up? I'm kind of a rookie.



In the model method I wish to look at the existing sql-table and use it to create more sql-tables that I will persist in the database, not really interested in sending anything back besides something that says "I'm done with the calculations".



Controller calling the model method that will perform actions.



 public async Task GenerateBackEndCalculations(string sqlTableName)

if (nameOfTable == "sqlTableName")

await _context.BackEndCalculations();





the model method that looks like this



public void BackEndCalculations ()

Do something here, and maybe return something if I have to???











share|improve this question






















  • use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait();

    – brykneval
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:13











  • Async should only return void for event handlers. In your case it should not return void. Furthermore, even if this is done async, keep in mind that the response will not return to the front end until the whole operation is completed. The front end can issue the request asyn and then do other things until the repsonse is returned from the server but you need to do that on the front end side.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19






  • 1





    Don't use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait(); Wrapping already asynchronous method with Task.Run is waste of resources(threads) and you will loose all benefits of asynchronous methods.

    – Fabio
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19











  • ...............................

    – Johan
    Jul 23 '17 at 16:40














1












1








1








BACKGROUND: I'm trying to make an async Task in my MVCcontroller class that will call a method in my modelclass which will insert a bunch of data into multiple sql tables using an already existing sql table.
As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.
Once it is done with it's operations it should write to a file that I will see and understand that all computations are done.
Yes, there might be smarter ways of calling the Task but that's for later, for now I just wish to figure out how to do the async set-up.



PROBLEM/QUESTION:
Controller says that the await_part can not await void, can I just return something like Json(success)? Or how do I do this set up? I'm kind of a rookie.



In the model method I wish to look at the existing sql-table and use it to create more sql-tables that I will persist in the database, not really interested in sending anything back besides something that says "I'm done with the calculations".



Controller calling the model method that will perform actions.



 public async Task GenerateBackEndCalculations(string sqlTableName)

if (nameOfTable == "sqlTableName")

await _context.BackEndCalculations();





the model method that looks like this



public void BackEndCalculations ()

Do something here, and maybe return something if I have to???











share|improve this question














BACKGROUND: I'm trying to make an async Task in my MVCcontroller class that will call a method in my modelclass which will insert a bunch of data into multiple sql tables using an already existing sql table.
As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.
Once it is done with it's operations it should write to a file that I will see and understand that all computations are done.
Yes, there might be smarter ways of calling the Task but that's for later, for now I just wish to figure out how to do the async set-up.



PROBLEM/QUESTION:
Controller says that the await_part can not await void, can I just return something like Json(success)? Or how do I do this set up? I'm kind of a rookie.



In the model method I wish to look at the existing sql-table and use it to create more sql-tables that I will persist in the database, not really interested in sending anything back besides something that says "I'm done with the calculations".



Controller calling the model method that will perform actions.



 public async Task GenerateBackEndCalculations(string sqlTableName)

if (nameOfTable == "sqlTableName")

await _context.BackEndCalculations();





the model method that looks like this



public void BackEndCalculations ()

Do something here, and maybe return something if I have to???








c# asp.net asp.net-mvc asynchronous task






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 22 '17 at 7:10









JohanJohan

209




209












  • use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait();

    – brykneval
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:13











  • Async should only return void for event handlers. In your case it should not return void. Furthermore, even if this is done async, keep in mind that the response will not return to the front end until the whole operation is completed. The front end can issue the request asyn and then do other things until the repsonse is returned from the server but you need to do that on the front end side.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19






  • 1





    Don't use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait(); Wrapping already asynchronous method with Task.Run is waste of resources(threads) and you will loose all benefits of asynchronous methods.

    – Fabio
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19











  • ...............................

    – Johan
    Jul 23 '17 at 16:40


















  • use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait();

    – brykneval
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:13











  • Async should only return void for event handlers. In your case it should not return void. Furthermore, even if this is done async, keep in mind that the response will not return to the front end until the whole operation is completed. The front end can issue the request asyn and then do other things until the repsonse is returned from the server but you need to do that on the front end side.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19






  • 1





    Don't use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait(); Wrapping already asynchronous method with Task.Run is waste of resources(threads) and you will loose all benefits of asynchronous methods.

    – Fabio
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:19











  • ...............................

    – Johan
    Jul 23 '17 at 16:40

















use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait();

– brykneval
Jul 22 '17 at 7:13





use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait();

– brykneval
Jul 22 '17 at 7:13













Async should only return void for event handlers. In your case it should not return void. Furthermore, even if this is done async, keep in mind that the response will not return to the front end until the whole operation is completed. The front end can issue the request asyn and then do other things until the repsonse is returned from the server but you need to do that on the front end side.

– CodingYoshi
Jul 22 '17 at 7:19





Async should only return void for event handlers. In your case it should not return void. Furthermore, even if this is done async, keep in mind that the response will not return to the front end until the whole operation is completed. The front end can issue the request asyn and then do other things until the repsonse is returned from the server but you need to do that on the front end side.

– CodingYoshi
Jul 22 '17 at 7:19




1




1





Don't use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait(); Wrapping already asynchronous method with Task.Run is waste of resources(threads) and you will loose all benefits of asynchronous methods.

– Fabio
Jul 22 '17 at 7:19





Don't use Task.Run(()=>BackEndCalculations()).Wait(); Wrapping already asynchronous method with Task.Run is waste of resources(threads) and you will loose all benefits of asynchronous methods.

– Fabio
Jul 22 '17 at 7:19













...............................

– Johan
Jul 23 '17 at 16:40






...............................

– Johan
Jul 23 '17 at 16:40













4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1














If i understand you correctly, you can change void to Task (and add async keyword) any where and as long as there is a await in your function. If you don`t have any async method to await, just return some completed Task. For example Task.CompletedTask;



public async Task BackEndCalculations ()

Do something async



Or



public Task BackEndCalculations ()

Do something sync
return Task.CompletedTask;






share|improve this answer























  • No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:33











  • Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

    – Johan
    Jul 23 '17 at 18:01


















0














If you want to use await in BackEndCalculations it cannot return void, it needs to return a Task.



Here are your options:



public Task BackEndCalculations() ... 
public Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...
public async Task BackEndCalculations() ...
public async Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...


Depending on how the body of your function looks like






share|improve this answer























  • Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 22 '17 at 7:34











  • Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

    – MondKin
    Jul 22 '17 at 20:27











  • Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 23 '17 at 8:01











  • As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

    – Johan
    Jul 23 '17 at 16:30











  • @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

    – CodingYoshi
    Jul 23 '17 at 17:49



















0















As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.




Asynchronous code is not going to help you (see the section "Not a Silver Bullet"). In summary, async on ASP.NET is a way to yield to the server's thread pool - it is not a way to yield (or return) to the client/browser.



There are a few approaches to returning early from ASP.NET requests, but most of them are dangerous to some degree or another. Since you already have a database, I'd recommend looking at HangFire. Note that your HangFire processing should be done outside ASP.NET - e.g., in an Azure Worker Role or Win32 Service.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    For making any synchronous method to behave like async, just add two things, in method signature replace void with Task. and at the end of the method write return Task.CompletedTask;.



    Final implementation is like



     public Task ASimpleSynchronousMethod()
    // TO DO

    // Add this additional line at the end of the method body
    return Task.CompletedTask;



    Hope this will work.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f45251780%2fasync-call-in-controller-calling-a-void-method-in-model-asp-net-mvc-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      If i understand you correctly, you can change void to Task (and add async keyword) any where and as long as there is a await in your function. If you don`t have any async method to await, just return some completed Task. For example Task.CompletedTask;



      public async Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something async



      Or



      public Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something sync
      return Task.CompletedTask;






      share|improve this answer























      • No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:33











      • Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 18:01















      1














      If i understand you correctly, you can change void to Task (and add async keyword) any where and as long as there is a await in your function. If you don`t have any async method to await, just return some completed Task. For example Task.CompletedTask;



      public async Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something async



      Or



      public Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something sync
      return Task.CompletedTask;






      share|improve this answer























      • No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:33











      • Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 18:01













      1












      1








      1







      If i understand you correctly, you can change void to Task (and add async keyword) any where and as long as there is a await in your function. If you don`t have any async method to await, just return some completed Task. For example Task.CompletedTask;



      public async Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something async



      Or



      public Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something sync
      return Task.CompletedTask;






      share|improve this answer













      If i understand you correctly, you can change void to Task (and add async keyword) any where and as long as there is a await in your function. If you don`t have any async method to await, just return some completed Task. For example Task.CompletedTask;



      public async Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something async



      Or



      public Task BackEndCalculations ()

      Do something sync
      return Task.CompletedTask;







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Jul 22 '17 at 7:21









      AmirRaptoRAmirRaptoR

      112




      112












      • No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:33











      • Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 18:01

















      • No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:33











      • Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 18:01
















      No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 22 '17 at 7:33





      No this will not do.see my comment to the OP question.

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 22 '17 at 7:33













      Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

      – Johan
      Jul 23 '17 at 18:01





      Well I'm just lost now, I'll take this thread to a colleague and show it as I don't get the flag and file thing either. Thanks for helping out even though I don't really get all of it :)

      – Johan
      Jul 23 '17 at 18:01













      0














      If you want to use await in BackEndCalculations it cannot return void, it needs to return a Task.



      Here are your options:



      public Task BackEndCalculations() ... 
      public Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...


      Depending on how the body of your function looks like






      share|improve this answer























      • Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:34











      • Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

        – MondKin
        Jul 22 '17 at 20:27











      • Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 8:01











      • As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 16:30











      • @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 17:49
















      0














      If you want to use await in BackEndCalculations it cannot return void, it needs to return a Task.



      Here are your options:



      public Task BackEndCalculations() ... 
      public Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...


      Depending on how the body of your function looks like






      share|improve this answer























      • Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:34











      • Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

        – MondKin
        Jul 22 '17 at 20:27











      • Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 8:01











      • As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 16:30











      • @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 17:49














      0












      0








      0







      If you want to use await in BackEndCalculations it cannot return void, it needs to return a Task.



      Here are your options:



      public Task BackEndCalculations() ... 
      public Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...


      Depending on how the body of your function looks like






      share|improve this answer













      If you want to use await in BackEndCalculations it cannot return void, it needs to return a Task.



      Here are your options:



      public Task BackEndCalculations() ... 
      public Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task BackEndCalculations() ...
      public async Task<JsonObject> BackEndCalculations() ...


      Depending on how the body of your function looks like







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Jul 22 '17 at 7:15









      MondKinMondKin

      10.4k63861




      10.4k63861












      • Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:34











      • Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

        – MondKin
        Jul 22 '17 at 20:27











      • Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 8:01











      • As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 16:30











      • @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 17:49


















      • Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 22 '17 at 7:34











      • Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

        – MondKin
        Jul 22 '17 at 20:27











      • Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 8:01











      • As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

        – Johan
        Jul 23 '17 at 16:30











      • @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

        – CodingYoshi
        Jul 23 '17 at 17:49

















      Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 22 '17 at 7:34





      Not this will not help. See my comment to question.

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 22 '17 at 7:34













      Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

      – MondKin
      Jul 22 '17 at 20:27





      Will not work because? How is your comment in OP's question related to this solution?

      – MondKin
      Jul 22 '17 at 20:27













      Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 23 '17 at 8:01





      Returning a Task will not help because the server will not return a response yo the client until the whole operation is completed. The OP is trying to use async to return to the client right away and thats not possible. See the answer from @stephencleary below.

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 23 '17 at 8:01













      As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

      – Johan
      Jul 23 '17 at 16:30





      As I said in the question I will write to a text file once the operations is done, not send anything back to the front end so async will help as I understand it. Thanks for answers.

      – Johan
      Jul 23 '17 at 16:30













      @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 23 '17 at 17:49






      @johan no it will not. That is not how async works. What you could do is to write a flag to a file and return the response to the client right away. Have another process that polls the file and if the flag is set, does the processing of the "million items" as you say. Or you can start the process async from the client. Your client can do other things while you are processing the "million items"

      – CodingYoshi
      Jul 23 '17 at 17:49












      0















      As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.




      Asynchronous code is not going to help you (see the section "Not a Silver Bullet"). In summary, async on ASP.NET is a way to yield to the server's thread pool - it is not a way to yield (or return) to the client/browser.



      There are a few approaches to returning early from ASP.NET requests, but most of them are dangerous to some degree or another. Since you already have a database, I'd recommend looking at HangFire. Note that your HangFire processing should be done outside ASP.NET - e.g., in an Azure Worker Role or Win32 Service.






      share|improve this answer



























        0















        As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.




        Asynchronous code is not going to help you (see the section "Not a Silver Bullet"). In summary, async on ASP.NET is a way to yield to the server's thread pool - it is not a way to yield (or return) to the client/browser.



        There are a few approaches to returning early from ASP.NET requests, but most of them are dangerous to some degree or another. Since you already have a database, I'd recommend looking at HangFire. Note that your HangFire processing should be done outside ASP.NET - e.g., in an Azure Worker Role or Win32 Service.






        share|improve this answer

























          0












          0








          0








          As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.




          Asynchronous code is not going to help you (see the section "Not a Silver Bullet"). In summary, async on ASP.NET is a way to yield to the server's thread pool - it is not a way to yield (or return) to the client/browser.



          There are a few approaches to returning early from ASP.NET requests, but most of them are dangerous to some degree or another. Since you already have a database, I'd recommend looking at HangFire. Note that your HangFire processing should be done outside ASP.NET - e.g., in an Azure Worker Role or Win32 Service.






          share|improve this answer














          As the frontend will time out when called from there if it's not async (It makes millions of operations) I wish to use this controller task to run async operations.




          Asynchronous code is not going to help you (see the section "Not a Silver Bullet"). In summary, async on ASP.NET is a way to yield to the server's thread pool - it is not a way to yield (or return) to the client/browser.



          There are a few approaches to returning early from ASP.NET requests, but most of them are dangerous to some degree or another. Since you already have a database, I'd recommend looking at HangFire. Note that your HangFire processing should be done outside ASP.NET - e.g., in an Azure Worker Role or Win32 Service.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jul 22 '17 at 12:26









          Stephen ClearyStephen Cleary

          298k49493621




          298k49493621





















              0














              For making any synchronous method to behave like async, just add two things, in method signature replace void with Task. and at the end of the method write return Task.CompletedTask;.



              Final implementation is like



               public Task ASimpleSynchronousMethod()
              // TO DO

              // Add this additional line at the end of the method body
              return Task.CompletedTask;



              Hope this will work.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                For making any synchronous method to behave like async, just add two things, in method signature replace void with Task. and at the end of the method write return Task.CompletedTask;.



                Final implementation is like



                 public Task ASimpleSynchronousMethod()
                // TO DO

                // Add this additional line at the end of the method body
                return Task.CompletedTask;



                Hope this will work.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  For making any synchronous method to behave like async, just add two things, in method signature replace void with Task. and at the end of the method write return Task.CompletedTask;.



                  Final implementation is like



                   public Task ASimpleSynchronousMethod()
                  // TO DO

                  // Add this additional line at the end of the method body
                  return Task.CompletedTask;



                  Hope this will work.






                  share|improve this answer













                  For making any synchronous method to behave like async, just add two things, in method signature replace void with Task. and at the end of the method write return Task.CompletedTask;.



                  Final implementation is like



                   public Task ASimpleSynchronousMethod()
                  // TO DO

                  // Add this additional line at the end of the method body
                  return Task.CompletedTask;



                  Hope this will work.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 25 at 8:09









                  Tahir AlviTahir Alvi

                  4892832




                  4892832



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f45251780%2fasync-call-in-controller-calling-a-void-method-in-model-asp-net-mvc-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                      SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

                      은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현