Is there a way to make kustomize merge headings in a yaml file instead of completely replacing that heading with the overlay yamlKubernetes equivalent of env-file in Dockerrequests.get(url) return error code 404 from kubernetes api while the response could be get via curl/GETKubectl apply for a deployment with revHistoryLimit 0 does not delete the old replica set, here is my deploment templateHow to start a pod in command line without deployment in kubernetes?How to map one single file into kubernetes pod using hostPath?Kubernetes doesn't allow to mount file to containerHow to mount a volume with a windows container in kubernetes?Share nfs volume between kubernetes clustersNot able to see Pod when I create a Jobkubeadm install flannel get error, what's wrong?

Have there ever been other TV shows or Films that told a similiar story to the new 90210 show?

How to render "have ideas above his station" into German

What does a comma signify in inorganic chemistry?

My new Acer Aspire 7 doesn't have a Legacy Boot option, what can I do to get it?

A reccomended structured approach to self studying music theory for songwriting

What is the opposite of "hunger level"?

Why should I pay for an SSL certificate?

Unconventional examples of mathematical modelling

Photoshop older default brushes

Polar contour plot in Mathematica?

Eric Andre had a dream

Would getting a natural 20 with a penalty still count as a critical hit?

If a person claims to know anything could it be disproven by saying 'prove that we are not in a simulation'?

What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?

Why don't modern jet engines use forced exhaust mixing?

Has there ever been a truly bilingual country prior to the contemporary period?

Units of measurement, especially length, when body parts vary in size among races

Expressing a chain of boolean ORs using ILP

When does The Truman Show take place?

What is the purpose/function of this power inductor in parallel?

Heyawacky: Ace of Cups

Why is su world executable?

Get the full text of a long request

Are there any OR challenges that are similar to kaggle's competitions?



Is there a way to make kustomize merge headings in a yaml file instead of completely replacing that heading with the overlay yaml


Kubernetes equivalent of env-file in Dockerrequests.get(url) return error code 404 from kubernetes api while the response could be get via curl/GETKubectl apply for a deployment with revHistoryLimit 0 does not delete the old replica set, here is my deploment templateHow to start a pod in command line without deployment in kubernetes?How to map one single file into kubernetes pod using hostPath?Kubernetes doesn't allow to mount file to containerHow to mount a volume with a windows container in kubernetes?Share nfs volume between kubernetes clustersNot able to see Pod when I create a Jobkubeadm install flannel get error, what's wrong?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















i have a base yaml and an overlay yaml and using "kustomize" i want to merge these two yaml. what happens with me is that on running kustomize build there comes an output but it is not expected why? because the kustomize instead of filling the custom information from the overlay yaml replaces the whole heading tag of the base with the overlay "containers" in my case. The intended behaviour that i need is the it should somehow fill in the missing information using the overlay yaml instead of replacement.



base yaml:



apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: temp
labels:
tier: temp
spec:
containers:
- name: temp
image: temp
imagePullPolicy: Always
command: temp
args:
temp
envFrom:
- configMapRef:
name: temp
volumeMounts:
volumes:


overlay yaml:



apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: temp
labels:
tier: temp
spec:
containers:
volumeMounts:
- name: temppathname
mountPath: /temppath
volumes:
- name: temppathname
hostPath:
type: temp
path: temppath



Expected result after kustomize build:



apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: temp
labels:
tier: temp
spec:
containers:
- name: temp
image: temp
imagePullPolicy: Always
command: temp
args:
["sleep 9000"]
envFrom:
- configMapRef:
name: temp
volumeMounts:
- name: temppathname
mountPath: /temppath
volumes:
- name: temppathname
hostPath:
type: temp
path: temppath


what i'm getting:



apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
labels:
tier: temp
name: temp
spec:
containers:
volumeMounts:
- name: temppathname
mountPath: /temppath
volumes:
- name: temppathname
hostPath:
type: temp
path: temppath









share|improve this question
































    0















    i have a base yaml and an overlay yaml and using "kustomize" i want to merge these two yaml. what happens with me is that on running kustomize build there comes an output but it is not expected why? because the kustomize instead of filling the custom information from the overlay yaml replaces the whole heading tag of the base with the overlay "containers" in my case. The intended behaviour that i need is the it should somehow fill in the missing information using the overlay yaml instead of replacement.



    base yaml:



    apiVersion: v1
    kind: Pod
    metadata:
    name: temp
    labels:
    tier: temp
    spec:
    containers:
    - name: temp
    image: temp
    imagePullPolicy: Always
    command: temp
    args:
    temp
    envFrom:
    - configMapRef:
    name: temp
    volumeMounts:
    volumes:


    overlay yaml:



    apiVersion: v1
    kind: Pod
    metadata:
    name: temp
    labels:
    tier: temp
    spec:
    containers:
    volumeMounts:
    - name: temppathname
    mountPath: /temppath
    volumes:
    - name: temppathname
    hostPath:
    type: temp
    path: temppath



    Expected result after kustomize build:



    apiVersion: v1
    kind: Pod
    metadata:
    name: temp
    labels:
    tier: temp
    spec:
    containers:
    - name: temp
    image: temp
    imagePullPolicy: Always
    command: temp
    args:
    ["sleep 9000"]
    envFrom:
    - configMapRef:
    name: temp
    volumeMounts:
    - name: temppathname
    mountPath: /temppath
    volumes:
    - name: temppathname
    hostPath:
    type: temp
    path: temppath


    what i'm getting:



    apiVersion: v1
    kind: Pod
    metadata:
    labels:
    tier: temp
    name: temp
    spec:
    containers:
    volumeMounts:
    - name: temppathname
    mountPath: /temppath
    volumes:
    - name: temppathname
    hostPath:
    type: temp
    path: temppath









    share|improve this question




























      0












      0








      0








      i have a base yaml and an overlay yaml and using "kustomize" i want to merge these two yaml. what happens with me is that on running kustomize build there comes an output but it is not expected why? because the kustomize instead of filling the custom information from the overlay yaml replaces the whole heading tag of the base with the overlay "containers" in my case. The intended behaviour that i need is the it should somehow fill in the missing information using the overlay yaml instead of replacement.



      base yaml:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      name: temp
      labels:
      tier: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      - name: temp
      image: temp
      imagePullPolicy: Always
      command: temp
      args:
      temp
      envFrom:
      - configMapRef:
      name: temp
      volumeMounts:
      volumes:


      overlay yaml:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      name: temp
      labels:
      tier: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      volumeMounts:
      - name: temppathname
      mountPath: /temppath
      volumes:
      - name: temppathname
      hostPath:
      type: temp
      path: temppath



      Expected result after kustomize build:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      name: temp
      labels:
      tier: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      - name: temp
      image: temp
      imagePullPolicy: Always
      command: temp
      args:
      ["sleep 9000"]
      envFrom:
      - configMapRef:
      name: temp
      volumeMounts:
      - name: temppathname
      mountPath: /temppath
      volumes:
      - name: temppathname
      hostPath:
      type: temp
      path: temppath


      what i'm getting:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      labels:
      tier: temp
      name: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      volumeMounts:
      - name: temppathname
      mountPath: /temppath
      volumes:
      - name: temppathname
      hostPath:
      type: temp
      path: temppath









      share|improve this question
















      i have a base yaml and an overlay yaml and using "kustomize" i want to merge these two yaml. what happens with me is that on running kustomize build there comes an output but it is not expected why? because the kustomize instead of filling the custom information from the overlay yaml replaces the whole heading tag of the base with the overlay "containers" in my case. The intended behaviour that i need is the it should somehow fill in the missing information using the overlay yaml instead of replacement.



      base yaml:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      name: temp
      labels:
      tier: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      - name: temp
      image: temp
      imagePullPolicy: Always
      command: temp
      args:
      temp
      envFrom:
      - configMapRef:
      name: temp
      volumeMounts:
      volumes:


      overlay yaml:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      name: temp
      labels:
      tier: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      volumeMounts:
      - name: temppathname
      mountPath: /temppath
      volumes:
      - name: temppathname
      hostPath:
      type: temp
      path: temppath



      Expected result after kustomize build:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      name: temp
      labels:
      tier: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      - name: temp
      image: temp
      imagePullPolicy: Always
      command: temp
      args:
      ["sleep 9000"]
      envFrom:
      - configMapRef:
      name: temp
      volumeMounts:
      - name: temppathname
      mountPath: /temppath
      volumes:
      - name: temppathname
      hostPath:
      type: temp
      path: temppath


      what i'm getting:



      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
      labels:
      tier: temp
      name: temp
      spec:
      containers:
      volumeMounts:
      - name: temppathname
      mountPath: /temppath
      volumes:
      - name: temppathname
      hostPath:
      type: temp
      path: temppath






      merge kubernetes yaml kustomize






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 5 at 12:24









      ITChap

      4391 gold badge3 silver badges14 bronze badges




      4391 gold badge3 silver badges14 bronze badges










      asked Mar 27 at 12:50









      user3030524user3030524

      407 bronze badges




      407 bronze badges

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          In your base.yaml the value for the key containers is a sequence (node). In your overlay.yaml the value for the key containers is a mapping. Of course those two cannot be merged.



          Not knowing kustomize at all, it seems logical that because those cannot be merged, the overlay replaces that whole sequence node with the mapping node. Your expectation that the mapping of the overlay is merged with a mapping that happens to be an item (in this case the only item) in the sequence of the base seems completely arbitrary. Which item would need to be taken if there had been multiple items? The first? The last? The last one before item five that is a mapping?



          If your overlay.yaml looked like:



          apiVersion: v1
          kind: Pod
          metadata:
          name: temp
          labels:
          tier: temp
          spec:
          containers:
          - volumeMounts: # < created a sequence item here by inserting an item indicator
          - name: temppathname
          mountPath: /temppath
          volumes:
          - name: temppathname
          hostPath:
          type: temp
          path: temppath


          then I could understand your expectation (and maybe the above change can be applied to make it work, I don't have a way to test).






          share|improve this answer
































            0














            I find that the easiest way to deal with this is to use JSONPatch. I would remove the empty fields of the base as in:



            apiVersion: v1
            kind: Pod
            metadata:
            name: temp
            labels:
            tier: temp
            spec:
            containers:
            - name: temp
            image: temp
            imagePullPolicy: Always
            command: temp
            args:
            temp
            envFrom:
            - configMapRef:
            name: temp


            Then in your overlay create a new patch, for example named create_volume.yml:



            - op: add
            path: /spec/volumes/-
            value:
            name: temppathname
            hostPath:
            type: temp
            path: temppath

            - op: add
            path: /spec/containers/0/volumeMounts/-
            value:
            name: temppathname
            mountPath: /temppath


            And finally in the overlay kustomization.yml add:



            patchesJson6902:
            - target:
            version: v1
            kind: Pod
            name: temp
            path: create_volume.yml


            If it doesn't work you might have to play with the API group in the patch target. I only patched deployments until now and my target would be:



            - target:
            group: apps
            version: v1
            kind: Deployment
            name: temp
            path: create_volume.yml





            share|improve this answer





























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55377644%2fis-there-a-way-to-make-kustomize-merge-headings-in-a-yaml-file-instead-of-comple%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1














              In your base.yaml the value for the key containers is a sequence (node). In your overlay.yaml the value for the key containers is a mapping. Of course those two cannot be merged.



              Not knowing kustomize at all, it seems logical that because those cannot be merged, the overlay replaces that whole sequence node with the mapping node. Your expectation that the mapping of the overlay is merged with a mapping that happens to be an item (in this case the only item) in the sequence of the base seems completely arbitrary. Which item would need to be taken if there had been multiple items? The first? The last? The last one before item five that is a mapping?



              If your overlay.yaml looked like:



              apiVersion: v1
              kind: Pod
              metadata:
              name: temp
              labels:
              tier: temp
              spec:
              containers:
              - volumeMounts: # < created a sequence item here by inserting an item indicator
              - name: temppathname
              mountPath: /temppath
              volumes:
              - name: temppathname
              hostPath:
              type: temp
              path: temppath


              then I could understand your expectation (and maybe the above change can be applied to make it work, I don't have a way to test).






              share|improve this answer





























                1














                In your base.yaml the value for the key containers is a sequence (node). In your overlay.yaml the value for the key containers is a mapping. Of course those two cannot be merged.



                Not knowing kustomize at all, it seems logical that because those cannot be merged, the overlay replaces that whole sequence node with the mapping node. Your expectation that the mapping of the overlay is merged with a mapping that happens to be an item (in this case the only item) in the sequence of the base seems completely arbitrary. Which item would need to be taken if there had been multiple items? The first? The last? The last one before item five that is a mapping?



                If your overlay.yaml looked like:



                apiVersion: v1
                kind: Pod
                metadata:
                name: temp
                labels:
                tier: temp
                spec:
                containers:
                - volumeMounts: # < created a sequence item here by inserting an item indicator
                - name: temppathname
                mountPath: /temppath
                volumes:
                - name: temppathname
                hostPath:
                type: temp
                path: temppath


                then I could understand your expectation (and maybe the above change can be applied to make it work, I don't have a way to test).






                share|improve this answer



























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  In your base.yaml the value for the key containers is a sequence (node). In your overlay.yaml the value for the key containers is a mapping. Of course those two cannot be merged.



                  Not knowing kustomize at all, it seems logical that because those cannot be merged, the overlay replaces that whole sequence node with the mapping node. Your expectation that the mapping of the overlay is merged with a mapping that happens to be an item (in this case the only item) in the sequence of the base seems completely arbitrary. Which item would need to be taken if there had been multiple items? The first? The last? The last one before item five that is a mapping?



                  If your overlay.yaml looked like:



                  apiVersion: v1
                  kind: Pod
                  metadata:
                  name: temp
                  labels:
                  tier: temp
                  spec:
                  containers:
                  - volumeMounts: # < created a sequence item here by inserting an item indicator
                  - name: temppathname
                  mountPath: /temppath
                  volumes:
                  - name: temppathname
                  hostPath:
                  type: temp
                  path: temppath


                  then I could understand your expectation (and maybe the above change can be applied to make it work, I don't have a way to test).






                  share|improve this answer













                  In your base.yaml the value for the key containers is a sequence (node). In your overlay.yaml the value for the key containers is a mapping. Of course those two cannot be merged.



                  Not knowing kustomize at all, it seems logical that because those cannot be merged, the overlay replaces that whole sequence node with the mapping node. Your expectation that the mapping of the overlay is merged with a mapping that happens to be an item (in this case the only item) in the sequence of the base seems completely arbitrary. Which item would need to be taken if there had been multiple items? The first? The last? The last one before item five that is a mapping?



                  If your overlay.yaml looked like:



                  apiVersion: v1
                  kind: Pod
                  metadata:
                  name: temp
                  labels:
                  tier: temp
                  spec:
                  containers:
                  - volumeMounts: # < created a sequence item here by inserting an item indicator
                  - name: temppathname
                  mountPath: /temppath
                  volumes:
                  - name: temppathname
                  hostPath:
                  type: temp
                  path: temppath


                  then I could understand your expectation (and maybe the above change can be applied to make it work, I don't have a way to test).







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 27 at 15:38









                  AnthonAnthon

                  36.3k18 gold badges103 silver badges161 bronze badges




                  36.3k18 gold badges103 silver badges161 bronze badges


























                      0














                      I find that the easiest way to deal with this is to use JSONPatch. I would remove the empty fields of the base as in:



                      apiVersion: v1
                      kind: Pod
                      metadata:
                      name: temp
                      labels:
                      tier: temp
                      spec:
                      containers:
                      - name: temp
                      image: temp
                      imagePullPolicy: Always
                      command: temp
                      args:
                      temp
                      envFrom:
                      - configMapRef:
                      name: temp


                      Then in your overlay create a new patch, for example named create_volume.yml:



                      - op: add
                      path: /spec/volumes/-
                      value:
                      name: temppathname
                      hostPath:
                      type: temp
                      path: temppath

                      - op: add
                      path: /spec/containers/0/volumeMounts/-
                      value:
                      name: temppathname
                      mountPath: /temppath


                      And finally in the overlay kustomization.yml add:



                      patchesJson6902:
                      - target:
                      version: v1
                      kind: Pod
                      name: temp
                      path: create_volume.yml


                      If it doesn't work you might have to play with the API group in the patch target. I only patched deployments until now and my target would be:



                      - target:
                      group: apps
                      version: v1
                      kind: Deployment
                      name: temp
                      path: create_volume.yml





                      share|improve this answer































                        0














                        I find that the easiest way to deal with this is to use JSONPatch. I would remove the empty fields of the base as in:



                        apiVersion: v1
                        kind: Pod
                        metadata:
                        name: temp
                        labels:
                        tier: temp
                        spec:
                        containers:
                        - name: temp
                        image: temp
                        imagePullPolicy: Always
                        command: temp
                        args:
                        temp
                        envFrom:
                        - configMapRef:
                        name: temp


                        Then in your overlay create a new patch, for example named create_volume.yml:



                        - op: add
                        path: /spec/volumes/-
                        value:
                        name: temppathname
                        hostPath:
                        type: temp
                        path: temppath

                        - op: add
                        path: /spec/containers/0/volumeMounts/-
                        value:
                        name: temppathname
                        mountPath: /temppath


                        And finally in the overlay kustomization.yml add:



                        patchesJson6902:
                        - target:
                        version: v1
                        kind: Pod
                        name: temp
                        path: create_volume.yml


                        If it doesn't work you might have to play with the API group in the patch target. I only patched deployments until now and my target would be:



                        - target:
                        group: apps
                        version: v1
                        kind: Deployment
                        name: temp
                        path: create_volume.yml





                        share|improve this answer





























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          I find that the easiest way to deal with this is to use JSONPatch. I would remove the empty fields of the base as in:



                          apiVersion: v1
                          kind: Pod
                          metadata:
                          name: temp
                          labels:
                          tier: temp
                          spec:
                          containers:
                          - name: temp
                          image: temp
                          imagePullPolicy: Always
                          command: temp
                          args:
                          temp
                          envFrom:
                          - configMapRef:
                          name: temp


                          Then in your overlay create a new patch, for example named create_volume.yml:



                          - op: add
                          path: /spec/volumes/-
                          value:
                          name: temppathname
                          hostPath:
                          type: temp
                          path: temppath

                          - op: add
                          path: /spec/containers/0/volumeMounts/-
                          value:
                          name: temppathname
                          mountPath: /temppath


                          And finally in the overlay kustomization.yml add:



                          patchesJson6902:
                          - target:
                          version: v1
                          kind: Pod
                          name: temp
                          path: create_volume.yml


                          If it doesn't work you might have to play with the API group in the patch target. I only patched deployments until now and my target would be:



                          - target:
                          group: apps
                          version: v1
                          kind: Deployment
                          name: temp
                          path: create_volume.yml





                          share|improve this answer















                          I find that the easiest way to deal with this is to use JSONPatch. I would remove the empty fields of the base as in:



                          apiVersion: v1
                          kind: Pod
                          metadata:
                          name: temp
                          labels:
                          tier: temp
                          spec:
                          containers:
                          - name: temp
                          image: temp
                          imagePullPolicy: Always
                          command: temp
                          args:
                          temp
                          envFrom:
                          - configMapRef:
                          name: temp


                          Then in your overlay create a new patch, for example named create_volume.yml:



                          - op: add
                          path: /spec/volumes/-
                          value:
                          name: temppathname
                          hostPath:
                          type: temp
                          path: temppath

                          - op: add
                          path: /spec/containers/0/volumeMounts/-
                          value:
                          name: temppathname
                          mountPath: /temppath


                          And finally in the overlay kustomization.yml add:



                          patchesJson6902:
                          - target:
                          version: v1
                          kind: Pod
                          name: temp
                          path: create_volume.yml


                          If it doesn't work you might have to play with the API group in the patch target. I only patched deployments until now and my target would be:



                          - target:
                          group: apps
                          version: v1
                          kind: Deployment
                          name: temp
                          path: create_volume.yml






                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Jun 5 at 9:16

























                          answered Jun 5 at 9:08









                          ITChapITChap

                          4391 gold badge3 silver badges14 bronze badges




                          4391 gold badge3 silver badges14 bronze badges






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55377644%2fis-there-a-way-to-make-kustomize-merge-headings-in-a-yaml-file-instead-of-comple%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

                              Swift 4 - func physicsWorld not invoked on collision? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to call Objective-C code from Swift#ifdef replacement in the Swift language@selector() in Swift?#pragma mark in Swift?Swift for loop: for index, element in array?dispatch_after - GCD in Swift?Swift Beta performance: sorting arraysSplit a String into an array in Swift?The use of Swift 3 @objc inference in Swift 4 mode is deprecated?How to optimize UITableViewCell, because my UITableView lags

                              Access current req object everywhere in Node.js ExpressWhy are global variables considered bad practice? (node.js)Using req & res across functionsHow do I get the path to the current script with Node.js?What is Node.js' Connect, Express and “middleware”?Node.js w/ express error handling in callbackHow to access the GET parameters after “?” in Express?Modify Node.js req object parametersAccess “app” variable inside of ExpressJS/ConnectJS middleware?Node.js Express app - request objectAngular Http Module considered middleware?Session variables in ExpressJSAdd properties to the req object in expressjs with Typescript