Need to find and list duplicates between multiple CTEsHow do you remove duplicates from a list whilst preserving order?Find duplicate records in MySQLSQL Server: How to Join to first rowFinding duplicate values in a SQL tableSQL Problem - Duplicate Names, listing all fieldsHow to select only the first rows for each unique value of a columnRemoving duplicates in listsCTE query not returning duplicate rowsIGNORE “column was specified multiple times for” CTESQL CTE to Find Senior Managers in Hierarchy (2nd Level from the Top)

Did the British navy fail to take into account the ballistics correction due to Coriolis force during WW1 Falkland Islands battle?

Can a Rogue PC teach an NPC to perform Sneak Attack?

What are some interesting features that are common cross-linguistically but don't exist in English?

What to say to a student who has failed?

Asymmetric table

Compelling story with the world as a villain

Network helper class with retry logic on failure

Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?

Localization at a multiplicative set is a localization at a prime ideal if local

Why is 7 Bd3 in the Cambridge Springs QGD more often met with 7...Ne4 than 7...dxc4?

Is MOSFET active device?

Are the A380 engines interchangeable (given they are not all equipped with reverse)?

How do I, an introvert, communicate to my friend and only colleague, an extrovert, that I want to spend my scheduled breaks without them?

Showing that the limit of non-eigenvector goes to infinity

Numbers Decrease while Letters Increase

Most natural way to use the negative with つもり

How can I unambiguously ask for a new user's "Display Name"?

Why isn't "I've" a proper response?

Is "The life is beautiful" incorrect or just very non-idiomatic?

How many US airports have 4 or more parallel runways?

Would it be possible to have a GMO that produces chocolate?

Are there any elected officials in the U.S. who are not legislators, judges, or constitutional officers?

How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?

Which book is the Murderer's Gloves magic item from?



Need to find and list duplicates between multiple CTEs


How do you remove duplicates from a list whilst preserving order?Find duplicate records in MySQLSQL Server: How to Join to first rowFinding duplicate values in a SQL tableSQL Problem - Duplicate Names, listing all fieldsHow to select only the first rows for each unique value of a columnRemoving duplicates in listsCTE query not returning duplicate rowsIGNORE “column was specified multiple times for” CTESQL CTE to Find Senior Managers in Hierarchy (2nd Level from the Top)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I need to identify duplicates on a single table where users have entered the name incorrectly (e.g., instead of putting "John" in fname and "Smith" in lname, a record which already exists, they put "Smith" in fname and "John" in lname). I need to identify these duplicates and list the duplicates and their correct record counterpart.



I have set up two CTEs, one to pull just the columns I need and one to pull the same columns that have the bad info to remove. The primary query pulls all the columns and compares the complete table against the CTE table with the duplicates. I can't do a comparison between the two CTEs becaus it will error (more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression). In its current form the query returns 9813408908970990872314 results (I gave up at exporting 650k). This is a PostgreSQL database, unknown version, but it's 9+ I believe. There are ~320k valid rows on the person table and 2499 from the wrong_order CTE. The key field is person.number but each will have a unique number, even the wrong entries (every row gets one but not all rows have one due to deleted records that conflict with data retention rules).



WITH
correct_order AS (
SELECT (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) AS "name",
p.number AS "num",
p.birthdate AS "dob"
FROM person p
WHERE p.lname IS NOT NULL
),
wrong_order AS (
SELECT (p.fname||', '|| p.lname) AS "name",
p.number AS "num",
p.birthdate AS "dob"
FROM person p
WHERE (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) IN (p.fname||', '|| p.lname)
)
SELECT
correct_order.name AS "Correct Name",
correct_order.num AS "Correct Num",
correct_order.birthdate AS "Correct DOB",
wrong_order.name AS "Wrong Name",
wrong_order.num AS "Wrong Num",
wrong_order.birthdate AS "Wrong DOB"
FROM
correct_order, wrong_order
WHERE
correct_order.name IN (SELECT wrong_order.name FROM wrong_order)


I expected to see name/number/dob from both CTEs where both sets of data match between the two. What I got instead was a duplication where every conceivable combination of those six values. I have tried using a join in the main query (correct_order JOIN wrong_order ON correct_order.name = wrong_order.name) but you can't use = on a string and using IN throws "more than one row...". While it may be possible to do in powershell after the fact I'm not strong enough to lift that without some help.










share|improve this question
































    0















    I need to identify duplicates on a single table where users have entered the name incorrectly (e.g., instead of putting "John" in fname and "Smith" in lname, a record which already exists, they put "Smith" in fname and "John" in lname). I need to identify these duplicates and list the duplicates and their correct record counterpart.



    I have set up two CTEs, one to pull just the columns I need and one to pull the same columns that have the bad info to remove. The primary query pulls all the columns and compares the complete table against the CTE table with the duplicates. I can't do a comparison between the two CTEs becaus it will error (more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression). In its current form the query returns 9813408908970990872314 results (I gave up at exporting 650k). This is a PostgreSQL database, unknown version, but it's 9+ I believe. There are ~320k valid rows on the person table and 2499 from the wrong_order CTE. The key field is person.number but each will have a unique number, even the wrong entries (every row gets one but not all rows have one due to deleted records that conflict with data retention rules).



    WITH
    correct_order AS (
    SELECT (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) AS "name",
    p.number AS "num",
    p.birthdate AS "dob"
    FROM person p
    WHERE p.lname IS NOT NULL
    ),
    wrong_order AS (
    SELECT (p.fname||', '|| p.lname) AS "name",
    p.number AS "num",
    p.birthdate AS "dob"
    FROM person p
    WHERE (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) IN (p.fname||', '|| p.lname)
    )
    SELECT
    correct_order.name AS "Correct Name",
    correct_order.num AS "Correct Num",
    correct_order.birthdate AS "Correct DOB",
    wrong_order.name AS "Wrong Name",
    wrong_order.num AS "Wrong Num",
    wrong_order.birthdate AS "Wrong DOB"
    FROM
    correct_order, wrong_order
    WHERE
    correct_order.name IN (SELECT wrong_order.name FROM wrong_order)


    I expected to see name/number/dob from both CTEs where both sets of data match between the two. What I got instead was a duplication where every conceivable combination of those six values. I have tried using a join in the main query (correct_order JOIN wrong_order ON correct_order.name = wrong_order.name) but you can't use = on a string and using IN throws "more than one row...". While it may be possible to do in powershell after the fact I'm not strong enough to lift that without some help.










    share|improve this question




























      0












      0








      0








      I need to identify duplicates on a single table where users have entered the name incorrectly (e.g., instead of putting "John" in fname and "Smith" in lname, a record which already exists, they put "Smith" in fname and "John" in lname). I need to identify these duplicates and list the duplicates and their correct record counterpart.



      I have set up two CTEs, one to pull just the columns I need and one to pull the same columns that have the bad info to remove. The primary query pulls all the columns and compares the complete table against the CTE table with the duplicates. I can't do a comparison between the two CTEs becaus it will error (more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression). In its current form the query returns 9813408908970990872314 results (I gave up at exporting 650k). This is a PostgreSQL database, unknown version, but it's 9+ I believe. There are ~320k valid rows on the person table and 2499 from the wrong_order CTE. The key field is person.number but each will have a unique number, even the wrong entries (every row gets one but not all rows have one due to deleted records that conflict with data retention rules).



      WITH
      correct_order AS (
      SELECT (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) AS "name",
      p.number AS "num",
      p.birthdate AS "dob"
      FROM person p
      WHERE p.lname IS NOT NULL
      ),
      wrong_order AS (
      SELECT (p.fname||', '|| p.lname) AS "name",
      p.number AS "num",
      p.birthdate AS "dob"
      FROM person p
      WHERE (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) IN (p.fname||', '|| p.lname)
      )
      SELECT
      correct_order.name AS "Correct Name",
      correct_order.num AS "Correct Num",
      correct_order.birthdate AS "Correct DOB",
      wrong_order.name AS "Wrong Name",
      wrong_order.num AS "Wrong Num",
      wrong_order.birthdate AS "Wrong DOB"
      FROM
      correct_order, wrong_order
      WHERE
      correct_order.name IN (SELECT wrong_order.name FROM wrong_order)


      I expected to see name/number/dob from both CTEs where both sets of data match between the two. What I got instead was a duplication where every conceivable combination of those six values. I have tried using a join in the main query (correct_order JOIN wrong_order ON correct_order.name = wrong_order.name) but you can't use = on a string and using IN throws "more than one row...". While it may be possible to do in powershell after the fact I'm not strong enough to lift that without some help.










      share|improve this question
















      I need to identify duplicates on a single table where users have entered the name incorrectly (e.g., instead of putting "John" in fname and "Smith" in lname, a record which already exists, they put "Smith" in fname and "John" in lname). I need to identify these duplicates and list the duplicates and their correct record counterpart.



      I have set up two CTEs, one to pull just the columns I need and one to pull the same columns that have the bad info to remove. The primary query pulls all the columns and compares the complete table against the CTE table with the duplicates. I can't do a comparison between the two CTEs becaus it will error (more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression). In its current form the query returns 9813408908970990872314 results (I gave up at exporting 650k). This is a PostgreSQL database, unknown version, but it's 9+ I believe. There are ~320k valid rows on the person table and 2499 from the wrong_order CTE. The key field is person.number but each will have a unique number, even the wrong entries (every row gets one but not all rows have one due to deleted records that conflict with data retention rules).



      WITH
      correct_order AS (
      SELECT (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) AS "name",
      p.number AS "num",
      p.birthdate AS "dob"
      FROM person p
      WHERE p.lname IS NOT NULL
      ),
      wrong_order AS (
      SELECT (p.fname||', '|| p.lname) AS "name",
      p.number AS "num",
      p.birthdate AS "dob"
      FROM person p
      WHERE (p.lname||', '|| p.fname) IN (p.fname||', '|| p.lname)
      )
      SELECT
      correct_order.name AS "Correct Name",
      correct_order.num AS "Correct Num",
      correct_order.birthdate AS "Correct DOB",
      wrong_order.name AS "Wrong Name",
      wrong_order.num AS "Wrong Num",
      wrong_order.birthdate AS "Wrong DOB"
      FROM
      correct_order, wrong_order
      WHERE
      correct_order.name IN (SELECT wrong_order.name FROM wrong_order)


      I expected to see name/number/dob from both CTEs where both sets of data match between the two. What I got instead was a duplication where every conceivable combination of those six values. I have tried using a join in the main query (correct_order JOIN wrong_order ON correct_order.name = wrong_order.name) but you can't use = on a string and using IN throws "more than one row...". While it may be possible to do in powershell after the fact I'm not strong enough to lift that without some help.







      sql postgresql duplicates common-table-expression






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 27 at 18:45









      Laurenz Albe

      62.9k11 gold badges44 silver badges66 bronze badges




      62.9k11 gold badges44 silver badges66 bronze badges










      asked Mar 27 at 18:18









      GryyphynGryyphyn

      11 bronze badge




      11 bronze badge

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1















          You have an unintended cross join in there (the FROM correct_order, wrong_order has no join condition). That explains the astronomical row count.



          You need to query along these lines:



          SELECTS /* columns you need */
          FROM person AS correct
          JOIN person AS wrong
          ON (correct.fname, correct.lname) =
          (wrong.lname, wrong.fname)
          WHERE correct.lname IS NOT NULL;


          I hope I understood your intention correctly.



          There is no problem comparing strings with =, that must be a misunderstanding.






          share|improve this answer



























          • The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:07











          • Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:17












          • Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 20:22











          • I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

            – Laurenz Albe
            Mar 28 at 6:55











          • I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

            – Gryyphyn
            Apr 25 at 17:36










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55384061%2fneed-to-find-and-list-duplicates-between-multiple-ctes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1















          You have an unintended cross join in there (the FROM correct_order, wrong_order has no join condition). That explains the astronomical row count.



          You need to query along these lines:



          SELECTS /* columns you need */
          FROM person AS correct
          JOIN person AS wrong
          ON (correct.fname, correct.lname) =
          (wrong.lname, wrong.fname)
          WHERE correct.lname IS NOT NULL;


          I hope I understood your intention correctly.



          There is no problem comparing strings with =, that must be a misunderstanding.






          share|improve this answer



























          • The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:07











          • Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:17












          • Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 20:22











          • I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

            – Laurenz Albe
            Mar 28 at 6:55











          • I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

            – Gryyphyn
            Apr 25 at 17:36















          1















          You have an unintended cross join in there (the FROM correct_order, wrong_order has no join condition). That explains the astronomical row count.



          You need to query along these lines:



          SELECTS /* columns you need */
          FROM person AS correct
          JOIN person AS wrong
          ON (correct.fname, correct.lname) =
          (wrong.lname, wrong.fname)
          WHERE correct.lname IS NOT NULL;


          I hope I understood your intention correctly.



          There is no problem comparing strings with =, that must be a misunderstanding.






          share|improve this answer



























          • The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:07











          • Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:17












          • Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 20:22











          • I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

            – Laurenz Albe
            Mar 28 at 6:55











          • I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

            – Gryyphyn
            Apr 25 at 17:36













          1














          1










          1









          You have an unintended cross join in there (the FROM correct_order, wrong_order has no join condition). That explains the astronomical row count.



          You need to query along these lines:



          SELECTS /* columns you need */
          FROM person AS correct
          JOIN person AS wrong
          ON (correct.fname, correct.lname) =
          (wrong.lname, wrong.fname)
          WHERE correct.lname IS NOT NULL;


          I hope I understood your intention correctly.



          There is no problem comparing strings with =, that must be a misunderstanding.






          share|improve this answer















          You have an unintended cross join in there (the FROM correct_order, wrong_order has no join condition). That explains the astronomical row count.



          You need to query along these lines:



          SELECTS /* columns you need */
          FROM person AS correct
          JOIN person AS wrong
          ON (correct.fname, correct.lname) =
          (wrong.lname, wrong.fname)
          WHERE correct.lname IS NOT NULL;


          I hope I understood your intention correctly.



          There is no problem comparing strings with =, that must be a misunderstanding.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 27 at 18:46

























          answered Mar 27 at 18:39









          Laurenz AlbeLaurenz Albe

          62.9k11 gold badges44 silver badges66 bronze badges




          62.9k11 gold badges44 silver badges66 bronze badges















          • The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:07











          • Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:17












          • Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 20:22











          • I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

            – Laurenz Albe
            Mar 28 at 6:55











          • I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

            – Gryyphyn
            Apr 25 at 17:36

















          • The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:07











          • Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 19:17












          • Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

            – Gryyphyn
            Mar 27 at 20:22











          • I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

            – Laurenz Albe
            Mar 28 at 6:55











          • I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

            – Gryyphyn
            Apr 25 at 17:36
















          The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

          – Gryyphyn
          Mar 27 at 19:07





          The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error:

          – Gryyphyn
          Mar 27 at 19:07













          Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

          – Gryyphyn
          Mar 27 at 19:17






          Sorry, got distracted by the phone. The logic in that join doesn't make sense to me (not to say it doesn't make sense). If the CTE is already there for comparison why re-declare the relationship between the table and it's alias? Consequently that threw a whole different error: "relation "person" does not exist" SELECT [...] FROM person AS correct_order JOIN person AS wrong_order ON (correct_order.name) = (wrong_order.name) WHERE correct_order.name IS NOT NULL Is that what you meant?

          – Gryyphyn
          Mar 27 at 19:17














          Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

          – Gryyphyn
          Mar 27 at 20:22





          Laurenz, thanks for your help. It's always a semicolon, or in this case a parenthesis. When I did the join originally I didn't put the criteria in parentheses. So now it's working... kinda. Down to 18 duplicates.

          – Gryyphyn
          Mar 27 at 20:22













          I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

          – Laurenz Albe
          Mar 28 at 6:55





          I meant that you should use no CTE at all. In your query, the table is called person.

          – Laurenz Albe
          Mar 28 at 6:55













          I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

          – Gryyphyn
          Apr 25 at 17:36





          I get what you're saying. I guess I needed time away from that problem to see the solution. Thanks again Laurenz.

          – Gryyphyn
          Apr 25 at 17:36








          Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.







          Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55384061%2fneed-to-find-and-list-duplicates-between-multiple-ctes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

          SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

          은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현