Random partitioner does not distribute messages between Kafka topic partitionsData Modeling with Kafka? Topics and PartitionsKafKa partitioner class, assign message to partition within topic using keyTopics, partitions and keysKafka – check number of messages in each partitionMessage not getting distributed in RoundRobin order when increasing the number of partition in KafkaKafka Consumer partition mappingWhy is data not evenly distributed among partitions when a partitioning key is not specified?What's the best way to design message key in Kafka?Matching Kafka consumer and producer partitionHow Can a Consumer in Kafka be assigned to a Specific partition ;The partition in my case is assigned through the hash value of the Key

Notepad++ cannot print

Architectural feasibility of a tiered circular stone keep

Do Bayesian credible intervals treat the estimated parameter as a random variable?

Could George I (of Great Britain) speak English?

Compelling story with the world as a villain

Non-visual Computers - thoughts?

Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?

Duplicate instruments in unison in an orchestra

Obtaining the intermediate solutions in AMPL

How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?

Can I get temporary health insurance while moving to the US?

Why is the UK so keen to remove the "backstop" when their leadership seems to think that no border will be needed in Northern Ireland?

Where can/should I, as a high schooler, publish a paper regarding the derivation of a formula?

Are the A380 engines interchangeable (given they are not all equipped with reverse)?

Two questions about typesetting a Roman missal

What is the best type of paint to paint a shipping container?

Another solution to create a set with two conditions

How do I make my image comply with the requirements of this photography competition?

Can a Rogue PC teach an NPC to perform Sneak Attack?

How do I prevent other wifi networks from showing up on my computer?

I don't have the theoretical background in my PhD topic. I can't justify getting the degree

Can RMSE and MAE have the same value?

Why doesn't 'd /= d' throw a division by zero exception?

How long do you think advanced cybernetic implants would plausibly last?



Random partitioner does not distribute messages between Kafka topic partitions


Data Modeling with Kafka? Topics and PartitionsKafKa partitioner class, assign message to partition within topic using keyTopics, partitions and keysKafka – check number of messages in each partitionMessage not getting distributed in RoundRobin order when increasing the number of partition in KafkaKafka Consumer partition mappingWhy is data not evenly distributed among partitions when a partitioning key is not specified?What's the best way to design message key in Kafka?Matching Kafka consumer and producer partitionHow Can a Consumer in Kafka be assigned to a Specific partition ;The partition in my case is assigned through the hash value of the Key






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















I've created a topic in Kafka with 9 partitions, naming it aptly 'test', and knocked together two simple applications in C# (.NET Core), using Confluent.Kafka client library: a producer and a consumer. I did little more than tweak examples from the documentation.



I am running two instances of the consumer application and one instance of the producer. I don't see much point in pasting the consumer code here, it's a trivial 'get a message, print it on screen' app, however, it does also print the number of the partition the message came from.



This is the producer app:



 static async Task Main(string[] args)

var random = new Random();

var config = new ProducerConfig
BootstrapServers = "10.0.0.5:9092",
Partitioner = Partitioner.ConsistentRandom
;

int counter = 0;
while (true)

using (var p = new ProducerBuilder<string, string>(config).Build())

try

p.BeginProduce(
"test",
new Message<string, string>

//Key = random.Next().ToString(),
Value = $"test ++counter"
);

if (counter % 10 == 0)
p.Flush();

catch (ProduceException<Null, string> e)

Console.WriteLine($"Delivery failed: e.Error.Reason");






Problem: If the Key property of the message is not set, all messages get sent to the partition number 7, meaning that one of my consumer instances is idle. I had to manually randomise the key in order to distribute them between partitions (see the commented out line). (The original code, as copied from the docs, used Null as the type of the key, and this sent all messages to the 7th partition too.)



Why is that? According to the documentation of the ProducerConfig.Partitioner property, the consistent_random option should ensure random distribution if the key is not specified. I tried using the Partioner.Random option, which should use random distribution regardless of the key, but this did not help.



Is this the expected behaviour, am I doing something wrong, or did I come across a bug?



I am using version 1.0.0-RC2 of Confluent.Kafka NuGet.



Complete documentation of the Partitioner config:



// Summary:
// Partitioner: `random` - random distribution, `consistent` - CRC32 hash of key
// (Empty and NULL keys are mapped to single partition), `consistent_random` - CRC32
// hash of key (Empty and NULL keys are randomly partitioned), `murmur2` - Java
// Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are mapped to single partition),
// `murmur2_random` - Java Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are
// randomly partitioned. This is functionally equivalent to the default partitioner
// in the Java Producer.). default: consistent_random importance: high









share|improve this question


























  • I don't think there would be a bug in the project. Can you add the link to Partitioner config documentation?

    – JR ibkr
    Mar 27 at 19:39











  • @JRibkr Yeah, I don't really think it's a bug either, something so obvious would surely have been spotted. I copied the documentation from the XML docs in the library itself, as seen in Visual Studio, I don't know if an online version is available at all. A google search only yielded this source file: github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-dotnet/blob/master/src/…

    – kamilk
    Mar 27 at 20:37


















0















I've created a topic in Kafka with 9 partitions, naming it aptly 'test', and knocked together two simple applications in C# (.NET Core), using Confluent.Kafka client library: a producer and a consumer. I did little more than tweak examples from the documentation.



I am running two instances of the consumer application and one instance of the producer. I don't see much point in pasting the consumer code here, it's a trivial 'get a message, print it on screen' app, however, it does also print the number of the partition the message came from.



This is the producer app:



 static async Task Main(string[] args)

var random = new Random();

var config = new ProducerConfig
BootstrapServers = "10.0.0.5:9092",
Partitioner = Partitioner.ConsistentRandom
;

int counter = 0;
while (true)

using (var p = new ProducerBuilder<string, string>(config).Build())

try

p.BeginProduce(
"test",
new Message<string, string>

//Key = random.Next().ToString(),
Value = $"test ++counter"
);

if (counter % 10 == 0)
p.Flush();

catch (ProduceException<Null, string> e)

Console.WriteLine($"Delivery failed: e.Error.Reason");






Problem: If the Key property of the message is not set, all messages get sent to the partition number 7, meaning that one of my consumer instances is idle. I had to manually randomise the key in order to distribute them between partitions (see the commented out line). (The original code, as copied from the docs, used Null as the type of the key, and this sent all messages to the 7th partition too.)



Why is that? According to the documentation of the ProducerConfig.Partitioner property, the consistent_random option should ensure random distribution if the key is not specified. I tried using the Partioner.Random option, which should use random distribution regardless of the key, but this did not help.



Is this the expected behaviour, am I doing something wrong, or did I come across a bug?



I am using version 1.0.0-RC2 of Confluent.Kafka NuGet.



Complete documentation of the Partitioner config:



// Summary:
// Partitioner: `random` - random distribution, `consistent` - CRC32 hash of key
// (Empty and NULL keys are mapped to single partition), `consistent_random` - CRC32
// hash of key (Empty and NULL keys are randomly partitioned), `murmur2` - Java
// Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are mapped to single partition),
// `murmur2_random` - Java Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are
// randomly partitioned. This is functionally equivalent to the default partitioner
// in the Java Producer.). default: consistent_random importance: high









share|improve this question


























  • I don't think there would be a bug in the project. Can you add the link to Partitioner config documentation?

    – JR ibkr
    Mar 27 at 19:39











  • @JRibkr Yeah, I don't really think it's a bug either, something so obvious would surely have been spotted. I copied the documentation from the XML docs in the library itself, as seen in Visual Studio, I don't know if an online version is available at all. A google search only yielded this source file: github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-dotnet/blob/master/src/…

    – kamilk
    Mar 27 at 20:37














0












0








0








I've created a topic in Kafka with 9 partitions, naming it aptly 'test', and knocked together two simple applications in C# (.NET Core), using Confluent.Kafka client library: a producer and a consumer. I did little more than tweak examples from the documentation.



I am running two instances of the consumer application and one instance of the producer. I don't see much point in pasting the consumer code here, it's a trivial 'get a message, print it on screen' app, however, it does also print the number of the partition the message came from.



This is the producer app:



 static async Task Main(string[] args)

var random = new Random();

var config = new ProducerConfig
BootstrapServers = "10.0.0.5:9092",
Partitioner = Partitioner.ConsistentRandom
;

int counter = 0;
while (true)

using (var p = new ProducerBuilder<string, string>(config).Build())

try

p.BeginProduce(
"test",
new Message<string, string>

//Key = random.Next().ToString(),
Value = $"test ++counter"
);

if (counter % 10 == 0)
p.Flush();

catch (ProduceException<Null, string> e)

Console.WriteLine($"Delivery failed: e.Error.Reason");






Problem: If the Key property of the message is not set, all messages get sent to the partition number 7, meaning that one of my consumer instances is idle. I had to manually randomise the key in order to distribute them between partitions (see the commented out line). (The original code, as copied from the docs, used Null as the type of the key, and this sent all messages to the 7th partition too.)



Why is that? According to the documentation of the ProducerConfig.Partitioner property, the consistent_random option should ensure random distribution if the key is not specified. I tried using the Partioner.Random option, which should use random distribution regardless of the key, but this did not help.



Is this the expected behaviour, am I doing something wrong, or did I come across a bug?



I am using version 1.0.0-RC2 of Confluent.Kafka NuGet.



Complete documentation of the Partitioner config:



// Summary:
// Partitioner: `random` - random distribution, `consistent` - CRC32 hash of key
// (Empty and NULL keys are mapped to single partition), `consistent_random` - CRC32
// hash of key (Empty and NULL keys are randomly partitioned), `murmur2` - Java
// Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are mapped to single partition),
// `murmur2_random` - Java Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are
// randomly partitioned. This is functionally equivalent to the default partitioner
// in the Java Producer.). default: consistent_random importance: high









share|improve this question
















I've created a topic in Kafka with 9 partitions, naming it aptly 'test', and knocked together two simple applications in C# (.NET Core), using Confluent.Kafka client library: a producer and a consumer. I did little more than tweak examples from the documentation.



I am running two instances of the consumer application and one instance of the producer. I don't see much point in pasting the consumer code here, it's a trivial 'get a message, print it on screen' app, however, it does also print the number of the partition the message came from.



This is the producer app:



 static async Task Main(string[] args)

var random = new Random();

var config = new ProducerConfig
BootstrapServers = "10.0.0.5:9092",
Partitioner = Partitioner.ConsistentRandom
;

int counter = 0;
while (true)

using (var p = new ProducerBuilder<string, string>(config).Build())

try

p.BeginProduce(
"test",
new Message<string, string>

//Key = random.Next().ToString(),
Value = $"test ++counter"
);

if (counter % 10 == 0)
p.Flush();

catch (ProduceException<Null, string> e)

Console.WriteLine($"Delivery failed: e.Error.Reason");






Problem: If the Key property of the message is not set, all messages get sent to the partition number 7, meaning that one of my consumer instances is idle. I had to manually randomise the key in order to distribute them between partitions (see the commented out line). (The original code, as copied from the docs, used Null as the type of the key, and this sent all messages to the 7th partition too.)



Why is that? According to the documentation of the ProducerConfig.Partitioner property, the consistent_random option should ensure random distribution if the key is not specified. I tried using the Partioner.Random option, which should use random distribution regardless of the key, but this did not help.



Is this the expected behaviour, am I doing something wrong, or did I come across a bug?



I am using version 1.0.0-RC2 of Confluent.Kafka NuGet.



Complete documentation of the Partitioner config:



// Summary:
// Partitioner: `random` - random distribution, `consistent` - CRC32 hash of key
// (Empty and NULL keys are mapped to single partition), `consistent_random` - CRC32
// hash of key (Empty and NULL keys are randomly partitioned), `murmur2` - Java
// Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are mapped to single partition),
// `murmur2_random` - Java Producer compatible Murmur2 hash of key (NULL keys are
// randomly partitioned. This is functionally equivalent to the default partitioner
// in the Java Producer.). default: consistent_random importance: high






c# apache-kafka confluent-kafka






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 20:30









JR ibkr

4491 silver badge13 bronze badges




4491 silver badge13 bronze badges










asked Mar 27 at 17:51









kamilkkamilk

1,74616 silver badges33 bronze badges




1,74616 silver badges33 bronze badges















  • I don't think there would be a bug in the project. Can you add the link to Partitioner config documentation?

    – JR ibkr
    Mar 27 at 19:39











  • @JRibkr Yeah, I don't really think it's a bug either, something so obvious would surely have been spotted. I copied the documentation from the XML docs in the library itself, as seen in Visual Studio, I don't know if an online version is available at all. A google search only yielded this source file: github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-dotnet/blob/master/src/…

    – kamilk
    Mar 27 at 20:37


















  • I don't think there would be a bug in the project. Can you add the link to Partitioner config documentation?

    – JR ibkr
    Mar 27 at 19:39











  • @JRibkr Yeah, I don't really think it's a bug either, something so obvious would surely have been spotted. I copied the documentation from the XML docs in the library itself, as seen in Visual Studio, I don't know if an online version is available at all. A google search only yielded this source file: github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-dotnet/blob/master/src/…

    – kamilk
    Mar 27 at 20:37

















I don't think there would be a bug in the project. Can you add the link to Partitioner config documentation?

– JR ibkr
Mar 27 at 19:39





I don't think there would be a bug in the project. Can you add the link to Partitioner config documentation?

– JR ibkr
Mar 27 at 19:39













@JRibkr Yeah, I don't really think it's a bug either, something so obvious would surely have been spotted. I copied the documentation from the XML docs in the library itself, as seen in Visual Studio, I don't know if an online version is available at all. A google search only yielded this source file: github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-dotnet/blob/master/src/…

– kamilk
Mar 27 at 20:37






@JRibkr Yeah, I don't really think it's a bug either, something so obvious would surely have been spotted. I copied the documentation from the XML docs in the library itself, as seen in Visual Studio, I don't know if an online version is available at all. A google search only yielded this source file: github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-dotnet/blob/master/src/…

– kamilk
Mar 27 at 20:37













0






active

oldest

votes










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55383644%2frandom-partitioner-does-not-distribute-messages-between-kafka-topic-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes




Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.







Is this question similar to what you get asked at work? Learn more about asking and sharing private information with your coworkers using Stack Overflow for Teams.



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55383644%2frandom-partitioner-does-not-distribute-messages-between-kafka-topic-partitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Kamusi Yaliyomo Aina za kamusi | Muundo wa kamusi | Faida za kamusi | Dhima ya picha katika kamusi | Marejeo | Tazama pia | Viungo vya nje | UrambazajiKuhusu kamusiGo-SwahiliWiki-KamusiKamusi ya Kiswahili na Kiingerezakuihariri na kuongeza habari

SQL error code 1064 with creating Laravel foreign keysForeign key constraints: When to use ON UPDATE and ON DELETEDropping column with foreign key Laravel error: General error: 1025 Error on renameLaravel SQL Can't create tableLaravel Migration foreign key errorLaravel php artisan migrate:refresh giving a syntax errorSQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists or Base table or view already exists: 1050 Tableerror in migrating laravel file to xampp serverSyntax error or access violation: 1064:syntax to use near 'unsigned not null, modelName varchar(191) not null, title varchar(191) not nLaravel cannot create new table field in mysqlLaravel 5.7:Last migration creates table but is not registered in the migration table

은진 송씨 목차 역사 본관 분파 인물 조선 왕실과의 인척 관계 집성촌 항렬자 인구 같이 보기 각주 둘러보기 메뉴은진 송씨세종실록 149권, 지리지 충청도 공주목 은진현