How to test multiple withLatestFrom store injections in NgRx-Effects?How should I unit test threaded code?How do I test a private function or a class that has private methods, fields or inner classes?How to unit test abstract classes: extend with stubs?Writing unit tests in Python: How do I start?When should I use $provide versus Jasmine Spies in my Angular JS Unit testsTesting ngrx Effects with Jasmine spyRxJs/Ngrx TestSheduler with simulated user input (Jasmine)How to unit test cancellation of in-flight RXJS requestsHow to unit test withLatestFrom in ngrx effectsNGRX Effect withLatestFrom
Is there any reason to concentrate on the Thunderous Smite spell after using its effects?
Is using gradient descent for MIP a good idea?
Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register
How to publish superseding results without creating enemies
Some Prime Peerage
Are there any “Third Order” acronyms used in space exploration?
Speedometer as a symbol into awesomebox
How To Make Earth's Oceans as Brackish as Lyr's
I was promised a work PC but still awaiting approval 3 months later so using my own laptop - Is it fair to ask employer for laptop insurance?
Interaction between Teferi Time Raveler and Enduring Ideal
The Planck constant for mathematicians
Telling my mother that I have anorexia without panicking her
Why does "arimasen" mean "there's no hope"?
Asked to Not Use Transactions and to Use A Workaround to Simulate One
What is the mathematical notation for rounding a given number to the nearest integer?
Can I fix my boots by gluing the soles back on?
How offensive is the French word "femmelette" considered to be?
What organs or modifications would be needed for a life biological creature not to require sleep?
Is there a real-world mythological counterpart to WoW's "kill your gods for power" theme?
What next step can I take in solving this sudoku?
What is the name of this Allen-head furniture fastener?
Can derivatives be defined as anti-integrals?
Make 2019 with single digits
Amortized Loans seem to benefit the bank more than the customer
How to test multiple withLatestFrom store injections in NgRx-Effects?
How should I unit test threaded code?How do I test a private function or a class that has private methods, fields or inner classes?How to unit test abstract classes: extend with stubs?Writing unit tests in Python: How do I start?When should I use $provide versus Jasmine Spies in my Angular JS Unit testsTesting ngrx Effects with Jasmine spyRxJs/Ngrx TestSheduler with simulated user input (Jasmine)How to unit test cancellation of in-flight RXJS requestsHow to unit test withLatestFrom in ngrx effectsNGRX Effect withLatestFrom
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In our angular webapp we have some NgRx-effects that use different information from different parts of our store. For this we are using the recommended withLatestFrom
-approach:
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
...
)
While this approach seems to be working fine in production, it feels horrible for unit testing the effects.
For our unit-tests we are currently using jasmine-marbles, jasmine spy-objects and the ngrx MockStore (NgRx 7+). The hard part is to provide the necessary store state, so that the selectors can work properly.
EXAMPLE-EFFECT, for which we do not have a unit-test:
@Effect()
getStammdatenDetails$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(StammdatenItemDetailActionTypes.REQUEST_DETAILS),
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getMetadata)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getCustomerId)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getRouterParams))
),
mergeMap(([action, metadata, customerId, params]) =>
*effect logic*
)
);
Maybe someone here can provide more insight or a useful link to a piece of documentation we are missing?
I would really appreciate any help in regards if there is a convenient method to unit tests such effects, or how to refactor those effects to be more "testable" (without moving the problem to another piece of code, which we cannot test afterwards).
angular typescript unit-testing testing ngrx
add a comment
|
In our angular webapp we have some NgRx-effects that use different information from different parts of our store. For this we are using the recommended withLatestFrom
-approach:
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
...
)
While this approach seems to be working fine in production, it feels horrible for unit testing the effects.
For our unit-tests we are currently using jasmine-marbles, jasmine spy-objects and the ngrx MockStore (NgRx 7+). The hard part is to provide the necessary store state, so that the selectors can work properly.
EXAMPLE-EFFECT, for which we do not have a unit-test:
@Effect()
getStammdatenDetails$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(StammdatenItemDetailActionTypes.REQUEST_DETAILS),
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getMetadata)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getCustomerId)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getRouterParams))
),
mergeMap(([action, metadata, customerId, params]) =>
*effect logic*
)
);
Maybe someone here can provide more insight or a useful link to a piece of documentation we are missing?
I would really appreciate any help in regards if there is a convenient method to unit tests such effects, or how to refactor those effects to be more "testable" (without moving the problem to another piece of code, which we cannot test afterwards).
angular typescript unit-testing testing ngrx
Is this your first steps in testing effects, or you tried some patterns before?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 28 at 15:17
We already have setup some tests for our less complex effects but to be honest i'm not quite sure which patterns you are speaking of. Mind sharing a good read?
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:07
Sure, give me 1h I'll find something
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:09
Pls tell me, did you use stuffs like TestBet, Spy, and async unit test in Karma?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:21
We set up our TestBed with needed Spys (for used services) and use the fakeAsync()-environment for the tests that need it.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:24
add a comment
|
In our angular webapp we have some NgRx-effects that use different information from different parts of our store. For this we are using the recommended withLatestFrom
-approach:
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
...
)
While this approach seems to be working fine in production, it feels horrible for unit testing the effects.
For our unit-tests we are currently using jasmine-marbles, jasmine spy-objects and the ngrx MockStore (NgRx 7+). The hard part is to provide the necessary store state, so that the selectors can work properly.
EXAMPLE-EFFECT, for which we do not have a unit-test:
@Effect()
getStammdatenDetails$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(StammdatenItemDetailActionTypes.REQUEST_DETAILS),
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getMetadata)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getCustomerId)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getRouterParams))
),
mergeMap(([action, metadata, customerId, params]) =>
*effect logic*
)
);
Maybe someone here can provide more insight or a useful link to a piece of documentation we are missing?
I would really appreciate any help in regards if there is a convenient method to unit tests such effects, or how to refactor those effects to be more "testable" (without moving the problem to another piece of code, which we cannot test afterwards).
angular typescript unit-testing testing ngrx
In our angular webapp we have some NgRx-effects that use different information from different parts of our store. For this we are using the recommended withLatestFrom
-approach:
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
this.store.pipe(select(...)),
...
)
While this approach seems to be working fine in production, it feels horrible for unit testing the effects.
For our unit-tests we are currently using jasmine-marbles, jasmine spy-objects and the ngrx MockStore (NgRx 7+). The hard part is to provide the necessary store state, so that the selectors can work properly.
EXAMPLE-EFFECT, for which we do not have a unit-test:
@Effect()
getStammdatenDetails$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType(StammdatenItemDetailActionTypes.REQUEST_DETAILS),
withLatestFrom(
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getMetadata)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getCustomerId)),
this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.getRouterParams))
),
mergeMap(([action, metadata, customerId, params]) =>
*effect logic*
)
);
Maybe someone here can provide more insight or a useful link to a piece of documentation we are missing?
I would really appreciate any help in regards if there is a convenient method to unit tests such effects, or how to refactor those effects to be more "testable" (without moving the problem to another piece of code, which we cannot test afterwards).
angular typescript unit-testing testing ngrx
angular typescript unit-testing testing ngrx
asked Mar 28 at 10:53
MPreloadedMPreloaded
84 bronze badges
84 bronze badges
Is this your first steps in testing effects, or you tried some patterns before?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 28 at 15:17
We already have setup some tests for our less complex effects but to be honest i'm not quite sure which patterns you are speaking of. Mind sharing a good read?
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:07
Sure, give me 1h I'll find something
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:09
Pls tell me, did you use stuffs like TestBet, Spy, and async unit test in Karma?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:21
We set up our TestBed with needed Spys (for used services) and use the fakeAsync()-environment for the tests that need it.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:24
add a comment
|
Is this your first steps in testing effects, or you tried some patterns before?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 28 at 15:17
We already have setup some tests for our less complex effects but to be honest i'm not quite sure which patterns you are speaking of. Mind sharing a good read?
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:07
Sure, give me 1h I'll find something
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:09
Pls tell me, did you use stuffs like TestBet, Spy, and async unit test in Karma?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:21
We set up our TestBed with needed Spys (for used services) and use the fakeAsync()-environment for the tests that need it.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:24
Is this your first steps in testing effects, or you tried some patterns before?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 28 at 15:17
Is this your first steps in testing effects, or you tried some patterns before?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 28 at 15:17
We already have setup some tests for our less complex effects but to be honest i'm not quite sure which patterns you are speaking of. Mind sharing a good read?
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:07
We already have setup some tests for our less complex effects but to be honest i'm not quite sure which patterns you are speaking of. Mind sharing a good read?
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:07
Sure, give me 1h I'll find something
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:09
Sure, give me 1h I'll find something
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:09
Pls tell me, did you use stuffs like TestBet, Spy, and async unit test in Karma?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:21
Pls tell me, did you use stuffs like TestBet, Spy, and async unit test in Karma?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:21
We set up our TestBed with needed Spys (for used services) and use the fakeAsync()-environment for the tests that need it.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:24
We set up our TestBed with needed Spys (for used services) and use the fakeAsync()-environment for the tests that need it.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:24
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I suggest to do something like this:
describe('ChapterEffects', () =>
const actions$ = new Subject<any>();
let effects: ChapterEffects;
beforeEach(() =>
TestBed.configureTestingModule(
providers: [
TestedEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
...otherMocks,
],
);
effects = TestBed.get(ChapterEffects);
);
it('', () =>
);
);
Tested effect:
@Effect()
fetchData$ = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType<FetchAction>(ActionTypes.FetchAction),
switchMap(( payload ) =>
return this.someService
.get(payload)
.pipe(
map((data) => new LoadAction(data)),
catchError(() => new ErrorAction()),
);
),
);
Thats the sees do your effect and test. You want to test if FetchAction
will call get request and load LoadAction
when request will finish.
First thing is mock someService in testBet:
const otherMocks = [ provide: SomeService, useValue: get: () => of(42) , ]
now in your test runtime this.someService will be get: () => of(42) }
.
Now lets mock FetchAction. In test actions$
is a Subject so you can call actions$.next(new FetchRequest(7))
(7 is a payload).
Then out effect should emit LoadAction with 42, so:
it('', (done) =>
effect.fetchData$.subscribe(action =>
expect(action.payload).toEqual(42);
done()
actions$.next(7);
);
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hencewithLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
It will be pretty much the same case as inSomeService
.this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it byprovide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use theMockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55395785%2fhow-to-test-multiple-withlatestfrom-store-injections-in-ngrx-effects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I suggest to do something like this:
describe('ChapterEffects', () =>
const actions$ = new Subject<any>();
let effects: ChapterEffects;
beforeEach(() =>
TestBed.configureTestingModule(
providers: [
TestedEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
...otherMocks,
],
);
effects = TestBed.get(ChapterEffects);
);
it('', () =>
);
);
Tested effect:
@Effect()
fetchData$ = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType<FetchAction>(ActionTypes.FetchAction),
switchMap(( payload ) =>
return this.someService
.get(payload)
.pipe(
map((data) => new LoadAction(data)),
catchError(() => new ErrorAction()),
);
),
);
Thats the sees do your effect and test. You want to test if FetchAction
will call get request and load LoadAction
when request will finish.
First thing is mock someService in testBet:
const otherMocks = [ provide: SomeService, useValue: get: () => of(42) , ]
now in your test runtime this.someService will be get: () => of(42) }
.
Now lets mock FetchAction. In test actions$
is a Subject so you can call actions$.next(new FetchRequest(7))
(7 is a payload).
Then out effect should emit LoadAction with 42, so:
it('', (done) =>
effect.fetchData$.subscribe(action =>
expect(action.payload).toEqual(42);
done()
actions$.next(7);
);
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hencewithLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
It will be pretty much the same case as inSomeService
.this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it byprovide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use theMockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
|
show 1 more comment
I suggest to do something like this:
describe('ChapterEffects', () =>
const actions$ = new Subject<any>();
let effects: ChapterEffects;
beforeEach(() =>
TestBed.configureTestingModule(
providers: [
TestedEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
...otherMocks,
],
);
effects = TestBed.get(ChapterEffects);
);
it('', () =>
);
);
Tested effect:
@Effect()
fetchData$ = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType<FetchAction>(ActionTypes.FetchAction),
switchMap(( payload ) =>
return this.someService
.get(payload)
.pipe(
map((data) => new LoadAction(data)),
catchError(() => new ErrorAction()),
);
),
);
Thats the sees do your effect and test. You want to test if FetchAction
will call get request and load LoadAction
when request will finish.
First thing is mock someService in testBet:
const otherMocks = [ provide: SomeService, useValue: get: () => of(42) , ]
now in your test runtime this.someService will be get: () => of(42) }
.
Now lets mock FetchAction. In test actions$
is a Subject so you can call actions$.next(new FetchRequest(7))
(7 is a payload).
Then out effect should emit LoadAction with 42, so:
it('', (done) =>
effect.fetchData$.subscribe(action =>
expect(action.payload).toEqual(42);
done()
actions$.next(7);
);
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hencewithLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
It will be pretty much the same case as inSomeService
.this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it byprovide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use theMockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
|
show 1 more comment
I suggest to do something like this:
describe('ChapterEffects', () =>
const actions$ = new Subject<any>();
let effects: ChapterEffects;
beforeEach(() =>
TestBed.configureTestingModule(
providers: [
TestedEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
...otherMocks,
],
);
effects = TestBed.get(ChapterEffects);
);
it('', () =>
);
);
Tested effect:
@Effect()
fetchData$ = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType<FetchAction>(ActionTypes.FetchAction),
switchMap(( payload ) =>
return this.someService
.get(payload)
.pipe(
map((data) => new LoadAction(data)),
catchError(() => new ErrorAction()),
);
),
);
Thats the sees do your effect and test. You want to test if FetchAction
will call get request and load LoadAction
when request will finish.
First thing is mock someService in testBet:
const otherMocks = [ provide: SomeService, useValue: get: () => of(42) , ]
now in your test runtime this.someService will be get: () => of(42) }
.
Now lets mock FetchAction. In test actions$
is a Subject so you can call actions$.next(new FetchRequest(7))
(7 is a payload).
Then out effect should emit LoadAction with 42, so:
it('', (done) =>
effect.fetchData$.subscribe(action =>
expect(action.payload).toEqual(42);
done()
actions$.next(7);
);
I suggest to do something like this:
describe('ChapterEffects', () =>
const actions$ = new Subject<any>();
let effects: ChapterEffects;
beforeEach(() =>
TestBed.configureTestingModule(
providers: [
TestedEffects,
provideMockActions(() => actions$),
...otherMocks,
],
);
effects = TestBed.get(ChapterEffects);
);
it('', () =>
);
);
Tested effect:
@Effect()
fetchData$ = this.actions$.pipe(
ofType<FetchAction>(ActionTypes.FetchAction),
switchMap(( payload ) =>
return this.someService
.get(payload)
.pipe(
map((data) => new LoadAction(data)),
catchError(() => new ErrorAction()),
);
),
);
Thats the sees do your effect and test. You want to test if FetchAction
will call get request and load LoadAction
when request will finish.
First thing is mock someService in testBet:
const otherMocks = [ provide: SomeService, useValue: get: () => of(42) , ]
now in your test runtime this.someService will be get: () => of(42) }
.
Now lets mock FetchAction. In test actions$
is a Subject so you can call actions$.next(new FetchRequest(7))
(7 is a payload).
Then out effect should emit LoadAction with 42, so:
it('', (done) =>
effect.fetchData$.subscribe(action =>
expect(action.payload).toEqual(42);
done()
actions$.next(7);
);
answered Mar 29 at 13:18
Przemyslaw Jan BeigertPrzemyslaw Jan Beigert
1,1091 gold badge6 silver badges12 bronze badges
1,1091 gold badge6 silver badges12 bronze badges
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hencewithLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
It will be pretty much the same case as inSomeService
.this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it byprovide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use theMockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
|
show 1 more comment
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hencewithLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
It will be pretty much the same case as inSomeService
.this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it byprovide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use theMockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hence
withLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
While this is a good summary for how to test ngrx effects in general, the part i am struggling with in my question is, how to convienently test effects that use parts of the store (hence
withLatestFrom(this.store.pipe(select(...)))
). One way would be to completely mock the store but because our store-structure is already quite big, i feel that there has to be a more convenient solution.– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 13:27
It will be pretty much the same case as in
SomeService
. this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it by provide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
It will be pretty much the same case as in
SomeService
. this.store
is taken from DI so you can easily mock it by provide: Store, useValue: new BehaviorSubject()
and with BehaviorSubject you can push current mocked state.– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 13:49
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use the
MockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
As stated, i already knew about this option (but i would prefer to use the
MockStore
from ngrx). Our store structure is nested deeply, so that it feels like a big overhead to build such a store for different testcases. But maybe there isn't another way currently... I will accept this answer thanks for your help its much appreciated!– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 7:32
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
I know that, hoverer i didn't want to recommend you patterns witch i didn't check in my applications. For me it's not perfect because required a lot of code, but it works well.
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Apr 1 at 7:40
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
Out of pure interest: Could you name those patterns you can not recommend? I would like to read up on them!
– MPreloaded
Apr 1 at 13:37
|
show 1 more comment
Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.
Got a question that you can’t ask on public Stack Overflow? Learn more about sharing private information with Stack Overflow for Teams.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55395785%2fhow-to-test-multiple-withlatestfrom-store-injections-in-ngrx-effects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is this your first steps in testing effects, or you tried some patterns before?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 28 at 15:17
We already have setup some tests for our less complex effects but to be honest i'm not quite sure which patterns you are speaking of. Mind sharing a good read?
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:07
Sure, give me 1h I'll find something
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:09
Pls tell me, did you use stuffs like TestBet, Spy, and async unit test in Karma?
– Przemyslaw Jan Beigert
Mar 29 at 12:21
We set up our TestBed with needed Spys (for used services) and use the fakeAsync()-environment for the tests that need it.
– MPreloaded
Mar 29 at 12:24